| |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
07-23-2008, 08:51 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Hound Dog wrote: > Frank wrote: >> Hound Dog wrote: >>> Alias wrote: >>> >>> <snipped> >>> >>> Even Ringmaster Albright is not this stupid to bite. They bait you, >>> and you bite every time. ;-) >> >> Yeah, the only thing that exceeds his stupidity is his arrogance!...LOL! >> He bites ever time! > > Alias is really blind as to what is happening. :) What's happening is that you the dog, Frank the Wank and Broke Bill are living in fantasy land and you think it's reality. Alias      |
|
07-23-2008, 09:30 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > Hound Dog wrote: >> Alias wrote: >>> Hound Dog wrote: >>>> Alias wrote: >>>> >>>> <snipped> >>>> >>>> Even Ringmaster Albright is not this stupid to bite. They bait you, >>>> and you bite every time. ;-) >>> >>> I did not post for you or for Bill. I posted for those who might >>> think Bill was posting something that's true, something Bill and you >>> are incapable of doing. >>> >> >> You are totally blind, ridiculous and too easy. Don't you know that >> when you respond like that, it makes you look like you are crazy? > > Actually, your response does that. But you're the one that seems to respond to everything making yourself look foolish. Your reputation is already shot, and you continue to pure gasoline on your own flames. > >> >> Are you in *love* with Linux. > > No. I disagree. > >> Just like no one should *hate* an O/S, no one should be in *love* with >> one either. <wink> > > I don't hate or love any OS. I use them. > So you accuse other's of the hate, which is what you posted in the Linux Advocacy NG when you have exhibited the same tendencies in the NG. You also call others trolls when you continue to keep the noise level up yourself. Somehow, you continue to make yourself out to not be a troll, when you are in fact a troll. You have all the tendencies. |
|
07-23-2008, 09:30 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > FAB wrote: > >> Alias wrote: >> >>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>> >>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime >>>> time: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>> >>> >>> >>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>> >>>> >>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a gazillion >>>> commands to make it do what you want, and who has time for that? >>> >>> >>> >>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one >>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do >>> you know what it is, lamer? >>> >>>> >>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly >>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth of >>>> specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform emulators >>>> are lame. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications in >>> Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>> >>>> >>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the >>>> effect of making the apps any better. >>> >>> >>> >>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>> this judgment. >>> >>>> >>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive to >>>> actually use. >>> >>> >>> >>> False. >>> >>>> >>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms or >>>> stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning >>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not the >>>> least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format hard >>>> disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not so >>>> clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they just >>>> have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>> >>> >>> >>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you can >>> customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>> >>>> >>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users >>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of >>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help >>>> available. >>> >>> >>> >>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>> >>>> >>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as >>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense >>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially >>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its >>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The >>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just >>>> the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of >>>> things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs >>>> to be balance from people not so smitten with something. >>>> >>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more >>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>> >>> >>> >>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>> >>> Alias >> >> >> More of your lies? >> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked and >> daily make a fool out of yourself. >> Loser! > > > Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? Your discipline of choice was what...lying? You're an educated liar!...LOL! > > Alias |
|
07-23-2008, 09:30 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > What's happening is that you the dog, Frank the Wank and Broke Bill are > living in fantasy land and you think it's reality. > You keep trying to defend your position of not being a troll, when you are a troll Alias adding to the noise level. I just saw Ringmaster Albright post. Let's see if he will be stupid enough like your are to join you in this. You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just egg you on to see where you're going to go next. |
|
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Hound Dog wrote: > Alias wrote: >> Hound Dog wrote: >>> Alias wrote: >>>> Hound Dog wrote: >>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <snipped> >>>>> >>>>> Even Ringmaster Albright is not this stupid to bite. They bait you, >>>>> and you bite every time. ;-) >>>> >>>> I did not post for you or for Bill. I posted for those who might >>>> think Bill was posting something that's true, something Bill and you >>>> are incapable of doing. >>>> >>> >>> You are totally blind, ridiculous and too easy. Don't you know that >>> when you respond like that, it makes you look like you are crazy? >> >> Actually, your response does that. > > But you're the one that seems to respond to everything making yourself > look foolish. Your reputation is already shot, and you continue to pure > gasoline on your own flames. > >> >>> >>> Are you in *love* with Linux. >> >> No. > > I disagree. > >> >>> Just like no one should *hate* an O/S, no one should be in *love* >>> with one either. <wink> >> >> I don't hate or love any OS. I use them. >> > > So you accuse other's of the hate, which is what you posted in the Linux > Advocacy NG when you have exhibited the same tendencies in the NG. You > also call others trolls when you continue to keep the noise level up > yourself. > > Somehow, you continue to make yourself out to not be a troll, when you > are in fact a troll. You have all the tendencies. > > > If you plan to be a shrink, don't give up your day job. Alias |
|
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Hound Dog wrote: > Alias wrote: > >> What's happening is that you the dog, Frank the Wank and Broke Bill >> are living in fantasy land and you think it's reality. >> > > You keep trying to defend your position of not being a troll, when you > are a troll Alias adding to the noise level. > > I just saw Ringmaster Albright post. Let's see if he will be stupid > enough like your are to join you in this. > > You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just > egg you on to see where you're going to go next. > > That's what you think you're doing but, in fact, all you're doing is revealing what a troll you are and how you all failed logic and common decency. Alias |
|
