|
| | |||||||
| Windows XP Tablet PC Newsgroup Join the discussions in the Microsoft Windows XP Tablet PC Newsgroup |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| toshiba m200 vs R15-which is better? Looking at the specs, the R15 looks more desirable to me: 1) 14 inch screen vs a 12 inch screen 2) cheaper 3) firewire port 4) built in optical drive Sure the M200 has a slightly faster processor and the screen resolution is 1400 by 1000 as opposed to 1024 by 768. Is the screen resolution a big factor? Am I missing something? Thanks Doug Lazenby |
| |||
| Re: toshiba m200 vs R15-which is better? On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:59:05 -0700, "dlazenby" <dlazenby@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >Sure the M200 has a slightly faster processor and the screen resolution is >1400 by 1000 as opposed to 1024 by 768. Is the screen resolution a big factor? It may be, depending on the particular user's needs. For a person who needs to be able to see more than one window at a time, or switch back and forth quickly, screen size is critical. My home computer's 1280x1024 display is just barely big enough -- except when it's not big enough. When I buy a tablet PC it will be an M200 or something else with a comparable screen, if something else is available by then. My email address is llm040903 at earthlink dot net. |
| |||
| Re: toshiba m200 vs R15-which is better? If you do a lot of stand-up computing, you're looking at slightly less than twice the weight on the R15 versus the M200. I much prefer being able to go at least 1280x1024 on the M200, rather than 1024x768 at the best a machine can do. -- http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ts/nichol.mspx In memory of a true friend, Windows MVP Alex Nichol Chris H. Microsoft Windows MVP/Tablet PC Tablet Creations - http://nicecreations.us/ Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone "dlazenby" <dlazenby@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:DCBA1A50-74B2-4EAC-B2B5-C14CAFCD8061@microsoft.com... > Looking at the specs, the R15 looks more desirable to me: > 1) 14 inch screen vs a 12 inch screen > 2) cheaper > 3) firewire port > 4) built in optical drive > Sure the M200 has a slightly faster processor and the screen resolution is > 1400 by 1000 as opposed to 1024 by 768. Is the screen resolution a big > factor? > Am I missing something? > Thanks > Doug Lazenby > |
| |||
| Real-estate Quote:
Christine |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RE: Toshiba M200 and Vista | awgneo | Vista Hardware | 0 | 04-12-2007 07:38 AM |
| Toshiba M200 & Pen | Alamo | Windows XP Tablet PC Newsgroup | 6 | 01-04-2005 12:15 PM |
| New Toshiba m200 | rwarmstrong | New Member Introductions & Greetings | 3 | 08-01-2004 08:13 PM |
| One Complaint About the Toshiba M200 | Marauderz | Windows XP Tablet PC Newsgroup | 3 | 05-26-2004 10:11 PM |
| Toshiba Portégé M200: a first look | LPH | Tablet PC - In The News | 0 | 02-19-2004 08:30 AM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |