| |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > > If you plan to be a shrink, don't give up your day job. > You're the only patient I have that's on the couch, stupid. But you are just that stupid, and you fail to see what is happening to you.      |
|
07-23-2008, 10:10 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > FAB wrote: > >> Alias wrote: >> >>> Frank wrote: >>> >>>> Alias wrote: >>>> >>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for >>>>>>>> prime time: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time >>>>>>>> for that? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line >>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called >>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is >>>>>>>> distinctly second rate, which explains why it is free, and there >>>>>>>> is a dearth of specialized software for particular uses. >>>>>>>> Cross-platform emulators are lame. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications >>>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to >>>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>>>>>> this judgment. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are >>>>>>>> counterintuitive to actually use. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> False. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, >>>>>>>> worms or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra >>>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by >>>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition >>>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with >>>>>>>> it. It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from >>>>>>>> such hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as >>>>>>>> they fly under the radar. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you >>>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux >>>>>>>> users who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness >>>>>>>> of vitality of their system, and there is no real professional >>>>>>>> help available. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same >>>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of >>>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, >>>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty >>>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a >>>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on >>>>>>>> both sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is >>>>>>>> filled with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, >>>>>>>> and on an on. There needs to be balance from people not so >>>>>>>> smitten with something. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you >>>>>>>> more easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Alias >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> More of your lies? >>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked >>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>>>> Loser! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? >>> >>> >>> >>> Frank's jealous. >>> >> >> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? >> Got those degrees in lying huh! >> How wonderful! >> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! >> > > Frank's *really* jealous. Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying. That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it! You deserve it...LOL! |
|
07-23-2008, 10:10 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time "FAB" <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in message news:Ox2vWpO7IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Alias wrote: > >> FAB wrote: >> >>> Alias wrote: >>> >>>> Frank wrote: >>>> >>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for >>>>>>>>> prime time: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time >>>>>>>>> for that? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one >>>>>>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do >>>>>>>> you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly >>>>>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth >>>>>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform >>>>>>>>> emulators are lame. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications >>>>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to >>>>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>>>>>>> this judgment. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive >>>>>>>>> to actually use. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> False. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms >>>>>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning >>>>>>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not >>>>>>>>> the least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format >>>>>>>>> hard disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not >>>>>>>>> so clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they >>>>>>>>> just have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you >>>>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users >>>>>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of >>>>>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help >>>>>>>>> available. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as >>>>>>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense >>>>>>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially >>>>>>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its >>>>>>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The >>>>>>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not >>>>>>>>> just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers >>>>>>>>> of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There >>>>>>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more >>>>>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> More of your lies? >>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked >>>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>>>>> Loser! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Frank's jealous. >>>> >>> >>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? >>> Got those degrees in lying huh! >>> How wonderful! >>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! >>> >> >> Frank's *really* jealous. > > Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying. > That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it! > You deserve it...LOL! > If they gave out degrees in lying you would have a Masters and a PhD. |
|
07-23-2008, 10:10 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Bill Yanaire wrote: > An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime time: > > > > I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against Linux, its > that I can't be for it. > > The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a gazillion > commands to make it do what you want, and who has time for that? > I have installed and setup Ubuntu for computer novices. The install included setting up and configuring Firefox, Thunderbird, OpenOffice and a few other applications like Gimp plus the standard applications that came with Ubuntu. I also installed a printer for them. All they need to do is log on and use the applications. No viruses, no security breaches and it never crashes for them. They almost never have to reboot it and they have no trouble. And they do notg know even 1 command. > The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly second > rate, Not true. Open Office behaves better than MS Office and handles graphic much better. And for those who like Picasa you can download the Linux version and it works great. > which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth of specialized > software for particular uses. Cross-platform emulators are lame. > > The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for home users, > especially since customizing does not seem to be to the effect of making the > apps any better. > > The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive to > actually use. > No they are not. As a matter of fact Nautilus is superior to Windows Explorer. It does not crash and has better ease of use. > The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms or > stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning time, > research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not the least of them > being frequent need to repartition and/or format hard disks if you are going > to play around with it. It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune > from such hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as they fly > under the radar. > Once you set it up properly for a novice they have no learning curve and no issues. > Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users who will > actually be angry if you question the usefulness of vitality of their > system, and there is no real professional help available. > That is not true. While there are some that meet that description most are helpful. Peer support is very good. But the average plain old user does not need support. > Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as cheap. > Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense attached to a > Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially since I found myself > surprised by its difficulty and/or its impossibility even when reading > instructions from a $30 book. The world ought to know that there are > opinions on both sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is > filled with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an > on. There needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something. > > In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm suggesting > lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more easily: "Should I > choose Linux?" > > > |
|
07-23-2008, 10:10 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message news:j2Khk.17064$89.11556@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com... > > "FAB" <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in message > news:Ox2vWpO7IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Alias wrote: >> >>> FAB wrote: >>> >>>> Alias wrote: >>>> >>>>> Frank wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for >>>>>>>>>> prime time: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>>>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time >>>>>>>>>> for that? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line >>>>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called >>>>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly >>>>>>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth >>>>>>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform >>>>>>>>>> emulators are lame. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications >>>>>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>>>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to >>>>>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>>>>>>>> this judgment. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive >>>>>>>>>> to actually use. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> False. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms >>>>>>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra >>>>>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by >>>>>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition >>>>>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with it. >>>>>>>>>> It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from such >>>>>>>>>> hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as they fly >>>>>>>>>> under the radar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you >>>>>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users >>>>>>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of >>>>>>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help >>>>>>>>>> available. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same >>>>>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of >>>>>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, >>>>>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty >>>>>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a >>>>>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on both >>>>>>>>>> sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled >>>>>>>>>> with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on >>>>>>>>>> an on. There needs to be balance from people not so smitten with >>>>>>>>>> something. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more >>>>>>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> More of your lies? >>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked >>>>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>>>>>> Loser! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Frank's jealous. >>>>> >>>> >>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? >>>> Got those degrees in lying huh! >>>> How wonderful! >>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! >>>> >>> >>> Frank's *really* jealous. >> >> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying. >> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it! >> You deserve it...LOL! >> > > If they gave out degrees in lying you would have a Masters and a PhD. > > > Oops. The above message was meant for Alias. |
|
07-23-2008, 10:11 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416 @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: > You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just > egg you on to see where you're going to go next. Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then. |
|
07-23-2008, 10:40 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Bill Yanaire wrote: > "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message > news:j2Khk.17064$89.11556@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com... >> "FAB" <aliasis@sheep-fukker.com> wrote in message >> news:Ox2vWpO7IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> Alias wrote: >>> >>>> FAB wrote: >>>> >>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Frank wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> FAB wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for >>>>>>>>>>> prime time: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>>>>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time >>>>>>>>>>> for that? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line >>>>>>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called >>>>>>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly >>>>>>>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth >>>>>>>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform >>>>>>>>>>> emulators are lame. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications >>>>>>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>>>>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to >>>>>>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>>>>>>>>> this judgment. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive >>>>>>>>>>> to actually use. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> False. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms >>>>>>>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra >>>>>>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by >>>>>>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition >>>>>>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with it. >>>>>>>>>>> It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from such >>>>>>>>>>> hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as they fly >>>>>>>>>>> under the radar. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you >>>>>>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users >>>>>>>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of >>>>>>>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help >>>>>>>>>>> available. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same >>>>>>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of >>>>>>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, >>>>>>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty >>>>>>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a >>>>>>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on both >>>>>>>>>>> sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled >>>>>>>>>>> with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on >>>>>>>>>>> an on. There needs to be balance from people not so smitten with >>>>>>>>>>> something. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>>>>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more >>>>>>>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Alias >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> More of your lies? >>>>>>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked >>>>>>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>>>>>>> Loser! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Frank's jealous. >>>>>> >>>>> hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? >>>>> Got those degrees in lying huh! >>>>> How wonderful! >>>>> You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! >>>>> >>>> Frank's *really* jealous. >>> Sorry pal. I don't have any degrees in lying. >>> That's is your discipline...you own it and you can have it! >>> You deserve it...LOL! >>> >> If they gave out degrees in lying you would have a Masters and a PhD. >> >> >> > > Oops. The above message was meant for Alias. > > > The first post was correct. Alias |
|
07-23-2008, 01:10 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time DanS wrote: > Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416 > @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: > > >> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just >> egg you on to see where you're going to go next. > > Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then. > You don't know what a troll is Lone Ranger. I didn't bait the fool, but I'll join in on the fun. http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killf..._troll_faq.htm And you are classified as a <stalker>. You stalk posters on the Internet. I see you doing it in this NG as you stalk across NG(s), but that's not good enough for you. You must go to the NG and <stalk> when you get your nose opened, like I see you doing with in Linux Advocacy as you chase. You fess-up to being a <stalker>. I myself, I am an EOR Specialist, and to you, that's Equal Opportunity Ragger. You don't fukk with me, and I don't fukk with you. Alias choose to get in my face, like Albright chosen to and now you. I didn't put any of you there. You put yourself there. |
|
07-23-2008, 03:40 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:e36dycQ7IHA.2260 @TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl: > DanS wrote: >> Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416 >> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: >> >> >>> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just >>> egg you on to see where you're going to go next. >> >> Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then. >> > > You don't know what a troll is Lone Ranger. I didn't bait the fool, but > I'll join in on the fun. Gang mentality....gotta love it. > > http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killf..._troll_faq.htm > > And you are classified as a <stalker>. You stalk posters on the > Internet. I see you doing it in this NG as you stalk across NG(s), but > that's not good enough for you. You must go to the NG and <stalk> when > you get your nose opened, like I see you doing with in Linux Advocacy as > you chase. > > You fess-up to being a <stalker>. Get your nose opened ? What does that mean ? As I chase what ? All I do is point out when the pot is calling the kettle black, and post corrective information when some gluebag makes claims that I know are absolutely false or only partial truths......ex. - Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista. I also don't participate in COLA, and am not even subscribed to it. Those posts are crossposted to this group, an XP group, an Ubuntu group (where I see them), and COLA. As of late I have also been trying to remember to remove the 2 Windows groups from my replies. A stalker...ha! If you so wish. At least I don't hide behind multiple personalities/posting names......and refuse to admit it when I've been caught........ |
|
07-23-2008, 03:40 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time DanS wrote: <snipped> You're not worth a read. You just might go off with some off the wall reply post like you did the last time, nut. Dan Silly, go on now and crawl back to your <stalker> hole. You are worthless to me. |
|
07-23-2008, 04:50 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:00:45 -0400, Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote: >DanS wrote: >> Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416 >> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: >> >> >>> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just >>> egg you on to see where you're going to go next. >> >> Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then. >> > >You don't know what a troll is Lone Ranger. I didn't bait the fool, but >I'll join in on the fun. > >http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killf..._troll_faq.htm > >And you are classified as a <stalker>. You stalk posters on the >Internet. I see you doing it in this NG as you stalk across NG(s), but >that's not good enough for you. You must go to the NG and <stalk> when >you get your nose opened, like I see you doing with in Linux Advocacy as >you chase. In some ways you're more psychotic then Frank. How many more times will you change the name you post under in some feeble attempt to hide who you are? What a loser. > >You fess-up to being a <stalker>. > >I myself, I am an EOR Specialist, and to you, that's Equal Opportunity >Ragger. You don't fukk with me, and I don't fukk with you. You are just another idiot that squats in this newsgroup. Nothing more. > >Alias choose to get in my face, like Albright chosen to and now you. I >didn't put any of you there. You put yourself there. You sound like a psycho. Get in your face? If I ever got in "your face" for any of you idiots you all would piss in your pants out of fear. Thank you lucky stars you're all gutless morons hiding behind your computer and can only make some feeble brave talk through your keyboard. Face to face you wouldn't last ten seconds. |
|
07-23-2008, 05:20 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Frank <fb@nospam.com> wrote in news:g68eg8$86c$1@aioe.org: > DanS wrote: > >> Frank's claim that OSX doesn't cost less than Vista. > ------------------------------------------------------ > Well that's not really true is it dan-o? > Now you're lying! > Yes, it is true, and no I'm not lying. Look back at the thread. |
|
07-23-2008, 05:20 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:OqT8hnR7IHA.2336 @TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl: > DanS wrote: > > <snipped> > > You're not worth a read. You just might go off with some off the wall > reply post like you did the last time, nut. > > Dan Silly, go on now and crawl back to your <stalker> hole. You are > worthless to me. Then stop reading my posts and replying to them. Practice some self control. |
|
07-23-2008, 05:21 PM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time "Ringmaster" <bigtop@VistaGeneralCircus.net> wrote in message news:psif849fm8ckftj6a39or1jm7q4boun83k@4ax.com... > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:00:45 -0400, Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote: > >>DanS wrote: >>> Hound Dog <Hound@Dog.com> wrote in news:uVaQRYO7IHA.2416 >>> @TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl: >>> >>> >>>> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just >>>> egg you on to see where you're going to go next. >>> >>> Classic definition of a troll. So you are admitting it then. >>> >> >>You don't know what a troll is Lone Ranger. I didn't bait the fool, but >>I'll join in on the fun. >> >>http://www.hyphenologist.co.uk/killf..._troll_faq.htm >> >>And you are classified as a <stalker>. You stalk posters on the >>Internet. I see you doing it in this NG as you stalk across NG(s), but >>that's not good enough for you. You must go to the NG and <stalk> when >>you get your nose opened, like I see you doing with in Linux Advocacy as >>you chase. > > In some ways you're more psychotic then Frank. How many more times > will you change the name you post under in some feeble attempt to hide > who you are? What a loser. >> >>You fess-up to being a <stalker>. >> >>I myself, I am an EOR Specialist, and to you, that's Equal Opportunity >>Ragger. You don't fukk with me, and I don't fukk with you. > > You are just another idiot that squats in this newsgroup. Nothing > more. >> >&g |
