Apparently the people over on digg.com are a lot smarter than the
people in comp.os.linux.advocacy because they are on to Roy
Schestowitz and his games.

Read on to see how COLA's favorite SPAMMER gets his SPAM thrown right
back at him by people who can think for themselves instead of lapped
up by his loyal subjects in COLA.

[url]http://digg.com/linux_unix/Newly_leaked_Antitrust_Memos_Microsoft_Deliberately_Corrupts_Documentation[/url]

Just a few of the comments:

"Corrupts documentation? How can they corrupt something that wasn't
present in the first place? Oh yeah, because you used a
sensationalistic misleading title to resubmit an old story."

"Schestowitz... you love to be hated, don't you?"

" Newly-leaked Antitrust Memos: schestowitz Deliberately Submitting
Anti-MS Stories In
The Linux Topic To Make Them Popular."

[url]http://digg.com/apple/Leaked_Antitrust_Memo_Reveals_Microsoft_Systematically_Mimics_Apple_Macs#c5677986[/url]

" That's BS and you know it schestowitz. Maybe if you had done it once
or twice, it'd be excusable but doing it daily isn't. You purposefully
chose a single comment and took it out of context so you could push
your ignorant anti-MS campaign, you just happened to be caught with
your pants down by RedLion, who unluckily for you actually read it
whereas most people Digging this article won't read it and will simply
take your word, which can not be trusted."

"love how as soon as someone points out the FUD schestowitz is posting
he starts some tirade about how they're following him around and/or
hired by Microsoft, etc."

" and the schestowitz's FUD continues. this is the 3rd (or maybe 4th)
story that he submits with phrases taken out of context and misleading
titles."

And this pattern continues throughout most of Roy Schestowitz's posts
over on digg.com

It's amazing what happens when you take the king out of the safety and
comfort of his kingdom and place him in the real world with people who
can actually think for themselves unlike the drones and yes men that
inhabit comp.os.linux.advocacy.

[email]wylbur.horseman******.com[/email] wrote:

[snip]

Oh look, flatfish using another anonymous proxy. At least you are
choosing proxies running a secure / stable OS these days.

> Just a few of the comments:[color=blue]
>
> "Corrupts documentation? How can they corrupt something that wasn't
> present in the first place? Oh yeah, because you used a
> sensationalistic misleading title to resubmit an old story."
>
> "Schestowitz... you love to be hated, don't you?"
>
> " Newly-leaked Antitrust Memos: schestowitz Deliberately Submitting
> Anti-MS Stories In
> The Linux Topic To Make Them Popular."
>
>[/color]
[url]http://digg.com/apple/Leaked_Antitrust_Memo_Reveals_Microsoft_Systematically_Mimics_Apple_Macs#c5677986[/url][color=blue]
>
> " That's BS and you know it schestowitz. Maybe if you had done it once
> or twice, it'd be excusable but doing it daily isn't. You purposefully
> chose a single comment and took it out of context so you could push
> your ignorant anti-MS campaign, you just happened to be caught with
> your pants down by RedLion, who unluckily for you actually read it
> whereas most people Digging this article won't read it and will simply
> take your word, which can not be trusted."
>
> "love how as soon as someone points out the FUD schestowitz is posting
> he starts some tirade about how they're following him around and/or
> hired by Microsoft, etc."
>
> " and the schestowitz's FUD continues. this is the 3rd (or maybe 4th)
> story that he submits with phrases taken out of context and misleading
> titles."[/color]

Why do you feel the need to repost your comments on digg to so many Usenet
newsgroups ?

On Mar 16, 2:59 pm, Robert Parsonage <r...******.com> wrote:[color=blue]
> wylbur.horse...******.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Oh look, flatfish using another anonymous proxy. At least you are
> choosing proxies running a secure / stable OS these days.[/color]

Attack the messenger when you can't refute the message.
That's the first sign of a lamer.
Right, Culley?
Why are you hiding behind the Robert Parsonage name Roy?

Having trouble accepting the truth that when Roy Schestowitz takes his
SPAM show on the road, people object to his *seedy* tactics.

It must have something to do with the name "Roy", right
Culley,,,,,errrr Parsonage....?

BTW you have no idea how wrong you are and how right I am....

Apparently the people over on digg.com are a lot smarter than the
people in comp.os.linux.advocacy because they are on to Roy
Schestowitz and his games.

Read on to see how COLA's favorite SPAMMER gets his SPAM thrown right
back at him by people who can think for themselves instead of lapped
up by his loyal subjects in COLA.


[url]http://digg.com/linux_unix/Newly_leaked_Antitrust_Memos_Microsoft_Del[/url]...


Just a few of the comments:


"Corrupts documentation? How can they corrupt something that wasn't
present in the first place? Oh yeah, because you used a
sensationalistic misleading title to resubmit an old story."


"Schestowitz... you love to be hated, don't you?"


" Newly-leaked Antitrust Memos: schestowitz Deliberately Submitting
Anti-MS Stories In
The Linux Topic To Make Them Popular."


[url]http://digg.com/apple/Leaked_Antitrust_Memo_Reveals_Microsoft_Systema[/url]...


" That's BS and you know it schestowitz. Maybe if you had done it
once
or twice, it'd be excusable but doing it daily isn't. You
purposefully
chose a single comment and took it out of context so you could push
your ignorant anti-MS campaign, you just happened to be caught with
your pants down by RedLion, who unluckily for you actually read it
whereas most people Digging this article won't read it and will
simply
take your word, which can not be trusted."


"love how as soon as someone points out the FUD schestowitz is
posting
he starts some tirade about how they're following him around and/or
hired by Microsoft, etc."


" and the schestowitz's FUD continues. this is the 3rd (or maybe 4th)
story that he submits with phrases taken out of context and
misleading
titles."


And this pattern continues throughout most of Roy Schestowitz's posts
over on digg.com


It's amazing what happens when you take the king out of the safety
and
comfort of his kingdom and place him in the real world with people
who
can actually think for themselves unlike the drones and yes men that
inhabit comp.os.linux.advocacy.

On Mar 16, 2:54 pm, Geico Caveman <spammers-beg...@spam.invalid>
wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> > Just a few of the comments:[/color]
>[color=green]
> > "Corrupts documentation? How can they corrupt something that wasn't
> > present in the first place? Oh yeah, because you used a
> > sensationalistic misleading title to resubmit an old story."[/color]
>[color=green]
> > "Schestowitz... you love to be hated, don't you?"[/color]
>[color=green]
> > " Newly-leaked Antitrust Memos: schestowitz Deliberately Submitting
> > Anti-MS Stories In
> > The Linux Topic To Make Them Popular."[/color]
>
> [url]http://digg.com/apple/Leaked_Antitrust_Memo_Reveals_Microsoft_Systema[/url]...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>[color=green]
> > " That's BS and you know it schestowitz. Maybe if you had done it once
> > or twice, it'd be excusable but doing it daily isn't. You purposefully
> > chose a single comment and took it out of context so you could push
> > your ignorant anti-MS campaign, you just happened to be caught with
> > your pants down by RedLion, who unluckily for you actually read it
> > whereas most people Digging this article won't read it and will simply
> > take your word, which can not be trusted."[/color]
>[color=green]
> > "love how as soon as someone points out the FUD schestowitz is posting
> > he starts some tirade about how they're following him around and/or
> > hired by Microsoft, etc."[/color]
>[color=green]
> > " and the schestowitz's FUD continues. this is the 3rd (or maybe 4th)
> > story that he submits with phrases taken out of context and misleading
> > titles."[/color]
>
> Why do you feel the need to repost your comments on digg to so many Usenet
> newsgroups ?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -[/color]

Your tin-foil hat is on a little too tight.
I never realized that paranoia is contagious, but I suppose it's a
disease that comes a long as a by-product of Linux advocacy because it
seems so prevelant in the Linux groups.

Have some KoolAid!

[url]http://gopvixen.blogs.com/gop_vixen/images/kool_aid.jpg[/url]

On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:34:48 -0700, wylbur.horseman wrote:
[color=blue]
> Apparently the people over on digg.com are a lot smarter than the people
> in comp.os.linux.advocacy because they are on to Roy Schestowitz and his
> games.
>[/color]
So what? Beeg Deel.

(snip)

--
Rick

Rick wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:34:48 -0700, wylbur.horseman wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Apparently the people over on digg.com are a lot smarter than the people
>> in comp.os.linux.advocacy because they are on to Roy Schestowitz and his
>> games.
>>[/color]
> So what? Beeg Deel.
>
> (snip)
>[/color]

Actually... they are STUPID, windows advocates gone crazy. You see...
Microsoft is dieing a death of a thousand cuts... all self inflicted. While
all of us Linux users find it rather funny... the windows camp is
scrambling like mad... trying to blame, defame and defraud any of us that
they can as a distraction. Fact is, it ain't working... go track msft and
see the truth for yourself.

Mighty msft... used to be the gem of the financial market, is now being
treated for the junk that it is...





--


Jerry McBride

On Mar 16, 7:18 pm, "peterwn" <pete...@paradise.net.nz> wrote:[color=blue]
> On Mar 17, 11:39 am, Jerry McBride <mcbrid...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Yes, they were even smearing Roy with nasty obscene comments, even on
> irrevalant sites such as alt.locksmithing (Roy never posted there
> anywhere). I doubt that Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer intended this,
> but their troops did get out of control.[/color]

What are you talking about?
Nobody, at least none that I have seen, is smearing Roy over on
digg.com.

They are just on to his little tricks over there and point it out
instead of walking around like
drugged sheep which is what happens in COLA.

They are on to Roy seeding Google.
They are on to Roy's misleading subject lines.
They are on to Roy's ancient articles.
They are on to Roy's using blogs and bloggers as if they are gospel.
They are on to Roy uisng his own posts to back up other posts.
They are on to Roy's paranoia that everyone who posts a bury or such
is a paid for Microsoft person who is out to get him.
And so forth...

You people just don't get it.
Read the comments for yourself.


[color=blue]
> It must really annoy Bill Gates (who likes behaving like a pseudo
> statesman), Darl McBride, big biz, politicians (eg Orrin Hatch), the
> White House (eg George Bush), financiers (eg those who keep suppoting
> the likes of SCO) etc that there are communications channels which are
> gaining great respect but which they are powerless to 'control'
> whether by law, power, money, private detectives or just plain
> spamming, astroturfing, spin doctoring etc.[/color]

It must really annoy Linux / Open Source advocates, who advocate
freedom BTW, when other people don't see freedom
the same way that they do.
Henceforth things like the various boycott sites spring up.

You people are nothing but hypocrites.

> Read on to see how COLA's favorite SPAMMER gets his SPAM thrown right[color=blue]
> back at him by people who can think for themselves instead of lapped[/color]

Think for themselves???? How would you, a little weepy MS nose ring punk
know anything about the concept.

Good lord, you call Bill to get permission to bark.

Funny little coat tail dragger you are.

On Friday 16 March 2007 20:11 [email]wylbur.horseman******.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Mar 16, 2:59 pm, Robert Parsonage <r...******.com> wrote:[color=green]
>> wylbur.horse...******.com wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Oh look, flatfish using another anonymous proxy. At least you are
>> choosing proxies running a secure / stable OS these days.[/color]
>
> Attack the messenger when you can't refute the message.
> That's the first sign of a lamer.[/color]

Precisely!

- and that is *exactly* what *you*, under this nym and your many others,
have done, and continue to do, isn't it?
You go so far as to try to forge other people, in fact.

When you can't get your own way in one group, you slope off and post to
others, or add cross-postings. You have gone so far that you have (under
one of your nyms) been banned from Digg.

You are a pest, a wash-out, a loser, and a waste of time.
In short, you are a Big Girl's Blouse, aren't you?

On Friday 16 March 2007 20:23 [email]wylbur.horseman******.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
>> Why do you feel the need to repost your comments on digg to so many
>> Usenet newsgroups ?[/color][/color]

[color=blue]
> Your tin-foil hat is on a little too tight.[/color]

You silly silly boy
[color=blue]
> I never realized that paranoia is contagious, but I suppose it's a
> disease that comes a long as a by-product of Linux advocacy because it
> seems so prevelant in the Linux groups.[/color]

You speak of paranoia, but you seem to be unable to recognise your own.

You are now so paranoid about Linux, and in particular Roy, that you
desperately change nym daily, try to imitate Roy in your postings to try to
disparage him in the eyes of others, you flit from one newsgroup to the
next with your cross-postings, and even go so far as to post on Digg under
your nyms.

- You are paranoid, but call others paranoid

- You cross-post daily, but accuse others of spamming

- When you "attack the messenger", you accuse others of "attacking the
messenger"

- When people point out that all your nyms are from the same mentally sick
source, you don't deny it, you merely respond with messages like "and I
suppose that you can prove that?", posting under yet another of your nyms.

You are an idiot and a loser - a Big Girl's Blouse, in fact.

On Mar 17, 9:23 am, B Gruff <bbgr...******.co.uk> wrote:[color=blue]
> On Friday 16 March 2007 20:23 wylbur.horse...******.com wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> Why do you feel the need to repost your comments on digg to so many
> >> Usenet newsgroups ?[/color]
> > Your tin-foil hat is on a little too tight.[/color]
>
> You silly silly boy[/color]

I'm not a boy, silly or otherwise.
[color=blue][color=green]
> > I never realized that paranoia is contagious, but I suppose it's a
> > disease that comes a long as a by-product of Linux advocacy because it
> > seems so prevelant in the Linux groups.[/color]
>
> You speak of paranoia, but you seem to be unable to recognise your own.[/color]

I'm not paranoid.
You must be hearing those oices in your head again.

[color=blue]
> You are now so paranoid about Linux, and in particular Roy, that you
> desperately change nym daily, try to imitate Roy in your postings to try to
> disparage him in the eyes of others, you flit from one newsgroup to the
> next with your cross-postings, and even go so far as to post on Digg under
> your nyms.[/color]

I'm not doing anything of the sort.
Why don't you go and take a look at what people say about Roy on Digg.

Are your eyes so blinded that you can't see that they are on to his
tactics?

We are actually doing you fools in COLA a favor by exposing Roy
Schestowitz for what he really is
and that is a phony.
You see so called Linux advocacy.
Others with no axe to grind either way see a spammer trying to seed
google with his website URL and his own name.

So he wants to seed google?
Fine, we'll just help him a long a little.
And believe me, we have.

[color=blue]
> - You are paranoid, but call others paranoid[/color]

Paranoid no.
That's you people over in COLA that think every single person who
calls Roy on the carpet for his antics is flatfish.
You people are the paranoid ones.

Maybe someday you'll be able to offer some proof of your statements,
but for now you're just sucking wind and flapping your
lips like the typical junior Linux zealot that you are.

[color=blue]
> - You cross-post daily, but accuse others of spamming[/color]

Roy wants to seed Google with his misleading subject lines.
That works both ways, only we are telling the truth about him.
The digg users have Roy all figured out.
COLA is composed mostly of mental retards so you guys haven't caught
on yet.
We have high hopes for you though.
[color=blue]
> - When you "attack the messenger", you accuse others of "attacking the
> messenger"[/color]

Nobody is attacking the messenger, at least not from our side.
We are telling it like it is.

[color=blue]
> - When people point out that all your nyms are from the same mentally sick
> source, you don't deny it, you merely respond with messages like "and I
> suppose that you can prove that?", posting under yet another of your nyms.[/color]

Well can you?
You can't.
You point to a certain newsser, open proxy etc.
Yet some of your stalwarts do the same thing.

Roy Culley for example who has been caught nyming under Robert
Parsonage and from aioe.org I might add.
Doug Mental for another who posts from all over the world,

So you see, your so called proof means nothing except in your twisted
little mind and I will give you a hint, you are not even close.
Not even close.
[color=blue]
> You are an idiot and a loser - a Big Girl's Blouse, in fact.[/color]
You said that already.
Running out of material already?

You'll make a terrible Linux advocate because you can't even lie with
conviction.

On Saturday 17 March 2007 15:21 [email]wylbur.horseman******.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Mar 17, 9:23 am, B Gruff <bbgr...******.co.uk> wrote:[color=green]
>> On Friday 16 March 2007 20:23 wylbur.horse...******.com wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> >> Why do you feel the need to repost your comments on digg to so many
>> >> Usenet newsgroups ?
>> > Your tin-foil hat is on a little too tight.[/color]
>>
>> You silly silly boy[/color]
>
> I'm not a boy, silly or otherwise.[/color]

OK - silly girl, then
[color=blue][color=green]
>> - When people point out that all your nyms are from the same mentally
>> sick source, you don't deny it, you merely respond with messages like
>> "and I suppose that you can prove that?", posting under yet another of
>> your nyms.[/color]
>
> Well can you?[/color]

Yes
[color=blue]
> You can't.
> You point to a certain newsser, open proxy etc.[/color]

Where was that?

You really are a Big Girl's Blouse, aren't you.

On Mar 17, 10:39 am, B Gruff <bbgr...******.co.uk> wrote:[color=blue]
> On Saturday 17 March 2007 15:11 wylbur.horse...******.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>[color=green]
> > On Mar 17, 9:13 am, B Gruff <bbgr...******.co.uk> wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> On Friday 16 March 2007 20:11 wylbur.horse...******.com wrote:[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> > On Mar 16, 2:59 pm, Robert Parsonage <r...******.com> wrote:
> >> >> wylbur.horse...******.com wrote:[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> >> [snip][/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> >> Oh look, flatfish using another anonymous proxy. At least you are
> >> >> choosing proxies running a secure / stable OS these days.[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> > Attack the messenger when you can't refute the message.
> >> > That's the first sign of a lamer.[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> Precisely![/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> - and that is *exactly* what *you*, under this nym and your many others,
> >> have done, and continue to do, isn't it?
> >> You go so far as to try to forge other people, in fact.[/color][/color]
>[color=green]
> > And of course you have proof of those statements?[/color]
>
> Of course
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> When you can't get your own way in one group, you slope off and post to
> >> others, or add cross-postings. You have gone so far that you have (under
> >> one of your nyms) been banned from Digg.[/color][/color]
>[color=green]
> > I've never had a nym under digg.[/color]
>
> Wrong
>[color=green]
> > I have, and have always had, one name.[/color]
>
> Wrong
>[color=green]
> > More of your lies and untruths that you can't prove.[/color]
>
> Wrong
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> You are a pest, a wash-out, a loser, and a waste of time.
> >> In short, you are a Big Girl's Blouse, aren't you?[/color][/color]
>
> In short - you got it wrong.
>
> You really are a Big Girl's Blouse.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -[/color]


Thanks for proving my point!

BGruff, if you want to be a true Linux zealot instead of following Roy
Schestowitz around like Culley the lap dog, you have to
at least make plausible points.

All you do is flap your lips, which I'm sure Roy loves, but for the
rest of us, well, we are laughing at you.