No wonder you were banned from Twitter.

You are incapable of brevity.

Mark-

"Mark Conrad" <none-of@your-business.invalid> wrote in message
news:030820090931339100%none-of@your-business.invalid...[color=blue]
>
> No wonder you were banned from Twitter.[/color]

I do not use Twitter, another fact you got wrong. You are not very good
with your facts are you.
[color=blue]
> You are incapable of brevity.[/color]

And you are incapable of moving to the next stage of life. Get some help
while you are in that sanatorium!



Carry on you sorry sack of sh*t

This is for your next post,

<Snip OT drivel>

I and everybody else have heard it all before

I am not wasting any more time with a Californian hillbilly retard with no
life!


andy t

"Mark Conrad" <none-of@your-business.invalid> wrote in message
news:030820090931339100%none-of@your-business.invalid...
[color=blue]
> No wonder you were banned from Twitter.[/color]

I have never joined Twitter. Another fact you got wrong.
You have never been much good at getting your facts right, have you.

I heard they chucked you out of my space because they were too intelligent
for you.

[color=blue]
> You are incapable of brevity.[/color]

And you are incapable of getting passed the next stage of life. You have
used that phrase before if I remember rightly. Still stuck in your own
little world. (Shame)

This is for your next post, which I and everybody else have been doing
lately by the looks of it.

< Snip yada yada OT drivel >

Do yourself a favour and take the hint!

I have better things to do with my time than to converse with an old
Californian hillbilly retard!

andy t

In article <eS2Hi0FFKHA.1252@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>, Michael
<the_real_mike@garbagemail.com> wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
> > No wonder you were banned from Twitter.[/color]
>
> I do not use Twitter, another fact you got wrong.[/color]

Of course you do not use Twitter, they will not let you.


They also ignore you in the Vista Speech section of the
KnowBrainer forum, where you tried to obligate them to
answer scores of questions you were too lazy to research
for yourself.

Like I posted, you are incapable of brevity.

Mark-

"Mark Conrad" <none-of@your-business.invalid> wrote in message
news:030820090931339100%none-of@your-business.invalid...

[color=blue]
> No wonder you were banned from Twitter.[/color]

I have never joined Twitter. Another fact you got wrong.
You have never been much good at getting your facts right, have you.

I heard they chucked you out of my space because they were too intelligent
for you.
[color=blue]
> You are incapable of brevity.[/color]

And you are incapable of getting passed the next stage of life. You have
used that phrase before if I remember rightly. Still stuck in your own
little world. (Shame)


This is for your next post, which I and everybody else have been doing
lately by the looks of it.

< Snip yada yada OT drivel >

Do yourself a favour and take the hint!

I have better things to do with my time than to converse with an old
Californian hillbilly retard!

andy t

How's this for brevity -

You're a prize C*nt

andy t

"Mark Conrad" <none-of@your-business.invalid> wrote in message
news:030820091305111625%none-of@your-business.invalid...[color=blue]
> In article <eS2Hi0FFKHA.1252@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>, Michael
> <the_real_mike@garbagemail.com> wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>> > No wonder you were banned from Twitter.[/color]
>>
>> I do not use Twitter, another fact you got wrong.[/color]
>
> Of course you do not use Twitter, they will not let you.
>
>
> They also ignore you in the Vista Speech section of the
> KnowBrainer forum, where you tried to obligate them to
> answer scores of questions you were too lazy to research
> for yourself.
>
> Like I posted, you are incapable of brevity.
>
> Mark-[/color]

In article <OZdbdfHFKHA.4280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, andy t
<none-of@your-businesseither.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
> How's this for brevity -
>
> You're a prize C*nt
>
> andy t[/color]

Well now that is a start. See, with me guiding you,
you are now showing a little bit of improvement.

But you really should do something about your hateful
attitude towards your betters, who are guiding you.

That bulging artery in your neck, your red face, the
foaming at your mouth, they all contribute to stress,
which makes for your premature aging.



Now back to the subject of this thread, namely speech
recognition. You mentioned how great you thought it was that
Vista Speech had a feature called "numbers", to assist in
correcting mistakes where there is more than one instance
of a word needing correction.

I admit there is a certain glitz to that feature, after all it sucks
in new people to speech recognition technology.

Unfortunately, "numbers" has little value in the real world.

For example, even today a doctor does not have the time to
fiddle around with correcting text.

He delegates that chore to a member of his staff.

Staff member plays back the original audio, checking the
text. If the text does not match the doctors original audio,
staff member corrects the text with his keyboard.

No "numbers" feature even used.


BTW, the toy Vista Speech app does not even let the user
save the original audio record, so no correction by a
staff member is even possible!

Mark-

"Mark Conrad" <none-of@your-business.invalid> wrote in message
news:030820091955095419%none-of@your-business.invalid...[color=blue]
> In article <OZdbdfHFKHA.4280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, andy t
> <none-of@your-businesseither.invalid> wrote:[/color]
[color=blue]
> Now back to the subject of this thread, namely speech
> recognition.[/color]

Wrong again. You must pay more attention to detail, then you might learn a
bit.

The actual subject of this thread is speech recognition and andy t. You
should know this, YOU WROTE IT! More proof of your failing memory. I see
the sanatorium you are in have their work cut out.

Seeing as the actual name of this thread is called speech recognition and
andy t and my name is mentioned, I can honestly say that I am completely
happy with WSR and do not need the use of overpriced software such as DNS
proving you do not need to spend lots of money on a speech app when in this
case, the other will do exactly the same and in some cases more!
[color=blue]
> You mentioned how great you thought it was that...[/color]

< SNIP the rest of your OT drivel >

This time I took your advice, I did not bother to read the rest of your
post. I knew what was coming, the same OT drivel you have been spouting for
the last two years!

Change the record, heard it all before and still you do not convince anybody
of your Bullsh*t!

The floor is yours. My time is precious, yours is obviously not!

Oh, and by *the floor is yours*, I mean keep the sanatorium floors clean!


andy t.

In article <OT$XBnOFKHA.5956@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>, andy t
<none-of@your-businesseither.invalid> wrote:
[color=blue]
> The actual subject of this thread is speech recognition and andy t.[/color]

Tsk Tsk, wrong again, you are indeed fortunate you have
someone like me looking over your shoulder.

Paranoid as you are, you need guidance, in fact I suggest you
get some professional mental help, as you appear to be
heading for a mental breakdown.

I will do some emergency mentoring, you poor soul.

I said the subject of this thread is speech recognition.

You obviously are having trouble understanding the
simple word "the" - - - blinded as you are by your
extreme paranoia.


the (adjective)

1. denoting one or more people or things already
mentioned or assumed to be common knowledge:

what's the matter?
call the doctor
the phone rang


Andy, you poor crazed soul, I will spell it out for you.

ONE OR MORE THINGS...

- - - and - - -

ONE OR MORE THINGS ALREADY MENTIONED

Now, wasn't that easy?


As in the dictionary definition, NO ONE is saying that
when a person says: CALL THE DOCTOR - - - ...that there
is ONLY one doctor, you poor crazed paranoid soul.


[color=blue]
> ...and do not need the use of overpriced software such as DNS[/color]

Yet another sure sign of your extreme paranoia, as my post
had *NO* mention whatever of "DNS". My actual post is
below my signature here, so you can see for yourself.

[color=blue]
> This time I took your advice...<clip nonsense>...[/color]

No you did not, you never have, that is your problem.


Mark-

--
Mark Conrad's entire post, as referred to by the
crazed "andy t" - - -

Poor soul imagines that "DNS" is mentioned,
which of course there was absolutely *NO*
reference to DNS in my post, very easy to see
that by observing the post below.

The actual speech app I was referring to in the following
post was "MacSpeech Dictate 1.5" which is a COMPETITOR
to DNS.

To spell it out for paranoid Andy, if MacSpeech had their way,
there would be no DNS.

Yet somehow, in Andy's twisted mind, he still thinks I was
promoting DNS in the following post. Go figure.
[color=blue]
> In article <OZdbdfHFKHA.4280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, andy t
> <none-of@your-businesseither.invalid> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > How's this for brevity -
> >
> > You're a prize C*nt
> >
> > andy t[/color]
>
> Well now that is a start. See, with me guiding you,
> you are now showing a little bit of improvement.
>
> But you really should do something about your hateful
> attitude towards your betters, who are guiding you.
>
> That bulging artery in your neck, your red face, the
> foaming at your mouth, they all contribute to stress,
> which makes for your premature aging.
>
>
>
> Now back to the subject of this thread, namely speech
> recognition. You mentioned how great you thought it was that
> Vista Speech had a feature called "numbers", to assist in
> correcting mistakes where there is more than one instance
> of a word needing correction.
>
> I admit there is a certain glitz to that feature, after all it sucks
> in new people to speech recognition technology.
>
> Unfortunately, "numbers" has little value in the real world.
>
> For example, even today a doctor does not have the time to
> fiddle around with correcting text.
>
> He delegates that chore to a member of his staff.
>
> Staff member plays back the original audio, checking the
> text. If the text does not match the doctors original audio,
> staff member corrects the text with his keyboard.
>
> No "numbers" feature even used.
>
>
> BTW, the toy Vista Speech app does not even let the user
> save the original audio record, so no correction by a
> staff member is even possible!
>
> Mark-[/color]

"Mark Conrad" <none-of@your-business.invalid> wrote in message
news:040820090651419893%none-of@your-business.invalid...[color=blue]
> In article <OT$XBnOFKHA.5956@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>, andy t
> <none-of@your-businesseither.invalid> wrote:[/color]


Who does not know the meaning of brevity? I think you need a rethink, you
poor misguided fool.
[color=blue]
> The actual subject of this thread is speech...[/color]

< SNIP - heard it all before! Load of OT drivel >

There, that didn't hurt did it?

Try telling me something I haven't heard before, better still, wait till you
come out of the sanatorium. Perhaps then you might stop keeping repeating
yourself.


andy t

"Robin Banks" <robinbanks@lovespam.invalid> wrote in message
news:O73e4bRFKHA.4932@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
>
>
> "Mark Conrad" <none-of@your-business.invalid> wrote in message
> news:040820090651419893%none-of@your-business.invalid...[color=green]
>> In article <OT$XBnOFKHA.5956@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>, andy t
>> <none-of@your-businesseither.invalid> wrote:[/color]
>
>
> Who does not know the meaning of brevity? I think you need a rethink, you
> poor misguided fool.
>[color=green]
>> The actual subject of this thread is speech...[/color]
>
> < SNIP - heard it all before! Load of OT drivel >
>
> There, that didn't hurt did it?
>
> Try telling me something I haven't heard before, better still, wait till
> you come out of the sanatorium. Perhaps then you might stop keeping
> repeating yourself.
>
>
> andy t[/color]


Is that directed at me Robin?

andy t

I'm so sick of this sh*t. You clearly do not understand paranoia; that's my department. Give him an answer or keep your peace.

"Mark Conrad" <none-of@your-business.invalid> wrote in message news:040820090651419893%none-of@your-business.invalid...[color=blue]
> In article <OT$XBnOFKHA.5956@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl>, andy t
> <none-of@your-businesseither.invalid> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> The actual subject of this thread is speech recognition and andy t.[/color]
>
> Tsk Tsk, wrong again, you are indeed fortunate you have
> someone like me looking over your shoulder.
>
> Paranoid as you are, you need guidance, in fact I suggest you
> get some professional mental help, as you appear to be
> heading for a mental breakdown.
>
> I will do some emergency mentoring, you poor soul.
>
> I said the subject of this thread is speech recognition.
>
> You obviously are having trouble understanding the
> simple word "the" - - - blinded as you are by your
> extreme paranoia.
>
>
> the (adjective)
>
> 1. denoting one or more people or things already
> mentioned or assumed to be common knowledge:
>
> what's the matter?
> call the doctor
> the phone rang
>
>
> Andy, you poor crazed soul, I will spell it out for you.
>
> ONE OR MORE THINGS...
>
> - - - and - - -
>
> ONE OR MORE THINGS ALREADY MENTIONED
>
> Now, wasn't that easy?
>
>
> As in the dictionary definition, NO ONE is saying that
> when a person says: CALL THE DOCTOR - - - ...that there
> is ONLY one doctor, you poor crazed paranoid soul.
>
>
>[color=green]
>> ...and do not need the use of overpriced software such as DNS[/color]
>
> Yet another sure sign of your extreme paranoia, as my post
> had *NO* mention whatever of "DNS". My actual post is
> below my signature here, so you can see for yourself.
>
>[color=green]
>> This time I took your advice...<clip nonsense>...[/color]
>
> No you did not, you never have, that is your problem.
>
>
> Mark-
>
> --
> Mark Conrad's entire post, as referred to by the
> crazed "andy t" - - -
>
> Poor soul imagines that "DNS" is mentioned,
> which of course there was absolutely *NO*
> reference to DNS in my post, very easy to see
> that by observing the post below.
>
> The actual speech app I was referring to in the following
> post was "MacSpeech Dictate 1.5" which is a COMPETITOR
> to DNS.
>
> To spell it out for paranoid Andy, if MacSpeech had their way,
> there would be no DNS.
>
> Yet somehow, in Andy's twisted mind, he still thinks I was
> promoting DNS in the following post. Go figure.
>[color=green]
>> In article <OZdbdfHFKHA.4280@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, andy t
>> <none-of@your-businesseither.invalid> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > How's this for brevity -
>> >
>> > You're a prize C*nt
>> >
>> > andy t[/color]
>>
>> Well now that is a start. See, with me guiding you,
>> you are now showing a little bit of improvement.
>>
>> But you really should do something about your hateful
>> attitude towards your betters, who are guiding you.
>>
>> That bulging artery in your neck, your red face, the
>> foaming at your mouth, they all contribute to stress,
>> which makes for your premature aging.
>>
>>
>>
>> Now back to the subject of this thread, namely speech
>> recognition. You mentioned how great you thought it was that
>> Vista Speech had a feature called "numbers", to assist in
>> correcting mistakes where there is more than one instance
>> of a word needing correction.
>>
>> I admit there is a certain glitz to that feature, after all it sucks
>> in new people to speech recognition technology.
>>
>> Unfortunately, "numbers" has little value in the real world.
>>
>> For example, even today a doctor does not have the time to
>> fiddle around with correcting text.
>>
>> He delegates that chore to a member of his staff.
>>
>> Staff member plays back the original audio, checking the
>> text. If the text does not match the doctors original audio,
>> staff member corrects the text with his keyboard.
>>
>> No "numbers" feature even used.
>>
>>
>> BTW, the toy Vista Speech app does not even let the user
>> save the original audio record, so no correction by a
>> staff member is even possible!
>>
>> Mark-[/color][/color]