|
| | |||||||
| Windows XP Discuss the Microsoft Windows XP Operating System |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? I renew my MSDN subscription every couple of years instead of annually. I'd like to catch the last go-around that includes XP. Is this something imminent? Or will it be a few more years before they drop XP on the MSDN disks? -- PeteCresswell |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? Pete; Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the answer. Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after SP-3 is released. Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier one will be identical. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote in message news:880al2trhnfk5h74cl150hukucalf0m9pa@4ax.com... >I renew my MSDN subscription every couple of years instead of annually. > > I'd like to catch the last go-around that includes XP. > > Is this something imminent? Or will it be a few more years before they > drop XP > on the MSDN disks? > -- > PeteCresswell |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? Pete; Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the answer. Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after SP-3 is released. Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier one will be identical. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote in message news:880al2trhnfk5h74cl150hukucalf0m9pa@4ax.com... >I renew my MSDN subscription every couple of years instead of annually. > > I'd like to catch the last go-around that includes XP. > > Is this something imminent? Or will it be a few more years before they > drop XP > on the MSDN disks? > -- > PeteCresswell |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install LOL. "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Pete; > Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the > answer. > Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after > SP-3 is released. > Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is no > real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier > one will be identical. > > -- > Jupiter Jones [MVP] > http://www3.telus.net/dandemar > http://www.dts-l.org > > > "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote in message > news:880al2trhnfk5h74cl150hukucalf0m9pa@4ax.com... >>I renew my MSDN subscription every couple of years instead of annually. >> >> I'd like to catch the last go-around that includes XP. >> >> Is this something imminent? Or will it be a few more years before they >> drop XP >> on the MSDN disks? >> -- >> PeteCresswell > > |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install LOL. "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Pete; > Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the > answer. > Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after > SP-3 is released. > Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is no > real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier > one will be identical. > > -- > Jupiter Jones [MVP] > http://www3.telus.net/dandemar > http://www.dts-l.org > > > "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote in message > news:880al2trhnfk5h74cl150hukucalf0m9pa@4ax.com... >>I renew my MSDN subscription every couple of years instead of annually. >> >> I'd like to catch the last go-around that includes XP. >> >> Is this something imminent? Or will it be a few more years before they >> drop XP >> on the MSDN disks? >> -- >> PeteCresswell > > |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? Jupiter did say Windows XP does not change "except for service packs" I believe. -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message news:uw5ksgTBHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service > packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install > LOL. > > "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message > news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> Pete; >> Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the >> answer. >> Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after >> SP-3 is released. >> Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is >> no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an >> earlier one will be identical. >> >> -- >> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >> http://www.dts-l.org >> >> >> "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote in message >> news:880al2trhnfk5h74cl150hukucalf0m9pa@4ax.com... >>>I renew my MSDN subscription every couple of years instead of annually. >>> >>> I'd like to catch the last go-around that includes XP. >>> >>> Is this something imminent? Or will it be a few more years before they >>> drop XP >>> on the MSDN disks? >>> -- >>> PeteCresswell >> >> > > |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? Jupiter did say Windows XP does not change "except for service packs" I believe. -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message news:uw5ksgTBHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service > packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install > LOL. > > "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message > news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> Pete; >> Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the >> answer. >> Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after >> SP-3 is released. >> Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is >> no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an >> earlier one will be identical. >> >> -- >> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >> http://www.dts-l.org >> >> >> "(PeteCresswell)" <x@y.Invalid> wrote in message >> news:880al2trhnfk5h74cl150hukucalf0m9pa@4ax.com... >>>I renew my MSDN subscription every couple of years instead of annually. >>> >>> I'd like to catch the last go-around that includes XP. >>> >>> Is this something imminent? Or will it be a few more years before they >>> drop XP >>> on the MSDN disks? >>> -- >>> PeteCresswell >> >> > > |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? You seem to have missed this phrase: "...does not change except for the Service Packs..." Windows XP with SP-2 received today is identical to Windows XP with SP-2 when it first shipped. Etc. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message news:uw5ksgTBHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service > packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install > LOL. > > "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message > news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> Pete; >> Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the >> answer. >> Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after >> SP-3 is released. >> Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is >> no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an >> earlier one will be identical. >> >> -- >> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >> http://www.dts-l.org |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? You seem to have missed this phrase: "...does not change except for the Service Packs..." Windows XP with SP-2 received today is identical to Windows XP with SP-2 when it first shipped. Etc. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message news:uw5ksgTBHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service > packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install > LOL. > > "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message > news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> Pete; >> Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the >> answer. >> Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after >> SP-3 is released. >> Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is >> no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an >> earlier one will be identical. >> >> -- >> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >> http://www.dts-l.org |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? To Richard also: Doesn't make sense, so you needlessly added the exception. Nothing is identical with exceptions. Mentioned was SP3, and of course SP2 disk is the same as an SP2 disk, but that isn't what you said. You said,"there is no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier one will be identical." If you're going to say that you meant SP2 later and SP2 earlier, then you should have left out "exception" and SP3 should have come into play. "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message news:u3P$8qTBHHA.3316@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > You seem to have missed this phrase: > "...does not change except for the Service Packs..." > Windows XP with SP-2 received today is identical to Windows XP with SP-2 > when it first shipped. > Etc. > > -- > Jupiter Jones [MVP] > http://www3.telus.net/dandemar > http://www.dts-l.org > > > "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message > news:uw5ksgTBHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service >> packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install >> LOL. >> >> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message >> news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> Pete; >>> Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the >>> answer. >>> Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after >>> SP-3 is released. >>> Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is >>> no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an >>> earlier one will be identical. >>> >>> -- >>> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >>> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >>> http://www.dts-l.org > > |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? To Richard also: Doesn't make sense, so you needlessly added the exception. Nothing is identical with exceptions. Mentioned was SP3, and of course SP2 disk is the same as an SP2 disk, but that isn't what you said. You said,"there is no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier one will be identical." If you're going to say that you meant SP2 later and SP2 earlier, then you should have left out "exception" and SP3 should have come into play. "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message news:u3P$8qTBHHA.3316@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > You seem to have missed this phrase: > "...does not change except for the Service Packs..." > Windows XP with SP-2 received today is identical to Windows XP with SP-2 > when it first shipped. > Etc. > > -- > Jupiter Jones [MVP] > http://www3.telus.net/dandemar > http://www.dts-l.org > > > "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message > news:uw5ksgTBHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service >> packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install >> LOL. >> >> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message >> news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> Pete; >>> Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the >>> answer. >>> Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well after >>> SP-3 is released. >>> Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is >>> no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an >>> earlier one will be identical. >>> >>> -- >>> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >>> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >>> http://www.dts-l.org > > |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? I meant to say at the end "and SP3 shouldn't have come into play." "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message news:uBuIPvTBHHA.2304@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > To Richard also: > Doesn't make sense, so you needlessly added the exception. Nothing is > identical with exceptions. Mentioned was SP3, and of course SP2 disk is > the same as an SP2 disk, but that isn't what you said. You said,"there is > no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier > one will be identical." If you're going to say that you meant SP2 later > and SP2 earlier, then you should have left out "exception" and SP3 should > have come into play. > > "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message > news:u3P$8qTBHHA.3316@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> You seem to have missed this phrase: >> "...does not change except for the Service Packs..." >> Windows XP with SP-2 received today is identical to Windows XP with SP-2 >> when it first shipped. >> Etc. >> >> -- >> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >> http://www.dts-l.org >> >> >> "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message >> news:uw5ksgTBHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service >>> packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install >>> LOL. >>> >>> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message >>> news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>> Pete; >>>> Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the >>>> answer. >>>> Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well >>>> after SP-3 is released. >>>> Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is >>>> no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an >>>> earlier one will be identical. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >>>> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >>>> http://www.dts-l.org >> >> > > |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? I meant to say at the end "and SP3 shouldn't have come into play." "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message news:uBuIPvTBHHA.2304@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > To Richard also: > Doesn't make sense, so you needlessly added the exception. Nothing is > identical with exceptions. Mentioned was SP3, and of course SP2 disk is > the same as an SP2 disk, but that isn't what you said. You said,"there is > no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier > one will be identical." If you're going to say that you meant SP2 later > and SP2 earlier, then you should have left out "exception" and SP3 should > have come into play. > > "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message > news:u3P$8qTBHHA.3316@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> You seem to have missed this phrase: >> "...does not change except for the Service Packs..." >> Windows XP with SP-2 received today is identical to Windows XP with SP-2 >> when it first shipped. >> Etc. >> >> -- >> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >> http://www.dts-l.org >> >> >> "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message >> news:uw5ksgTBHHA.5068@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> You don't make sense; how can they be indentical with different service >>> packs on them? One big different would be the size of the intial install >>> LOL. >>> >>> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message >>> news:%23oyPxUTBHHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>> Pete; >>>> Imminent, sure, but when, that is the question only Microsoft knows the >>>> answer. >>>> Windows XP SP-3 is currently planned for 2008, so my guess is well >>>> after SP-3 is released. >>>> Since Windows XP does not change except for the Service Packs, there is >>>> no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an >>>> earlier one will be identical. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >>>> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >>>> http://www.dts-l.org >> >> > > |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? If you do not like exceptions, that is OK with me. If I had left out that exception, probably many others would have posted back explaining there are differences in Windows XP Gold vs. Windows XP with the various Service Packs. The fact is several different CDs are available and I included that as a necessary exception. If I wrote the sentence the way you misquoted me, it would be wrong. But you changed the meaning of what I wrote by your selective quoting. I wrote it the way I wrote since confusing one individual such as yourself is far preferable to the possibility of confusing or misleading everyone else. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message news:uBuIPvTBHHA.2304@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > To Richard also: > Doesn't make sense, so you needlessly added the exception. Nothing is > identical with exceptions. Mentioned was SP3, and of course SP2 disk is > the same as an SP2 disk, but that isn't what you said. You said,"there is > no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier > one will be identical." If you're going to say that you meant SP2 later > and SP2 earlier, then you should have left out "exception" and SP3 should > have come into play. > > "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message > news:u3P$8qTBHHA.3316@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> You seem to have missed this phrase: >> "...does not change except for the Service Packs..." >> Windows XP with SP-2 received today is identical to Windows XP with SP-2 >> when it first shipped. >> Etc. >> >> -- >> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >> http://www.dts-l.org |
| |||
| Re: Last MSDN Subscriptions To Include XP? If you do not like exceptions, that is OK with me. If I had left out that exception, probably many others would have posted back explaining there are differences in Windows XP Gold vs. Windows XP with the various Service Packs. The fact is several different CDs are available and I included that as a necessary exception. If I wrote the sentence the way you misquoted me, it would be wrong. But you changed the meaning of what I wrote by your selective quoting. I wrote it the way I wrote since confusing one individual such as yourself is far preferable to the possibility of confusing or misleading everyone else. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] http://www3.telus.net/dandemar http://www.dts-l.org "Tom" <noway@nothere.com> wrote in message news:uBuIPvTBHHA.2304@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > To Richard also: > Doesn't make sense, so you needlessly added the exception. Nothing is > identical with exceptions. Mentioned was SP3, and of course SP2 disk is > the same as an SP2 disk, but that isn't what you said. You said,"there is > no real need to get a Windows XP published on a later DVD while an earlier > one will be identical." If you're going to say that you meant SP2 later > and SP2 earlier, then you should have left out "exception" and SP3 should > have come into play. > > "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message > news:u3P$8qTBHHA.3316@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> You seem to have missed this phrase: >> "...does not change except for the Service Packs..." >> Windows XP with SP-2 received today is identical to Windows XP with SP-2 >> when it first shipped. >> Etc. >> >> -- >> Jupiter Jones [MVP] >> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar >> http://www.dts-l.org |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| https://technet.microsoft.com/subscriptions/manage/default.aspx | scuba19 | Windows Vista | 6 | 06-16-2008 03:10 PM |
| Re: Include quote ? | Gordon | Windows Vista | 0 | 03-18-2008 12:41 AM |
| RE: Include quote ? | Mick Murphy | Windows Vista | 0 | 03-17-2008 10:20 PM |
| Kindle RSS Subscriptions | LPH | Kindle | 0 | 11-23-2007 05:50 AM |
| Include qat files in MSP | littleccguy | Microsoft Office | 0 | 09-25-2007 03:20 PM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |