On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:48:08 +0100, "Synapse Syndrome"
<synapse@NOSPAMsyndrome.me.uk> wrote:
[color=blue]
>"Nonny" <nonnymoose******.com> wrote in message
>news:3b6u445nds3kmh9uree6i4pms9hoh1kok2@4ax.com...[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>>>Excepting Outlook, pre 2003
>>>>
>>>> Like you think that doesn't run on Vista?
>>>>
>>>> WRONG.
>>>>
>>>> I'm using it quite happily.
>>>>
>>>> Never had a problem installing it. Had one small but annoying problem
>>>> with certain kinds of received HTML email, but found a by-request-only
>>>> hotfix for that. Works fine.
>>>
>>>
>>>So you do not have to enter your server password every time you download
>>>emails? I thought that the way that Outlook <2003 encrypted passwords was
>>>deemed insecure.[/color]
>>
>> "I'm using it quite happily" means that it works just like it's
>> supposed to work without my getting any annoying popups or having to
>> continuously add my password.[/color]
>
>I suppose you must have turned UAC off then.[/color]

<sigh>

NO, it's on.

"Nonny" <nonnymoose******.com> wrote in message
news:h59u44tmu69mg49ngbklrrkqt19svr129o@4ax.com...[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>>>>>Excepting Outlook, pre 2003
>>>>>
>>>>> Like you think that doesn't run on Vista?
>>>>>
>>>>> WRONG.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using it quite happily.
>>>>>
>>>>> Never had a problem installing it. Had one small but annoying problem
>>>>> with certain kinds of received HTML email, but found a by-request-only
>>>>> hotfix for that. Works fine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>So you do not have to enter your server password every time you download
>>>>emails? I thought that the way that Outlook <2003 encrypted passwords
>>>>was
>>>>deemed insecure.
>>>
>>> "I'm using it quite happily" means that it works just like it's
>>> supposed to work without my getting any annoying popups or having to
>>> continuously add my password.[/color]
>>
>>I suppose you must have turned UAC off then.[/color]
>
> <sigh>
>
> NO, it's on.[/color]

What version of Outlook?

ss.

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:15:55 +0100, "Synapse Syndrome"
<synapse@NOSPAMsyndrome.me.uk> wrote:
[color=blue]
>"Nonny" <nonnymoose******.com> wrote in message
>news:h59u44tmu69mg49ngbklrrkqt19svr129o@4ax.com...[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>>>>>Excepting Outlook, pre 2003
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like you think that doesn't run on Vista?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WRONG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm using it quite happily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Never had a problem installing it. Had one small but annoying problem
>>>>>> with certain kinds of received HTML email, but found a by-request-only
>>>>>> hotfix for that. Works fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>So you do not have to enter your server password every time you download
>>>>>emails? I thought that the way that Outlook <2003 encrypted passwords
>>>>>was
>>>>>deemed insecure.
>>>>
>>>> "I'm using it quite happily" means that it works just like it's
>>>> supposed to work without my getting any annoying popups or having to
>>>> continuously add my password.
>>>
>>>I suppose you must have turned UAC off then.[/color]
>>
>> <sigh>
>>
>> NO, it's on.[/color]
>
>What version of Outlook?[/color]

Check the thread out at Google Groups. I'm outta here.

"Nonny" <nonnymoose******.com> wrote in message
news:n9au44hnfaul0aip5g51fnk0f6sgpqsqof@4ax.com...[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>>>>>>>Excepting Outlook, pre 2003
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like you think that doesn't run on Vista?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WRONG.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm using it quite happily.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Never had a problem installing it. Had one small but annoying
>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>> with certain kinds of received HTML email, but found a
>>>>>>> by-request-only
>>>>>>> hotfix for that. Works fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So you do not have to enter your server password every time you
>>>>>>download
>>>>>>emails? I thought that the way that Outlook <2003 encrypted passwords
>>>>>>was
>>>>>>deemed insecure.
>>>>>
>>>>> "I'm using it quite happily" means that it works just like it's
>>>>> supposed to work without my getting any annoying popups or having to
>>>>> continuously add my password.
>>>>
>>>>I suppose you must have turned UAC off then.
>>>
>>> <sigh>
>>>
>>> NO, it's on.[/color]
>>
>>What version of Outlook?[/color]
>
> Check the thread out at Google Groups. I'm outta here.[/color]

Hmmn. Very fishy....

ss.

