To all you Vista touting jerks who reject customer complaints against
Vista, one of your own big wigs posted an acknowledgement of the problems
many faced with Vista on the Microsoft.com site! He acknowledged that many
had major inabilities getting Vista running acceptably on many computers.
These problems are solved in Windows 7! Many of us customers have fought a
loosing battle to get Vista running properly and have been forced to
upgrade to WXP, a MUCH superior OS. Why do you hate your customers so much
that you insult them with bogus claims of running trouble free when so many
customers have had enormous problems running programs? Why do you lie and
say Vista can run its own packaged programs when many times Vista can't
recognize its own programs as legitimate Windows programs? Talk about
stupid. Many of you MS guys here are the dictionary definition of stupid!

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:56:24 -0500, Michael Dobony wrote:
[color=blue]
> To all you Vista touting jerks who reject customer complaints against
> Vista, one of your own big wigs posted an acknowledgement of the problems
> many faced with Vista on the Microsoft.com site! He acknowledged that many
> had major inabilities getting Vista running acceptably on many computers.
> These problems are solved in Windows 7! Many of us customers have fought a
> loosing battle to get Vista running properly and have been forced to
> upgrade to WXP, a MUCH superior OS. Why do you hate your customers so much
> that you insult them with bogus claims of running trouble free when so many
> customers have had enormous problems running programs? Why do you lie and
> say Vista can run its own packaged programs when many times Vista can't
> recognize its own programs as legitimate Windows programs? Talk about
> stupid. Many of you MS guys here are the dictionary definition of stupid![/color]

You seem to think you are addressing Microsoft personnel. If so you're in
the wrong place.

This is a newsgroup with posts by volunteers who are here on their own time
to help people, without any compensation.

Take your venom elsewhere.

--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom

Gene E. Bloch wrote:
[color=blue]
> This is a newsgroup with posts by volunteers who are here on their own time
> to help people, without any compensation.
>
> Take your venom elsewhere.
>[/color]

Nah, yet another troll. Easy to tell when they say they "upgraded to XP"
.. That's not what upgrade means. Upgrade means to go from one version to
a NEWER version of the software, not OLDER. XP is older than Vista,
therefore its a DOWNGRADE. Then again, trolls never get things right.

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:16:20 -0500, milt wrote:
[color=blue]
> Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>[color=green]
>> This is a newsgroup with posts by volunteers who are here on their own time
>> to help people, without any compensation.
>>
>> Take your venom elsewhere.
>>[/color]
>
> Nah, yet another troll. Easy to tell when they say they "upgraded to XP"
> . That's not what upgrade means. Upgrade means to go from one version to
> a NEWER version of the software, not OLDER. XP is older than Vista,
> therefore its a DOWNGRADE. Then again, trolls never get things right.[/color]

Yeah, I guess you're right, but I had to scream :-)

--
Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom

Feel better now?

--

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP
Windows Desktop Experience & Security

Correct. You stated a well-known fact that businesses stayed away from
Vista, keeping or downgrading to a superior OS - WindowsXP.
Vista was meant for gaming & lame home users, NOT business.

It's been established. So what? We've known entire purpose of Windows7
being released faster than normal update cycle (compare to
Win3.1/95/98/2000/XP cycles) was to urgently a;;eviate pain created by Vista
for Microsoft's revenues.

But now it's OVER. You can have WIndows7 now.
I know I did and happy with it because finally it doesn't forget views in
WInExplorer as Redmoind knuckleheads made Vista to persistenmtly forget and
think mostof my documents are "pictures and music" adding stupid "tags, date
taken" etc ninsense besides filename, type, size, date modified - the only
things professionals care about

OK?
Windows7 is here and it fixed issues, now get it.

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:16:20 -0500, milt wrote:
[color=blue]
> Gene E. Bloch wrote:
>[color=green]
>> This is a newsgroup with posts by volunteers who are here on their own time
>> to help people, without any compensation.
>>
>> Take your venom elsewhere.
>>[/color]
>
> Nah, yet another troll. Easy to tell when they say they "upgraded to XP"
> . That's not what upgrade means. Upgrade means to go from one version to
> a NEWER version of the software, not OLDER. XP is older than Vista,
> therefore its a DOWNGRADE. Then again, trolls never get things right.[/color]

No, UPGRADE means an improvement.

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:00:42 -0700, Gene E. Bloch wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:56:24 -0500, Michael Dobony wrote:
>[color=green]
>> To all you Vista touting jerks who reject customer complaints against
>> Vista, one of your own big wigs posted an acknowledgement of the problems
>> many faced with Vista on the Microsoft.com site! He acknowledged that many
>> had major inabilities getting Vista running acceptably on many computers.
>> These problems are solved in Windows 7! Many of us customers have fought a
>> loosing battle to get Vista running properly and have been forced to
>> upgrade to WXP, a MUCH superior OS. Why do you hate your customers so much
>> that you insult them with bogus claims of running trouble free when so many
>> customers have had enormous problems running programs? Why do you lie and
>> say Vista can run its own packaged programs when many times Vista can't
>> recognize its own programs as legitimate Windows programs? Talk about
>> stupid. Many of you MS guys here are the dictionary definition of stupid![/color]
>
> You seem to think you are addressing Microsoft personnel. If so you're in
> the wrong place.
>
> This is a newsgroup with posts by volunteers who are here on their own time
> to help people, without any compensation.
>
> Take your venom elsewhere.[/color]

Maybe I do have the wrong group, but MS personnel on Vista NG's HAVE had
the attitude I have mentioned. Their signature line demonstrated it. Fact,
a large, possibly majority of users forced to have it on a new computer,
feel Vista is junk. The problems are extremely counter-productive when they
require repeated
sssssssssssssssslllllllllllllllllllllllllllllooooooooooooooooooowwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
reboots.

