Technology Questions

Go Back   Technology Questions > Software Questions > Operating System Questions > Vista Community > Windows Vista

Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2009, 02:40 PM
Lonestar
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Is Vista SP-2 relevant?

I went from the original Vista to Vista SP-1 and noticed considerable
improvements. My system is very stable now.

Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to SP-2? I don't need any
Bluetooth, touchpad, Warp Drive, ray gun, or other out-of-world feature
enhancements since my system is relatively simple. I always install Windows
Updates (other than the SP-2 that's offered daily). I also don't feel there
are any additional security features in SP-2, unless I'm mistaken.

Comments? Is anyone there just happy with SP-1 and avoiding the possible
problems with SP-2 installation? Or am I missing out on something really
important? Thanks.

EW



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

 
Old 08-11-2009, 02:40 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2009, 02:40 PM
FrankB
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Is Vista SP-2 relevant?

On 8/12/2009 12:33 AM, Lonestar wrote:[color=blue]
> I went from the original Vista to Vista SP-1 and noticed considerable
> improvements. My system is very stable now.
>
> Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to SP-2? I don't need any
> Bluetooth, touchpad, Warp Drive, ray gun, or other out-of-world feature
> enhancements since my system is relatively simple. I always install Windows
> Updates (other than the SP-2 that's offered daily). I also don't feel there
> are any additional security features in SP-2, unless I'm mistaken.
>
> Comments? Is anyone there just happy with SP-1 and avoiding the possible
> problems with SP-2 installation? Or am I missing out on something really
> important? Thanks.
>
> EW
>
>
>[/color]

vista is irrelevant and always will be no matter how many service packs
they throw at it, consider to upgrading that piece of crap to windows7
once its available to the masses


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2009, 02:50 PM
philo
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Is Vista SP-2 relevant?

Lonestar wrote:[color=blue]
> I went from the original Vista to Vista SP-1 and noticed considerable
> improvements. My system is very stable now.
>
> Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to SP-2? I don't need any
> Bluetooth, touchpad, Warp Drive, ray gun, or other out-of-world feature
> enhancements since my system is relatively simple. I always install Windows
> Updates (other than the SP-2 that's offered daily). I also don't feel there
> are any additional security features in SP-2, unless I'm mistaken.
>
> Comments? Is anyone there just happy with SP-1 and avoiding the possible
> problems with SP-2 installation? Or am I missing out on something really
> important? Thanks.
>
> EW
>
>
>[/color]


I am not a big Vista fan...
but do have an installation that I just installed SP2 on
and noticed that the system definitely performed better...
so to all those who use Vista...I'd say SP2 is a good idea...
probably added some security updates too
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2009, 04:00 PM
gregg
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Is Vista SP-2 relevant?

Bill Yanaire wrote:[color=blue]
> FrankB wrote:[color=green]
>> On 8/12/2009 12:33 AM, Lonestar wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> I went from the original Vista to Vista SP-1 and noticed considerable
>>> improvements. My system is very stable now.
>>>
>>> Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to SP-2? I don't need any
>>> Bluetooth, touchpad, Warp Drive, ray gun, or other out-of-world feature
>>> enhancements since my system is relatively simple. I always install
>>> Windows
>>> Updates (other than the SP-2 that's offered daily). I also don't
>>> feel there
>>> are any additional security features in SP-2, unless I'm mistaken.
>>>
>>> Comments? Is anyone there just happy with SP-1 and avoiding the
>>> possible
>>> problems with SP-2 installation? Or am I missing out on something
>>> really
>>> important? Thanks.
>>>
>>> EW
>>>
>>>
>>>[/color]
>>
>> vista is irrelevant and always will be no matter how many service
>> packs they throw at it, consider to upgrading that piece of crap to
>> windows7 once its available to the masses
>>
>>[/color]
> SHUT UP YOU ****ING RETARD.[/color]

Yeah, I am running both Vista 64 bit SP2 Home Premium and Windows 7 RC
and would really see no compelling reason to move to Windows 7. Its a
nice OS but so is the Vista.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2009, 05:30 PM
Alias
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Is Vista SP-2 relevant?

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:[color=green]
>> Frank wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> DanS wrote:
>>>> Frank <fb@ber.csa> wrote in news:4a81f942$1@news.x-privat.org:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh and to verify you're a ****ing idiot you keep proving it in here on
>>>>> a daily basis.
>>>>> How GD brain-dead and how much of an asshole POS loser does someone
>>>>> have to be to keep doing that?
>>>>
>>>> Yes Frank, how much of a GD brain-dead and how much of an asshole
>>>> POS loser does someone have to be to keep posting the same things in
>>>> here day after day after day ?
>>>>
>>>> (Like you do....just in case you didn't get the implication.)
>>>
>>> Hahaha...do I irritate you dan-o?
>>> I sure hope so...cause that makes my day!...LOL!
>>> Thanks...ASSHOLE!!![/color]
>>
>> Frank's goal in life: be an irritant to others.[/color]
>
> Projecting again asshole?
> Oops!
>[/color]

You're the one bragging about it.