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 20:24:40 -0500, Nonny <nonnymoose******.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:15:55 +0100, "Synapse Syndrome"
><synapse@NOSPAMsyndrome.me.uk> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>"Nonny" <nonnymoose******.com> wrote in message
>>news:h59u44tmu69mg49ngbklrrkqt19svr129o@4ax.com...[color=darkred]
>>>>>>>>Excepting Outlook, pre 2003
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like you think that doesn't run on Vista?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WRONG.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm using it quite happily.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Never had a problem installing it. Had one small but annoying problem
>>>>>>> with certain kinds of received HTML email, but found a by-request-only
>>>>>>> hotfix for that. Works fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>So you do not have to enter your server password every time you download
>>>>>>emails? I thought that the way that Outlook <2003 encrypted passwords
>>>>>>was
>>>>>>deemed insecure.
>>>>>
>>>>> "I'm using it quite happily" means that it works just like it's
>>>>> supposed to work without my getting any annoying popups or having to
>>>>> continuously add my password.
>>>>
>>>>I suppose you must have turned UAC off then.
>>>
>>> <sigh>
>>>
>>> NO, it's on.[/color]
>>
>>What version of Outlook?[/color]
>
>Check the thread out at Google Groups. I'm outta here.[/color]

Don't let the door hit your big dumb ass on the way out.

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:58:23 -0600, Bruce Chambers
<bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote:
[color=blue]
>FlashmanLeo wrote:[color=green]
>> I just bought a new laptop and the sales guy tells me I cant use my existing
>> MS Office 2003 software from my XP machine on the new Vista laptop, can
>> anyone confirm this it true.
>>
>> I find confusing arguments for and against[/color]
>
>
> The answer depends entirely upon information which you've declined to
>provide.[/color]

Your answers don't depend on anything. You always say the same thing
like a broken record.

It ain't Microsoft's fault.
It ain't Microsoft's fault.
It ain't Microsoft's fault.
It ain't Microsoft's fault.
It ain't Microsoft's fault.
It ain't Microsoft's fault.

This is a recording...this is a recording.

[color=blue]
>
> Did you have an OEM license for Office 2003 that came pre-installed on
>your last computer? If so, than the sales guy, against all odds, is
>correct. OEM licenses are not transferable to any other computers, ever.
>
> If, however, you have a retail license for Office 2003 that you
>purchased separately, then you can transfer it to the new laptop; Office
>2003 is Vista-compatible. Also, some Office Licenses allow one to have
>it installed on both a desktop and a portable computer simultaneously,
>as long as both computers have the same primary user. Read your Office
>EULA to determine if this applies, in your case.[/color]

****, I hope Microsoft pays you well to make such an ass of yourself
in public.

Adam Albright wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:58:23 -0600, Bruce Chambers
> <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
>>FlashmanLeo wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>I just bought a new laptop and the sales guy tells me I cant use my existing
>>>MS Office 2003 software from my XP machine on the new Vista laptop, can
>>>anyone confirm this it true.
>>>
>>>I find confusing arguments for and against[/color]
>>
>>
>> The answer depends entirely upon information which you've declined to
>>provide.[/color]
>
>
> Your answers don't depend on anything. You always say the same thing
> like a broken record.
>
> It ain't Microsoft's fault.
> It ain't Microsoft's fault.
> It ain't Microsoft's fault.
> It ain't Microsoft's fault.
> It ain't Microsoft's fault.
> It ain't Microsoft's fault.
>
> This is a recording...this is a recording.
>
>
>[color=green]
>> Did you have an OEM license for Office 2003 that came pre-installed on
>>your last computer? If so, than the sales guy, against all odds, is
>>correct. OEM licenses are not transferable to any other computers, ever.
>>
>> If, however, you have a retail license for Office 2003 that you
>>purchased separately, then you can transfer it to the new laptop; Office
>>2003 is Vista-compatible. Also, some Office Licenses allow one to have
>>it installed on both a desktop and a portable computer simultaneously,
>>as long as both computers have the same primary user. Read your Office
>>EULA to determine if this applies, in your case.[/color]
>
>
> ****, I hope Microsoft pays you well to make such an ass of yourself
> in public.
>[/color]

You're dumber than we all thought!
A real fukkin idiot moron loser.
Frank