|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| which platform is best for vista? INTEL or AMD? I have been testing vista as a CPP participant since may this year and have always kept an eye on this newsgroup in order to keep myself up to date on any issues that may arise while running vista. I can say that I've probably been pretty lucky seeing that in all this time I haven't had a BSOD and vista has run very well on my pc However I'm thinking about building a new pc preferably a 64 bit system I have seen quite a few posts on this Ng about people having probs with the 64 bit vista builds Which would vista be more stable on? an INTEL or AMD 64 bit system I don't really have a preference between INTEL or AMD I'd just like to hear some balanced opinions my system specs are intel P4 3.0 Ghz prescott core cpu asus p4p800s-x mobo 1 GB ddr 400 ram Nvidia 6200 256Mb agp western digital 40Gb Ide Hdd western digital 250Gb Sata Hdd 500 Watt antec tru power Psu |
| |||
| Re: which platform is best for vista? INTEL or AMD? On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:42:27 +1100, will wrote: [color=blue] > However I'm thinking about building a new pc preferably a 64 bit system > I have seen quite a few posts on this Ng about people having probs with > the 64 bit vista builds[/color] Trust me, you really don't want the 64 bit builds, unless you want to go to driver hell... -- -Jeff B. zoomie at fastmail dot fm |
| |||
| Re: which platform is best for vista? INTEL or AMD? On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:28:28 -0500, Yeff <zoomie@fastmail.fm> wrote: [color=blue] >On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:42:27 +1100, will wrote: >[color=green] >> However I'm thinking about building a new pc preferably a 64 bit system >> I have seen quite a few posts on this Ng about people having probs with >> the 64 bit vista builds[/color] > >Trust me, you really don't want the 64 bit builds, unless you want to go >to driver hell...[/color] I'm running it on an Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 in 64-bit mode. The drivers I am missing are for my scanner; everything else is either built-in to Vista or available from the manufacturer. Jim |
| |||
| Re: which platform is best for vista? INTEL or AMD? yeff is right about driver issues, but if there are drivers available, then use 'em. if you got drivers available for ALL hardware, then go 64bit imo. speaking of which, i need the g95 network drivers from HP.... i wonder if they work with vista :S |
| |||
| Re: which platform is best for vista? INTEL or AMD? On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 11:42:27 -0000, will <imagine_44******.com> wrote: [color=blue] > I have been testing vista as a CPP participant since may this year and > have always kept an eye on this newsgroup in order to keep myself up to > date on any issues that may arise while running vista. > > I can say that I've probably been pretty lucky seeing that in all this > time I haven't had a BSOD and vista has run very well on my pc > > However I'm thinking about building a new pc preferably a 64 bit system > I have seen quite a few posts on this Ng about people having probs with > the 64 bit vista builds > > Which would vista be more stable on? an INTEL or AMD 64 bit system I > don't > really have a preference between INTEL or AMD I'd just like to hear some > balanced opinions > > my system specs are > intel P4 3.0 Ghz prescott core cpu > asus p4p800s-x mobo > 1 GB ddr 400 ram > Nvidia 6200 256Mb agp > western digital 40Gb Ide Hdd > western digital 250Gb Sata Hdd > 500 Watt antec tru power Psu[/color] Personally, most non-Intel systems I have put together have been flakey, ranging from once in a blue moon driver crashes, to frequent problems on my last AMD64 with A8V board. Constrast that with all my Intel based systems, which have always worked very well(my Core 2 Duo E6600 and P5B is rock solid), I would say go Intel, they have the performance, they have the relibility you have to pay a little more for it thou... |
| |||
| Re: which platform is best for vista? INTEL or AMD? "will" <imagine_44******.com> wrote in message news:pan.2006.11.17.11.42.26.41812******.com...[color=blue] > > However I'm thinking about building a new pc preferably a 64 bit > system > I have seen quite a few posts on this Ng about people having probs > with > the 64 bit vista builds[/color] The problems are not related to AMD or Intel, but rather to the support hardware and peripherals. There are not enough 64-bit drivers available yet, in my opinion. My printer, scanner, webcam, and a few motherboard components are not yet fully supported, so I won't run the 64-bit edition until the drivers are ready. Hopefully now that Vista is "ready", the manufacturers will get their drivers ready soon. [color=blue] > Which would vista be more stable on? an INTEL or AMD 64 bit system I > don't > really have a preference between INTEL or AMD I'd just like to hear > some > balanced opinions[/color] If you're deciding between the dual-core versions, the Intel is the better for overall performance right now. A year ago AMD was the clear price/performance leader especially with DDR memory and dual channel support. The two companies compete constantly and the advantage switches back and forth. My current rig uses an AMD x2 setup, and my previous rig was an Intel P4. I switch to whichever company has the best price/performance ratio at the time. I've never had compatibility issues with either AMD or Intel. AMD is the underdog and they try harder than Intel, so I tend to have a slight bias for them. The rest of the system components are often far more important to overall performance than just the CPU anyway, so which CPU you buy is usually not the critical factor. Buy whatever makes you feel good, and keeps your wallet happy. :-) |
| |||
| Re: which platform is best for vista? INTEL or AMD? The cpu won't matter. The BIOS may. Advice: Don't buy a system with a mobo that just came out last week. Get something a bit more tested and refined. Better yet, wait until HP, Gateway, etc have Vista systems ready to deliver so you get full driver and hardware support. "will" <imagine_44******.com> wrote in message news:pan.2006.11.17.11.42.26.41812******.com...[color=blue] >I have been testing vista as a CPP participant since may this year and > have always kept an eye on this newsgroup in order to keep myself up to > date on any issues that may arise while running vista. > > I can say that I've probably been pretty lucky seeing that in all this > time I haven't had a BSOD and vista has run very well on my pc > > However I'm thinking about building a new pc preferably a 64 bit system > I have seen quite a few posts on this Ng about people having probs with > the 64 bit vista builds > > Which would vista be more stable on? an INTEL or AMD 64 bit system I don't > really have a preference between INTEL or AMD I'd just like to hear some > balanced opinions > > my system specs are > intel P4 3.0 Ghz prescott core cpu > asus p4p800s-x mobo > 1 GB ddr 400 ram > Nvidia 6200 256Mb agp > western digital 40Gb Ide Hdd > western digital 250Gb Sata Hdd > 500 Watt antec tru power Psu[/color] |
| |||
| Re: which platform is best for vista? INTEL or AMD? The question always comes down to this when you're building or buying a new computer. What are you going to use your computer for? "will" <imagine_44******.com> wrote in message news:pan.2006.11.17.11.42.26.41812******.com...[color=blue] >I have been testing vista as a CPP participant since may this year and > have always kept an eye on this newsgroup in order to keep myself up to > date on any issues that may arise while running vista. > > I can say that I've probably been pretty lucky seeing that in all this > time I haven't had a BSOD and vista has run very well on my pc > > However I'm thinking about building a new pc preferably a 64 bit system > I have seen quite a few posts on this Ng about people having probs with > the 64 bit vista builds > > Which would vista be more stable on? an INTEL or AMD 64 bit system I don't > really have a preference between INTEL or AMD I'd just like to hear some > balanced opinions > > my system specs are > intel P4 3.0 Ghz prescott core cpu > asus p4p800s-x mobo > 1 GB ddr 400 ram > Nvidia 6200 256Mb agp > western digital 40Gb Ide Hdd > western digital 250Gb Sata Hdd > 500 Watt antec tru power Psu[/color] |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Intel Ultra Mobile Group Platform Roadmap | Lora | Ultra Mobile PC | 3 | 11-30-2008 11:18 AM |
| the INF Update Utility - Primarily for Intel® 4, 3, 900 Series Chipsets are the same Intel Driver Chipset for Vista and XP? | rebelscum0000 | Windows Vista | 13 | 06-25-2008 08:50 AM |
| INTEL DRIVER CHIPSET INF Update Utility - Primarily for Intel® 4, 3, 900 Series Chipsets (2455KB) 9.0.0.1008 6/2/2008 are the same Intel Driver Chipset for Vista and XP? | rebelscum0000 | Windows Vista | 5 | 06-24-2008 09:40 PM |
| the INF Update Utility - Primarily for Intel® 4, 3, 900 Series Chipsets are the same Intel Driver Chipset for Vista and XP? | rebelscum0000 | Windows Vista | 1 | 06-24-2008 03:00 PM |
| Anyone running 64-bit RTM on Intel platform - please can you check a file for me | Jim | Windows Vista | 5 | 02-01-2007 06:00 AM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |