Alias,

Jonathan never experiences troubles and conflicts while using Windows Vista.

Oddly, Alias and others that use those third party applications repeatedly
complains wrongly assigning blame toward Vista.

What could possibly be the reason why Alias is filled with complaints?

Who is sooooooooooooo wrong? Could it be Alias?

Review the below information for learning the inherent benefits provided by
Windows Vista.

Internet Explorer Dynamic Security Protection
Through a robust new architecture, Internet Explorer 7 offers multiple,
interrelated security features to help defend your PC against malware
(malicious code or unwanted software, including worms, viruses, adware, and
spyware). Among the browser's dynamic security protections are safeguards to
help make sure your personal information doesn’t fall into the hands of
fraudulent or deceptive websites.
Web browsers perform many functions. They must be open and flexible enough
to handle a mix of website activity while maintaining sufficiently high
security to prevent unwanted data access or application behaviors. Managing
this balance is a top priority for Microsoft.

Together with Windows Defender, the security built into Internet Explorer 7
provides more levels of defense than ever before.

Microsoft has two primary security objectives with Internet Explorer 7:
• Protection against malware
• Personal data safeguards

Protection against malware
Malware, short for malicious software, refers to software applications
designed to damage or disrupt a user’s system. The proliferation of malware
and its impact on security were some of the key driving forces behind the
design features of Internet Explorer 7. The new version has been improved to
reduce the potential for hackers to harm a system by limiting the amount of
damage that can be done if malware is able to find its way onto a user's
system. In addition, Internet Explorer 7 includes several technical features
designed to thwart hackers' efforts to trick you into entering personal data
when you should not. Core parts of the browser's architecture have also been
fortified to better defend against exploitation and improve the way the
browser handles data.

Protected Mode
Available only to people running Internet Explorer 7 in Windows Vista,
Protected Mode provides new levels of security and data protection for
Windows users. Designed to defend against "elevation of privilege" attacks,
Protected Mode provides the safety of a robust Internet browsing experience
while helping prevent hackers from taking over the system and installing
programs or deleting your information.
In Protected Mode, Internet Explorer 7 in Windows Vista cannot modify user
or system files and settings without user consent. Protected Mode requires
the user to confirm any activity that tries to put something on your machine
or start another program. By ensuring the user consents to these kinds of
actions, the likelihood of automated and/or unwanted software installation is
reduced. This feature also makes you aware of what a website is trying to do,
giving you a chance to stop it and take time to double check the
trustworthiness of the website.


--
Windows Vista
Become Part of The Legacy!



"Alias" wrote:
[color=blue]
> Jonathan Schwartz 2 wrote:[color=green]
> > Scott,
> >
> > Double NOTICE for Vista users.
> >
> > Do NOT *ever* install Firefox and Vista will never experience conflicts.
> >
> > The best method for preventing user induced troubles and conflicts while
> > using Windows Vista; keep that in-secure nightly-build crap as Firefox far
> > away from Vista.
> >
> > What you have factually accomplished; corrupted and polluted our worlds most
> > state-of-the-art OS, Vista.
> >
> > Question for you; would you install Yugo parts inside a new Rolls Royce and
> > then complain how the new Rolls Royce no longer properly functions?[/color]
>
> According to your "logic", one shouldn't install anything that isn't
> made by Microsoft? If so you are sooooooooooooo wrong!
>
> Alias
>[/color]

Jonathan Schwartz 2 wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias,
>
> Jonathan never experiences troubles and conflicts while using Windows Vista.[/color]

Can you answer the question on your own or can you only copy and paste
spin that doesn't address the question asked?

