|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| Re: 4GB of physical memory shows as less than 3 in system properties Hi, Depending on the hardware, the actual range of addresses reserved can be from .5 to 1.3GB, leaving anywhere from 2.7-3.5GB of memory addresses. It's not hard and fast. All depends on the system, and the OP could very well be on the low end of this. -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP [url]http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/[/url] Windows help - [url]www.rickrogers.org[/url] Vote for my shoe: [url]http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com[/url] "ray" <ray@zianet.com> wrote in message news:7gn94nF2opmmpU2@mid.individual.net...[color=blue] > On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 06:07:20 -0400, Rick Rogers wrote: >[color=green] >> The 32-bit version of Vista has 4GB of address space. A portion of this, >> roughly about .8GB in most systems, is reserved for the system hardware. >> The remainder (3.2GB) is assigned to memory. The memory isn't missing, >> there just aren't enough addresses to use all of it.[/color] > > You'll note the OP indicated about 2.7gb available. 3.2 - 2.7 = .5gb.[/color] |
| |||
| Re: 4GB of physical memory shows as less than 3 in system properties Alan Shepro <a.shepro******.com> wrote: [color=blue] >I just upgraded my physical memory to 4GB but under system properties, it >only shows as 2.7 or so. 32 Bit Windows 7. Why?[/color] Some of your 4GB of address space must be used to access such things as your video RAM and BIOS. What's left over is used for physical RAM. See [url]http://members.cox.net/slatteryt/RAM.html[/url] for a full discussion. -- Tim Slattery MS MVP(Shell/User) [email]Slattery_T@bls.gov[/email] [url]http://members.cox.net/slatteryt[/url] |
| |||
| Re: 4GB of physical memory shows as less than 3 in system properties On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 01:07:27 -0500, "Andy Huang" <anson198002********.com> wrote: [color=blue] >for Christ's sake, how many times can people ask the same question? > >Go search forums for my 2-page article on this subject. >You get 3.25GB, get it? > >Don't asdk why, I already explained 100 times[/color] Go away little man. Or at least keep these kinds of comments to yourself. Your reply borders on being classified as spam. I know that I am breaking my own rule here ... But, just don't reply if you can't answer the OP's question. And as posted above, [url]http://members.cox.net/slatteryt/RAM.html[/url] is a good page to start. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation checked by a California public school graduate. Don't expect too much. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vista 64 Installed Physical Memory vs Total Physical Memory | Fitz | Windows Vista | 9 | 04-02-2009 03:30 AM |
| Total Physical Memory on Task Manager shows wrong value? | churin | Windows Vista | 18 | 07-30-2008 03:58 AM |
| System Properties shows false RAM size? | churin | Windows XP | 3 | 06-04-2008 11:50 AM |
| Difference between Physical Memory and the Vista System Memory (Ra | DP | Vista Hardware | 2 | 02-20-2008 10:41 AM |
| System Properties shows xp pro sp2 not tablet pc 2005 | davidmf98@yahoo.com | Windows XP Tablet PC Newsgroup | 15 | 03-19-2007 07:15 PM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |