| |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
07-23-2008, 06:30 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time DanS wrote: > Frank <fb@nospam.com> wrote in news:g68eg8$86c$1@aioe.org: > > >>DanS wrote: >> >> >>>Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista. >> >>------------------------------------------------------ >>Well that's not really true is it dan-o? >>Now you're lying! >> > > > Yes, it is true, and no I'm not lying. Look back at the thread. No, it's not true. You look it up, liar!      |
|
07-23-2008, 07:11 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Bill Yanaire wrote: > An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime > time: > > > > I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against > Linux, its that I can't be for it. > > The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a gazillion > commands to make it do what you want, and who has time for that? > > The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly > second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth of > specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform emulators > are lame. > > The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for home > users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the effect > of making the apps any better. > > The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive to > actually use. > > The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms or > stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning time, > research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not the least > of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format hard disks > if you are going to play around with it. It is also not so clear that > Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they just have a > reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. > > Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users who > will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of vitality of > their system, and there is no real professional help available. > > Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as > cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense > attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially > since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its > impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The > world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just > the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of > things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs > to be balance from people not so smitten with something. > > In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm > suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more > easily: "Should I choose Linux?" Please spell it correctly next time - it is Linsux - geez. Toad -- |
|
07-23-2008, 09:30 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time In article <ReIhk.16057$mh5.1886@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com>, Bill Yanaire <bill@yanaire.com> wrote: > >The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive to >actually use. > Bzzzzt. X11 predates windows 1.0 by about 18 months. And Unixes had useable windowed desktops when MS was still tiling little squares on 14" CRTs. >being frequent need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are going Lol. You miserable troll. You dont' have to frequently format ANY modern system's drives. >there is no real professional help available. You DO know that Redhat, SUSE, Dell, IBM, Sun, and about a hundred other companies offer commercial linux support, right, troll? >surprised by its difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading >instructions from a $30 book. Yeah, I had the same problem with linear algebra. And the book was like eighty bucks too! |
|
07-24-2008, 03:00 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time FAB wrote: > Alias wrote: > >> FAB wrote: >> >>> Alias wrote: >>> >>>> Frank wrote: >>>> >>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for >>>>>>>>> prime time: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm >>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has >>>>>>>>> time for that? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line >>>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called >>>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is >>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and >>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular uses. >>>>>>>>> Cross-platform emulators are lame. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the >>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to >>>>>>>> install it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent >>>>>>>>> for home users, especially since customizing does not seem to >>>>>>>>> be to the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could >>>>>>>> make this judgment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are >>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> False. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, >>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra >>>>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by >>>>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition >>>>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with >>>>>>>>> it. It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from >>>>>>>>> such hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as >>>>>>>>> they fly under the radar. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, >>>>>>>> you can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux >>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness >>>>>>>>> of vitality of their system, and there is no real professional >>>>>>>>> help available. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same >>>>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of >>>>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, >>>>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty >>>>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a >>>>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on >>>>>>>>> both sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is >>>>>>>>> filled with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their >>>>>>>>> bands, and on an on. There needs to be balance from people not >>>>>>>>> so smitten with something. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you >>>>>>>>> more easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More of your lies? >>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked >>>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>>>>> Loser! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Frank's jealous. >>>> >>> >>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? >>> Got those degrees in lying huh! >>> How wonderful! >>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! >>> >> >> Frank's *really* jealous. > > Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying. Nor do I and, of course, that's not why you're jealous. > That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it! > You deserve it...LOL! Ye olde sour grapes again, eh? Alias |
|
07-24-2008, 03:00 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time FAB wrote: > Alias wrote: > >> FAB wrote: >> >>> >>> Hey sheep-fukker, you're stupid... ignorant lying trolling ass >> >> >> Enough said. > > Trouble with the truth...again...as usual? > let all act really surprised! > Not at all but you sure do. Alias |
|
07-24-2008, 03:00 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Hound Dog yelped: > Alias wrote: >> >> That's what you think you're doing but, in fact, all you're doing is >> revealing what a troll you are and how you all failed logic and common >> decency. >> > > > The fact that you respond Alias makes you a troll. False. > You keep the noise > level up to a fever pitch. False. > You're just one person. Gosh, did you figure that one out all by yourself? > Do you really see us > coming after anyone else other than you or Albright with the game you > fail to recognize? I'm not playing your game, your delusion that I am notwithstanding. > We come after you two, because you both are trolls No, you post here all day long because you have no life and you are a troll. So are Frank and Broke Bill. > and you'll respond particularly you Alias. Huh? > It's the nature of the beast > -- you. Like I said, don't give up your day job. You're not a shrink and you're no a very good troll. Alias |
|
07-24-2008, 04:50 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time FAB wrote: > Alias wrote: > >> FAB wrote: >> >>> Alias wrote: >>> >>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>> >>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime >>>>> time: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time >>>>> for that? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one >>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do >>>> you know what it is, lamer? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly >>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth >>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform >>>>> emulators are lame. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications in >>>> Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the >>>>> effect of making the apps any better. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>>> this judgment. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive >>>>> to actually use. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> False. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms >>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning >>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not >>>>> the least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format >>>>> hard disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not >>>>> so clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they >>>>> just have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you >>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users >>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of >>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help >>>>> available. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as >>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense >>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially >>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its >>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The >>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just >>>>> the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of >>>>> things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There >>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something. >>>>> >>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more >>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>> >>>> Alias >>> >>> >>> More of your lies? >>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked and >>> daily make a fool out of yourself. >>> Loser! >> >> >> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >> >> Alias > > Thanks for proving my point (once again). Proving that you are uneducated and a low life with no class is done by you with your every post. I'm just confirming it. Alias |
|
07-24-2008, 08:01 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > FAB wrote: > >> Alias wrote: >> >>> FAB wrote: >>> >>>> Alias wrote: >>>> >>>>> Frank wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for >>>>>>>>>> prime time: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm >>>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has >>>>>>>>>> time for that? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line >>>>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called >>>>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is >>>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and >>>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular uses. >>>>>>>>>> Cross-platform emulators are lame. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the >>>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to >>>>>>>>> install it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent >>>>>>>>>> for home users, especially since customizing does not seem to >>>>>>>>>> be to the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could >>>>>>>>> make this judgment. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are >>>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> False. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, >>>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the >>>>>>>>>> extra learning time, research time, and other chores >>>>>>>>>> necessitated by Linux, not the least of them being frequent >>>>>>>>>> need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are going >>>>>>>>>> to play around with it. It is also not so clear that Linux >>>>>>>>>> users are immune from such hazards, or if they just have a >>>>>>>>>> reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, >>>>>>>>> you can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux >>>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the >>>>>>>>>> usefulness of vitality of their system, and there is no real >>>>>>>>>> professional help available. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the >>>>>>>>>> same as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is >>>>>>>>>> lots of expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of >>>>>>>>>> upside, especially since I found myself surprised by its >>>>>>>>>> difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading >>>>>>>>>> instructions from a $30 book. The world ought to know that >>>>>>>>>> there are opinions on both sides, not just the hype of Linux >>>>>>>>>> lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of things -- their >>>>>>>>>> soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs to be >>>>>>>>>> balance from people not so smitten with something. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so >>>>>>>>>> I'm suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find >>>>>>>>>> you more easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More of your lies? >>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass >>>>>>>> kicked and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>>>>>> Loser! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Frank's jealous. >>>>> >>>> >>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? >>>> Got those degrees in lying huh! >>>> How wonderful! >>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! >>>> >>> >>> Frank's *really* jealous. >> >> >> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying. > > > Nor do I and, of course, that's not why you're jealous. > >> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it! >> You deserve it...LOL! > > > Ye olde sour grapes again, eh? > Ye olde backpedaling and denial again huh? Figures! |
|
07-24-2008, 08:40 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Frank wrote: > Alias wrote: > >> FAB wrote: >> >>> Alias wrote: >>> >>>> FAB wrote: >>>> >>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Frank wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for >>>>>>>>>>> prime time: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm >>>>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has >>>>>>>>>>> time for that? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command >>>>>>>>>> line one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing >>>>>>>>>> called CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is >>>>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and >>>>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular >>>>>>>>>>> uses. Cross-platform emulators are lame. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the >>>>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to >>>>>>>>>> install it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent >>>>>>>>>>> for home users, especially since customizing does not seem to >>>>>>>>>>> be to the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could >>>>>>>>>> make this judgment. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are >>>>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> False. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, >>>>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the >>>>>>>>>>> extra learning time, research time, and other chores >>>>>>>>>>> necessitated by Linux, not the least of them being frequent >>>>>>>>>>> need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are going >>>>>>>>>>> to play around with it. It is also not so clear that Linux >>>>>>>>>>> users are immune from such hazards, or if they just have a >>>>>>>>>>> reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, >>>>>>>>>> you can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux >>>>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the >>>>>>>>>>> usefulness of vitality of their system, and there is no real >>>>>>>>>>> professional help available. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, >>>>>>>>>> right? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the >>>>>>>>>>> same as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is >>>>>>>>>>> lots of expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of >>>>>>>>>>> upside, especially since I found myself surprised by its >>>>>>>>>>> difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading >>>>>>>>>>> instructions from a $30 book. The world ought to know that >>>>>>>>>>> there are opinions on both sides, not just the hype of Linux >>>>>>>>>>> lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of things -- their >>>>>>>>>>> soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs to be >>>>>>>>>>> balance from people not so smitten with something. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so >>>>>>>>>>> I'm suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find >>>>>>>>>>> you more easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> More of your lies? >>>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass >>>>>>>>> kicked and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>>>>>>> Loser! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Frank's jealous. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? >>>>> Got those degrees in lying huh! >>>>> How wonderful! >>>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! >>>>> >>>> >>>> Frank's *really* jealous. >>> >>> >>> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying. >> >> >> Nor do I and, of course, that's not why you're jealous. >> >>> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it! >>> You deserve it...LOL! >> >> >> Ye olde sour grapes again, eh? >> > Ye olde backpedaling and denial again huh? > Figures! Just be a man instead of a lying low life slime ball and admit you're jealous and wish that you had applied yourself more in school. Alias |
|
07-24-2008, 08:40 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > Frank wrote: > >> Alias wrote: >> >>> FAB wrote: >>> >>>> Alias wrote: >>>> >>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Frank wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready >>>>>>>>>>>> for prime time: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm >>>>>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has >>>>>>>>>>>> time for that? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command >>>>>>>>>>> line one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing >>>>>>>>>>> called CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is >>>>>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and >>>>>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular >>>>>>>>>>>> uses. Cross-platform emulators are lame. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the >>>>>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid >>>>>>>>>>> to install it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent >>>>>>>>>>>> for home users, especially since customizing does not seem >>>>>>>>>>>> to be to the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could >>>>>>>>>>> make this judgment. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are >>>>>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> False. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, >>>>>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the >>>>>>>>>>>> extra learning time, research time, and other chores >>>>>>>>>>>> necessitated by Linux, not the least of them being frequent >>>>>>>>>>>> need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are >>>>>>>>>>>> going to play around with it. It is also not so clear that >>>>>>>>>>>> Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they just >>>>>>>>>>>> have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, >>>>>>>>>>> you can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux >>>>>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the >>>>>>>>>>>> usefulness of vitality of their system, and there is no real >>>>>>>>>>>> professional help available. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, >>>>>>>>>>> right? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the >>>>>>>>>>>> same as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is >>>>>>>>>>>> lots of expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot >>>>>>>>>>>> of upside, especially since I found myself surprised by its >>>>>>>>>>>> difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading >>>>>>>>>>>> instructions from a $30 book. The world ought to know that >>>>>>>>>>>> there are opinions on both sides, not just the hype of Linux >>>>>>>>>>>> lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of things -- >>>>>>>>>>>> their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs >>>>>>>>>>>> to be balance from people not so smitten with something. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find >>>>>>>>>>>> you more easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> More of your lies? >>>>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass >>>>>>>>>> kicked and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>>>>>>>> Loser! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Frank's jealous. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? >>>>>> Got those degrees in lying huh! >>>>>> How wonderful! >>>>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Frank's *really* jealous. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying. >>> >>> >>> >>> Nor do I and, of course, that's not why you're jealous. >>> >>>> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it! >>>> You deserve it...LOL! >>> >>> >>> >>> Ye olde sour grapes again, eh? >>> >> Ye olde backpedaling and denial again huh? >> Figures! > > > Just be a man instead of a lying low life slime ball and admit you're > jealous and wish that you had applied yourself more in school. > Projecting again huh (as usual)? Figures! |
|
07-24-2008, 08:41 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time FAB wrote: > Alias wrote: > >> Frank wrote: >> >>> Alias wrote: >>> >>>> FAB wrote: >>>> >>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Frank wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready >>>>>>>>>>>>> for prime time: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>> against Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has >>>>>>>>>>>>> time for that? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command >>>>>>>>>>>> line one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a >>>>>>>>>>>> thing called CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is >>>>>>>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a dearth of specialized software for particular >>>>>>>>>>>>> uses. Cross-platform emulators are lame. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the >>>>>>>>>>>> applications in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid >>>>>>>>>>>> to install it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be >>>>>>>>>>>>> non-existent for home users, especially since customizing >>>>>>>>>>>>> does not seem to be to the effect of making the apps any >>>>>>>>>>>>> better. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could >>>>>>>>>>>> make this judgment. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are >>>>>>>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> False. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, >>>>>>>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the >>>>>>>>>>>>> extra learning time, research time, and other chores >>>>>>>>>>>>> necessitated by Linux, not the least of them being frequent >>>>>>>>>>>>> need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are >>>>>>>>>>>>> going to play around with it. It is also not so clear that >>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they just >>>>>>>>>>>>> have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and >>>>>>>>>>>> click, you can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux >>>>>>>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the >>>>>>>>>>>>> usefulness of vitality of their system, and there is no >>>>>>>>>>>>> real professional help available. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, >>>>>>>>>>>> right? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the >>>>>>>>>>>>> same as cheap |