Alias

Alias spake thusly on 2/24/2007 5:14 AM:[color=blue]
> Scott wrote:[color=green]
>> ghstbstr spake thusly on 2/24/2007 1:03 AM:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>
>>>
>>> "Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message
>>> news:%23TOxV89VHHA.1180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>> Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions of
>>>> Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released [1].
>>>>
>>>> If you've got Firefox set to check for and install updates
>>>> automatically, you'll find it won't work properly due to a
>>>> Vista-related bug. It checks, downloads the update and notifies you
>>>> to install, but the installation will fail without notice [2].
>>>>
>> >
>> > The Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 update just downloaded and after[/color]
>> restate it[color=darkred]
>> > worked just fine for me without any problems.[/color]
>>
>> That it would, but did you happen to look at "About" under the help
>> menu to see what it says?[/color]
>
> Yes, it says 2.0.0.2 on three machines.[/color]

OK, I'll have to lay off the hallucinogens I guess.[color=blue]
>
> What I *don't* see is an update to Thunder Bird.[/color]

That's cuz there isn't one (yet).



--
Scott [url]http://angrykeyboarder.com[/url]

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.

Jonathan Schwartz 2 spake thusly on 2/24/2007 5:18 AM:[color=blue]
> Alias,
>
> Jonathan never experiences troubles and conflicts while using Windows Vista.
>
> [drivel snippage][/color]

Oooooooooooo Jonnie the troll!

--
Scott [url]http://angrykeyboarder.com[/url]

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.

Scott wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias spake thusly on 2/24/2007 5:14 AM:[color=green]
>> Scott wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> ghstbstr spake thusly on 2/24/2007 1:03 AM:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message
>>>> news:%23TOxV89VHHA.1180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions of
>>>>> Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> If you've got Firefox set to check for and install updates
>>>>> automatically, you'll find it won't work properly due to a
>>>>> Vista-related bug. It checks, downloads the update and notifies
>>>>> you to install, but the installation will fail without notice [2].
>>>>>
>>> >
>>> > The Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 update just downloaded and after
>>> restate it
>>> > worked just fine for me without any problems.
>>>
>>> That it would, but did you happen to look at "About" under the help
>>> menu to see what it says?[/color]
>>
>> Yes, it says 2.0.0.2 on three machines.[/color]
>
> OK, I'll have to lay off the hallucinogens I guess.[color=green]
>>
>> What I *don't* see is an update to Thunder Bird.[/color]
>
> That's cuz there isn't one (yet).
>
>
>[/color]

Then why did you write this?:

"Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions of
Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released [1]."

Alias

Alias spake thusly on 2/24/2007 5:32 AM:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> What I *don't* see is an update to Thunder Bird.[/color]
>>
>> That's cuz there isn't one (yet).
>>
>>
>>[/color]
>
> Then why did you write this?:
>
> "Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions of
> Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released [1]."[/color]

Because Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions
of Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released.

No Thunderbird. Just Firefox.

--
Scott [url]http://angrykeyboarder.com[/url]

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.

Scott wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias spake thusly on 2/24/2007 5:32 AM:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>> What I *don't* see is an update to Thunder Bird.
>>>
>>> That's cuz there isn't one (yet).
>>>
>>>
>>>[/color]
>>
>> Then why did you write this?:
>>
>> "Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions of
>> Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released [1]."[/color]
>
> Because Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions
> of Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released.
>
> No Thunderbird. Just Firefox.
>[/color]

Oh, now I get it. Sorry about that.

Alias

"Jonathan Schwartz 2" <JonathanSchwartz2@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:A6B7EDF5-B2A0-4030-B3A7-B19DE2E0AF16@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> Scott,
>
> Double NOTICE for Vista users.
>
> Do NOT *ever* install Firefox and Vista will never experience conflicts.
>
> The best method for preventing user induced troubles and conflicts while
> using Windows Vista; keep that in-secure nightly-build crap as Firefox far
> away from Vista.
>
> What you have factually accomplished; corrupted and polluted our worlds
> most
> state-of-the-art OS, Vista.
>
> Question for you; would you install Yugo parts inside a new Rolls Royce
> and
> then complain how the new Rolls Royce no longer properly functions?
> --
> Windows Vista
> Become Part of The Legacy![/color]


Geez, you just got promoted to Captain Boot Licker.
Do you get this worked up over a pair of vise grips?