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Frank wrote: > Alias wrote: > >> FAB wrote: >> >>> Alias wrote: >>> >>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>> >>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime >>>>> time: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time >>>>> for that? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one >>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do >>>> you know what it is, lamer? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly >>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth >>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform >>>>> emulators are lame. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications in >>>> Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the >>>>> effect of making the apps any better. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>>> this judgment. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive >>>>> to actually use. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> False. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms >>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning >>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not >>>>> the least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format >>>>> hard disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not >>>>> so clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they >>>>> just have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you >>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users >>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of >>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help >>>>> available. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as >>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense >>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially >>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its >>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The >>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just >>>>> the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of >>>>> things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There >>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something. >>>>> >>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more >>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>> >>>> Alias >>> >>> >>> More of your lies? >>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked and >>> daily make a fool out of yourself. >>> Loser! >> >> >> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. > > Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? Frank's jealous. Alias |
|
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > Frank wrote: > >> Alias wrote: >> >>> FAB wrote: >>> >>>> Alias wrote: >>>> >>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for >>>>>> prime time: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time >>>>>> for that? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one >>>>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do >>>>> you know what it is, lamer? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly >>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth >>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform >>>>>> emulators are lame. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications >>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to >>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>>>> this judgment. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive >>>>>> to actually use. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> False. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms >>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning >>>>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not >>>>>> the least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format >>>>>> hard disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not >>>>>> so clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they >>>>>> just have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you >>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users >>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of >>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help >>>>>> available. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as >>>>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense >>>>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially >>>>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its >>>>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The >>>>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not >>>>>> just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers >>>>>> of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There >>>>>> needs to be balance from people not so smitten with something. >>>>>> >>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more >>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>> >>>>> Alias >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> More of your lies? >>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked >>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>> Loser! >>> >>> >>> >>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >> >> >> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? > > > Frank's jealous. > hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? Got those degrees in lying huh! How wonderful! You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! |
|
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > Hound Dog wrote: > >> Alias wrote: >> >>> Hound Dog wrote: >>> >>>> Alias wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hound Dog wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <snipped> >>>>>> >>>>>> Even Ringmaster Albright is not this stupid to bite. They bait >>>>>> you, and you bite every time. ;-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I did not post for you or for Bill. I posted for those who might >>>>> think Bill was posting something that's true, something Bill and >>>>> you are incapable of doing. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You are totally blind, ridiculous and too easy. Don't you know that >>>> when you respond like that, it makes you look like you are crazy? >>> >>> >>> Actually, your response does that. >> >> >> But you're the one that seems to respond to everything making yourself >> look foolish. Your reputation is already shot, and you continue to >> pure gasoline on your own flames. >> >>> >>>> >>>> Are you in *love* with Linux. >>> >>> >>> No. >> >> >> I disagree. >> >>> >>>> Just like no one should *hate* an O/S, no one should be in *love* >>>> with one either. <wink> >>> >>> >>> I don't hate or love any OS. I use them. >>> >> >> So you accuse other's of the hate, which is what you posted in the >> Linux Advocacy NG when you have exhibited the same tendencies in the >> NG. You also call others trolls when you continue to keep the noise >> level up yourself. >> >> Somehow, you continue to make yourself out to not be a troll, when you >> are in fact a troll. You have all the tendencies. >> >> >> > > If you plan to be a shrink, don't give up your day job. And your day job is lying and trolling. |
|
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > Hound Dog wrote: > >> Alias wrote: >> >>> What's happening is that you the dog, Frank the Wank and Broke Bill >>> are living in fantasy land and you think it's reality. >>> >> >> You keep trying to defend your position of not being a troll, when you >> are a troll Alias adding to the noise level. >> >> I just saw Ringmaster Albright post. Let's see if he will be stupid >> enough like your are to join you in this. >> >> You were baited, and you have taken it hook, line and sinker. We just >> egg you on to see where you're going to go next. >> >> > > That's what you think you're doing but, in fact, all you're doing is > revealing what a troll you are and how you all failed logic and common > decency. Hey sheep-fukker, you're stupid...his booting your ignorant lying trolling ass all over this ng...as is obvious to all...except maybe you? Hahaha! |
|
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > FAB wrote: > >> Alias wrote: >> >>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>> >>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for prime >>>> time: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>> >>> >>> >>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>> >>>> >>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a gazillion >>>> commands to make it do what you want, and who has time for that? >>> >>> >>> >>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line one >>> single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called CMD. Do >>> you know what it is, lamer? >>> >>>> >>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly >>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth of >>>> specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform emulators >>>> are lame. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications in >>> Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>> >>>> >>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to the >>>> effect of making the apps any better. >>> >>> >>> >>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>> this judgment. >>> >>>> >>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive to >>>> actually use. >>> >>> >>> >>> False. >>> >>>> >>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms or >>>> stability issues is offset when you add back the extra learning >>>> time, research time, and other chores necessitated by Linux, not the >>>> least of them being frequent need to repartition and/or format hard >>>> disks if you are going to play around with it. It is also not so >>>> clear that Linux users are immune from such hazards, or if they just >>>> have a reprieve for as long as they fly under the radar. >>> >>> >>> >>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you can >>> customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>> >>>> >>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users >>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of >>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help >>>> available. >>> >>> >>> >>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>> >>>> >>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same as >>>> cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of expense >>>> attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, especially >>>> since I found myself surprised by its difficulty and/or its >>>> impossibility even when reading instructions from a $30 book. The >>>> world ought to know that there are opinions on both sides, not just >>>> the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled with lovers of >>>> things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on an on. There needs >>>> to be balance from people not so smitten with something. >>>> >>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more >>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>> >>> >>> >>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>> >>> Alias >> >> >> More of your lies? >> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked and >> daily make a fool out of yourself. >> Loser! > > > Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. > > Alias Thanks for proving my point (once again). |
|
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time FAB wrote: > Alias wrote: >> Frank wrote: >> >>> Alias wrote: >>> >>>> FAB wrote: >>>> >>>>> Alias wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> An experienced Linux user explains why Linux is not ready for >>>>>>> prime time: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm with the webmasters on this 1000%. It's not that I'm against >>>>>>> Linux, its that I can't be for it. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We know you're too stupid to install *any* OS. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The OS is just impossible because you have to know about a >>>>>>> gazillion commands to make it do what you want, and who has time >>>>>>> for that? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I set up my install of Ubuntu 8.04 without using a command line >>>>>> one single time. Oops. BTW, in Windows, there is a thing called >>>>>> CMD. Do you know what it is, lamer? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The apps software that comes with it as open source is distinctly >>>>>>> second rate, which explains why it is free, and there is a dearth >>>>>>> of specialized software for particular uses. Cross-platform >>>>>>> emulators are lame. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ill informed opinion based on never using any of the applications >>>>>> in Ubuntu because you're too biased and stupid to install it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The supposed benefits of customizing seem to be non-existent for >>>>>>> home users, especially since customizing does not seem to be to >>>>>>> the effect of making the apps any better. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You would have to know how to install Linux before you could make >>>>>> this judgment. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The desktops are poor clones of Windows, and are counterintuitive >>>>>>> to actually use. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> False. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The fact that downtime is reduced because of fewer viruses, worms >>>>>>> or stability issues is offset when you add back the extra >>>>>>> learning time, research time, and other chores necessitated by >>>>>>> Linux, not the least of them being frequent need to repartition >>>>>>> and/or format hard disks if you are going to play around with it. >>>>>>> It is also not so clear that Linux users are immune from such >>>>>>> hazards, or if they just have a reprieve for as long as they fly >>>>>>> under the radar. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> More ill informed drivel. If you know how to point and click, you >>>>>> can customize Ubuntu with no problems. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Linux websites and helpsites are filled with arrogant Linux users >>>>>>> who will actually be angry if you question the usefulness of >>>>>>> vitality of their system, and there is no real professional help >>>>>>> available. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, like you, Frank, Spanky, The and Hound Dog help here, right? >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ultimately, the problem with Linux is that free is not the same >>>>>>> as cheap. Someday that may change, but today there is lots of >>>>>>> expense attached to a Linux install, and not a lot of upside, >>>>>>> especially since I found myself surprised by its difficulty >>>>>>> and/or its impossibility even when reading instructions from a >>>>>>> $30 book. The world ought to know that there are opinions on both >>>>>>> sides, not just the hype of Linux lovers. The Internet is filled >>>>>>> with lovers of things -- their soccer heros, their bands, and on >>>>>>> an on. There needs to be balance from people not so smitten with >>>>>>> something. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In fact, the words "whylinuxsucks" won't google to well, so I'm >>>>>>> suggesting lots of use of this phrase so people can find you more >>>>>>> easily: "Should I choose Linux?" >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So much FUD. So many lies. How do you live with yourself, troll? >>>>>> >>>>>> Alias >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> More of your lies? >>>>> Give it up sheep-fukker, or else continue to have your ass kicked >>>>> and daily make a fool out of yourself. >>>>> Loser! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Once again, Frank the Wank, reveals how educated and classy he is. >>> >>> >>> Ok sheep-fukker...tell us all about your ba, ma and phd ok? >> >> >> Frank's jealous. >> > > hehehe...got your panties all in a bunch, huh sheep-fukker? > Got those degrees in lying huh! > How wonderful! > You are an accomplished liar!...LOL! > Frank's *really* jealous. Alias |
|
07-23-2008, 09:31 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Linux is not readly for prime time Alias wrote: > > That's what you think you're doing but, in fact, all you're doing is > revealing what a troll you are and how you all failed logic and common > decency. > The fact that you respond Alias makes you a troll. You keep the noise level up to a fever pitch. You're just one person. Do you really see us coming after anyone else other than you or Albright with the game you fail to recognize? We come after you two, because you both are trolls and you'll respond particularly you Alias. It's the nature of the beast -- you. |