Vista? works for me
First time ..
Every time ...
Last LONG time ...

Sorry Charlie

touting ...
taunting ...
its all in how you look at it

Rich

On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:15:27 -0700, Rich wrote:
[color=blue]
> Vista? works for me
> First time ..
> Every time ...
> Last LONG time ...
>
> Sorry Charlie
>
> touting ...
> taunting ...
> its all in how you look at it
>
> Rich[/color]

The only ones I have met that have Vista and feel that way are here on the
Vista NG's. In person I have not met a single satisfied customer.

I tried to install Windows 7 on my Dell 386 and it
doesn't run!!

What a piece of crap.

Now if they only had real operating systems like Windows
3.1!!


In article <vme1u96wwlu4$.1gydoghvcqz38$.dlg@
40tude.net>, [email]survey@stopassaultnow.net[/email] says...[color=blue]
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:15:27 -0700, Rich wrote:
>[color=green]
> > Vista? works for me
> > First time ..
> > Every time ...
> > Last LONG time ...
> >
> > Sorry Charlie
> >
> > touting ...
> > taunting ...
> > its all in how you look at it
> >
> > Rich[/color]
>
> The only ones I have met that have Vista and feel that way are here on the
> Vista NG's. In person I have not met a single satisfied customer.
>[/color]

Michael Dobony wrote:[color=blue]
> To all you Vista touting jerks who reject customer complaints against
> Vista, one of your own big wigs posted an acknowledgement of the problems
> many faced with Vista on the Microsoft.com site! He acknowledged that many
> had major inabilities getting Vista running acceptably on many computers.
> These problems are solved in Windows 7! Many of us customers have fought a
> loosing battle to get Vista running properly and have been forced to
> upgrade to WXP, a MUCH superior OS. Why do you hate your customers so much
> that you insult them with bogus claims of running trouble free when so many
> customers have had enormous problems running programs? Why do you lie and
> say Vista can run its own packaged programs when many times Vista can't
> recognize its own programs as legitimate Windows programs? Talk about
> stupid. Many of you MS guys here are the dictionary definition of stupid![/color]

I have had NO PROBLEMS with Vista on my notebook since it came out.

"Michael Dobony" <survey@stopassaultnow.net> wrote in message
news:vme1u96wwlu4$.1gydoghvcqz38$.dlg@40tude.net...[color=blue]
> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:15:27 -0700, Rich wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Vista? works for me
>> First time ..
>> Every time ...
>> Last LONG time ...
>>
>> Sorry Charlie
>>
>> touting ...
>> taunting ...
>> its all in how you look at it
>>
>> Rich[/color]
>
> The only ones I have met that have Vista and feel that way are here on the
> Vista NG's. In person I have not met a single satisfied customer.[/color]

So you're saying you surround yourself with idiots, like yourself?

--


"Don't pick a fight with an old man.
If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you."

On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:29:04 -0400, Michael wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Michael Dobony" <survey@stopassaultnow.net> wrote in message
> news:vme1u96wwlu4$.1gydoghvcqz38$.dlg@40tude.net...[color=green]
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:15:27 -0700, Rich wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Vista? works for me
>>> First time ..
>>> Every time ...
>>> Last LONG time ...
>>>
>>> Sorry Charlie
>>>
>>> touting ...
>>> taunting ...
>>> its all in how you look at it
>>>
>>> Rich[/color]
>>
>> The only ones I have met that have Vista and feel that way are here on the
>> Vista NG's. In person I have not met a single satisfied customer.[/color]
>
> So you're saying you surround yourself with idiots, like yourself?[/color]

See original post. Even a M$ official admitted that many people (IT
professionals) are unable to get Vista running, that Vista is unstable.

Michael Dobony wrote:[color=blue]
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:29:04 -0400, Michael wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "Michael Dobony" <survey@stopassaultnow.net> wrote in message
>> news:vme1u96wwlu4$.1gydoghvcqz38$.dlg@40tude.net...[color=darkred]
>>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:15:27 -0700, Rich wrote:
>>>
>>>> Vista? works for me
>>>> First time ..
>>>> Every time ...
>>>> Last LONG time ...
>>>>
>>>> Sorry Charlie
>>>>
>>>> touting ...
>>>> taunting ...
>>>> its all in how you look at it
>>>>
>>>> Rich
>>> The only ones I have met that have Vista and feel that way are here on the
>>> Vista NG's. In person I have not met a single satisfied customer.[/color]
>> So you're saying you surround yourself with idiots, like yourself?[/color]
>
> See original post. Even a M$ official admitted that many people (IT
> professionals) are unable to get Vista running, that Vista is unstable.[/color]

*BULL*****!!!