Think again:

<http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researcher>

Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies, straw
man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but their
initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.

Alias

you're an idiot Linux troll
Nobody is asking you to post pro-Linux on a Windows group meant to HELP
Windows customers.

Kevin Mitnick thought he is invincible, until he was awarded with a prison
term for hacking US gov & semi-gov organizations.

What you do here is to annoy & aggravate Windows users with useless Linux
dribble

STAN STARINSKI wrote:[color=blue]
> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>
> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone, moreover
> by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers, self-professed
> wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots usually under 30 years
> old who're yet to find out that corporations are the reason their
> country is powerful and can design/produce great stuff, ands only a few
> Linux users are trully doing it for the sake of themselves.
> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
> philosophy "I am not like them".
>
> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK,
> but seriou sbusiness - not.[/color]

Hi Polly, want a cracker?

Alias

"Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hcsn15$n3g$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=blue]
> STAN STARINSKI wrote:[color=green]
>> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>>
>> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone, moreover
>> by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
>> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers, self-professed
>> wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots usually under 30 years
>> old who're yet to find out that corporations are the reason their country
>> is powerful and can design/produce great stuff, ands only a few Linux
>> users are trully doing it for the sake of themselves.
>> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
>> philosophy "I am not like them".
>>
>> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
>> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
>> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
>> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
>> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK, but
>> seriou sbusiness - not.[/color]
>
> Hi Polly, want a cracker?
>
> Alias[/color]

That's all you've got? Figures. What a loser.

Alias wrote:[color=blue]
> STAN STARINSKI wrote:[color=green]
>> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>>
>> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone,
>> moreover by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
>> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers, self-professed
>> wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots usually under 30 years
>> old who're yet to find out that corporations are the reason their
>> country is powerful and can design/produce great stuff, ands only a
>> few Linux users are trully doing it for the sake of themselves.
>> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
>> philosophy "I am not like them".
>>
>> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
>> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
>> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
>> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
>> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK,
>> but seriou sbusiness - not.[/color]
>
> Hi Polly, want a cracker?
>[/color]

So you're Polly and you have the crackers, huh?
Oops!!!...LOL!

The subject line is to describe the post.

Where I am typing now is the BODY of the post.

You put the body in the subject line. That isn't normal posting, also,
running sentences together is not normal. That means you must not be
normal. Please schedule an appointment with your psychiatrist and discuss
your anger and mental issues prior to posting again.

Thank you.


"Kevin John Panzke" <kevin.panzke******.com> wrote in message
news:a31a95b4-1a73-4f9e-86c2-7b78a1f3d7ac@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> Alias wrote: > Think again: > > <[url]http://www.computerworld.com/s/[/url]
> article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researcher> >[color=green]
>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,[/color]
> straw > man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
> their > initials are Frank and The Nymshifter. > > Alias[/color]

Mr. Arnold wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:[color=green]
>> Think again:
>>
>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researcher>
>>
>>
>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but their
>> initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>[/color]
>
>
> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>
> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>[/color]

Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.

Alias

Alias wrote:[color=blue]
> Mr. Arnold wrote:[color=green]
>> Alias wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Think again:
>>>
>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researcher>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>[/color]
>>
>>
>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>
>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>[/color]
>
> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>
> Alias[/color]

Neither is Vista or Windows 7 but how many are running as admin/root huh?
Oops!!!...LOL!

LOL you've just responded to yourself

Alias wrote:[color=blue]
> Mr. Arnold wrote:[color=green]
>> Alias wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Think again:
>>>
>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researcher>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>[/color]
>>
>>
>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>
>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>[/color]
>
> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>
> Alias[/color]

And you're talking out the side of your head as usual.

You show some kind if proof, instead of your lip service about how Linux
can protect itself.

Linux can no more protect itself from user actions than the man in the
Moon. And Linux doesn't need any help either by the user, since it's
swiss cheese too. Linux only saving grace is it's 'security by oblivion'
for it.

God didn't make Linux. Man made Linux And man is fallible.

Yeah Alias, you drop your linen and keep on grinnin about something made
by man.

<http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Hole-in-the-Linux-kernel-allows-root-access-850016.html>

Alias wrote:

SNIP
[color=blue]
>
> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run, moron.
>
> Alias[/color]

True, True.
Takes some tinkering.

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:[color=green]
>> Mr. Arnold wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> Think again:
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researcher>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>>
>>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>[/color]
>>
>> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
>> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>>
>> Alias[/color]
>
> Neither is Vista or Windows 7 but how many are running as admin/root huh?
> Oops!!!...LOL![/color]

You can't tell someone like Alias anything, as Alias buried its head in
the sand long ago about something made by man.

Mr. Arnold wrote:[color=blue]
>
> Alias wrote:[color=green]
>> Mr. Arnold wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> Think again:
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researcher>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>>
>>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>[/color]
>>
>> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
>> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>>
>> Alias[/color]
>
> And you're talking out the side of your head as usual.
>
> You show some kind if proof, instead of your lip service about how Linux
> can protect itself.
>
> Linux can no more protect itself from user actions than the man in the
> Moon. And Linux doesn't need any help either by the user, since it's
> swiss cheese too. Linux only saving grace is it's 'security by oblivion'
> for it.
>
> God didn't make Linux. Man made Linux And man is fallible.
>
> Yeah Alias, you drop your linen and keep on grinnin about something made
> by man.
>
> <http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Hole-in-the-Linux-kernel-allows-root-access-850016.html>
>
>
>[/color]

And how, pray tell, do you plan to run someone else's computer at root
level without being in front of the computer?

Alias

Mr. Arnold wrote:[color=blue]
> Frank wrote:[color=green]
>> Alias wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Mr. Arnold wrote:
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>> Think again:
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9140323/Microsoft_neutered_UAC_in_Windows_7_says_researcher>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now the two *neutered* windroids will reply with their usual lies,
>>>>> straw man arguments and insults. I won't mention their names but
>>>>> their initials are Frank and The Nymshifter.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You best be worried about Linux's linen.
>>>>
>>>> <http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/127202/2/>
>>>
>>> Got another biased and ill informed blog that isn't two years old?
>>> Ubuntu is set up by default not to run as root, moron.
>>>
>>> Alias[/color]
>>
>> Neither is Vista or Windows 7 but how many are running as admin/root huh?
>> Oops!!!...LOL![/color]
>
> You can't tell someone like Alias anything, as Alias buried its head in
> the sand long ago about something made by man.[/color]

Nothing is fallible, true, but Linux is far more secure than Windows.
Full stop.

Alias

Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=blue]
>
>
> "Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hcsn15$n3g$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=green]
>> STAN STARINSKI wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Ever wondered why so little effort is invested into hacking Linux?
>>>
>>> Because its small customer base is worthless by numbers alone,
>>> moreover by the importance of those customers it's EVEN SMALLER.
>>> What I mean is its "customers" are nonpaying Teenagers,
>>> self-professed wacko geeks, anti-"greedy corporations" zealots
>>> usually under 30 years old who're yet to find out that corporations
>>> are the reason their country is powerful and can design/produce great
>>> stuff, ands only a few Linux users are trully doing it for the sake
>>> of themselves.
>>> The rest are just trying to wipe Microsoft's nose with a 16-year old
>>> philosophy "I am not like them".
>>>
>>> Youre'a bona fide Liar.
>>> You make money by paid/long-term support of Ubuntu, courtesy of Mike
>>> Shuttleworth, a South African entrpreneur.
>>> P.S. if I use Linux it would be NovellSUSE & I'd be *amned if I run a
>>> critically important application on it, for a Netbook it might be OK,
>>> but seriou sbusiness - not.[/color]
>>
>> Hi Polly, want a cracker?
>>
>> Alias[/color]
>
> That's all you've got? Figures. What a loser.
>
>[/color]

You're the one acting like a parrot. I am merely pointing it out. Do you
*ever* have an original thought?

Alias