Is thee a way to remove worthless search window ?
The search engine is worthless, it give the file name location
with no full path, plus I hardly use it.

Many thanks

So what's useless?? Once you get a clue how it works, it's far more powerful
than XPs.

"TedF" <noreply@xxxxmsn.com> wrote in message
news:Og4LiZ6UHHA.4764@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Is thee a way to remove worthless search window ?
> The search engine is worthless, it give the file name location
> with no full path, plus I hardly use it.
>
> Many thanks[/color]

All I need is a simple file search engine which I have.
And I use Google from Favorites.


"Peter M" <phmcn********.com> wrote in message
news:u0zO$Z8UHHA.4568@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> So what's useless?? Once you get a clue how it works, it's far more
> powerful than XPs.
>
> "TedF" <noreply@xxxxmsn.com> wrote in message
> news:Og4LiZ6UHHA.4764@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=green]
>> Is thee a way to remove worthless search window ?
>> The search engine is worthless, it give the file name location
>> with no full path, plus I hardly use it.
>>
>> Many thanks[/color]
>[/color]

"Peter M" <phmcn********.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> So what's useless?? Once you get a clue how it works, it's far more
> powerful than XPs.[/color]

I also wonder about all of these people who want to make Vista "faster" by
stripping it of everything that makes it better than XP. For them, the
ideal machine is one that does no tasks at all! If it isn't doing anything,
it isn't spending any CPU cycles doing anything either. Then instead they
would whine about Microsoft designing a computer system that doesn't do
anything.

A lazy machine will always be faster than a hard working machine. But the
hard working machine will do much more for the user. For example, the
indexing service makes Vista's new awesome search features possible.
SuperFetch loads programs into RAM before you need them so that they load
much faster when you finally do access them. And so on. Moreover, Vista
does these tasks in the background on low priority when the machine is
otherwise idle anyway.

Ken

It is nothing but a clutter window that I don't need.


"Ken Gardner" <kesgardner@charter.net> wrote in message
news:2C64F16B-7DDD-41DF-A66B-63C969B97B35@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> "Peter M" <phmcn********.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> So what's useless?? Once you get a clue how it works, it's far more
>> powerful than XPs.[/color]
>
> I also wonder about all of these people who want to make Vista "faster" by
> stripping it of everything that makes it better than XP. For them, the
> ideal machine is one that does no tasks at all! If it isn't doing
> anything, it isn't spending any CPU cycles doing anything either. Then
> instead they would whine about Microsoft designing a computer system that
> doesn't do anything.
>
> A lazy machine will always be faster than a hard working machine. But the
> hard working machine will do much more for the user. For example, the
> indexing service makes Vista's new awesome search features possible.
> SuperFetch loads programs into RAM before you need them so that they load
> much faster when you finally do access them. And so on. Moreover, Vista
> does these tasks in the background on low priority when the machine is
> otherwise idle anyway.
>
> Ken[/color]

Just like million other programs that like to place them selves
in the Systray and every where else.

You must not have never seen novice computer users.


"Ken Gardner" <kesgardner@charter.net> wrote in message
news:2C64F16B-7DDD-41DF-A66B-63C969B97B35@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> "Peter M" <phmcn********.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> So what's useless?? Once you get a clue how it works, it's far more
>> powerful than XPs.[/color]
>
> I also wonder about all of these people who want to make Vista "faster" by
> stripping it of everything that makes it better than XP. For them, the
> ideal machine is one that does no tasks at all! If it isn't doing
> anything, it isn't spending any CPU cycles doing anything either. Then
> instead they would whine about Microsoft designing a computer system that
> doesn't do anything.
>
> A lazy machine will always be faster than a hard working machine. But the
> hard working machine will do much more for the user. For example, the
> indexing service makes Vista's new awesome search features possible.
> SuperFetch loads programs into RAM before you need them so that they load
> much faster when you finally do access them. And so on. Moreover, Vista
> does these tasks in the background on low priority when the machine is
> otherwise idle anyway.
>
> Ken[/color]

On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:47:50 -0800, "TedF" <noreply@xxxxmsn.com> spake
thusly:
[color=blue]
>It is nothing but a clutter window that I don't need.[/color]

It doesn't flash, change color, blink or make noise. It just sits
there in the corner. It doesn't obscure anything else in the window.

I've got an idea!

Ignore it.
--
Scott [url]http://angrykeyboarder.com[/url]

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Just right click the file and choose "Open File Location"

"TedF" <noreply@xxxxmsn.com> wrote in message
news:Og4LiZ6UHHA.4764@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Is thee a way to remove worthless search window ?
> The search engine is worthless, it give the file name location
> with no full path, plus I hardly use it.
>
> Many thanks[/color]

Thanks


"StevenW" <swolf67@nospam.cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:47137A67-B1B2-4936-99C9-F91AB82EAC9E@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> Just right click the file and choose "Open File Location"
>
> "TedF" <noreply@xxxxmsn.com> wrote in message
> news:Og4LiZ6UHHA.4764@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=green]
>> Is thee a way to remove worthless search window ?
>> The search engine is worthless, it give the file name location
>> with no full path, plus I hardly use it.
>>
>> Many thanks[/color]
>[/color]

If a bunch of them showed up, I like to see the oath of all
files right there.
It has always been like that.



"StevenW" <swolf67@nospam.cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:47137A67-B1B2-4936-99C9-F91AB82EAC9E@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> Just right click the file and choose "Open File Location"
>
> "TedF" <noreply@xxxxmsn.com> wrote in message
> news:Og4LiZ6UHHA.4764@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=green]
>> Is thee a way to remove worthless search window ?
>> The search engine is worthless, it give the file name location
>> with no full path, plus I hardly use it.
>>
>> Many thanks[/color]
>[/color]