|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| Vista Voice recongition compared with Dragon Naturaly Speaking Vista voice recognition [url]http://youtube.com/watch?v=KyLqUf4cdwc[/url] Response to above video from another user, Dragon Naturaly speaking [url]http://youtube.com/watch?v=S9T3RXFDtfo[/url] An actual demostration of Vista Voice recongition.... [url]http://youtube.com/watch?v=IkeC7HpsHxo[/url] -Vista is stupid (TM) |
| |||
| Re: Vista Voice recongition compared with Dragon Naturaly Speaking But the difference is, I don't need to shell out extra cash when the functionality already comes bundled with the OS. Also, I have seen a significant improvement with Speech in Vista, you just have to be willing to practice it. -- Andre Blog: [url]http://adacosta.spaces.live.com[/url] My Vista Quickstart Guide: [url]http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!E8E5CC039D51E3DB!9709.entry[/url] "kirk jim" <11@11.11> wrote in message news:OiT6kBreHHA.3932@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Vista voice recognition > [url]http://youtube.com/watch?v=KyLqUf4cdwc[/url] > > Response to above video from another user, Dragon Naturaly speaking > [url]http://youtube.com/watch?v=S9T3RXFDtfo[/url] > > An actual demostration of Vista Voice recongition.... > [url]http://youtube.com/watch?v=IkeC7HpsHxo[/url] > > > -Vista is stupid (TM) >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista Voice recongition compared with Dragon Naturaly Speaking I have a better Idea... take voice recognition out, reduce the price of vista, so we can buy a product that works. MS tries to put in basic functionality programs that do various tasks. Thats not a bad idea.... But with voice recogition they blundered. Either it works, or it doesnt. And in vista, it just doesnt. I know that they (MS) knows that vista recongition stinks, and they have bought a new company that specialized in this area... so in the future it will improve. "Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <andred25********.com> wrote in message news:uE2GFOreHHA.4636@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > But the difference is, I don't need to shell out extra cash when the > functionality already comes bundled with the OS. Also, I have seen a > significant improvement with Speech in Vista, you just have to be willing > to practice it. > -- > Andre > Blog: [url]http://adacosta.spaces.live.com[/url] > My Vista Quickstart Guide: > [url]http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!E8E5CC039D51E3DB!9709.entry[/url] > "kirk jim" <11@11.11> wrote in message > news:OiT6kBreHHA.3932@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...[color=green] >> Vista voice recognition >> [url]http://youtube.com/watch?v=KyLqUf4cdwc[/url] >> >> Response to above video from another user, Dragon Naturaly speaking >> [url]http://youtube.com/watch?v=S9T3RXFDtfo[/url] >> >> An actual demostration of Vista Voice recongition.... >> [url]http://youtube.com/watch?v=IkeC7HpsHxo[/url] >> >> >> -Vista is stupid (TM) >>[/color] > >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista Voice recongition compared with Dragon Naturaly Speaking Not sure what the point is here. Your beloved Ubuntu doesn't come with integrated voice recognition at all, does it? Like Andre says, you've got a functional speech recognition system in Vista, and if you want something better you can buy it. Same as the graphic editor, web browser, backup program, CD burner, etc, etc. Basic functionality which you can enhance if you want to. Seems perfectly reasonable to me. Steve |
| |||
| Re: Vista Voice recongition compared with Dragon Naturaly Speaking > But with voice recogition they blundered. Either it works, or it doesnt. Nonsense!! Speech recognition is one of the few technologies that you CANNOT say that about. All speech recogntion engines have a measurable error rate. Some are better than others. It is very rare indeed to get above 99% accuracy without lots of training and very consistent diction. So far, none of them are good enough for me to use. But some people get along with them fine. Steve |
| |||
| Re: Vista Voice recongition compared with Dragon Naturaly Speaking Ok let me tell it to you this way. Dragon understands human speech better. :-) Nothing is perfect.... "Steve Thackery" <thack@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:e7BZEZreHHA.928@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...[color=blue][color=green] >> But with voice recogition they blundered. Either it works, or it doesnt.[/color] > > Nonsense!! Speech recognition is one of the few technologies that you > CANNOT say that about. All speech recogntion engines have a measurable > error rate. Some are better than others. It is very rare indeed to get > above 99% accuracy without lots of training and very consistent diction. > > So far, none of them are good enough for me to use. But some people get > along with them fine. > > Steve >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista Voice recongition compared with Dragon Naturaly Speaking kirk jim wrote: [color=blue] > But with voice recogition they blundered. Either it works, or it doesnt. > > And in vista, it just doesnt.[/color] You've use it in your computer (which Vista version do you have?)and it doesn't work (don't lie!). Or you heard someone else say it doesn't work. Which is it? Frank |
| |||
| Re: Vista Voice recongition compared with Dragon Naturaly Speaking Agreed, not to mention the fact that if you want to do an objective test then you need to have the EXACT same setup for testing both pieces of software. Also microphone quality has a ton to do with results that you get, as does background noise. So, unless they were really stringent about their testing methods, their results are useless. "Steve Thackery" <thack@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:e9F5#XreHHA.3548@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Not sure what the point is here. Your beloved Ubuntu doesn't come with > integrated voice recognition at all, does it? > > Like Andre says, you've got a functional speech recognition system in > Vista, and if you want something better you can buy it. Same as the > graphic editor, web browser, backup program, CD burner, etc, etc. Basic > functionality which you can enhance if you want to. > > Seems perfectly reasonable to me. > > Steve >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista Voice recongition compared with Dragon Naturaly Speaking On Apr 9, 4:58 pm, "kirk jim" <1...@11.11> wrote:[color=blue] > Ok let me tell it to you this way. Dragon understands human speech better. > :-) Nothing is perfect....[/color] I just wish dragon was available for vista in this country! Unfortunately it isn't. So I'll just have to make do with this for now. But dictating into a non Microsoft application is enough to drive anyone potty. It's a good way to make sure everyone uses Word! But it's still a bit of a mess. I see UK and U.S. spelling mixed up. It also seems to be picking up a lot of Dutch words... In which case it's reading the text in the documents I am translating. That is not a good idea! Regards Martin |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dragon Naturally Speaking and Vista | Rob | Windows Vista | 1 | 09-29-2007 06:10 AM |
| Dragon Naturally Speaking and Vista | Ross M. Greenberg | Windows Vista | 23 | 05-13-2007 10:10 AM |
| Dragon Naturally Speaking, and Vista | Patrick Dickey | Windows Vista | 9 | 03-02-2007 05:00 AM |
| Dragon Naturally Speaking Office 2007 Voice Recognition Voice to T | Robert_from_Guam | Microsoft Office | 0 | 03-01-2007 11:15 PM |
| Tablet pc and Dragon Nat. Speaking | =?Utf-8?B?Y3JhaWdlcg==?= | Windows XP Tablet PC Newsgroup | 3 | 05-26-2004 10:14 PM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |