INLINE:


"Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hbhnra$msa$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=blue]
> and you can download the new Ubuntu, Karmic Koala, Ubuntu 9.10 from
> [url]http://www.ubuntu.com/[/url] and it's free and comes with access to thousands of
> free programs!
>
> What you can do with Ubuntu:[/color]


Not much.

[color=blue]
> Email[/color]


MS-DOS can email.

[color=blue]
> Surf the web[/color]


MS-DOS can surf the web.

[color=blue]
> Burn CDs.[/color]


With junk quality burning software.

[color=blue]
> Rip CDs.[/color]


Mostly rip-off copyrighted CDs is more like it.

[color=blue]
> Listen to music using the computer.[/color]


Windows 95 can do that, Windows 3.1 for that matter.

[color=blue]
> Watch vidoes/DVDs.[/color]


Ha! *Maybe* watch a movie.

[color=blue]
> Scan and print.[/color]


If the printer drivers are compiled into the kernel. Even then you probably
will have to give up some of the printers features and functionality.

[color=blue]
> Spreadsheets.[/color]


In second rate spreadsheet programs.

[color=blue]
> Presentations[/color]


In second rate presentation programs.

[color=blue]
> Newsgroups.[/color]


From the quality of your posts this is a dubious boast on your part.

[color=blue]
> HTML editing.[/color]


Notepad can do that.

[color=blue]
> Games like Chess, Tetris, all kinds of solitaire, etc.[/color]


Cheesy flat games that smack of the Windows 3.1 days. Let's face it, if you
want to game, get Windows or an XBox.

[color=blue]
> Make videos.[/color]


Sure sure .. again with second rate stuff .. good luck.

[color=blue]
> Download photos from a camera and organize them.[/color]


Again, good luck. 'Hope the camera drivers are there.

[color=blue]
> Translations from one language to another.[/color]


Just visit Google dot com for that. A computer running Windows 95 can
achieve the same.

[color=blue]
> Use a dictionary program that's much faster than using a book[/color]


See immediately above.

[color=blue]
> Learn how to touch type with a touch type learning program.[/color]


You're kidding, right?

[color=blue]
> Edit images.[/color]


Let me guess, Gimp? It's almost pathetic how outdated it is. However Gimp
the one and only image editing software generally available to the Linux
crowd.

[color=blue]
> Send and receive a fax.[/color]


Windows 95 can do that.

[color=blue]
> Take screenshots.[/color]


You mean Linux implements the Prt Scr key? So did Windows 95.

[color=blue]
> Create .PDF files.[/color]


Up-to-date .PDF files?? Maybe.

[color=blue]
> Create and use a data base.[/color]


MySQL anyone? Sorry, but Microsoft database software is superior.

[color=blue]
> Instant messaging with over 10 different programs in one including
> Windows Live Messenger.
> IRC.
> Bluetooth.[/color]


Linux only implements messaging so you can first ask each other how to get
things to work with Linux and then cry on each others shoulders when you
find you can't.

[color=blue]
> and much more![/color]


Yes, typical distros of Linux come with thousands of half-baked alpha-ware
quality junk that passes as "software".

[color=blue]
> What you can't do with Ubuntu:
>
> Worry about:[/color]


Bull. There's lots to worry about with UNIX and UNIX clones such as Linux.

[color=blue]
> WPA and WGA raising their ugly heads,[/color]


Not likely if you don't steal your software.

[color=blue]
> DRM,[/color]


or steal your music. Even then it is easily circumvented by not using DRM'd
music.

[color=blue]
> Viruses,[/color]


Don't be so sure.

[color=blue]
> Root kits,[/color]


UNIX and UNIX clones such as Linux are the origin of the term "rooted" LOL

[color=blue]
> Spyware,[/color]


No?

[color=blue]
> and
> Malware.[/color]


Sure sure. Linux is riddled with vulnerabilities. The errata List for RedHat
Linux (a premier distro) is as long as my arm and then some.

[color=blue]
> The reasons that Ubuntu is more secure than Windows are twofold:[/color]


The only security in Linux is its obscurity.

[color=blue]
> 1. When *anything* in Ubuntu needs updating or patching, it all comes
> from the same source and a little orange star appears when any updates
> or patches are available. It's a known fact that anti virus apps and[/color]


Linux distros will often have lousy patch systems. Ubuntu's is probably not
all that great seeing as they've never come up with a good one for any UNIX
or UNIX clone such as Linux.

[color=blue]
> anti malware apps can only deal with nasties that are known, not the new
> ones. Hence, it is very important to be updated or patched and not just
> the operating system but everything that is installed on the computer.
> Windows has no central updating source and the user has to be checking
> constantly for updates to their programs or face the possibility of
> being compromised.[/color]


With ten zillion different distros out there and countless Linux libraries,
there's no "central updating source" in Linux. Whereas Microsoft does have a
centralized updating system for its software.

[color=blue]
> 2. In Ubuntu, when anything wants to install, you have to key in your[/color]


Bull.

[color=blue]
> password. With Windows, you have to click on "OK" or nothing at all as
> is evidenced by drive by malware. Unlike Windows, the Linux kernel is
> not intertwined with a browser like Windows is with Internet Explorer
> and the kernel is kept away and protected from the user account.[/color]


Bull, because it is Windows 7 that has the modern security system, not
Linux. With Windows 7's version of UAC, many if not all privileges problems
are completely solved. With Linux's ancient system, it's the old problematic
"either / or" security system .. where one is either root or user.

[color=blue]
> Alias[/color]


Please don't cry because Windows 7 is better (as in way better). OK Alias?
Get yourself a kleenex tissue.


Saucy

Saucy wrote:[color=blue]
> INLINE:[/color]

You missed my last rebuttal to these lies? I guess so because you didn't
reply.

Snip lies and drivel.

Alias

No need to snip anything. She was correct with each and every response.
You just don't like the responses.

Too bad.



INLINE:


"Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hbhnra$msa$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=blue]
> and you can download the new Ubuntu, Karmic Koala, Ubuntu 9.10 from
> [url]http://www.ubuntu.com/[/url] and it's free and comes with access to thousands of
> free programs!
>
> What you can do with Ubuntu:[/color]


Not much.

[color=blue]
> Email[/color]


MS-DOS can email.

[color=blue]
> Surf the web[/color]


MS-DOS can surf the web.

[color=blue]
> Burn CDs.[/color]


With junk quality burning software.

[color=blue]
> Rip CDs.[/color]


Mostly rip-off copyrighted CDs is more like it.

[color=blue]
> Listen to music using the computer.[/color]


Windows 95 can do that, Windows 3.1 for that matter.

[color=blue]
> Watch vidoes/DVDs.[/color]


Ha! *Maybe* watch a movie.

[color=blue]
> Scan and print.[/color]


If the printer drivers are compiled into the kernel. Even then you probably
will have to give up some of the printers features and functionality.

[color=blue]
> Spreadsheets.[/color]


In second rate spreadsheet programs.

[color=blue]
> Presentations[/color]


In second rate presentation programs.

[color=blue]
> Newsgroups.[/color]


From the quality of your posts this is a dubious boast on your part.

[color=blue]
> HTML editing.[/color]


Notepad can do that.

[color=blue]
> Games like Chess, Tetris, all kinds of solitaire, etc.[/color]


Cheesy flat games that smack of the Windows 3.1 days. Let's face it, if you
want to game, get Windows or an XBox.

[color=blue]
> Make videos.[/color]


Sure sure .. again with second rate stuff .. good luck.

[color=blue]
> Download photos from a camera and organize them.[/color]


Again, good luck. 'Hope the camera drivers are there.

[color=blue]
> Translations from one language to another.[/color]


Just visit Google dot com for that. A computer running Windows 95 can
achieve the same.

[color=blue]
> Use a dictionary program that's much faster than using a book[/color]


See immediately above.

[color=blue]
> Learn how to touch type with a touch type learning program.[/color]


You're kidding, right?

[color=blue]
> Edit images.[/color]


Let me guess, Gimp? It's almost pathetic how outdated it is. However Gimp
the one and only image editing software generally available to the Linux
crowd.

[color=blue]
> Send and receive a fax.[/color]


Windows 95 can do that.

[color=blue]
> Take screenshots.[/color]


You mean Linux implements the Prt Scr key? So did Windows 95.

[color=blue]
> Create .PDF files.[/color]


Up-to-date .PDF files?? Maybe.

[color=blue]
> Create and use a data base.[/color]


MySQL anyone? Sorry, but Microsoft database software is superior.

[color=blue]
> Instant messaging with over 10 different programs in one including
> Windows Live Messenger.
> IRC.
> Bluetooth.[/color]


Linux only implements messaging so you can first ask each other how to get
things to work with Linux and then cry on each others shoulders when you
find you can't.

[color=blue]
> and much more![/color]


Yes, typical distros of Linux come with thousands of half-baked alpha-ware
quality junk that passes as "software".

[color=blue]
> What you can't do with Ubuntu:
>
> Worry about:[/color]


Bull. There's lots to worry about with UNIX and UNIX clones such as Linux.

[color=blue]
> WPA and WGA raising their ugly heads,[/color]


Not likely if you don't steal your software.

[color=blue]
> DRM,[/color]


or steal your music. Even then it is easily circumvented by not using DRM'd
music.

[color=blue]
> Viruses,[/color]


Don't be so sure.

[color=blue]
> Root kits,[/color]


UNIX and UNIX clones such as Linux are the origin of the term "rooted" LOL

[color=blue]
> Spyware,[/color]


No?

[color=blue]
> and
> Malware.[/color]


Sure sure. Linux is riddled with vulnerabilities. The errata List for RedHat
Linux (a premier distro) is as long as my arm and then some.

[color=blue]
> The reasons that Ubuntu is more secure than Windows are twofold:[/color]


The only security in Linux is its obscurity.

[color=blue]
> 1. When *anything* in Ubuntu needs updating or patching, it all comes
> from the same source and a little orange star appears when any updates
> or patches are available. It's a known fact that anti virus apps and[/color]


Linux distros will often have lousy patch systems. Ubuntu's is probably not
all that great seeing as they've never come up with a good one for any UNIX
or UNIX clone such as Linux.

[color=blue]
> anti malware apps can only deal with nasties that are known, not the new
> ones. Hence, it is very important to be updated or patched and not just
> the operating system but everything that is installed on the computer.
> Windows has no central updating source and the user has to be checking
> constantly for updates to their programs or face the possibility of
> being compromised.[/color]


With ten zillion different distros out there and countless Linux libraries,
there's no "central updating source" in Linux. Whereas Microsoft does have a
centralized updating system for its software.

[color=blue]
> 2. In Ubuntu, when anything wants to install, you have to key in your[/color]


Bull.

[color=blue]
> password. With Windows, you have to click on "OK" or nothing at all as
> is evidenced by drive by malware. Unlike Windows, the Linux kernel is
> not intertwined with a browser like Windows is with Internet Explorer
> and the kernel is kept away and protected from the user account.[/color]


Bull, because it is Windows 7 that has the modern security system, not
Linux. With Windows 7's version of UAC, many if not all privileges problems
are completely solved. With Linux's ancient system, it's the old problematic
"either / or" security system .. where one is either root or user.

[color=blue]
> Alias[/color]


Please don't cry because Windows 7 is better (as in way better). OK Alias?
Get yourself a kleenex tissue.


Saucy

Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=blue]
> No need to snip anything. She was correct with each and every response.
> You just don't like the responses.[/color]

The post has already been soundly refuted.
[color=blue]
> Too bad.[/color]

For you because you meet the definition of insanity.

"Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
different results."

- Einstein

Alias

Snip lies, FUD and drivel.

"Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hc1jil$i9c$10@news.eternal-september.org...[color=blue]
> Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=green]
>> No need to snip anything. She was correct with each and every response.
>> You just don't like the responses.[/color]
>
> The post has already been soundly refuted.[/color]

No it wasn't. Your opinion is rejected by most as lies. Live with it.[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>> Too bad.[/color]
>
> For you because you meet the definition of insanity.[/color]

Oops. Sorry. Not in a million years.[color=blue]
>
> "Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
> different results."
>
> - Einstein
>
> Alias (who is NO Einstein)[/color]

So what do you make of your drivel that you post over and over and over and
over and over again? Seems like that definition applies to you.

Live with it.

I'm a 'he'.

I just copied and pasted a previous reply. Same sheet, same reply.

Saucy


"Kevin SmallBone" <ksb@kshort.org> wrote in message
news:hc1jcd$mlg$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=blue]
> No need to snip anything. She was correct with each and every response.
> You just don't like the responses.
>
> Too bad.
>
>
>
> INLINE:
>
>
> "Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hbhnra$msa$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=green]
>> and you can download the new Ubuntu, Karmic Koala, Ubuntu 9.10 from
>> [url]http://www.ubuntu.com/[/url] and it's free and comes with access to thousands
>> of free programs!
>>
>> What you can do with Ubuntu:[/color]
>
>
> Not much.
>
>[color=green]
>> Email[/color]
>
>
> MS-DOS can email.
>
>[color=green]
>> Surf the web[/color]
>
>
> MS-DOS can surf the web.
>
>[color=green]
>> Burn CDs.[/color]
>
>
> With junk quality burning software.
>
>[color=green]
>> Rip CDs.[/color]
>
>
> Mostly rip-off copyrighted CDs is more like it.
>
>[color=green]
>> Listen to music using the computer.[/color]
>
>
> Windows 95 can do that, Windows 3.1 for that matter.
>
>[color=green]
>> Watch vidoes/DVDs.[/color]
>
>
> Ha! *Maybe* watch a movie.
>
>[color=green]
>> Scan and print.[/color]
>
>
> If the printer drivers are compiled into the kernel. Even then you
> probably
> will have to give up some of the printers features and functionality.
>
>[color=green]
>> Spreadsheets.[/color]
>
>
> In second rate spreadsheet programs.
>
>[color=green]
>> Presentations[/color]
>
>
> In second rate presentation programs.
>
>[color=green]
>> Newsgroups.[/color]
>
>
> From the quality of your posts this is a dubious boast on your part.
>
>[color=green]
>> HTML editing.[/color]
>
>
> Notepad can do that.
>
>[color=green]
>> Games like Chess, Tetris, all kinds of solitaire, etc.[/color]
>
>
> Cheesy flat games that smack of the Windows 3.1 days. Let's face it, if
> you
> want to game, get Windows or an XBox.
>
>[color=green]
>> Make videos.[/color]
>
>
> Sure sure .. again with second rate stuff .. good luck.
>
>[color=green]
>> Download photos from a camera and organize them.[/color]
>
>
> Again, good luck. 'Hope the camera drivers are there.
>
>[color=green]
>> Translations from one language to another.[/color]
>
>
> Just visit Google dot com for that. A computer running Windows 95 can
> achieve the same.
>
>[color=green]
>> Use a dictionary program that's much faster than using a book[/color]
>
>
> See immediately above.
>
>[color=green]
>> Learn how to touch type with a touch type learning program.[/color]
>
>
> You're kidding, right?
>
>[color=green]
>> Edit images.[/color]
>
>
> Let me guess, Gimp? It's almost pathetic how outdated it is. However Gimp
> the one and only image editing software generally available to the Linux
> crowd.
>
>[color=green]
>> Send and receive a fax.[/color]
>
>
> Windows 95 can do that.
>
>[color=green]
>> Take screenshots.[/color]
>
>
> You mean Linux implements the Prt Scr key? So did Windows 95.
>
>[color=green]
>> Create .PDF files.[/color]
>
>
> Up-to-date .PDF files?? Maybe.
>
>[color=green]
>> Create and use a data base.[/color]
>
>
> MySQL anyone? Sorry, but Microsoft database software is superior.
>
>[color=green]
>> Instant messaging with over 10 different programs in one including
>> Windows Live Messenger.
>> IRC.
>> Bluetooth.[/color]
>
>
> Linux only implements messaging so you can first ask each other how to get
> things to work with Linux and then cry on each others shoulders when you
> find you can't.
>
>[color=green]
>> and much more![/color]
>
>
> Yes, typical distros of Linux come with thousands of half-baked alpha-ware
> quality junk that passes as "software".
>
>[color=green]
>> What you can't do with Ubuntu:
>>
>> Worry about:[/color]
>
>
> Bull. There's lots to worry about with UNIX and UNIX clones such as Linux.
>
>[color=green]
>> WPA and WGA raising their ugly heads,[/color]
>
>
> Not likely if you don't steal your software.
>
>[color=green]
>> DRM,[/color]
>
>
> or steal your music. Even then it is easily circumvented by not using
> DRM'd
> music.
>
>[color=green]
>> Viruses,[/color]
>
>
> Don't be so sure.
>
>[color=green]
>> Root kits,[/color]
>
>
> UNIX and UNIX clones such as Linux are the origin of the term "rooted"
> LOL
>
>[color=green]
>> Spyware,[/color]
>
>
> No?
>
>[color=green]
>> and
>> Malware.[/color]
>
>
> Sure sure. Linux is riddled with vulnerabilities. The errata List for
> RedHat
> Linux (a premier distro) is as long as my arm and then some.
>
>[color=green]
>> The reasons that Ubuntu is more secure than Windows are twofold:[/color]
>
>
> The only security in Linux is its obscurity.
>
>[color=green]
>> 1. When *anything* in Ubuntu needs updating or patching, it all comes
>> from the same source and a little orange star appears when any updates
>> or patches are available. It's a known fact that anti virus apps and[/color]
>
>
> Linux distros will often have lousy patch systems. Ubuntu's is probably
> not
> all that great seeing as they've never come up with a good one for any
> UNIX
> or UNIX clone such as Linux.
>
>[color=green]
>> anti malware apps can only deal with nasties that are known, not the new
>> ones. Hence, it is very important to be updated or patched and not just
>> the operating system but everything that is installed on the computer.
>> Windows has no central updating source and the user has to be checking
>> constantly for updates to their programs or face the possibility of
>> being compromised.[/color]
>
>
> With ten zillion different distros out there and countless Linux
> libraries,
> there's no "central updating source" in Linux. Whereas Microsoft does have
> a
> centralized updating system for its software.
>
>[color=green]
>> 2. In Ubuntu, when anything wants to install, you have to key in your[/color]
>
>
> Bull.
>
>[color=green]
>> password. With Windows, you have to click on "OK" or nothing at all as
>> is evidenced by drive by malware. Unlike Windows, the Linux kernel is
>> not intertwined with a browser like Windows is with Internet Explorer
>> and the kernel is kept away and protected from the user account.[/color]
>
>
> Bull, because it is Windows 7 that has the modern security system, not
> Linux. With Windows 7's version of UAC, many if not all privileges
> problems
> are completely solved. With Linux's ancient system, it's the old
> problematic
> "either / or" security system .. where one is either root or user.
>
>[color=green]
>> Alias[/color]
>
>
> Please don't cry because Windows 7 is better (as in way better). OK Alias?
> Get yourself a kleenex tissue.
>
>
> Saucy
>
>
>[/color]

Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=blue]
>
>
> "Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hc1jil$i9c$10@news.eternal-september.org...[color=green]
>> Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> No need to snip anything. She was correct with each and every
>>> response. You just don't like the responses.[/color]
>>
>> The post has already been soundly refuted.[/color]
>
> No it wasn't. Your opinion is rejected by most as lies. Live with it.[color=green]
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Too bad.[/color]
>>
>> For you because you meet the definition of insanity.[/color]
>
> Oops. Sorry. Not in a million years.[color=green]
>>
>> "Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
>> different results."
>>
>> - Einstein
>>
>> Alias (who is NO Einstein)[/color]
>
> So what do you make of your drivel that you post over and over and over
> and over and over again? Seems like that definition applies to you.
>
> Live with it.
>
>
>[/color]

What I post is true. You don't post anything that's true.

Alias

"Saucy" <saucylemon@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
news:uNMBxdXVKHA.4592@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
>
> I'm a 'he'.
>
> I just copied and pasted a previous reply. Same sheet, same reply.
>
> Saucy[/color]

Oops. Sorry. :-)

Sorry. You post means nothing as usual.


Oops.



"Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
news:eo8tQgXVKHA.5584@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
>
>
> "Kevin SmallBone" <ksb@kshort.org> wrote in message
> news:hc1jcd$mlg$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=green]
>> No need to snip anything. She was correct with each and every response.
>> You just don't like the responses.[/color]
>
>
> Mi nombre está alias y vivo en España.
>
> No mucho sucede alrededor aquí porque es uno de los países más atrasados
> de Europa.
>
> Todavía tenemos no tenemos nuestra propia agua potable con todo así que
> tenemos que comprar botellas, si no puede ser que bebamos nuestro propio
> piss.
>
> ¡Es tan repugnante en este país, de que si usted no se lava las manos
> después de hacer cualquier cosa y todo, usted es probable coger una
> enfermedad o una diarrea repugnante por lo menos!
>
> Soy así que los pobres que tengo que invertir a usar un viejo sistema
> operativo ****ty llamado ' Ubuntu' , que es como este país, Tercer mundo y
> tercer grado.
>
> ¡Si usted lo transfiere nunca (que lo haga no mucha gente, aunque está
> libre), heche una ojeada el cubo de giro y el papel pintado, es la mejor
> cosa en él!
>
> Me siento en mi asno que pasa todo el dia mi tiempo en los groupes
> informativos de Microsoft Vista.
>
> Diciendo eso, todavía encuentro hora de ganar 9.795 euro' semana del S.A.
>
> Entre estar en los groupes informativos de Microsoft Vista y la ganancia
> de 9.795 euro' semana del S.A., encuentro hora de masturbate por todas
> partes mi interfaz.
>
> Ésa es toda mi vida triste consiste en.
>
> Roca ' n' Rodillo
>
> Alias
>
>
>[/color]

"Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
news:hc1nk4$o64$2@news.eternal-september.org...[color=blue]
> Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=green]
>> Sorry. You post means nothing as usual.
>>
>>
>> Oops.[/color]
>
> It wasn't my post. My Spanish is much better than the impostor's is.
>
> Alias[color=green]
>>[/color][/color]
So you are just like that retard Kevin, claiming that there are imposter's
here? I suggest looking under your bed. You could have imposters there
also! HA HA HA HA

Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=blue]
>
>
> "Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hc1nk4$o64$2@news.eternal-september.org...[color=green]
>> Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Sorry. You post means nothing as usual.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oops.[/color]
>>
>> It wasn't my post. My Spanish is much better than the impostor's is.
>>
>> Alias[color=darkred]
>>>[/color][/color]
> So you are just like that retard Kevin, claiming that there are
> imposter's here? I suggest looking under your bed. You could have
> imposters there also! HA HA HA HA
>
>[/color]

Look at the headers, retard. I am not in the UK and I don't use Windows
Mail. I thought you were into computers ... I guess not.

Alias

Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=blue]
>
>
> "Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hc1uo2$mhl$2@news.eternal-september.org...[color=green]
>> Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=darkred]
>>>
>>>
>>> "Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:hc1nk4$o64$2@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Kevin SmallBone wrote:
>>>>> Sorry. You post means nothing as usual.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops.
>>>>
>>>> It wasn't my post. My Spanish is much better than the impostor's is.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>> So you are just like that retard Kevin, claiming that there are
>>> imposter's here? I suggest looking under your bed. You could have
>>> imposters there also! HA HA HA HA
>>>
>>>[/color]
>>
>> Look at the headers, retard. I am not in the UK and I don't use
>> Windows Mail. I thought you were into computers ... I guess not.
>>
>> Alias[/color]
>
> Don't need to look at the headers. That's Kevin's job. He gets a
> hard-on drooling over headers. There are at least two idiot's using the
> name Alias to post. I was commenting on one of them. Try to keep up.
>
>
>
>
>[/color]

Only an idiot would use an apostrophe to indicate a plural. Either that
or you dropped out of third grade which is more likely considering the
type of "humor" you post.

Alias

"Kevin SmallBone" <ksb@kshort.org> wrote in message
news:hc1kd6$v96$1@news.eternal-september.org

Hasta la vista baby! lol

Alias

"Kevin SmallBone" <ksb@kshort.org> wrote in message
news:hc1jrd$qdc$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=blue]
>
>
> "Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hc1jil$i9c$10@news.eternal-september.org...[color=green]
>> Kevin SmallBone wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> No need to snip anything. She was correct with each and every response.
>>> You just don't like the responses.[/color]
>>
>> The post has already been soundly refuted.[/color]
>
> No it wasn't. Your opinion is rejected by most as lies. Live with it.[color=green]
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Too bad.[/color]
>>
>> For you because you meet the definition of insanity.[/color]
>
> Oops. Sorry. Not in a million years.[color=green]
>>
>> "Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
>> different results."
>>
>> - Einstein
>>
>> Alias (who is NO Einstein)[/color]
>
> So what do you make of your drivel that you post over and over and over
> and over and over again? Seems like that definition applies to you.
>
> Live with it.[/color]

Alias and I go back a long way.

You are just jealous Kevin, because Alias and I are intelligent people. I
have a lot of respect for Alias. He speaks a lot of sense.

I like Ubuntu and Windows. It is just that I follow Alias because he is
from Spain, and as everybody knows, the Spaniards are the most intelligent
people in the world.

Why do you not just accept that Ubuntu will be on everybody's computer in 20
years' time. Everyone in Spain has excepted it, why can't you?

"DanS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> wrote in
news:eRRaeDaVKHA.1792@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl:
[color=blue]
>
>
> "Kevin SmallBone" <ksb@kshort.org> wrote in message
> news:hc1jrd$qdc$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=green]
>>
>>
>> "Alias" <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:hc1jil$i9c$10@news.eternal-september.org...[color=darkred]
>>> Kevin SmallBone wrote:
>>>> No need to snip anything. She was correct with each and every
>>>> response. You just don't like the responses.
>>>
>>> The post has already been soundly refuted.[/color]
>>
>> No it wasn't. Your opinion is rejected by most as lies. Live with
>> it.[color=darkred]
>>>
>>>> Too bad.
>>>
>>> For you because you meet the definition of insanity.[/color]
>>
>> Oops. Sorry. Not in a million years.[color=darkred]
>>>
>>> "Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
>>> different results."
>>>
>>> - Einstein
>>>
>>> Alias (who is NO Einstein)[/color]
>>
>> So what do you make of your drivel that you post over and over and
>> over and over and over again? Seems like that definition applies to
>> you.
>>
>> Live with it.[/color]
>
> Alias and I go back a long way.[/color]


FU.