Speaking of grip, GET one.
It's an OS, it's just a tool, that's all.

I don't know what scarier, your goose stepping DEVOTION to a piece of
software, or the idea that you might actually be having kids.

"Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.es> wrote in message
news:O82sgaBWHHA.1000@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Scott wrote:[color=green]
>> Alias spake thusly on 2/24/2007 5:32 AM:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>>> What I *don't* see is an update to Thunder Bird.
>>>>
>>>> That's cuz there isn't one (yet).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then why did you write this?:
>>>
>>> "Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions of
>>> Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released [1]."[/color]
>>
>> Because Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions
>> of Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released.
>>
>> No Thunderbird. Just Firefox.
>>[/color]
>
> Oh, now I get it. Sorry about that.
>
> Alias[/color]

--


Mike Hall
MS MVP Windows Shell/User
[url]http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/[/url]

"Jonathan Schwartz 2" <JonathanSchwartz2@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:4E9E7D93-5D43-486D-9404-C5C012EFF75A@microsoft.com...
[color=blue]
> Windows Vista
> Become Part of The Legacy!
>[/color]

I really like your tag...

Legacy:
A legacy system is an antiquated computer system or application program
which continues to be used because the user (typically an organization) does
not want to replace or redesign it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy

So, in essence you're saying:

"Windows Vista!! Become Part of the Old Crap!"

freakin priceless

As I said the Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 update had downloaded and after
restart it worked just fine for me without any problems. So YES it says
version 2.0.0.2 under Help then About Mozilla Firefox, and again as I said
it downloaded just fine for me without any problems.




"Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message
news:e%23wjqvAWHHA.996@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> ghstbstr spake thusly on 2/24/2007 1:03 AM:
>[color=green]
>>
>>
>> "Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message
>> news:%23TOxV89VHHA.1180@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=darkred]
>>> Mozilla just released security and stability updates to versions of
>>> Firefox. Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 and 1.5.0.10 have been released [1].
>>>
>>> If you've got Firefox set to check for and install updates
>>> automatically, you'll find it won't work properly due to a Vista-related
>>> bug. It checks, downloads the update and notifies you to install, but
>>> the installation will fail without notice [2].
>>>[/color]
> >
> > The Mozilla Firefox 2.0.0.2 update just downloaded and after restate it
> > worked just fine for me without any problems.[/color]
>
> That it would, but did you happen to look at "About" under the help menu
> to see what it says?
>
> Does it tell you it's "2.0.0.2" (assuming you were using 2.0.x
> previously). Mine still said 2.0.0.1 (till I fixed it, that is).
>
> I'd read about this bug before which is why I checked after the update.
> And as expected, the update failed (but you wouldn't know that - not right
> away anyway).
>
> --
> Scott [url]http://angrykeyboarder.com[/url]
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
> be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.[/color]

Formerly "Firewall," etc . . .

Scott wrote:[color=blue]
> Jonathan Schwartz 2 spake thusly on 2/24/2007 5:18 AM:[color=green]
>> Alias,
>>
>> Jonathan never experiences troubles and conflicts while using Windows
>> Vista.
> >
>> [drivel snippage][/color]
>
> Oooooooooooo Jonnie the troll!
>[/color]

Scott wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias spake thusly on 2/24/2007 5:14 AM:[/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
>> Yes, it says 2.0.0.2 on three machines.[/color]
>
> OK, I'll have to lay off the hallucinogens I guess.[/color]

Now, let's not get too hasty here . . .
[color=blue][color=green]
>>
>> What I *don't* see is an update to Thunder Bird.[/color]
>
> That's cuz there isn't one (yet).
>[/color]

Thanks for the information regarding the updates -- didn't realize they
were out.


--
Barry Schnur

Troll alert...

--
Barry Schnur