|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| Vista home Permium to win 7 professional I know this may be the wrong group, but I need a fast answer. I have Vista Home Premium running. I ordered Windows 7 Professional upgrade. I just now found the Microsoft advisor, ran it, and it shows I can upgrade to win 7 premium or ultimate...but not professional is this correct? Thanks, NP |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional That is correct. The Professional edition would require a "Custom Install" which is really a "clean install". np-nyc wrote:[color=blue] > I know this may be the wrong group, but I need a fast answer. > I have Vista Home Premium running. I ordered Windows 7 Professional > upgrade. I just now found the Microsoft advisor, ran it, and it shows I > can upgrade to win 7 premium or ultimate...but not professional is this > correct? > Thanks, NP >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional A little more work, but I have done clean installs before... THANKS, Leroy "Leroy" <leroy@earthlink.com> wrote in message news:4ADF0D67.20703@earthlink.com...[color=blue] > That is correct. The Professional edition would require a "Custom Install" > which is really a "clean install". > > np-nyc wrote:[color=green] >> I know this may be the wrong group, but I need a fast answer. >> I have Vista Home Premium running. I ordered Windows 7 Professional >> upgrade. I just now found the Microsoft advisor, ran it, and it shows I >> can upgrade to win 7 premium or ultimate...but not professional is this >> correct? >> Thanks, NP >>[/color][/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional "np-nyc" <np1947@verizon.net> wrote in message news:FB30C43A-BDF1-4099-AE39-B23C9C21FDBA@microsoft.com...[color=blue] > I know this may be the wrong group, but I need a fast answer. > I have Vista Home Premium running. I ordered Windows 7 Professional > upgrade. I just now found the Microsoft advisor, ran it, and it shows I > can upgrade to win 7 premium or ultimate...but not professional is this > correct? > Thanks, NP >[/color] I think what it means is that you can't do an IN-PLACE upgrade. You can do a clean install of Win 7 using Vista as a qualifying software. For a more definitive answer go here: [url]http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7install/threads[/url] |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional "np-nyc" <np1947@verizon.net> wrote: [color=blue] >I know this may be the wrong group, but I need a fast answer. >I have Vista Home Premium running. I ordered Windows 7 Professional upgrade. >I just now found the Microsoft advisor, ran it, and it shows I can upgrade >to win 7 premium or ultimate...but not professional is this correct?[/color] Yes. Your Home Premium edition contains features that are not in the Professional edition, so that's not an upgrade path for you. Ultimate has all features from all other versions, so that will work. -- Tim Slattery [email]Slattery_T@bls.gov[/email] [url]http://members.cox.net/slatteryt[/url] |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional Hi, Gordon. [color=blue] > I think what it means is that you can't do an IN-PLACE upgrade.[/color] Is this a new use for the phrase "in-place upgrade"? I've seen it more than once today in these newsgroups. In WinXP, I used the in-place upgrade several times - and many of us advised users in WinXP newsgroups about when and how to do it. We generally referred them to this KB article: How to perform an in-place upgrade (reinstallation) of Windows XP [url]http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q315341[/url] (There are similar KB articles for Win2K and Windows Server 2003 - and maybe other Windows versions.) That article explained that, "An in-place upgrade is also named a repair installation. This operation reinstalls Windows XP to the same folder on your computer where it was originally installed. You may want to perform an in-place upgrade if your installation of Windows XP must be repaired..." In other words, an "in-place upgrade" repairs an existing installation; it does not upgrade to a different version of Windows - or even a different version of WinXP. So an upgrade from any Vista version (Home Premium to Ultimate) to any OTHER Vista version would not be an "in-place" upgrade. And neither would an upgrade from any version of Vista (or WinXP) to any version of Windows 7. If I've "missed the memo" about the new use of the term "in-place upgrade", please educate me. ;^} RC -- R. C. White, CPA San Marcos, TX [email]rc@grandecom.net[/email] Microsoft Windows MVP Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64 "Gordon" <gordonbparker******.com> wrote in message news:ef4p1NlUKHA.3428@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > > "np-nyc" <np1947@verizon.net> wrote in message > news:FB30C43A-BDF1-4099-AE39-B23C9C21FDBA@microsoft.com...[color=green] >> I know this may be the wrong group, but I need a fast answer. >> I have Vista Home Premium running. I ordered Windows 7 Professional >> upgrade. I just now found the Microsoft advisor, ran it, and it shows I >> can upgrade to win 7 premium or ultimate...but not professional is this >> correct? >> Thanks, NP >>[/color] > > I think what it means is that you can't do an IN-PLACE upgrade. You can do > a clean install of Win 7 using Vista as a qualifying software. > For a more definitive answer go here: > [url]http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7install/threads[/url][/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message news:uGxCGAmUKHA.1576@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Hi, Gordon. >[color=green] >> I think what it means is that you can't do an IN-PLACE upgrade.[/color] > > Is this a new use for the phrase "in-place upgrade"? I've seen it more > than once today in these newsgroups.[/color] AFAIK there's never been more than one meaning of "in place upgrade". It means upgrading an OS/application without removing the original first, thus keeping all settings/data etc etc. |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional "Tim Slattery" <Slattery_T@bls.gov> wrote in message news:jk3ud5hba7c9s0lhrifivjfd4hh4p5vcqm@4ax.com...[color=blue] > "np-nyc" <np1947@verizon.net> wrote: >[color=green] >>I know this may be the wrong group, but I need a fast answer. >>I have Vista Home Premium running. I ordered Windows 7 Professional >>upgrade. >>I just now found the Microsoft advisor, ran it, and it shows I can upgrade >>to win 7 premium or ultimate...but not professional is this correct?[/color] > > Yes. Your Home Premium edition contains features that are not in the > Professional edition, so that's not an upgrade path for you. Ultimate > has all features from all other versions, so that will work. > > -- > Tim Slattery > [email]Slattery_T@bls.gov[/email] > [url]http://members.cox.net/slatteryt[/url][/color] Win 7 Professional contains all features that are in Home Premium. The only features Ultimate has that Pro doesn't, are BitLocker and built-in support for 35 languages. That's why Ultimate Upgrade is only 20 bucks more than Pro Upg. Vista Business doesn't contain the mutimedia features of Vista Home Premium. |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional Hi, Gordon. "Gordon" <gordonbparker******.com> wrote in message news:ORw4AGmUKHA.1236@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > > "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message > news:uGxCGAmUKHA.1576@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=green] >> Hi, Gordon. >>[color=darkred] >>> I think what it means is that you can't do an IN-PLACE upgrade.[/color] >> >> Is this a new use for the phrase "in-place upgrade"? I've seen it more >> than once today in these newsgroups.[/color] > > AFAIK there's never been more than one meaning of "in place upgrade". It > means upgrading an OS/application without removing the original first, > thus keeping all settings/data etc etc.[/color] I believe that is simply a upgrade, without the "in-place" phrase. If we are upgrading to a different location - or removing the original installation and installing a new one on the same volume - then we may be using an "Upgrade" retail package, but we are actually doing a "clean install" with it. While "in-place upgrades" were quite common with WinXP, it is my understanding that they cannot be done with Vista. At least, not simply to repair an existing installation, as with WinXP. (See KB article 968279 for a limited application in Vista.) But Bing gets lots of hits on "in-place +vista" (mostly from the Answers forum), so maybe the use of the phrase is broadening and changing from what I learned several years ago. And your interpretation of the phrase does seem more logical than equating it to "repair". Maybe someone will chime in and clarify this for all of us. ;^} RC -- R. C. White, CPA San Marcos, TX [email]rc@grandecom.net[/email] Microsoft Windows MVP Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64 |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional R. C. To me an "in place upgrade" means a Repair install. It always meant that for me but as you point out RC the phrase is being used more and more to mean different things like Upgrading to a different Windows version as an example. So at this point I always need to read the post completely as to see what the OP means when he uses the term "in place upgrade" -- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message news:eg7ZqVmUKHA.4592@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Hi, Gordon. > > "Gordon" <gordonbparker******.com> wrote in message > news:ORw4AGmUKHA.1236@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=green] >> >> "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message >> news:uGxCGAmUKHA.1576@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=darkred] >>> Hi, Gordon. >>> >>>> I think what it means is that you can't do an IN-PLACE upgrade. >>> >>> Is this a new use for the phrase "in-place upgrade"? I've seen it more than >>> once today in these newsgroups.[/color] >> >> AFAIK there's never been more than one meaning of "in place upgrade". It means >> upgrading an OS/application without removing the original first, thus keeping all >> settings/data etc etc.[/color] > > I believe that is simply a upgrade, without the "in-place" phrase. > > If we are upgrading to a different location - or removing the original > installation and installing a new one on the same volume - then we may be using an > "Upgrade" retail package, but we are actually doing a "clean install" with it. > > While "in-place upgrades" were quite common with WinXP, it is my understanding > that they cannot be done with Vista. At least, not simply to repair an existing > installation, as with WinXP. (See KB article 968279 for a limited application in > Vista.) > > But Bing gets lots of hits on "in-place +vista" (mostly from the Answers forum), > so maybe the use of the phrase is broadening and changing from what I learned > several years ago. And your interpretation of the phrase does seem more logical > than equating it to "repair". > > Maybe someone will chime in and clarify this for all of us. ;^} > > RC > -- > R. C. White, CPA > San Marcos, TX > [email]rc@grandecom.net[/email] > Microsoft Windows MVP > Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional Crazy, eh? But you will have to choose a custom install, which is really a type of 'clean install'. So you should organize yourself *before* installing Windows 7. Make sure to back up your files and data. Check your Device Manager and note the various device details. Download their drivers from the manufacturer's website if you need to [ depending on your computer's maker or assembler you might already have all the drivers on a CD - but if not get them and burn to CD-R *before* you install Windows 7 - you might be surprised though that Windows 7 will probably pick up on most of the drivers during the install though :o) ] Gather all your softwares - their product keys and CDs [or copies of them burned to CD if you downloaded the programs]. Make notes of any details you will need etc. e.g. ISP phone numbers or email details. Note that Microsoft provides a wizard called "Windows Easy Transfer": [Windows Easy Transfer - Microsoft website] [url]http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/windows-easy-transfer[/url] Have fun, Saucy "np-nyc" <np1947@verizon.net> wrote in message news:FB30C43A-BDF1-4099-AE39-B23C9C21FDBA@microsoft.com...[color=blue] > I know this may be the wrong group, but I need a fast answer. > I have Vista Home Premium running. I ordered Windows 7 Professional > upgrade. I just now found the Microsoft advisor, ran it, and it shows I > can upgrade to win 7 premium or ultimate...but not professional is this > correct? > Thanks, NP >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:27:29 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22********.com> wrote: [color=blue] > R. C. > > To me an "in place upgrade" means a Repair install.[/color] I'll throw in my opinion here. It's never meant that to me, and my view is like RC's--an "in-place upgrade" is simply an "upgrade." An upgrade and a repair are two completely different things, as far as I'm concerned. [color=blue] > It always meant that for me but > as you point out RC the phrase is being used more and more to mean different things > like Upgrading to a different Windows version as an example. > So at this point I always need to read the post completely as to see what the OP > means when he uses the term "in place upgrade"[/color] I'm with you entirely here. In fact, sometime reading carefully isn't good enough, and it's best to ask to be sure I understand what the poster is talking about. [color=blue] > "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message > news:eg7ZqVmUKHA.4592@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=green] > > Hi, Gordon. > > > > "Gordon" <gordonbparker******.com> wrote in message > > news:ORw4AGmUKHA.1236@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=darkred] > >> > >> "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message > >> news:uGxCGAmUKHA.1576@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > >>> Hi, Gordon. > >>> > >>>> I think what it means is that you can't do an IN-PLACE upgrade. > >>> > >>> Is this a new use for the phrase "in-place upgrade"? I've seen it more than > >>> once today in these newsgroups. > >> > >> AFAIK there's never been more than one meaning of "in place upgrade". It means > >> upgrading an OS/application without removing the original first, thus keeping all > >> settings/data etc etc.[/color] > > > > I believe that is simply a upgrade, without the "in-place" phrase. > > > > If we are upgrading to a different location - or removing the original > > installation and installing a new one on the same volume - then we may be using an > > "Upgrade" retail package, but we are actually doing a "clean install" with it. > > > > While "in-place upgrades" were quite common with WinXP, it is my understanding > > that they cannot be done with Vista. At least, not simply to repair an existing > > installation, as with WinXP. (See KB article 968279 for a limited application in > > Vista.) > > > > But Bing gets lots of hits on "in-place +vista" (mostly from the Answers forum), > > so maybe the use of the phrase is broadening and changing from what I learned > > several years ago. And your interpretation of the phrase does seem more logical > > than equating it to "repair". > > > > Maybe someone will chime in and clarify this for all of us. ;^} > > > > RC > > -- > > R. C. White, CPA > > San Marcos, TX > > [email]rc@grandecom.net[/email] > > Microsoft Windows MVP > > Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64[/color][/color] -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 Please Reply to the Newsgroup |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional IMHO: Well, for the longest time "upgrade" meant installing a newer operating system (OS) over the older one without removing the older first. Third party programs wouldn't have to be reinstalled, the users data would still be there. Then the "in-place upgrade" and "Repair install" upgrades came along used to indicate the reinstalling of the *same* OS without removing the original installation as a method to fix problems and issues etc. etc. essentially the same as an "upgrade" with the exception that the old OS is the same version as the new OS. Then "in-place upgrade" came to indicate the same thing as "upgrade" for some reason -- probably to differentiate an "upgrade" from other types of installation such as a "custom install" (which seems to be a variant of a "clean install" where the clean install process is started by running a wizard in the old OS -- the user may perceive it to be an upgrade -- and there maybe some backup -- but defacto, it is really a "clean install" -- but since it is slightly different there's need of the new differentiating term) and a clean install (installing an OS fresh on a new harddrive (HDD) or wiped HDD). Saucy "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message news:md0vd5hg6rmj47csqsj2o7lekqpa2hqge2@4ax.com...[color=blue] > On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:27:29 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22********.com> > wrote: >[color=green] >> R. C. >> >> To me an "in place upgrade" means a Repair install.[/color] > > > I'll throw in my opinion here. It's never meant that to me, and my > view is like RC's--an "in-place upgrade" is simply an "upgrade." An > upgrade and a repair are two completely different things, as far as > I'm concerned. > >[color=green] >> It always meant that for me but >> as you point out RC the phrase is being used more and more to mean >> different things >> like Upgrading to a different Windows version as an example. >> So at this point I always need to read the post completely as to see what >> the OP >> means when he uses the term "in place upgrade"[/color] > > > I'm with you entirely here. In fact, sometime reading carefully isn't > good enough, and it's best to ask to be sure I understand what the > poster is talking about. > > >[color=green] >> "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message >> news:eg7ZqVmUKHA.4592@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=darkred] >> > Hi, Gordon. >> > >> > "Gordon" <gordonbparker******.com> wrote in message >> > news:ORw4AGmUKHA.1236@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> >> >> >> "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message >> >> news:uGxCGAmUKHA.1576@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> >>> Hi, Gordon. >> >>> >> >>>> I think what it means is that you can't do an IN-PLACE upgrade. >> >>> >> >>> Is this a new use for the phrase "in-place upgrade"? I've seen it >> >>> more than >> >>> once today in these newsgroups. >> >> >> >> AFAIK there's never been more than one meaning of "in place upgrade". >> >> It means >> >> upgrading an OS/application without removing the original first, thus >> >> keeping all >> >> settings/data etc etc. >> > >> > I believe that is simply a upgrade, without the "in-place" phrase. >> > >> > If we are upgrading to a different location - or removing the original >> > installation and installing a new one on the same volume - then we may >> > be using an >> > "Upgrade" retail package, but we are actually doing a "clean install" >> > with it. >> > >> > While "in-place upgrades" were quite common with WinXP, it is my >> > understanding >> > that they cannot be done with Vista. At least, not simply to repair an >> > existing >> > installation, as with WinXP. (See KB article 968279 for a limited >> > application in >> > Vista.) >> > >> > But Bing gets lots of hits on "in-place +vista" (mostly from the >> > Answers forum), >> > so maybe the use of the phrase is broadening and changing from what I >> > learned >> > several years ago. And your interpretation of the phrase does seem >> > more logical >> > than equating it to "repair". >> > >> > Maybe someone will chime in and clarify this for all of us. ;^} >> > >> > RC >> > -- >> > R. C. White, CPA >> > San Marcos, TX >> > [email]rc@grandecom.net[/email] >> > Microsoft Windows MVP >> > Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64[/color][/color] > > -- > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003 > Please Reply to the Newsgroup[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Vista home Permium to win 7 professional Hi, Saucy. Right! Perhaps those unfamiliar with the term think that "in-place" means back into the same partition. That does sound more logical, since the term includes the word "place". But the term "in-place upgrade" still means to "upgrade" to THE SAME OPERATING SYSTEM as already installed in that place. At least, that's what it still means to me. RC -- R. C. White, CPA San Marcos, TX [email]rc@grandecom.net[/email] Microsoft Windows MVP Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64 "Saucy" <saucylemon@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message news:ezjFW2xUKHA.3720@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > IMHO: > > Well, for the longest time "upgrade" meant installing a newer operating > system (OS) over the older one without removing the older first. Third > party programs wouldn't have to be reinstalled, the users data would still > be there. > > Then the "in-place upgrade" and "Repair install" upgrades came along used > to indicate the reinstalling of the *same* OS without removing the > original installation as a method to fix problems and issues etc. etc. > essentially the same as an "upgrade" with the exception that the old OS is > the same version as the new OS. > > Then "in-place upgrade" came to indicate the same thing as "upgrade" for > some reason -- probably to differentiate an "upgrade" from other types of > installation such as a "custom install" (which seems to be a variant of a > "clean install" where the clean install process is started by running a > wizard in the old OS -- the user may perceive it to be an upgrade -- and > there maybe some backup -- but defacto, it is really a "clean install" -- > but since it is slightly different there's need of the new differentiating > term) and a clean install (installing an OS fresh on a new harddrive (HDD) > or wiped HDD). > > Saucy > > > > "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message > news:md0vd5hg6rmj47csqsj2o7lekqpa2hqge2@4ax.com...[color=green] >> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:27:29 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22********.com> >> wrote: >>[color=darkred] >>> R. C. >>> >>> To me an "in place upgrade" means a Repair install.[/color] >> >> >> I'll throw in my opinion here. It's never meant that to me, and my >> view is like RC's--an "in-place upgrade" is simply an "upgrade." An >> upgrade and a repair are two completely different things, as far as >> I'm concerned. >> >>[color=darkred] >>> It always meant that for me but >>> as you point out RC the phrase is being used more and more to mean >>> different things >>> like Upgrading to a different Windows version as an example. >>> So at this point I always need to read the post completely as to see >>> what the OP >>> means when he uses the term "in place upgrade"[/color] >> >> >> I'm with you entirely here. In fact, sometime reading carefully isn't >> good enough, and it's best to ask to be sure I understand what the >> poster is talking about. >> >> >>[color=darkred] >>> "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message >>> news:eg7ZqVmUKHA.4592@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> > Hi, Gordon. >>> > >>> > "Gordon" <gordonbparker******.com> wrote in message >>> > news:ORw4AGmUKHA.1236@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> >> >>> >> "R. C. White" <rc@grandecom.net> wrote in message >>> >> news:uGxCGAmUKHA.1576@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> >>> Hi, Gordon. >>> >>> >>> >>>> I think what it means is that you can't do an IN-PLACE upgrade. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is this a new use for the phrase "in-place upgrade"? I've seen it >>> >>> more than >>> >>> once today in these newsgroups. >>> >> >>> >> AFAIK there's never been more than one meaning of "in place upgrade". >>> >> It means >>> >> upgrading an OS/application without removing the original first, thus >>> >> keeping all >>> >> settings/data etc etc. >>> > >>> > I believe that is simply a upgrade, without the "in-place" phrase. >>> > >>> > If we are upgrading to a different location - or removing the original >>> > installation and installing a new one on the same volume - then we may >>> > be using an >>> > "Upgrade" retail package, but we are actually doing a "clean install" >>> > with it. >>> > >>> > While "in-place upgrades" were quite common with WinXP, it is my >>> > understanding >>> > that they cannot be done with Vista. At least, not simply to repair >>> > an existing >>> > installation, as with WinXP. (See KB article 968279 for a limited >>> > application in >>> > Vista.) >>> > >>> > But Bing gets lots of hits on "in-place +vista" (mostly from the >>> > Answers forum), >>> > so maybe the use of the phrase is broadening and changing from what I >>> > learned >>> > several years ago. And your interpretation of the phrase does seem >>> > more logical >>> > than equating it to "repair". >>> > >>> > Maybe someone will chime in and clarify this for all of us. ;^} >>> > >>> > RC[/color] >> >> -- >> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003[/color][/color] |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems with HP Solution Center on HP Pavillion running VISTA Home Permium | johns | Windows Vista | 1 | 08-07-2009 08:10 AM |
| Office Professional 2003 and Vista Home Premium | Jim | Microsoft Office | 3 | 12-08-2007 11:30 AM |
| Vista home basic and XP Professional | Karl Walker | Windows Vista | 9 | 12-07-2007 07:40 PM |
| Migration from XP professional to VISTA home basic | F R A N K | Windows Vista | 5 | 07-16-2007 04:00 PM |
| Office 2003 professional and Vista Home Premium | mms71157 | Windows Vista | 4 | 03-19-2007 08:45 PM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |