Manfred Nathanal Hollingsworth wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias says that there are over 10 million Ubuntu users.
>
> Take a look at the numbers.
>
> [url]http://ubuntucounter.geekosophical.net/[/url]
>
>
> Now, there is a link to "The Linux Counter" which posts the number of
> registered users and machines. I would believe this is more like the
> actual number out there. Eat your heart out Alias. Just FYI.
>
> [url]http://counter.li.org/[/url][/color]

Your brain has the computing power of a 1960's vacuume tube.

Perhaps because your head too is a vacuum

On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:26:25 +0300, Frank <Imanidiot@com.ca.uk> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Manfred Nathanal Hollingsworth wrote:[color=green]
>> Alias says that there are over 10 million Ubuntu users.
>>
>> Take a look at the numbers.
>>
>> [url]http://ubuntucounter.geekosophical.net/[/url]
>>
>>
>> Now, there is a link to "The Linux Counter" which posts the number of
>> registered users and machines. I would believe this is more like the
>> actual number out there. Eat your heart out Alias. Just FYI.
>>
>> [url]http://counter.li.org/[/url][/color]
>
>Your brain has the computing power of a 1960's vacuume tube.
>
>Perhaps because your head too is a vacuum[/color]

A vacuum tube has as much "computing power" as today's replacement,
the transistor, would. (As a single relay that would be just about
"none").

Translation: you once again demonstrate that you have no idea what you
are talking about.

+Bob+ wrote:[color=blue]
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 21:26:25 +0300, Frank <Imanidiot@com.ca.uk> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Manfred Nathanal Hollingsworth wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Alias says that there are over 10 million Ubuntu users.
>>>
>>> Take a look at the numbers.
>>>
>>> [url]http://ubuntucounter.geekosophical.net/[/url]
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, there is a link to "The Linux Counter" which posts the number of
>>> registered users and machines. I would believe this is more like the
>>> actual number out there. Eat your heart out Alias. Just FYI.
>>>
>>> [url]http://counter.li.org/[/url][/color]
>> Your brain has the computing power of a 1960's vacuume tube.
>>
>> Perhaps because your head too is a vacuum[/color]
>
> A vacuum tube has as much "computing power" as today's replacement,
> the transistor, would. (As a single relay that would be just about
> "none").
>
> Translation: you once again demonstrate that you have no idea what you
> are talking about.[/color]


Yeah moron but it uses more power to do the same job... and is far slower.

So if you take into consideration the amount of switching in the same
time, a transistor is far faster than a tube.

in one second the transistor has more computing power than the tube in 1
second. BY FAR.

The tube due to its physical dimensions is slower and has more noise
when pushing it to work at higher speeds. Too much noise in high
switching speeds makes it a non effective relay you moron.

Just imagine the above idiots ears puffing out smoke frying itself
trying to think.....

So although you are trying to say that you are smart, you forget
physics, with a transistor that has the size in the scale of nm (nano
meters) a tube doest have the chance...

I guess you too have a brain similar to a vacuum tube!

LOL you are as smart as frank da bigot! LOL

On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:25:53 +0300, Frank <Imanidiot@com.ca.uk> wrote:
[color=blue]
>I guess you too have a brain similar to a vacuum tube!
>
>LOL you are as smart as frank da bigot! LOL[/color]

Sorry psuedoFrank: the computing power of "a" vacuum tube or "a"
transistor is still zero. You can't form AND, NAND, or NOR gates i.e.
make any decisions with single point. All you can do is relay a
signal. Therefore you can't do any "computing" with either.