|
| | |||||||
| Windows XP Discuss the Microsoft Windows XP Operating System |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| External Hard Drive used for System Backup. I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system backups (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any thoughts you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software thread: I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have found it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first backup took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was given two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it and H drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one week after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded down with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. I haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to the system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance here would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in the earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my software decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for the moment. Frog |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. I shut the power off on mine when not being used. "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message news:%23o8NDZVeIHA.4140@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system backups > (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the > external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when > it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup > information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the > invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any thoughts > you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. > > RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software > thread: > I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have found > it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a > 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB > external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first backup > took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was given > two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it and H > drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one week > after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to > complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded down > with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can > access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of > accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy > any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any > problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. > The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window > looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to > reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. I > haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to the > system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance here > would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in the > earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my software > decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for the moment. > > Frog |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. On Feb 27, 10:34*am, Frog <f...@pond.com> wrote: > * * * I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system > backups (making of backups are not scheduled). *My question now > is...should the external hard drive be plugged into the system at all > times or just when it is in use? *My concern has to do with the > potential for my backup information of the external hard drive becoming > corrupt due to the invasion of a virus at some future date. *I would > appreciate any thoughts you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- > off of this device. > > RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software > thread: > I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. *I have > found it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. *I > have a 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one > 500GB external USB connected hard drive. *The initial making of the > first backup took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard > drive was given two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive > information on it and H drive that has the E drive information on it. > The first update (one week after making the initial backup) took a grand > total of 1 minute to complete. *Of course, my computer is new and as > such it is not loaded down with large quantities of > software/folders/files and the like. *I can access the information on > the external drives G and H in like manner of accessing information on > the internal C and E drive. *Thus, I could copy any folder/file on the > external drive to the internal drive without any problem. *I then used > the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. *The startup disk takes > a couple of minutes to boot and then the window looks exactly like the > one I access from Program Files. *If you want to reload a backup back to > your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. *I haven't determined > whether I can copy only G or H individually back to the system as of > yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance here would be > helpful. *Well, there you have the results of your help in the earlier > thread. *I just thought I should report back about my software decision > and that all is well with my computer...at least for the moment. > > Frog USB drives can cause boot problem, especially if your PC's BIOS can be set up to boot off a USB drive. You should consider only connecting the drive at the time of backup and disconnect it when the backup is done. |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. smlunatick <yveslec******.com> wrote: >USB drives can cause boot problem, especially if your PC's BIOS can be >set up to boot off a USB drive. You should consider only connecting >the drive at the time of backup and disconnect it when the backup is >done. My BIOS can be setup that way. I leave the drive connected at all times and powered on because I have a program that backs up all of my data files every couple of hours. No problems. |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. Since you are doing manual backups I see no requirement to keep the external drive connected or not connected between backup sessions. Do what meets your other needs. I use the same external drive to do manual backup jobs on several computers without any issues. "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message news:%23o8NDZVeIHA.4140@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system backups > (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the > external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when > it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup > information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the > invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any thoughts > you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. > > RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software > thread: > I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have found > it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a > 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB > external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first backup > took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was given > two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it and H > drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one week > after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to > complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded down > with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can > access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of > accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy > any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any > problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. > The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window > looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to > reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. I > haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to the > system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance here > would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in the > earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my software > decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for the moment. > > Frog |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. On Feb 27, 11:34 am, Frog <f...@pond.com> wrote: > I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system > backups (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now > is...should the external hard drive be plugged into the system at all > times or just when it is in use? My concern has to do with the > potential for my backup information of the external hard drive becoming > corrupt due to the invasion of a virus at some future date. I would > appreciate any thoughts you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- > off of this device. I'd recommend leaving the hard drive disconnected and powered off between uses for a few reasons. One of the reasons is the one that you brought up. There is the potential for a disaster (such as a virus) that causes damage to your main drive to also take out your backup. Not good. Another potential problem would be if a lightning strike or other electrical problem took out your computer and its hard drive, the potential exist for the same fault to also damage your backups. I've also seen times where a computer lockup or other problem can corrupt the FAT or MFT on both internal and external hard drives. As well if your computer is ever stolen the thief may also eye the shiny external drive sitting there and take it too. Another factor is the reliability of hard drives. For a number of reasons (poor cooling, suseptability to physical shock, power supplies) it seems external hard drives fail more often then internal hard drives. Hard drives that are powered down are less suseptable to physical shock than powered on ones, so that would decrease the chances for damage. As well leaving the drive turned off most of the time would probably give you more time before any of the other problems reared their ugly head. What you're doing is certainly much better than no backup, but it probably wouldn't hurt to also occasionally make a copy of truly irreplaceable data onto other media and store a copy off site. I guess a con to disconnecting the drive might be that it's more inconvenient to backup so you'd be less likely to do it. Good luck. |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message news:%23o8NDZVeIHA.4140@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system backups > (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the > external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when > it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup > information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the > invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any thoughts > you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. > > RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software > thread: > I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have found > it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a > 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB > external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first backup > took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was given > two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it and H > drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one week > after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to > complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded down > with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can > access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of > accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy > any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any > problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. > The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window > looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to > reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. I > haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to the > system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance here > would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in the > earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my software > decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for the moment. > > Frog Frog: As you have heard from nearly all those who have responded to the first part of your query re connecting/disconnecting your USB external HDD... Since you're using that USBEHD primarily, if not exclusively, for backup purposes in connection with your Casper 4 disk-to-disk cloning program, there is really little reason to have it connected (powered on) except for those relatively infrequent times when you're engaged in a disk-cloning operation. There's certainly no harm in having its USB data cable connected to your PC - just ensure the device is powered off. Now as to your query re the cloning of partitions... When you originally cloned your "source" HDD containing two partitions designated C: & E: (I assume your optical drive is the D: drive) over to your USBEHD and then connected the external device to your computer while the system booted, the system designated the two cloned partitions on your USBEHD as G: & H: (I assume there's an F: drive somewhere in your system - possibly a flash drive or even a memory slot on your printer). There's no problem in cloning one or both of the partitions on your USBEHD back to your source disk (presumably for recovery purposes). Just as you can clone individual partitions from the "source" to the "destination" drive, the reverse is true as well. Incidentally you mentioned in your post that after you performed the initial backup of your system using the Casper 4 disk-cloning process, "the first update (one week after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to complete." I hope other users will take note of your comment. As I have tried to point out in my previous posts re the Casper 4 program - that factor, i.e., "incremental disk cloning" is probably the chief advantage of Casper - the extroardinary capability of the program to complete subsequent disk-cloning operations (for routine comprehensive backups of one's system) in a fraction of a time it takes other disk-cloning programs (at least the ones I'm familiar with). Thus there's a strong incentive for users to backup up their systems much more frequently than they might otherwise do, knowing that the time to complete the current disk-cloning process won't be particularly onerous and/or time-consuming. But I am a bit puzzled by your comment that the Casper CD Startup Disk took only "a couple of minutes to boot". That has not been our experience and we've worked with a large variety of systems. I can't recall a single instance where it took less than 6 minutes to reach the stage where one could begin the disk-cloning process. And I would guess that on the average it takes about 8 to 9 minutes to reach that point. In our experience booting up with the "Startup Disk" is not particularly quick, to say the least. Are you certain about that boot-time? (Potential users of this Casper 4 program should note that the "Startup Disk" CD) is used for recovery purposes. For example, let's say that, like "Frog", one is using his/her USBEHD as the "destination" drive, i.e., the recipient of the cloned contents of the one's internal day-to-day working HDD. Now that latter drive becomes dysfunctional and unable to boot. So the user would have no way of accessing the Casper program on that defunct drive to perform the disk-cloning operation from the USBEHD back to the internal HDD. That's where the "Startup Disk" comes in. The user would use that CD to boot to the Casper program on the CD and undertake the disk-cloning operation from the USBEHD back to an internal HDD. So (hopefully!) it would be on infrequent occasions where the recovery process would have to be employed). Anna |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. Anna wrote: > "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message > news:%23o8NDZVeIHA.4140@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> >> I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system >> backups >> (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the >> external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when >> it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup >> information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the >> invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any thoughts >> you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. >> >> RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software >> thread: >> I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have found >> it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a >> 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB >> external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first >> backup >> took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was given >> two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it and H >> drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one week >> after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to >> complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded >> down >> with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can >> access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of >> accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy >> any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any >> problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. >> The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window >> looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to >> reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. I >> haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to >> the >> system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance >> here >> would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in the >> earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my software >> decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for the moment. >> >> Frog > > Frog: > As you have heard from nearly all those who have responded to the first > part > of your query re connecting/disconnecting your USB external HDD... > > Since you're using that USBEHD primarily, if not exclusively, for backup > purposes in connection with your Casper 4 disk-to-disk cloning program, > there is really little reason to have it connected (powered on) except for > those relatively infrequent times when you're engaged in a disk-cloning > operation. There's certainly no harm in having its USB data cable > connected > to your PC - just ensure the device is powered off. > > Now as to your query re the cloning of partitions... > > When you originally cloned your "source" HDD containing two partitions > designated C: & E: (I assume your optical drive is the D: drive) over to > your USBEHD and then connected the external device to your computer while > the system booted, the system designated the two cloned partitions on your > USBEHD as G: & H: (I assume there's an F: drive somewhere in your system - > possibly a flash drive or even a memory slot on your printer). > > There's no problem in cloning one or both of the partitions on your USBEHD > back to your source disk (presumably for recovery purposes). Just as you > can > clone individual partitions from the "source" to the "destination" drive, > the reverse is true as well. > > Incidentally you mentioned in your post that after you performed the > initial > backup of your system using the Casper 4 disk-cloning process, "the first > update (one week after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 > minute to complete." > > I hope other users will take note of your comment. As I have tried to > point > out in my previous posts re the Casper 4 program - that factor, i.e., > "incremental disk cloning" is probably the chief advantage of Casper - the > extroardinary capability of the program to complete subsequent > disk-cloning > operations (for routine comprehensive backups of one's system) in a > fraction > of a time it takes other disk-cloning programs (at least the ones I'm > familiar with). Even True Image 11? I forgot, but didn't we agree that the Incremental Backup available there is similar? I haven't used the incremental backup/restore option yet, since I like making SURE I have backed up/restored the complete enchilada, without depending on the backup program keeping perfect track of any and all changes on the HD (if using the incremental options). > Thus there's a strong incentive for users to backup up their > systems much more frequently than they might otherwise do, knowing that > the > time to complete the current disk-cloning process won't be particularly > onerous and/or time-consuming. > > But I am a bit puzzled by your comment that the Casper CD Startup Disk > took > only "a couple of minutes to boot". That has not been our experience and > we've worked with a large variety of systems. I can't recall a single > instance where it took less than 6 minutes to reach the stage where one > could begin the disk-cloning process. And I would guess that on the > average > it takes about 8 to 9 minutes to reach that point. In our experience > booting > up with the "Startup Disk" is not particularly quick, to say the least. > Are > you certain about that boot-time? > > (Potential users of this Casper 4 program should note that the "Startup > Disk" CD) is used for recovery purposes. For example, let's say that, like > "Frog", one is using his/her USBEHD as the "destination" drive, i.e., the > recipient of the cloned contents of the one's internal day-to-day working > HDD. Now that latter drive becomes dysfunctional and unable to boot. So > the > user would have no way of accessing the Casper program on that defunct > drive > to perform the disk-cloning operation from the USBEHD back to the internal > HDD. That's where the "Startup Disk" comes in. The user would use that CD > to > boot to the Casper program on the CD and undertake the disk-cloning > operation from the USBEHD back to an internal HDD. So (hopefully!) it > would > be on infrequent occasions where the recovery process would have to be > employed). > Anna |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. First, let me say thank you for all of the responses in this thread. I have decided, based on your responses, that I will leave the USBEHD turned off except when I make backups and/or have to restore my system. Anna, please note my comments interspersed in your message. Anna wrote: > "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message > news:%23o8NDZVeIHA.4140@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system backups >> (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the >> external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when >> it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup >> information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the >> invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any thoughts >> you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. >> >> RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software >> thread: >> I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have found >> it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a >> 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB >> external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first backup >> took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was given >> two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it and H >> drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one week >> after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to >> complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded down >> with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can >> access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of >> accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy >> any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any >> problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. >> The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window >> looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to >> reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. I >> haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to the >> system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance here >> would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in the >> earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my software >> decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for the moment. >> >> Frog > > Frog: > As you have heard from nearly all those who have responded to the first part > of your query re connecting/disconnecting your USB external HDD... > > Since you're using that USBEHD primarily, if not exclusively, for backup > purposes in connection with your Casper 4 disk-to-disk cloning program, > there is really little reason to have it connected (powered on) except for > those relatively infrequent times when you're engaged in a disk-cloning > operation. There's certainly no harm in having its USB data cable connected > to your PC - just ensure the device is powered off. My USBEHD will be used exclusively for backup purposes. > > Now as to your query re the cloning of partitions... > > When you originally cloned your "source" HDD containing two partitions > designated C: & E: (I assume your optical drive is the D: drive) over to > your USBEHD and then connected the external device to your computer while > the system booted, the system designated the two cloned partitions on your > USBEHD as G: & H: (I assume there's an F: drive somewhere in your system - > possibly a flash drive or even a memory slot on your printer). Anna, you have to remember that my technical skills are self-learned and somewhat limited (my assessment). Thus, I am having some difficulty understanding the above paragraph...it's not your fault, but mine. So let me see if I can give you some information that may or may not respond to this paragraph. Here are the steps I took when I started my USBEHD/Caspar 4.0 backup process: --I connected the USB cable and power cord to the USBEHD. Then, while the computer was off, I connected the USB cable to the computer and the power cable to the power. I turned the USBEHD on and then turned on the computer. The computer found the USBEHD as a new piece of hardware and gave it a drive letter...I think the drive letter was F. I next installed the Caspar 4.0 software on my system following the instructions in the Caspar User Guide---instructions were very easy to follow. After the software was loaded, I then made a backup of my internal hard drive to the USBEHD. Again, this process was easy to do when following the Caspar User Guide. The Caspar 4.0 software loaded from Program Files very quickly, when I was in full/normal Windows. This backup of the entire C: and E: drives on the 500GB internal hard disk took 18 minutes to complete. When I looked in My Computer I found the following Hard Disk Drives listed: Name - Type - Total Size - Free Space Local Disk (C:) - Local Disk - 107GB - 91.7GB New Volume (E:) - Local Disk - 358GB - 352GB Local Disk (G:) - Local Disk - 107GB - 95.4GB New Volume (H:) - Local Disk - 358GB - 352GB Please note that F is not included in this list. I presumed that Caspar, during the backup process, partitioned the disk to look like the internal hard drive and gave it new drive letters (G: and H:). Am I wrong in my thinking? I then visited the G: and H: drives while in normal Windows, and there I found the same folders/files etc. that are on my C: and E: drives. --After completing the above tasks, I made a startup disk from the software downloaded. I did have a little difficulty following the instructions on how to make this disk; but, with patience, I succeeded in creating a workable CD Startup Disk. I then placed the CD Startup Disk in the CD drive and rebooted my computer. This is when I said that it took about 2 minutes to place the Caspar menu on my screen. (See more on this timing below.) I then clicked Copy Drive and worked my way through a few screens where it asked me what I wanted to copy and to where. It clearly showed the USBEHD as the place to copy from and the internal hard drive as the place to copy to. That is where I stopped this process...feeling assured that the rest of the process would work. --I created an ICON on my Desktop that permits me to make an up-to-date backup of my internal hard drive to the USBEHD with a simple click of a mouse...really user friendly. --Lastly, I clicked the backup ICON on the Desktop and updated the backup information on my USBEDH in just one minute. I was shocked at how fast this process was completed. > > There's no problem in cloning one or both of the partitions on your USBEHD > back to your source disk (presumably for recovery purposes). Just as you can > clone individual partitions from the "source" to the "destination" drive, > the reverse is true as well. I just started Caspar 4.0 from Program Files like I was about to make a backup, and there was the choice as to whether I wanted to copy the whole or part of the internal hard disk. I did the same thing in reverse while starting Caspar 4.0 from the Startup Disk, and the same choices were there also. Thus, I learned something new today...I can restore a whole disk, part of a disk, a folder, or a file from by backup disk... nice, very nice. > > Incidentally you mentioned in your post that after you performed the initial > backup of your system using the Casper 4 disk-cloning process, "the first > update (one week after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 > minute to complete." > > I hope other users will take note of your comment. As I have tried to point > out in my previous posts re the Casper 4 program - that factor, i.e., > "incremental disk cloning" is probably the chief advantage of Casper - the > extroardinary capability of the program to complete subsequent disk-cloning > operations (for routine comprehensive backups of one's system) in a fraction > of a time it takes other disk-cloning programs (at least the ones I'm > familiar with). Thus there's a strong incentive for users to backup up their > systems much more frequently than they might otherwise do, knowing that the > time to complete the current disk-cloning process won't be particularly > onerous and/or time-consuming. > > But I am a bit puzzled by your comment that the Casper CD Startup Disk took > only "a couple of minutes to boot". That has not been our experience and > we've worked with a large variety of systems. I can't recall a single > instance where it took less than 6 minutes to reach the stage where one > could begin the disk-cloning process. And I would guess that on the average > it takes about 8 to 9 minutes to reach that point. In our experience booting > up with the "Startup Disk" is not particularly quick, to say the least. Are > you certain about that boot-time? My two minutes from starting the Startup Disk to menu on the screen was estimated at 2 minutes (it seemed long, but I didn't time it at that point). I actually timed it this afternoon and it took 4 1/2 minutes. I knew it seemed long, but I didn't realize it was that long. Long, however, does not count if it is the difference between having a computer that doesn't work and one that can be restored from the backup. > > (Potential users of this Casper 4 program should note that the "Startup > Disk" CD) is used for recovery purposes. For example, let's say that, like > "Frog", one is using his/her USBEHD as the "destination" drive, i.e., the > recipient of the cloned contents of the one's internal day-to-day working > HDD. Now that latter drive becomes dysfunctional and unable to boot. So the > user would have no way of accessing the Casper program on that defunct drive > to perform the disk-cloning operation from the USBEHD back to the internal > HDD. That's where the "Startup Disk" comes in. The user would use that CD to > boot to the Casper program on the CD and undertake the disk-cloning > operation from the USBEHD back to an internal HDD. So (hopefully!) it would > be on infrequent occasions where the recovery process would have to be > employed). I will say hopefully one will never have the occasion to use the recover process. I had the unfortunate pleasure of having my 98SE computer become unusable, and it took this novice about three weeks to recover from that fiasco. I really wouldn't wish what I went through during that three week period on anybody. > Anna > > Thanks again for the help. Frog |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. That's what I do too. Leave the USB enclosure drive OFF until it is needed for a backup or restore operation, and ONLY then turn it on. Works great, and there are no potential boot-up anomalies that way, either. Frog wrote: > First, let me say thank you for all of the responses in this thread. I > have decided, based on your responses, that I will leave the USBEHD > turned off except when I make backups and/or have to restore my system. > > Anna, please note my comments interspersed in your message. > > Anna wrote: >> "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message >> news:%23o8NDZVeIHA.4140@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system >>> backups >>> (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the >>> external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when >>> it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup >>> information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the >>> invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any >>> thoughts >>> you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. >>> >>> RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software >>> thread: >>> I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have >>> found >>> it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a >>> 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB >>> external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first >>> backup >>> took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was given >>> two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it and H >>> drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one week >>> after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to >>> complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded >>> down >>> with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can >>> access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of >>> accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy >>> any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any >>> problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. >>> The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window >>> looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to >>> reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. >>> I >>> haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to >>> the >>> system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance >>> here >>> would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in the >>> earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my software >>> decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for the >>> moment. >>> >>> Frog >> >> Frog: >> As you have heard from nearly all those who have responded to the first >> part >> of your query re connecting/disconnecting your USB external HDD... >> >> Since you're using that USBEHD primarily, if not exclusively, for backup >> purposes in connection with your Casper 4 disk-to-disk cloning program, >> there is really little reason to have it connected (powered on) except >> for >> those relatively infrequent times when you're engaged in a disk-cloning >> operation. There's certainly no harm in having its USB data cable >> connected >> to your PC - just ensure the device is powered off. > > My USBEHD will be used exclusively for backup purposes. >> >> Now as to your query re the cloning of partitions... >> >> When you originally cloned your "source" HDD containing two partitions >> designated C: & E: (I assume your optical drive is the D: drive) over to >> your USBEHD and then connected the external device to your computer while >> the system booted, the system designated the two cloned partitions on >> your >> USBEHD as G: & H: (I assume there's an F: drive somewhere in your >> system - >> possibly a flash drive or even a memory slot on your printer). > > Anna, you have to remember that my technical skills are self-learned and > somewhat limited (my assessment). Thus, I am having some difficulty > understanding the above paragraph...it's not your fault, but mine. So > let me see if I can give you some information that may or may not > respond to this paragraph. Here are the steps I took when I started my > USBEHD/Caspar 4.0 backup process: > > --I connected the USB cable and power cord to the USBEHD. Then, while > the computer was off, I connected the USB cable to the computer and the > power cable to the power. I turned the USBEHD on and then turned on the > computer. The computer found the USBEHD as a new piece of hardware and > gave it a drive letter...I think the drive letter was F. I next > installed the Caspar 4.0 software on my system following the > instructions in the Caspar User Guide---instructions were very easy to > follow. After the software was loaded, I then made a backup of my > internal hard drive to the USBEHD. Again, this process was easy to do > when following the Caspar User Guide. The Caspar 4.0 software loaded > from Program Files very quickly, when I was in full/normal Windows. > This backup of the entire C: and E: drives on the 500GB internal hard > disk took 18 minutes to complete. When I looked in My Computer I found > the following Hard Disk Drives listed: > Name - Type - Total Size - Free Space > Local Disk (C:) - Local Disk - 107GB - 91.7GB > New Volume (E:) - Local Disk - 358GB - 352GB > Local Disk (G:) - Local Disk - 107GB - 95.4GB > New Volume (H:) - Local Disk - 358GB - 352GB > Please note that F is not included in this list. I presumed that > Caspar, during the backup process, partitioned the disk to look like the > internal hard drive and gave it new drive letters (G: and H:). Am I > wrong in my thinking? > > I then visited the G: and H: drives while in normal Windows, and there I > found the same folders/files etc. that are on my C: and E: drives. > > --After completing the above tasks, I made a startup disk from the > software downloaded. I did have a little difficulty following the > instructions on how to make this disk; but, with patience, I succeeded > in creating a workable CD Startup Disk. I then placed the CD Startup > Disk in the CD drive and rebooted my computer. This is when I said that > it took about 2 minutes to place the Caspar menu on my screen. (See > more on this timing below.) I then clicked Copy Drive and worked my way > through a few screens where it asked me what I wanted to copy and to > where. It clearly showed the USBEHD as the place to copy from and the > internal hard drive as the place to copy to. That is where I stopped > this process...feeling assured that the rest of the process would work. > > --I created an ICON on my Desktop that permits me to make an up-to-date > backup of my internal hard drive to the USBEHD with a simple click of a > mouse...really user friendly. > > --Lastly, I clicked the backup ICON on the Desktop and updated the > backup information on my USBEDH in just one minute. I was shocked at > how fast this process was completed. > > >> >> There's no problem in cloning one or both of the partitions on your >> USBEHD >> back to your source disk (presumably for recovery purposes). Just as you >> can >> clone individual partitions from the "source" to the "destination" drive, >> the reverse is true as well. > > I just started Caspar 4.0 from Program Files like I was about to make a > backup, and there was the choice as to whether I wanted to copy the > whole or part of the internal hard disk. I did the same thing in > reverse while starting Caspar 4.0 from the Startup Disk, and the same > choices were there also. Thus, I learned something new today...I can > restore a whole disk, part of a disk, a folder, or a file from by backup > disk... nice, very nice. > >> >> Incidentally you mentioned in your post that after you performed the >> initial >> backup of your system using the Casper 4 disk-cloning process, "the first >> update (one week after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 >> minute to complete." >> >> I hope other users will take note of your comment. As I have tried to >> point >> out in my previous posts re the Casper 4 program - that factor, i.e., >> "incremental disk cloning" is probably the chief advantage of Casper - >> the >> extroardinary capability of the program to complete subsequent >> disk-cloning >> operations (for routine comprehensive backups of one's system) in a >> fraction >> of a time it takes other disk-cloning programs (at least the ones I'm >> familiar with). Thus there's a strong incentive for users to backup up >> their >> systems much more frequently than they might otherwise do, knowing that >> the >> time to complete the current disk-cloning process won't be particularly >> onerous and/or time-consuming. >> >> But I am a bit puzzled by your comment that the Casper CD Startup Disk >> took >> only "a couple of minutes to boot". That has not been our experience and >> we've worked with a large variety of systems. I can't recall a single >> instance where it took less than 6 minutes to reach the stage where one >> could begin the disk-cloning process. And I would guess that on the >> average >> it takes about 8 to 9 minutes to reach that point. In our experience >> booting >> up with the "Startup Disk" is not particularly quick, to say the least. >> Are >> you certain about that boot-time? > > My two minutes from starting the Startup Disk to menu on the screen was > estimated at 2 minutes (it seemed long, but I didn't time it at that > point). I actually timed it this afternoon and it took 4 1/2 minutes. > I knew it seemed long, but I didn't realize it was that long. Long, > however, does not count if it is the difference between having a > computer that doesn't work and one that can be restored from the backup. >> >> (Potential users of this Casper 4 program should note that the "Startup >> Disk" CD) is used for recovery purposes. For example, let's say that, >> like >> "Frog", one is using his/her USBEHD as the "destination" drive, i.e., the >> recipient of the cloned contents of the one's internal day-to-day working >> HDD. Now that latter drive becomes dysfunctional and unable to boot. So >> the >> user would have no way of accessing the Casper program on that defunct >> drive >> to perform the disk-cloning operation from the USBEHD back to the >> internal >> HDD. That's where the "Startup Disk" comes in. The user would use that CD >> to >> boot to the Casper program on the CD and undertake the disk-cloning >> operation from the USBEHD back to an internal HDD. So (hopefully!) it >> would >> be on infrequent occasions where the recovery process would have to be >> employed). > > I will say hopefully one will never have the occasion to use the recover > process. I had the unfortunate pleasure of having my 98SE computer > become unusable, and it took this novice about three weeks to recover > from that fiasco. I really wouldn't wish what I went through during > that three week period on anybody. > >> Anna >> >> > > Thanks again for the help. > > Frog |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. > "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message > news:%23o8NDZVeIHA.4140@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >> >> I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system >> backups (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now >> is...should the external hard drive be plugged into the system at all >> times or just when it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential >> for my backup information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due >> to the invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any >> thoughts you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this >> device. >> >> RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software >> thread: >> I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have found >> it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a >> 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB >> external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first >> backup took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was >> given two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it >> and H drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one >> week after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to >> complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded >> down with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can >> access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of >> accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy >> any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any >> problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. >> The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window >> looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to >> reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. I >> haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to >> the system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance >> here would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in >> the earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my >> software decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for >> the moment. >> >> Frog "Anna" <myname@myisp.net> wrote in message... > Frog: > As you have heard from nearly all those who have responded to the first > part of your query re connecting/disconnecting your USB external HDD... > > Since you're using that USBEHD primarily, if not exclusively, for backup > purposes in connection with your Casper 4 disk-to-disk cloning program, > there is really little reason to have it connected (powered on) except for > those relatively infrequent times when you're engaged in a disk-cloning > operation. There's certainly no harm in having its USB data cable > connected to your PC - just ensure the device is powered off. > > Now as to your query re the cloning of partitions... > > When you originally cloned your "source" HDD containing two partitions > designated C: & E: (I assume your optical drive is the D: drive) over to > your USBEHD and then connected the external device to your computer while > the system booted, the system designated the two cloned partitions on your > USBEHD as G: & H: (I assume there's an F: drive somewhere in your system - > possibly a flash drive or even a memory slot on your printer). > > There's no problem in cloning one or both of the partitions on your USBEHD > back to your source disk (presumably for recovery purposes). Just as you > can clone individual partitions from the "source" to the "destination" > drive, the reverse is true as well. > > Incidentally you mentioned in your post that after you performed the > initial backup of your system using the Casper 4 disk-cloning process, > "the first update (one week after making the initial backup) took a grand > total of 1 minute to complete." > > I hope other users will take note of your comment. As I have tried to > point out in my previous posts re the Casper 4 program - that factor, > i.e., "incremental disk cloning" is probably the chief advantage of > Casper - the extroardinary capability of the program to complete > subsequent disk-cloning operations (for routine comprehensive backups of > one's system) in a fraction of a time it takes other disk-cloning programs > (at least the ones I'm familiar with). Thus there's a strong incentive for > users to backup up their systems much more frequently than they might > otherwise do, knowing that the time to complete the current disk-cloning > process won't be particularly onerous and/or time-consuming. > > But I am a bit puzzled by your comment that the Casper CD Startup Disk > took only "a couple of minutes to boot". That has not been our experience > and we've worked with a large variety of systems. I can't recall a single > instance where it took less than 6 minutes to reach the stage where one > could begin the disk-cloning process. And I would guess that on the > average it takes about 8 to 9 minutes to reach that point. In our > experience booting up with the "Startup Disk" is not particularly quick, > to say the least. Are you certain about that boot-time? > > (Potential users of this Casper 4 program should note that the "Startup > Disk" CD) is used for recovery purposes. For example, let's say that, like > "Frog", one is using his/her USBEHD as the "destination" drive, i.e., the > recipient of the cloned contents of the one's internal day-to-day working > HDD. Now that latter drive becomes dysfunctional and unable to boot. So > the user would have no way of accessing the Casper program on that defunct > drive to perform the disk-cloning operation from the USBEHD back to the > internal HDD. That's where the "Startup Disk" comes in. The user would use > that CD to boot to the Casper program on the CD and undertake the > disk-cloning operation from the USBEHD back to an internal HDD. So > (hopefully!) it would be on infrequent occasions where the recovery > process would have to be employed). > Anna "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message news:OoOffUZeIHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > First, let me say thank you for all of the responses in this thread. I > have decided, based on your responses, that I will leave the USBEHD > turned off except when I make backups and/or have to restore my system. > > Anna, you have to remember that my technical skills are self-learned and > somewhat limited (my assessment). Thus, I am having some difficulty > understanding the above paragraph...it's not your fault, but mine. So let > me see if I can give you some information that may or may not respond to > this paragraph. Here are the steps I took when I started my USBEHD/Caspar > 4.0 backup process: > > --I connected the USB cable and power cord to the USBEHD. Then, while > the computer was off, I connected the USB cable to the computer and the > power cable to the power. I turned the USBEHD on and then turned on the > computer. The computer found the USBEHD as a new piece of hardware and > gave it a drive letter...I think the drive letter was F. I next installed > the Caspar 4.0 software on my system following the > instructions in the Caspar User Guide---instructions were very easy to > follow. After the software was loaded, I then made a backup of my > internal hard drive to the USBEHD. Again, this process was easy to do > when following the Caspar User Guide. The Caspar 4.0 software loaded from > Program Files very quickly, when I was in full/normal Windows. This backup > of the entire C: and E: drives on the 500GB internal hard disk took 18 > minutes to complete. When I looked in My Computer I found the following > Hard Disk Drives listed: > Name - Type - Total Size - Free Space > Local Disk (C:) - Local Disk - 107GB - 91.7GB > New Volume (E:) - Local Disk - 358GB - 352GB > Local Disk (G:) - Local Disk - 107GB - 95.4GB > New Volume (H:) - Local Disk - 358GB - 352GB > Please note that F is not included in this list. I presumed that > Caspar, during the backup process, partitioned the disk to look like the > internal hard drive and gave it new drive letters (G: and H:). Am I > wrong in my thinking? > > I then visited the G: and H: drives while in normal Windows, and there I > found the same folders/files etc. that are on my C: and E: drives. > > --After completing the above tasks, I made a startup disk from the > software downloaded. I did have a little difficulty following the > instructions on how to make this disk; but, with patience, I succeeded in > creating a workable CD Startup Disk. I then placed the CD Startup Disk in > the CD drive and rebooted my computer. This is when I said that it took > about 2 minutes to place the Caspar menu on my screen. (See more on this > timing below.) I then clicked Copy Drive and worked my way through a few > screens where it asked me what I wanted to copy and to where. It clearly > showed the USBEHD as the place to copy from and the internal hard drive as > the place to copy to. That is where I stopped this process...feeling > assured that the rest of the process would work. > > --I created an ICON on my Desktop that permits me to make an up-to-date > backup of my internal hard drive to the USBEHD with a simple click of a > mouse...really user friendly. > > --Lastly, I clicked the backup ICON on the Desktop and updated the > backup information on my USBEDH in just one minute. I was shocked at > how fast this process was completed. > > I just started Caspar 4.0 from Program Files like I was about to make a > backup, and there was the choice as to whether I wanted to copy the whole > or part of the internal hard disk. I did the same thing in reverse while > starting Caspar 4.0 from the Startup Disk, and the same choices were there > also. Thus, I learned something new today...I can restore a whole disk, > part of a disk, a folder, or a file from by backup disk... nice, very > nice. > > My two minutes from starting the Startup Disk to menu on the screen was > estimated at 2 minutes (it seemed long, but I didn't time it at that > point). I actually timed it this afternoon and it took 4 1/2 minutes. I > knew it seemed long, but I didn't realize it was that long. Long, > however, does not count if it is the difference between having a computer > that doesn't work and one that can be restored from the backup. > > I will say hopefully one will never have the occasion to use the recover > process. I had the unfortunate pleasure of having my 98SE computer become > unusable, and it took this novice about three weeks to recover from that > fiasco. I really wouldn't wish what I went through during that three week > period on anybody. > > Thanks again for the help. > > Frog Frog: One thing before we start... The correct program's name is "Casper", not "Caspar". And it's best to refer to it (at least at some point in one's post as the "Casper 4" program. I say this because there is a Casper XP program (at least I *think* it still exists! And we were never particularly fond of that program even given its name indicating it's designed for an XP environment. The Casper 4 program is an entirely different (and much better in our estimation) program. As far as you're apparently able to get to the "Startup Disk" menu even at 4 1/2 minutes is very good. As I mentioned it takes us on the average nearly double that time even with fairly high-powered systems that we've worked with. I think the best time we had was something in the neighborhood of 6 minutes. So count you blessings! Anyway, the length of time it takes to boot to the Startup Disk is really not a terribly important factor one way or another. Presumably one would use the Startup Disk very infrequently involving those recovery-type situations where the user's internal HDD was dysfunctional for one reason or another and the user needed to employ the Startup Disk to access the Casper 4 program to undertake the disk-to-disk cloning operation since he or she obviously would be unable to access the program installed on the internal HDD that was to be recovered. As to the disk-cloning process from one's internal HDD to one's USB external HDD... Please understand that when you clone the contents of your internal HDD to your USBEHD, for all practical purposes the USBEHD is a copy of your "source" HDD, i.e., your internal HDD. As such, it mirrors all the files & folders on your source drive. It creates the same number of partitions that you had on the source HDD, the same file system, etc. That's why I'm fond of saying "a clone is a clone is a clone". Your "destination" HDD in that case need not be partitioned or formatted. It could be a "virgin" HDD straight out-of-the-box. In your case when you connected your USBEHD to your system *prior* to the disk-cloning operation it took on a drive-letter because the HDD had come from the factory partitioned/formatted, so XP assigned a drive-letter to it. Is that clear? Now the disk-capacities of your internal HDD and your USBEHD are identical - 500 GB - the resultant two partitions created on the USBEHD as a result of the disk-cloning operation would similarly be identical. (Although the program would allow the user to manipulate the partitions on the destination HDD). (Please note that the disk-cloning program - any disk-cloning - program does *not* assign drive letters to the disks. That is a function of the OS). So forget about the fact that originally *before* the disk-cloning operation your USBEHD was assigned a drive letter of "F:" For all practical purposes it's of no relevance here. Now if your USBEHD was a different capacity than your internal HDD (assuming of course it was sufficient in size to contain the cloned contents of your source disk), the Casper program would create proportionally-sized partitions on the destination HDD based on the same percentages created in your source HDD. Again, remember the user can manipulate partition-size on the destination HDD if desired. So to use a concrete example involving the possible restoration of your system based on your current situation... Let's say your source HDD goes to "HDD heaven" (hell?) so that you need to install a new internal HDD in your system. Now you have the cloned contents of that defunct HDD contained on your USBEHD (where their drive letters had been assigned G: & H: when you had a working, functional system which of course you no longer have). So all you would have to do after installing your new (blank) internal HDD is use the Casper 4 program (accessed via the "Startup Disk") to clone the contents of your USBEHD to the new HDD. And thus creating a now-bootable-functioning internal HDD containing all your programs, data, etc. and which would contain the same original two partitions designated C: & E: (or possibly D: depending upon your hardware configuration). It's as simple as that. So please, do not be concerned with what you think is a terribly complex and/or onerous process to "recover" your system. Using the Casper 4 program as we've described makes the process virtually "child's play". Just ensure that you continue to use the program to back up your system on a routine & systematic basis. That's the important part. And as you have discovered, Casper accomplishes subsequent backups so quickly that you have little excuse not to use the program frequently to do so. Anna |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. Can you please answer this, Anna? I can't remember what we determined in regards to what I wrote below. Bill in Co. wrote: > Anna wrote: >> "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message >> news:%23o8NDZVeIHA.4140@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>> >>> I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system >>> backups >>> (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the >>> external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when >>> it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup >>> information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the >>> invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any >>> thoughts >>> you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. >>> >>> RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software >>> thread: >>> I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have >>> found >>> it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a >>> 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB >>> external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first >>> backup >>> took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was given >>> two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it and H >>> drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one week >>> after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to >>> complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded >>> down >>> with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can >>> access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of >>> accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy >>> any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any >>> problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. >>> The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window >>> looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to >>> reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. >>> I >>> haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to >>> the >>> system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance >>> here >>> would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in the >>> earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my software >>> decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for the >>> moment. >>> >>> Frog >> >> Frog: >> As you have heard from nearly all those who have responded to the first >> part >> of your query re connecting/disconnecting your USB external HDD... >> >> Since you're using that USBEHD primarily, if not exclusively, for backup >> purposes in connection with your Casper 4 disk-to-disk cloning program, >> there is really little reason to have it connected (powered on) except >> for >> those relatively infrequent times when you're engaged in a disk-cloning >> operation. There's certainly no