Alias
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2009, 06:30 PM
Colin Barnhorst
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Is Vista SP-2 relevant?

"Lonestar" <ewyatt_del_me_@excite.com> wrote in message
news:h5snu5$tii$1@news.datemas.de...[color=blue]
>I went from the original Vista to Vista SP-1 and noticed considerable
> improvements. My system is very stable now.
>
> Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to SP-2? I don't need any
> Bluetooth, touchpad, Warp Drive, ray gun, or other out-of-world feature
> enhancements since my system is relatively simple. I always install
> Windows
> Updates (other than the SP-2 that's offered daily). I also don't feel
> there
> are any additional security features in SP-2, unless I'm mistaken.
>
> Comments? Is anyone there just happy with SP-1 and avoiding the possible
> problems with SP-2 installation? Or am I missing out on something really
> important? Thanks.
>
> EW
>
>
>[/color]

Once Vista SP1 is retired (two years after the release of SP2) then SP2 will
be necessary in order to receive updates, including security patches.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2009, 08:00 PM
DanS
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Is Vista SP-2 relevant?

Alias <iamaliasTAK3THIS@OUTOFHEREgmail.com> wrote in news:h5t16s$qr9$1
@news.eternal-september.org:
[color=blue]
> Frank wrote:[color=green]
>> DanS wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Frank <fb@ber.csa> wrote in news:4a81f942$1@news.x-privat.org:
>>>
>>>> Oh and to verify you're a ****ing idiot you keep proving it in here on
>>>> a daily basis.
>>>> How GD brain-dead and how much of an asshole POS loser does someone
>>>> have to be to keep doing that?
>>>
>>> Yes Frank, how much of a GD brain-dead and how much of an asshole POS
>>> loser does someone have to be to keep posting the same things in here
>>> day after day after day ?
>>>
>>> (Like you do....just in case you didn't get the implication.)[/color]
>>
>> Hahaha...do I irritate you dan-o?
>> I sure hope so...cause that makes my day!...LOL!
>> Thanks...ASSHOLE!!![/color]
>
> Frank's goal in life: be an irritant to others.[/color]

Are you saying instead of Rogaine, it would be much more appropriate for
Frank to rub Preperation H into his scalp ?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2009, 01:50 PM
Andrew Rossmann
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Is Vista SP-2 relevant?

In article <h5snu5$tii$1@news.datemas.de>, [email]ewyatt_del_me_@excite.com[/email]
says...[color=blue]
> I went from the original Vista to Vista SP-1 and noticed considerable
> improvements. My system is very stable now.
>
> Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to SP-2? I don't need any
> Bluetooth, touchpad, Warp Drive, ray gun, or other out-of-world feature
> enhancements since my system is relatively simple. I always install Windows
> Updates (other than the SP-2 that's offered daily). I also don't feel there
> are any additional security features in SP-2, unless I'm mistaken.
>
> Comments? Is anyone there just happy with SP-1 and avoiding the possible
> problems with SP-2 installation? Or am I missing out on something really
> important? Thanks.[/color]

SP2 has been more or less benign. In my case, it cut my boot times
(power-on to login prompt) from roughly 2:15-2:30 to 1:05-1:15. Any
other changes seem to be more subtle.

--
If there is a no_junk in my address, please REMOVE it before replying!
All junk mail senders will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
law!!
[url]http://home.att.net/~andyross[/url]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2009, 01:40 PM
Lonestar
Newsgroup Contributor
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Is Vista SP-2 relevant?


"Andrew Rossmann" <andysnewsreply@no_junk.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.24ece55463bcf4f49896a1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=blue]
> SP2 has been more or less benign. In my case, it cut my boot times
> (power-on to login prompt) from roughly 2:15-2:30 to 1:05-1:15. Any
> other changes seem to be more subtle.
>[/color]

Thanks to you and the couple of others who replied directly to my question.
I think I'll just stay with SP-1 and be happy with my current system
stability.

EW


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is Off
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How Microsoft Plans to Stay Relevant in the Post-Gates Era Paulo Windows XP 0 06-10-2008 12:50 PM
Re: [News] Corel Encouraged to Embrace Open Source to Stay Relevant Moshe. Goldfarb Windows Vista 0 05-22-2008 09:00 AM
Blogger tool idea: Pick list of relevant images Loren Tablet PC Bloggers 0 10-27-2007 07:10 AM
repost: mbsa wont work____ no replies from relevant forum T5 Windows XP 0 01-04-2007 01:55 AM
leave XP installed? Attention: Colin Barnhorst or other relevant p Axel in Hong Kong Windows Vista 6 01-01-2007 09:38 PM


New To Technology Questions? Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? Do You Need Help with this site?

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:25 PM.


2003 - 2009 All Rights Reserved. Technology Questions

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0