Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:[color=blue]
> sherwin dubren wrote:[color=green]
>> Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:[color=darkred]
>>>
>>>
>>> So FUCIWIT, what advice are you looking for?
>>>
>>>[/color]
>> Gee, it so pleasant dealing with such considerate people.[/color]
>
> Welcome to USENET!
>[/color]

Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum

sherwin dubren <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:[color=green]
>> sherwin dubren wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So FUCIWIT, what advice are you looking for?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Gee, it so pleasant dealing with such considerate people.[/color]
>>
>> Welcome to USENET!
>>[/color]
>
> Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum[/color]

You haven't asked any question. You've only emailed your friend and
accidentally put that email here.

Danny Krychek wrote:[color=blue]
> sherwin dubren <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> sherwin dubren wrote:
>>>> Spanky de Monkey, ESQ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So FUCIWIT, what advice are you looking for?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Gee, it so pleasant dealing with such considerate people.
>>> Welcome to USENET!
>>>[/color]
>> Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum[/color]
>
> You haven't asked any question. You've only emailed your friend and
> accidentally put that email here.[/color]

He's an idiot.

Philo Shagnasty wrote:[color=blue]
>
> He's an idiot.[/color]

Oh yeah?

Why don't you guys look at the threads in this posting?
My reply on August 8 spells things out.

Sherwin

sherwin dubren <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Philo Shagnasty wrote:[color=green]
>>
>> He's an idiot.[/color]
>
> Oh yeah?
>
> Why don't you guys look at the threads in this posting?
> My reply on August 8 spells things out.
>
> Sherwin[/color]

Your use of terms is confusing. "threads" are subjects. A "posting"
- better known as just a "post" are individual messages in a thread.

Your August 8 reply (a posting) in THIS thread said:

"Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum"

NOW what!?

Bill Daggett wrote:[color=blue]
> sherwin dubren <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Philo Shagnasty wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> He's an idiot.[/color]
>> Oh yeah?
>>
>> Why don't you guys look at the threads in this posting?
>> My reply on August 8 spells things out.
>>
>> Sherwin[/color]
>
> Your use of terms is confusing. "threads" are subjects. A "posting"
> - better known as just a "post" are individual messages in a thread.
>
> Your August 8 reply (a posting) in THIS thread said:
>
> "Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum"
>[/color]

You obviously looked at the wrong message.
[color=blue]
> NOW what!?[/color]

Here we go with the semantics again. A thread is a collected string
of messages. Saying my message was part of a thread is more specific
than just saying it was a posting.

Just to put things straight, I will repeat what I posted on August 8.

My problem concerns losing preferences to particular web
sites like tvguide.com and wunderground.com whenever my
Vista Home Premium system reboots.


I do not erase associated cookies, and certain sites do
seem to retain their data. Vista help function says there
are at least three categories of cookies. Are any of these
erased automatically on reboot? I have not set up any kind
of automatic reseting, as far as I know.


Sherwin

sherwin dubren wrote:[color=blue]
> Bill Daggett wrote:[color=green]
>> sherwin dubren <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Philo Shagnasty wrote:
>>>> He's an idiot.
>>> Oh yeah?
>>>
>>> Why don't you guys look at the threads in this posting?
>>> My reply on August 8 spells things out.
>>>
>>> Sherwin[/color]
>>
>> Your use of terms is confusing. "threads" are subjects. A "posting"
>> - better known as just a "post" are individual messages in a thread.
>>
>> Your August 8 reply (a posting) in THIS thread said:
>>
>> "Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum"
>>[/color]
>
> You obviously looked at the wrong message.
>[color=green]
>> NOW what!?[/color]
>
> Here we go with the semantics again. A thread is a collected string
> of messages. Saying my message was part of a thread is more specific
> than just saying it was a posting.
>
> Just to put things straight, I will repeat what I posted on August 8.
>
> My problem concerns losing preferences to particular web
> sites like tvguide.com and wunderground.com whenever my
> Vista Home Premium system reboots.
>
>
> I do not erase associated cookies, and certain sites do
> seem to retain their data. Vista help function says there
> are at least three categories of cookies. Are any of these
> erased automatically on reboot? I have not set up any kind
> of automatic reseting, as far as I know.
>
>
> Sherwin
>
>
>
>[/color]

Go to Google. Type in the box: Best Buy/Geek Squad

Then choose the local store in your area.

sherwin dubren wrote :[color=blue]
> Bill Daggett wrote:[color=green]
>> sherwin dubren <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Philo Shagnasty wrote:
>>>> He's an idiot.
>>> Oh yeah?
>>>
>>> Why don't you guys look at the threads in this posting?
>>> My reply on August 8 spells things out.
>>>
>>> Sherwin[/color]
>>
>> Your use of terms is confusing. "threads" are subjects. A "posting"
>> - better known as just a "post" are individual messages in a thread.
>>
>> Your August 8 reply (a posting) in THIS thread said:
>>
>> "Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum"
>>[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> You obviously looked at the wrong message.[/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
>> NOW what!?[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> Here we go with the semantics again. A thread is a collected string
> of messages. Saying my message was part of a thread is more specific
> than just saying it was a posting.[/color]
[color=blue]
> Just to put things straight, I will repeat what I posted on August 8.[/color]
[color=blue]
> My problem concerns losing preferences to particular web
> sites like tvguide.com and wunderground.com whenever my
> Vista Home Premium system reboots.[/color]

[color=blue]
> I do not erase associated cookies, and certain sites do
> seem to retain their data. Vista help function says there
> are at least three categories of cookies. Are any of these
> erased automatically on reboot? I have not set up any kind
> of automatic reseting, as far as I know.[/color]

[color=blue]
> Sherwin[/color]

In this thread I can find only one post by you that is dated August 8,
2009, and the only original text in it is this:

"Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum".

Can you reconcile this with your remarks above?

--
Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com

Philo Shagnasty wrote:[color=blue]
> sherwin dubren wrote:[color=green]
>> Bill Daggett wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> sherwin dubren <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Philo Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>> He's an idiot.
>>>> Oh yeah?
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you guys look at the threads in this posting?
>>>> My reply on August 8 spells things out.
>>>>
>>>> Sherwin
>>>
>>> Your use of terms is confusing. "threads" are subjects. A "posting"
>>> - better known as just a "post" are individual messages in a thread.
>>>
>>> Your August 8 reply (a posting) in THIS thread said:
>>>
>>> "Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum"
>>>[/color]
>>
>> You obviously looked at the wrong message.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> NOW what!?[/color]
>>
>> Here we go with the semantics again. A thread is a collected string
>> of messages. Saying my message was part of a thread is more specific
>> than just saying it was a posting.
>>
>> Just to put things straight, I will repeat what I posted on August 8.
>>
>> My problem concerns losing preferences to particular web
>> sites like tvguide.com and wunderground.com whenever my
>> Vista Home Premium system reboots.
>>
>>
>> I do not erase associated cookies, and certain sites do
>> seem to retain their data. Vista help function says there
>> are at least three categories of cookies. Are any of these
>> erased automatically on reboot? I have not set up any kind
>> of automatic reseting, as far as I know.
>>
>>
>> Sherwin
>>
>>
>>
>>[/color]
>
> Go to Google. Type in the box: Best Buy/Geek Squad
>
> Then choose the local store in your area.
>[/color]
You call me an idiot? Sending me to a store to fix a hardware
problem? If this is your idea of a joke, it isn't funny.
Just stop answering my postings.

sherwin dubren wrote:[color=blue]
> Philo Shagnasty wrote:[color=green]
>> sherwin dubren wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Bill Daggett wrote:
>>>> sherwin dubren <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Philo Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>> He's an idiot.
>>>>> Oh yeah?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why don't you guys look at the threads in this posting?
>>>>> My reply on August 8 spells things out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sherwin
>>>>
>>>> Your use of terms is confusing. "threads" are subjects. A "posting"
>>>> - better known as just a "post" are individual messages in a thread.
>>>>
>>>> Your August 8 reply (a posting) in THIS thread said:
>>>>
>>>> "Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum"
>>>>
>>>
>>> You obviously looked at the wrong message.
>>>
>>>> NOW what!?
>>>
>>> Here we go with the semantics again. A thread is a collected string
>>> of messages. Saying my message was part of a thread is more specific
>>> than just saying it was a posting.
>>>
>>> Just to put things straight, I will repeat what I posted on August 8.
>>>
>>> My problem concerns losing preferences to particular web
>>> sites like tvguide.com and wunderground.com whenever my
>>> Vista Home Premium system reboots.
>>>
>>>
>>> I do not erase associated cookies, and certain sites do
>>> seem to retain their data. Vista help function says there
>>> are at least three categories of cookies. Are any of these
>>> erased automatically on reboot? I have not set up any kind
>>> of automatic reseting, as far as I know.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sherwin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>[/color]
>>
>> Go to Google. Type in the box: Best Buy/Geek Squad
>>
>> Then choose the local store in your area.
>>[/color]
> You call me an idiot? Sending me to a store to fix a hardware
> problem? If this is your idea of a joke, it isn't funny.
> Just stop answering my postings.[/color]

Jesus H. Christ. How many posts have been posted? You still haven't
received an answer? Give it up.

If you want to deal with Cookies and retaining data, bring up IE, go to
tools, Internet Options, Delete. Take a look around and see what you
can delete.

Other than that, I think we will be beating a dead horse.

Gene E. Bloch wrote:[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>>[/color][/color]
>
> In this thread I can find only one post by you that is dated August 8,
> 2009, and the only original text in it is this:
>
> "Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum".
>
> Can you reconcile this with your remarks above?
>[/color]

The post you are referring to was on August 8 at 11:05 AM.

If you look at the post of August 9 at 1:48 AM, you will
find my question there.

Besides, if you look at what's included in your posting,
you will find my question there. How much clearer can
I be?

My theory is that certain people on this forum feel uncomfortable
not being able to answer a straight forward question, and are
trying to dodge it by focusing on posting etiquette.

Sherwin

Philo Shagnasty wrote:[color=blue]
>
> Jesus H. Christ. How many posts have been posted? You still haven't
> received an answer? Give it up.
>
> If you want to deal with Cookies and retaining data, bring up IE, go to
> tools, Internet Options, Delete. Take a look around and see what you
> can delete.[/color]

If you are going to give advice, at least be logical. Erasing cookies
is exactly the problem. I need to retain certain cookies for this
problem to be fixed.[color=blue]
>
> Other than that, I think we will be beating a dead horse.[/color]

It's not dead, it's tied up in the barn where nobody knows how
to ride it.

Sherwin[color=blue]
>[/color]

sherwin dubren wrote on 8/10/09 :[color=blue]
> Gene E. Bloch wrote:[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>>[/color]
>>
>> In this thread I can find only one post by you that is dated August 8,
>> 2009, and the only original text in it is this:
>>
>> "Look's like I'm not going to get any answers on this forum".
>>
>> Can you reconcile this with your remarks above?
>>[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> The post you are referring to was on August 8 at 11:05 AM.[/color]

Which is also the post you have been referring to...
[color=blue]
> If you look at the post of August 9 at 1:48 AM, you will
> find my question there.[/color]

On my copy of this thread there is no post from an entity named Sherwin
Dubren dated August 9 at 1:48 AM, or anything differing from that time
by an integral number of hours (i.e., a number of time zones).
[color=blue]
> Besides, if you look at what's included in your posting,
> you will find my question there. How much clearer can
> I be?[/color]

Not as quoted by you in this post...
[color=blue]
> My theory is that certain people on this forum feel uncomfortable
> not being able to answer a straight forward question, and are
> trying to dodge it by focusing on posting etiquette.[/color]
[color=blue]
> Sherwin[/color]

To me, you seem to be hopelessly confused.

Consider learning how to use Message IDs to refer to posts.

BTW, the text you claim to quote below the remark "Just to put things
straight, I will repeat what I posted on August 8" appears for the
first time in this thread in the post where the remark about putting
things straight appears, which is dated 8/10/09 17:34:26, and has
Message-ID: <h5qeq0$kdk$1@news.eternal-september.org>.

--
Gene Bloch 650.366.4267 lettersatblochg.com

Gene E. Bloch wrote:[color=blue]
>
> On my copy of this thread there is no post from an entity named Sherwin
> Dubren dated August 9 at 1:48 AM, or anything differing from that time
> by an integral number of hours (i.e., a number of time zones).[/color]

Get yourself a decent email handler. Thunderbird works for me and I
can clearly see both my posts with it.

Sherwin

"sherwin dubren" <sherwindu@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:h5t714$vud$1@news.eternal-september.org...[color=blue]
> Gene E. Bloch wrote:[color=green]
>>
>> On my copy of this thread there is no post from an entity named Sherwin
>> Dubren dated August 9 at 1:48 AM, or anything differing from that time by
>> an integral number of hours (i.e., a number of time zones).[/color]
>
> Get yourself a decent email handler. Thunderbird works for me and I
> can clearly see both my posts with it.
>
> Sherwin[/color]

Then I suggest you take a screenshot of it and post it to Picasa or
something similar. I'm seeing the same as everyone else and I reloaded the
ng.

--

Don't pick a fight with an old man.
If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.