No one but an idiot -- or perhaps a moron or an imbecile -- would NEED to
read an entire [long] thread in order to respond intelligently.

DSH

Lux et Veritas et Libertas
--------------------------------------------------

"Séimí mac Liam" <gwyddon@comcast.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:Xns98E4BB369873ESim@216.196.97.136...
[color=blue]
> "D. Spencer Hines" <poguemidden********.com> wrote in
> news:_C5Fh.210$O56.477@eagle.america.net:
>[color=green]
>> Then you should go back to previous posts and read as much material as
>> you need to -- in order to pick up the flow.
>>
>> Some of us have much better, trained memories than you do -- and
>> we're probably just smarter too.
>>
>> Chimpanzees might also have some problems with Top Posting...
>>
>> They are not in my Intended Audience.
>>
>> 'Nuff Said.
>>
>> DSH
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.204ea34d59ed4e6f9897f1@adfree.usenet.com...
>>[color=darkred]
>>> ...The 5 unread posts that I see in this thread may or may not
>>> contain enough information for me to know what the thread is about
>>> without proper flow and quoting/reply methods....[/color]
>>[/color]
> No one, and I mean no one, wants to review an entire thread to respond...[/color]

> No one but an idiot -- or perhaps a moron or an imbecile -- would NEED to[color=blue]
> read an entire [long] thread in order to respond intelligently.
>[/color]
And then there are those who notwithstanding their self declared super
intellect, have CDD (Civility Deficit Disorder)....


--
Barry Schnur

"BSchnur" <BSchnur@cox.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.204ec40f280ac7d698983e@msnews.microsoft.com...[color=blue][color=green]
>> No one but an idiot -- or perhaps a moron or an imbecile -- would NEED to
>> read an entire [long] thread in order to respond intelligently.
>>[/color]
> And then there are those who notwithstanding their self declared super
> intellect, have CDD (Civility Deficit Disorder)....[/color]

:-)


-Michael