|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| All Linux distros SUCK The reality is that all Linux distributions suck. No matter which distro you choose, if you use it for enough different tasks, you're *going* to tickle some bug in some library, or some quirk in some tool, or some idiosyncrasy, or missing package, or weird config syntax, or oddball package management. stuff. If you run into LDAP issues on one distro, and move to another one to get around that issue, you'll inevitably run into a broken PAM module or something. If you have compilation issues on one platform because of GCC, and switch distros, you'll have compile issues because of autoconf. If you leave one distro to get an upgraded Apache version in another, you'll inevitably find that *that* distro has an outdated Python install. Of course, most fanboys don't really understand this, because they run, like, 3 towers in their basement with a dynamic dns setup, and a firewall that isolates the other two towers on their own network segments, and then brag to their buddies how that have a "production" network with a DMZ in their house. They've never had to do what you'd call "managing servers". They've never had to automate the installation of a farm of machines that authenticate via cross-domain authentication schemes, or had to use a protocol analyzer to figure out why *one* guy in a thousand can't reach their web site, or set up a print server that supports 10 versions *each* of Windows, Mac, Linux, and Solaris, to any of about 60 different printers of varying makes and models, or support teams of developers requiring 3 versions of perl, 6 versions of gcc, 4 versions of Java, 3 versions of Python, two versions of PHP, InnoDB *and* MyISAM tables in MySQL, in addition to PostgreSQL (and they've never had to back all this stuff up). If you think there's a distro that does everything under the sun flawlessly, you should not let other people know that you think that. Further, if you've never used a distro, but are going to bash it, don't let people know you've never used the distro. Better yet, don't bash stuff you haven't used. Shut up and learn from people who *have* used it. |
| |||
| Re: All Linux distros SUCK Kevin SmallBone wrote: [color=blue] > > If you think there's a distro that does everything under the sun > flawlessly, you should not let other people know that you think that. > Further, if you've never used a distro, but are going to bash it, don't > let people know you've never used the distro. Better yet, don't bash > stuff you haven't used. Shut up and learn from people who *have* used it.[/color] So, are you going to follow the advice of what you copied and pasted, Parrot Boy? Alias[color=blue] > >[/color] |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sampling Distros: LiveCD -> memory stick | Thomas P Brisco | Linux | 8 | 03-27-2009 03:39 PM |
| can apps be used between distros? | les | Linux | 4 | 03-27-2009 02:48 PM |
| can apps be used between distros? | les | Linux | 4 | 05-07-2008 11:50 AM |
| Security Privacy, Big Brother, Linux Distros. | Tyler | Linux | 3 | 12-22-2007 09:10 AM |
| Looking for distros suitable for low-memory/low processor situations. | -Lost | Linux | 15 | 09-10-2007 01:40 PM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |