>I despair at the HUGE lack of computer security practiced by individuals.....

Put me as a beneficiary on your life insurance policy so I can benefit
when you die of despair.

On May 15, 8:38*am, "Gordon" <gbpli...******.com.invalid> wrote:
>

<oparr********.com> wrote in message
news:20e20f89-dbae-4d18-90c8-f9a3fc365dfa@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>I despair at the HUGE lack of computer security practiced by
>individuals....

>Put me as a beneficiary on your life insurance policy so I can benefit
>when you die of despair.



I will - after you've lost all your sensitive data or had your machine
tampered with....

>I will - after you've lost all your sensitive data

Geez, you're preaching to the choir. Too lazy to sing a reply.

On May 15, 9:05*am, "Gordon" <gbpli...******.com.invalid> wrote:
>

Still helping out Gordon? The guy doesn't want security it's his business.
Either help him out or shut the F U C K up.

Mark

"Gordon" <gbplinux******.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:g0hcet$k07$1@news.mixmin.net...
> <oparr********.com> wrote in message
> news:20e20f89-dbae-4d18-90c8-f9a3fc365dfa@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>>I despair at the HUGE lack of computer security practiced by
>>individuals....
>
>>Put me as a beneficiary on your life insurance policy so I can benefit
>>when you die of despair.
>
>
>
> I will - after you've lost all your sensitive data or had your machine
> tampered with....

"Kurt Herman" <scapino@nwlink.com> wrote in news:efvKkjftIHA.420
@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl:

> Then what you read was wrong.....
>
> Kurt

How do you known that? Have you tried the hacks? My guess is that you
haven't and don't even know where to get them.

On Wed, 14 May 2008 16:24:28 -0400, "John" <me@myhome.net> wrote:

>Depending on your version, start with control panel and go to the security
>section. If you can run gpedit.msc, then use group policies to kill more.
>Finally go into the Services area and disable all security related services.
>Check dependencies to be sure.
>
>
>"mike" <spamme9******.com> wrote in message news:i3GWj.185$vE.32@trnddc03...
>>I understand that many people need lots of security.
>> I'm NOT one of those people.
>>
>> I want to disable ALL security on my Vista System.
>>
>> I don't want any passwords.
>> I want every file visible/readable/writable/executable by ANYBODY
>> who happens onto my network.
>> I don't want any firewalls.
>> I don't want any antivirus.
>> I don't want any automatic updates of any kind to anything.
>> I don't want any popups asking for permission to do anything.
>> I'd rather not have all the bloat and duplication in folders for
>> different users.
>> I want a single-user system and to be administrator of all things.
>>
>> Yes, I'll put some tiny subset of this back with third-party tools
>> THAT I CONTROL.
>>
>> I've been poking around fixing up one issue after another...but
>> it's a task.
>> Is this info all in one place? Or better yet, a magic incantation
>> to remove ALL of it in one fell swoop?
>>
>> Thanks, mike
>> --
>> Return address is VALID!
>> Bunch-O-Stuff Forsale Here:
>> http://mike.liveline.de/sale.html
>

Then maybe turn off the Firewall, and don't replace it with a
third-party.

Don't install an AV package, and spend all your time on Porn/media
sites.

THEN you will have "no security".
But after removing all security, your machine will not be yours
anymore. Instead, it will belong to Ivan over in the former Soviet
Union.

Have fun!!!


Donald L McDaniel
Please reply to the correct thread and article.
================================================

Gordon wrote:
> <oparr********.com> wrote in message
> news:20e20f89-dbae-4d18-90c8-f9a3fc365dfa@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> I despair at the HUGE lack of computer security practiced by
>> individuals....
>
>> Put me as a beneficiary on your life insurance policy so I can benefit
>> when you die of despair.
>
>
>
> I will - after you've lost all your sensitive data or had your machine
> tampered with....

Why would anyone put unencrypted "sensitive data" on any computer?

Donald L McDaniel wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2008 16:24:28 -0400, "John" <me@myhome.net> wrote:
>
>> Depending on your version, start with control panel and go to the security
>> section. If you can run gpedit.msc, then use group policies to kill more.
>> Finally go into the Services area and disable all security related services.
>> Check dependencies to be sure.
>>
>>
>> "mike" <spamme9******.com> wrote in message news:i3GWj.185$vE.32@trnddc03...
>>> I understand that many people need lots of security.
>>> I'm NOT one of those people.
>>>
>>> I want to disable ALL security on my Vista System.
>>>
>>> I don't want any passwords.
>>> I want every file visible/readable/writable/executable by ANYBODY
>>> who happens onto my network.
>>> I don't want any firewalls.
>>> I don't want any antivirus.
>>> I don't want any automatic updates of any kind to anything.
>>> I don't want any popups asking for permission to do anything.
>>> I'd rather not have all the bloat and duplication in folders for
>>> different users.
>>> I want a single-user system and to be administrator of all things.
>>>
>>> Yes, I'll put some tiny subset of this back with third-party tools
>>> THAT I CONTROL.
>>>
>>> I've been poking around fixing up one issue after another...but
>>> it's a task.
>>> Is this info all in one place? Or better yet, a magic incantation
>>> to remove ALL of it in one fell swoop?
>>>
>>> Thanks, mike
>>> --
>>> Return address is VALID!
>>> Bunch-O-Stuff Forsale Here:
>>> http://mike.liveline.de/sale.html
>
> Then maybe turn off the Firewall, and don't replace it with a
> third-party.
>
> Don't install an AV package, and spend all your time on Porn/media
> sites.
>
> THEN you will have "no security".
> But after removing all security, your machine will not be yours
> anymore. Instead, it will belong to Ivan over in the former Soviet
> Union.
>
> Have fun!!!
>
You're missing the point. I didn't ask for no security. I asked
how to turn off all the security IN VISTA.

Unless Ivan has a key to my front door and the encryption keys,
he ain't gonna find much.

It's just a guess, but I expect that there are far more people
trying to exploit MS security than any one of the third party tools.

>
> Donald L McDaniel
> Please reply to the correct thread and article.
> ================================================