|
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update "Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message news:MXNrh.97118$873.21018@fe06.news.easynews.com...[color=blue] > Me, I'm going for the Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate UPGRADE Limited > Numbered Signature Edition. The box isn't available for download. ;-) > > [url]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000M2WPIQ[/url][/color] I keep thinking that offering from Amazon is a joke. Are you really willing to pay $10 for Bill Gates' signature? :-} |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update Scott wrote:.[color=blue] > > Most people have no clue what an "OEM" c0py is and if the retailer is > selling it legally the person would also have to be buying qualifying > hardware.[/color] I have yet to see one copy of a full retail XP in Spain. All the computer shops sell generic OEMs with NO hardware. In fact, I just bought myself a copy of XP Pro SPB from NewEgg in the USA with NO hardware. A friend of mine bought it and sent it to me by mail. The hardware nonsense was dropped a long time ago in ALL countries. Sooooo, it appears YOU need to get a clue regarding generic (DPS) OEM licences. Alias |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update [color=blue][color=green] >> >> Many others will opt for OEM copies since they are unlikely to want to >> move the OS from machine to machine, so this deal is even more expensive.[/color] > > Most people have no clue what an "OEM" c0py is and if the retailer is > selling it legally the person would also have to be buying qualifying > hardware. > >[/color] It maybe against the contract that the seller has with MS but I doubt very seriously that there is a law on the books that makes it a crime. Contract dispute is all. |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update The hardware requirement has been removed (some time ago). "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.ca> wrote in message news:eooerk$ve7$1@aioe.org...[color=blue] > Scott wrote:.[color=green] >> >> Most people have no clue what an "OEM" c0py is and if the retailer is >> selling it legally the person would also have to be buying qualifying >> hardware.[/color] > > I have yet to see one copy of a full retail XP in Spain. All the computer > shops sell generic OEMs with NO hardware. In fact, I just bought myself a > copy of XP Pro SPB from NewEgg in the USA with NO hardware. A friend of > mine bought it and sent it to me by mail. > > The hardware nonsense was dropped a long time ago in ALL countries. > > Sooooo, it appears YOU need to get a clue regarding generic (DPS) OEM > licences. > > Alias[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update Colin Barnhorst wrote:[color=blue] > The hardware requirement has been removed (some time ago).[/color] In the USA and maybe Canada. Not here. There never was a hardware requirement. Alias[color=blue] > > "Alias" <aka@maskedandanonymous.ca> wrote in message > news:eooerk$ve7$1@aioe.org...[color=green] >> Scott wrote:.[color=darkred] >>> >>> Most people have no clue what an "OEM" c0py is and if the retailer is >>> selling it legally the person would also have to be buying qualifying >>> hardware.[/color] >> >> I have yet to see one copy of a full retail XP in Spain. All the >> computer shops sell generic OEMs with NO hardware. In fact, I just >> bought myself a copy of XP Pro SPB from NewEgg in the USA with NO >> hardware. A friend of mine bought it and sent it to me by mail. >> >> The hardware nonsense was dropped a long time ago in ALL countries. >> >> Sooooo, it appears YOU need to get a clue regarding generic (DPS) OEM >> licences. >> >> Alias[/color] >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update In message <MXNrh.97118$873.21018@fe06.news.easynews.com> Scott <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote: [color=blue] >Me, I'm going for the Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate UPGRADE Limited >Numbered Signature Edition. The box isn't available for download. ;-) > >[url]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000M2WPIQ[/url][/color] I'll pay extra to NOT have the limited numbered signature edition. -- He who laughs last thinks slowest! |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update In message <03C8E079-DDE5-450D-89FE-DEBC54535AEB@microsoft.com> "Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote: [color=blue] >The hardware requirement has been removed (some time ago).[/color] At least one of my wholesalers still has the "* Only for purchase with qualifying hardware, or by authorized Microsoft partners" or something to that effect. They never enforced it though, they'd just give you $10 off and throw in a known-defective mouse for $10, or something equally stupid. That being said, I don't buy OEM software through them anymore, could be they just never updated the pricelist. -- He who laughs last thinks slowest! |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update NewEgg is slow to update their OEM info also. It seems the prices get updated PDQ but erroneous fine print lives on forever. "DevilsPGD" <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> wrote in message news:gmmvq2dtv88976t3hk7h4j8vf7lgdqf07d@4ax.com...[color=blue] > In message <03C8E079-DDE5-450D-89FE-DEBC54535AEB@microsoft.com> "Colin > Barnhorst" <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote: >[color=green] >>The hardware requirement has been removed (some time ago).[/color] > > At least one of my wholesalers still has the "* Only for purchase with > qualifying hardware, or by authorized Microsoft partners" or something > to that effect. > > They never enforced it though, they'd just give you $10 off and throw in > a known-defective mouse for $10, or something equally stupid. > > That being said, I don't buy OEM software through them anymore, could be > they just never updated the pricelist. > > -- > He who laughs last thinks slowest![/color] |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update Robert Blacher spake thusly on 1/18/2007 10:56 AM:[color=blue] > "Scott" <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote in message > news:MXNrh.97118$873.21018@fe06.news.easynews.com...[color=green] >> Me, I'm going for the Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate UPGRADE Limited >> Numbered Signature Edition. The box isn't available for download. ;-) >> >> [url]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000M2WPIQ[/url][/color] > > I keep thinking that offering from Amazon is a joke.[/color] Oh it's no joke. And it's being sold all over. Amazon isn't the only place to get it. [url]http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=203931995&loc=105&sp=1[/url] [url]http://www.compusa.com/products/product_info.asp?product_code=344270[/url] [url]http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=vista%20signature%20edition[/url] [color=blue] > > Are you really willing to pay $10 for Bill Gates' signature? :-}[/color] That depends on what it costs. In this case it's only $10.00. And actually, I'm more interested in the numbered part than the signature part (since obviously he didn't sign 20,000 boxes). -- Scott [url]http://angrykeyboartder.com[/url] A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update DevilsPGD spake thusly on 1/18/2007 1:52 PM:[color=blue] > In message <MXNrh.97118$873.21018@fe06.news.easynews.com> Scott > <geekboy@angrykeyboarder.comatose> wrote: >[color=green] >> Me, I'm going for the Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate UPGRADE Limited >> Numbered Signature Edition. The box isn't available for download. ;-) >> >> [url]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000M2WPIQ[/url][/color] > > I'll pay extra to NOT have the limited numbered signature edition.[/color] So buy the version of your choice and tear up a $10.00 bill. :-) -- Scott [url]http://angrykeyboartder.com[/url] A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update caver1 spake thusly on 1/18/2007 11:47 AM:[color=blue] >[color=green][color=darkred] >>> >>> Many others will opt for OEM copies since they are unlikely to want >>> to move the OS from machine to machine, so this deal is even more >>> expensive.[/color] >> >> Most people have no clue what an "OEM" c0py is and if the retailer is >> selling it legally the person would also have to be buying qualifying >> hardware. >> >>[/color] > > > It maybe against the contract that the seller has with MS but I doubt > very seriously that there is a law on the books that makes it a crime. > Contract dispute is all.[/color] Correct. My use of "legally" wasn't the right word, but you get the idea. :-) -- Scott [url]http://angrykeyboartder.com[/url] A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update Alias spake thusly on 1/18/2007 11:39 AM:[color=blue] > Scott wrote:.[color=green] >> >> Most people have no clue what an "OEM" c0py is and if the retailer is >> selling it legally the person would also have to be buying qualifying >> hardware.[/color] > > I have yet to see one copy of a full retail XP in Spain. All the > computer shops sell generic OEMs with NO hardware.[/color] Most places here (BestBuy, CompUSA etc) only sell retail. Smaller shops do sell OEM and then of course there are the online retailers. [color=blue] > In fact, I just > bought myself a copy of XP Pro SPB from NewEgg in the USA with NO > hardware. A friend of mine bought it and sent it to me by mail.[/color] I've actually never bought any OEM software, because most of what I've bought doesn't come in an OEM version, or I wasn't aware of an OEM version.[color=blue] > > The hardware nonsense was dropped a long time ago in ALL countries.[/color] I stand corrected. [color=blue] > Sooooo, it appears YOU need to get a clue regarding generic (DPS) OEM > licences.[/color] And thanks to you, I have. :-) -- Scott [url]http://angrykeyboartder.com[/url] A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update Scott wrote:[color=blue] > Alias spake thusly on 1/18/2007 11:39 AM:[color=green] >> Scott wrote:.[color=darkred] >>> >>> Most people have no clue what an "OEM" c0py is and if the retailer is >>> selling it legally the person would also have to be buying qualifying >>> hardware.[/color] >> >> I have yet to see one copy of a full retail XP in Spain. All the >> computer shops sell generic OEMs with NO hardware.[/color] > > Most places here (BestBuy, CompUSA etc) only sell retail. Smaller shops > do sell OEM and then of course there are the online retailers. >[color=green] > > In fact, I just >> bought myself a copy of XP Pro SPB from NewEgg in the USA with NO >> hardware. A friend of mine bought it and sent it to me by mail.[/color] > > I've actually never bought any OEM software, because most of what I've > bought doesn't come in an OEM version, or I wasn't aware of an OEM version.[color=green] >> >> The hardware nonsense was dropped a long time ago in ALL countries.[/color] > > I stand corrected. >[color=green] >> Sooooo, it appears YOU need to get a clue regarding generic (DPS) OEM >> licences.[/color] > > And thanks to you, I have. :-)[/color] You're welcome ;-) Alias |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update Alias spake thusly on 1/18/2007 5:24 PM:[color=blue] >[color=green][color=darkred] >>> Sooooo, it appears YOU need to get a clue regarding generic (DPS) OEM >>> licences.[/color] >> >> And thanks to you, I have. :-)[/color] > > You're welcome ;-)[/color] On the other hand..... [url]http://www.zipzoomfly.com/Microsoft_MS_OS.html[/url] I guess they didn't get the memo. ;-) -- Scott [url]http://angrykeyboartder.com[/url] A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| |||
| Re: Family Pack license in the works - Update Taking advantage of a possible loophole in Microsoft's policies is no more stealing than it is to take advantage of tax loopholes to save money on taxes. "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS********.com> wrote in message news:u5%23%23LAwOHHA.5064@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... WOW! I can't believe some of the comments here. I told a certain fella (I'm sure he remembers the thread) a couple of months ago that people steal because they want to steal. Lowering the price wouldn't make any difference. Well, unfortunately, from some of the comments it looks like I am right. Some of you still aren't happy and it looks like you would still steal the operating system if you could. What has happened to right and wrong? -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS********.com> wrote in message news:edOA5%23rOHHA.3944@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > It looks like it has been finalized. > > See here from CNET News: > [url]http://news.com.com/Microsoft+tries+to+spread+Vista+far+and+wide/2100-1016_3-6150933.html?tag=nefd.top[/url] > > Buy boxed Vista Ultimate edition and get 2 copies of Vista HOME Premium > for $50.00 per copy. > > I think that is something that most everyone can accept! > > -- > > > Regards, > > Richard Urban > Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User > (For email, remove the obvious from my address) > > Quote from George Ankner: > If you knew as much as you think you know, > You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! > > > [/color] |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| family license | srobin | Windows Vista | 4 | 02-12-2007 11:47 PM |
| Question on Family Pack | Raiden | Windows Vista | 2 | 02-08-2007 08:16 PM |
| Vista Family pack? | C. Britton | Windows Vista | 10 | 01-27-2007 03:00 PM |
| Family License? | Innes | Windows Vista | 14 | 01-23-2007 09:15 AM |
| Family Pack license in the works? | Richard Urban | Windows Vista | 23 | 01-19-2007 05:15 PM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |