Technology Questions

Go Back   Technology Questions > Software Questions > Operating System Questions > Windows XP

Windows XP Discuss the Microsoft Windows XP Operating System

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2009, 08:50 AM
Greg
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Firefox 353 slower than Opera 10

Firefox 3.53 slower than Opera 10

I notice firefox 3.53 is slower then Opera 10. Firefox 3.5.3 takes
forever to load (And doesn't load some tabs). This is with very few
add on installed. I will keep firefox 3.53 installed, only for sites
that have problems with Opera. (Note, I am not using turbo feature
that Opera has.)

Does anyone know how to make firefox use more memory?

It looks like I will be switching to Opera for windows xp sp3

Greg
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

 
Old 10-08-2009, 08:50 AM
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2009, 09:20 AM
Tom Willett
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Firefox 353 slower than Opera 10

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=38

"Greg" <invalid@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:7j6fs2F3340diU1@mid.individual.net...
: Firefox 3.53 slower than Opera 10
:
: I notice firefox 3.53 is slower then Opera 10. Firefox 3.5.3 takes
: forever to load (And doesn't load some tabs). This is with very few
: add on installed. I will keep firefox 3.53 installed, only for sites
: that have problems with Opera. (Note, I am not using turbo feature
: that Opera has.)
:
: Does anyone know how to make firefox use more memory?
:
: It looks like I will be switching to Opera for windows xp sp3
:
: Greg


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2009, 09:40 AM
BillW50
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Firefox 353 slower than Opera 10

In news:7j6fs2F3340diU1@mid.individual.net,
Greg typed on Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:48:27 -0400:
> Firefox 3.53 slower than Opera 10
>
> I notice firefox 3.53 is slower then Opera 10. Firefox 3.5.3 takes
> forever to load (And doesn't load some tabs). This is with very few
> add on installed. I will keep firefox 3.53 installed, only for sites
> that have problems with Opera. (Note, I am not using turbo feature
> that Opera has.)
>
> Does anyone know how to make firefox use more memory?
>
> It looks like I will be switching to Opera for windows xp sp3
>
> Greg


Firefox has always been the slowest and most memory leaking browser
since day one. And I too favor Opera v10 against Firefox any day. And I
count 13 critical vulnerabilities can be used to run attacker code and
install software, requiring no user interaction beyond normal browsing
just in FF 3.5.x alone.

http://www.mozilla.org/security/know...firefox35.html

--
Bill
Gateway MX6124 ('06 era) - Windows XP SP2


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-08-2009, 10:20 AM
FACE
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Firefox 353 slower than Opera 10

On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 11:48:27 -0400, in netscape.public.mozilla.browser,
Greg <invalid@invalid.net>, wrote

>Firefox 3.53 slower than Opera 10
>
>I notice firefox 3.53 is slower then Opera 10. Firefox 3.5.3 takes
>forever to load (And doesn't load some tabs). This is with very few
>add on installed. I will keep firefox 3.53 installed, only for sites
>that have problems with Opera. (Note, I am not using turbo feature
>that Opera has.)
>
>Does anyone know how to make firefox use more memory?
>
>It looks like I will be switching to Opera for windows xp sp3
>
>

Greg, I used to use Opera (starting with Opera 8) when I was on dialup.
The difference in the rendering result makes it worthwhile to use FF-- at
least for me, YMMV.

Believe me, you *do not want* for FF to use more memory. But if you
insist, the lines to do so are in prefs.js or may have to be added. I
imagine you can find the params to increase it on the web, i found the
params and instructions to restrict it there............

FACE

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-02-2009, 02:30 PM
baynole2@yahoo.com
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Firefox 353 slower than Opera 10

On Oct 8, 10:48*am, Greg <inva...@invalid.net> wrote:


Hi, new here, but have an idea: have you tried installing Speedyfox??
I have WinPatrol open the browser at start-up & w/ this thing, Ff is
loaded before I hear the MSN "music."

You mean "not use more memory"??...I simply have got into the habit of
exiting & restarting Firefox after an hour or so.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IE8 won't connect; Firefox&Opera will ZakkFlash Internet Explorer 7 07-08-2009 07:50 AM
RE: IE 7 vs. Opera vs. Firefox s0121 Internet Explorer 0 03-28-2009 04:58 PM
SNOCAP & IE7, Firefox 3 & Opera 9 W. K. Mahler, Mahlers.Com Windows Vista 9 02-14-2009 02:09 PM
IE7 slower than Firefox, Maxthon, Opera ChandramouliS Internet Explorer 2 01-15-2008 10:20 PM
RE: IE 7 vs. Opera vs. Firefox JustAComment Internet Explorer 0 11-15-2007 10:20 AM


New To Technology Questions? Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? Do You Need Help with this site?

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 AM.


2003 - 2009 All Rights Reserved. Technology Questions

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0