On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 20:54:04 +0200, Clogwog wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Phil Da Lick!" <phil_the_lickREMOVETHISSPAMTRAP********.com> schreef in
> bericht news:E5ednTT9Kr8NdvHVRVnyggA@posted.plusnet...[color=green]
>> Clogwog wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> The Cola-tards fool themselves claiming, "Linux is safe".[/color]
>>
>> "Linux is SAFER" I think you'll find the claim to be.[/color]
>
>
> No I don't!
> [url]http://keznews.com/2570_Microsoft__Windows_Vista_Safer_than_OS_X__Linux[/url]
> "Surprisingly, Vista came out in front: Vista had 5 vulnerabilities in its
> first 90 days, one of them fixed, and one pending with a High severity
> rating. By comparison, XP had a total of 17 vulnerabilities in its first 90
> days, 8 of which were rated High, when it shipped in 2001.
> The surprises, however, come when you compare the non-Microsoft competition.
> Mac OS X 10.4, a darling of the press, actually suffered from 20
> vulnerabilities in its first 90 days, 8 of which were rated High. Worse, OS
> X 10.4 still suffered from 17 publicly disclosed but unpatched
> vulnerabilities at the end of those 90 days. "The data doesn't support
> [Apple's] marketing," Jones writes.
> Linux fared even worse: Ubuntu 6.06 suffered from a whopping *71*
> vulnerabilities in its first 90 days, 27 of those rated High. And there were
> at least 29 unpatched vulnerabilities in that OS after the 90 day period
> ended. And so on."[/color]

I'll bet the people using the current versions of Ubuntu long for those
days.

These days they can barely keep the crap running due to all the freezing
problems Ubuntu seems to be prone to.

Fedora users are having similar problems BTW.


--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
[url]http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/[/url]