harm in having its USB data cable >> connected >> to your PC - just ensure the device is powered off. >> >> Now as to your query re the cloning of partitions... >> >> When you originally cloned your "source" HDD containing two partitions >> designated C: & E: (I assume your optical drive is the D: drive) over to >> your USBEHD and then connected the external device to your computer while >> the system booted, the system designated the two cloned partitions on >> your >> USBEHD as G: & H: (I assume there's an F: drive somewhere in your >> system - >> possibly a flash drive or even a memory slot on your printer). >> >> There's no problem in cloning one or both of the partitions on your >> USBEHD >> back to your source disk (presumably for recovery purposes). Just as you >> can >> clone individual partitions from the "source" to the "destination" drive, >> the reverse is true as well. >> >> Incidentally you mentioned in your post that after you performed the >> initial >> backup of your system using the Casper 4 disk-cloning process, "the first >> update (one week after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 >> minute to complete." >> >> I hope other users will take note of your comment. As I have tried to >> point >> out in my previous posts re the Casper 4 program - that factor, i.e., >> "incremental disk cloning" is probably the chief advantage of Casper - >> the >> extroardinary capability of the program to complete subsequent >> disk-cloning >> operations (for routine comprehensive backups of one's system) in a >> fraction >> of a time it takes other disk-cloning programs (at least the ones I'm >> familiar with). > > Even True Image 11? I forgot, but didn't we agree that the Incremental > Backup available there is similar? > > I haven't used the incremental backup/restore option yet, since I like > making SURE I have backed up/restored the complete enchilada, without > depending on the backup program keeping perfect track of any and all > changes > on the HD (if using the incremental options). > >> Thus there's a strong incentive for users to backup up their >> systems much more frequently than they might otherwise do, knowing that >> the >> time to complete the current disk-cloning process won't be particularly >> onerous and/or time-consuming. >> >> But I am a bit puzzled by your comment that the Casper CD Startup Disk >> took >> only "a couple of minutes to boot". That has not been our experience and >> we've worked with a large variety of systems. I can't recall a single >> instance where it took less than 6 minutes to reach the stage where one >> could begin the disk-cloning process. And I would guess that on the >> average >> it takes about 8 to 9 minutes to reach that point. In our experience >> booting >> up with the "Startup Disk" is not particularly quick, to say the least. >> Are >> you certain about that boot-time? >> >> (Potential users of this Casper 4 program should note that the "Startup >> Disk" CD) is used for recovery purposes. For example, let's say that, >> like >> "Frog", one is using his/her USBEHD as the "destination" drive, i.e., the >> recipient of the cloned contents of the one's internal day-to-day working >> HDD. Now that latter drive becomes dysfunctional and unable to boot. So >> the >> user would have no way of accessing the Casper program on that defunct >> drive >> to perform the disk-cloning operation from the USBEHD back to the >> internal >> HDD. That's where the "Startup Disk" comes in. The user would use that CD >> to >> boot to the Casper program on the CD and undertake the disk-cloning >> operation from the USBEHD back to an internal HDD. So (hopefully!) it >> would >> be on infrequent occasions where the recovery process would have to be >> employed). >> Anna |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote in message news:%23o8NDZVeIHA.4140@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > > I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system backups > (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the > external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when > it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup > information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the > invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any thoughts > you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. > > RELATED NOTE - to all those who helped me in an earlier backup software > thread: > I decided to use Caspar 4.0 software for making my backups. I have found > it, as Anna said it would be in her messages...easy to use. I have a > 500GB internal hard drive (2 partitions- drive C and E) and one 500GB > external USB connected hard drive. The initial making of the first backup > took about 18 minutes to complete, and the external hard drive was given > two drive letters...G drive that has the C drive information on it and H > drive that has the E drive information on it. The first update (one week > after making the initial backup) took a grand total of 1 minute to > complete. Of course, my computer is new and as such it is not loaded down > with large quantities of software/folders/files and the like. I can > access the information on the external drives G and H in like manner of > accessing information on the internal C and E drive. Thus, I could copy > any folder/file on the external drive to the internal drive without any > problem. I then used the startup disk to see that it worked...it did. > The startup disk takes a couple of minutes to boot and then the window > looks exactly like the one I access from Program Files. If you want to > reload a backup back to your hard drive, it is simply copy G/H to C/E. I > haven't determined whether I can copy only G or H individually back to the > system as of yet...I haven't looked at that possibility, and guidance here > would be helpful. Well, there you have the results of your help in the > earlier thread. I just thought I should report back about my software > decision and that all is well with my computer...at least for the moment. > > Frog Leave it off until needed for use. Turn it off, remove correctly when finished. Turn off system restore for the partitions on the external hard drive. Be sure to run your AV scan prior to cloning. -- Dave |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote > I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system backups > (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the > external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when > it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup > information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the > invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any thoughts > you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. I disconnect my USB external backup drive between backups and, for good measure, I don't keep it in the same place that the computer is but where I can grab it in a hurry if need be. -- Bob http://www.kanyak.com |
| |||
| Re: External Hard Drive used for System Backup. "Opinicus" <gezgin@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:13sdla59oaeenb6@news.supernews.com... > "Frog" <frog@pond.com> wrote > >> I am using an external USB connected hard drive for my system backups >> (making of backups are not scheduled). My question now is...should the >> external hard drive be plugged into the system at all times or just when >> it is in use? My concern has to do with the potential for my backup >> information of the external hard drive becoming corrupt due to the >> invasion of a virus at some future date. I would appreciate any thoughts >> you might have on the pros/cons on the on-and- off of this device. > > I disconnect my USB external backup drive between backups and, for good > measure, I don't keep it in the same place that the computer is but where > I can grab it in a hurry if need be. > ... I use two external drives. One on site, not powered up or connected, but convenient to power on and connect (USB), and the other in a safe place offsite (and I'm not going to say where). At reasonable intervals, I swap the two. This way I'm protected against malware, power spikes, power failures, and, but for recent work I don't judge to be critical, theft, fire, earthquake and our other natural and unnatural friends. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| System Event ID 57 with External Hard Drive | powerwalk | Windows XP | 1 | 12-30-2007 03:40 PM |
| Vista Backup won't recognize external WD hard drive | Nevet | Vista Hardware | 20 | 09-19-2007 03:33 AM |
| Vista System Backup Does Not See Internal Hard Drive | JerryZ | Windows Vista | 1 | 06-28-2007 08:30 PM |
| Backup Utility for External Hard Drive in the Media Center Edition | Hummer | Windows XP | 7 | 03-03-2007 07:30 PM |
| Using Backup Wizard tool to an external hard drive | Craig H | Windows XP | 4 | 01-04-2007 03:45 AM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |