On May 13, 12:50*pm, "Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com>
wrote:[color=blue]
> Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient"http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2008/05/12/gates-window...
>
> My comment: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient" *THAN THE
> BLOATED STUPID CRAP MONSTER OF AN OS CALLED VISTA!!!!
>
> So is MS acknowledging they have created the most stupid, slow, bloated OS
> ever to appear on the face of this earth? And what a stupid name to give a
> stupid OS, Vista..... Hahhhhh.....
>
> I guess this a hard blow for the vista fanboys like frank... but they are
> used to shrugging off FACTS! lol
>
> Gee they are stupid
>
> some text from the article:
>
> Nevertheless, it's [Vista] far from perfect, and not only on the security
> front. While many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some high-end
> computers, the average computer system does not run Windows Vista as well as
> it does Windows XP. This will of course change as the average computer
> becomes more powerful and as Microsoft tweaks the operating system (SP1
> already offers some help), but the fact of the matter is that Vista is
> recognized as a slow operating system.
>
> Many have therefore turned their hopes to Windows 7. Maybe, just maybe,
> Microsoft will not increase the minimum requirements as it did from Windows
> XP to Windows Vista. Considering that Microsoft hopes to get Windows 7 out
> the door faster than it did with Vista (which came out six years after XP,
> compared to the typical three) this is entirely possible, and Bill Gates has
> all but confirmed that Windows 7 will focus on performance improvements:
>
> We're hard at work, I would say, on the next version, which we call Windows
> 7. I'm very excited about the work being done there. The ability to be lower
> power, take less memory, be more efficient, and have lots more connections
> up to the mobile phone, so those scenarios connect up well to make it a
> great platform for the best gaming that can be done, to connect up to the
> thing being done out on the Internet, so that, for example, if you have two
> personal computers, that your files automatically are synchronized between
> them, and so you don't have a lot of work to move that data back and forth..
> One must remember though: Windows 7 is still in the development stage and
> Bill Gates touched upon a lot more than just performance improvements for
> Windows in his high-hopes speech at the Windows Digital Lifestyle Consortium
> in Japan.[/color]

****. You really are stupid. You just can't wait to find any
negative print about Vista and get this big "hard on" to rush to the
group and spew your garbage. Who really gives a RATS ASS? Why not go
to the local YMCA and hand out towels to the senior citizens?

There is not much good news about Vista... EVER! lol

haven't you noticed, or are you living under a slimy rock?.. don't tell
me... I know the answer to that question.



"Bill Yanaire" <BillYanaire******.com> wrote in message
news:2c474bd7-ac06-49ae-9992-4327977cb7cf@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> On May 13, 12:50 pm, "Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com>
> wrote:[color=green]
>> Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more
>> efficient"http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2008/05/12/gates-window...
>>
>> My comment: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient" THAN THE
>> BLOATED STUPID CRAP MONSTER OF AN OS CALLED VISTA!!!!
>>
>> So is MS acknowledging they have created the most stupid, slow, bloated
>> OS
>> ever to appear on the face of this earth? And what a stupid name to give
>> a
>> stupid OS, Vista..... Hahhhhh.....
>>
>> I guess this a hard blow for the vista fanboys like frank... but they are
>> used to shrugging off FACTS! lol
>>
>> Gee they are stupid
>>
>> some text from the article:
>>
>> Nevertheless, it's [Vista] far from perfect, and not only on the security
>> front. While many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some high-end
>> computers, the average computer system does not run Windows Vista as well
>> as
>> it does Windows XP. This will of course change as the average computer
>> becomes more powerful and as Microsoft tweaks the operating system (SP1
>> already offers some help), but the fact of the matter is that Vista is
>> recognized as a slow operating system.
>>
>> Many have therefore turned their hopes to Windows 7. Maybe, just maybe,
>> Microsoft will not increase the minimum requirements as it did from
>> Windows
>> XP to Windows Vista. Considering that Microsoft hopes to get Windows 7
>> out
>> the door faster than it did with Vista (which came out six years after
>> XP,
>> compared to the typical three) this is entirely possible, and Bill Gates
>> has
>> all but confirmed that Windows 7 will focus on performance improvements:
>>
>> We're hard at work, I would say, on the next version, which we call
>> Windows
>> 7. I'm very excited about the work being done there. The ability to be
>> lower
>> power, take less memory, be more efficient, and have lots more
>> connections
>> up to the mobile phone, so those scenarios connect up well to make it a
>> great platform for the best gaming that can be done, to connect up to the
>> thing being done out on the Internet, so that, for example, if you have
>> two
>> personal computers, that your files automatically are synchronized
>> between
>> them, and so you don't have a lot of work to move that data back and
>> forth.
>> One must remember though: Windows 7 is still in the development stage and
>> Bill Gates touched upon a lot more than just performance improvements for
>> Windows in his high-hopes speech at the Windows Digital Lifestyle
>> Consortium
>> in Japan.[/color]
>
> ****. You really are stupid. You just can't wait to find any
> negative print about Vista and get this big "hard on" to rush to the
> group and spew your garbage. Who really gives a RATS ASS? Why not go
> to the local YMCA and hand out towels to the senior citizens?
>[/color]

On May 13, 12:59*pm, "Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com>
wrote:[color=blue]
> There is not much good news about Vista... EVER! lol
>
> haven't *you noticed, or are you living under a slimy rock?.. don't tell
> me... I know the answer to that question.
>
> "Bill Yanaire" <BillYana...******.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2c474bd7-ac06-49ae-9992-4327977cb7cf@q27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>[color=green]
> > On May 13, 12:50 pm, "Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com>
> > wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more
> >> efficient"http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2008/05/12/gates-window...[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> My comment: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient" THAN THE
> >> BLOATED STUPID CRAP MONSTER OF AN OS CALLED VISTA!!!![/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> So is MS acknowledging they have created the most stupid, slow, bloated
> >> OS
> >> ever to appear on the face of this earth? And what a stupid name to give
> >> a
> >> stupid OS, Vista..... Hahhhhh.....[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> I guess this a hard blow for the vista fanboys like frank... but they are
> >> used to shrugging off FACTS! lol[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> Gee they are stupid[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> some text from the article:[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> Nevertheless, it's [Vista] far from perfect, and not only on the security
> >> front. While many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some high-end
> >> computers, the average computer system does not run Windows Vista as well
> >> as
> >> it does Windows XP. This will of course change as the average computer
> >> becomes more powerful and as Microsoft tweaks the operating system (SP1
> >> already offers some help), but the fact of the matter is that Vista is
> >> recognized as a slow operating system.[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> Many have therefore turned their hopes to Windows 7. Maybe, just maybe,
> >> Microsoft will not increase the minimum requirements as it did from
> >> Windows
> >> XP to Windows Vista. Considering that Microsoft hopes to get Windows 7
> >> out
> >> the door faster than it did with Vista (which came out six years after
> >> XP,
> >> compared to the typical three) this is entirely possible, and Bill Gates
> >> has
> >> all but confirmed that Windows 7 will focus on performance improvements:[/color][/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> We're hard at work, I would say, on the next version, which we call
> >> Windows
> >> 7. I'm very excited about the work being done there. The ability to be
> >> lower
> >> power, take less memory, be more efficient, and have lots more
> >> connections
> >> up to the mobile phone, so those scenarios connect up well to make it a
> >> great platform for the best gaming that can be done, to connect up to the
> >> thing being done out on the Internet, so that, for example, if you have
> >> two
> >> personal computers, that your files automatically are synchronized
> >> between
> >> them, and so you don't have a lot of work to move that data back and
> >> forth.
> >> One must remember though: Windows 7 is still in the development stage and
> >> Bill Gates touched upon a lot more than just performance improvements for
> >> Windows in his high-hopes speech at the Windows Digital Lifestyle
> >> Consortium
> >> in Japan.[/color][/color]
>[color=green]
> > ****. *You really are stupid. *You just can't wait to find any
> > negative print about Vista and get this big "hard on" to rush to the
> > group and spew your garbage. *Who really gives a RATS ASS? *Why not go
> > to the local YMCA and hand out towels to the senior citizens?- Hide quoted text -[/color]
>
> - Show quoted text -[/color]

No, I live down the street from the rock. You live under the rock

LOL, so many idiots sat there with 2GB of RAM but think Vista is bloated
because the RAM meter shows 40% in use at idle.

My advice: open the PC and unplug the RAM, then it won't be in use :) it
will be as much use to you unplugged, if it's not being used.

Long answer: What you call BLOAT is in fact making everything run faster by
loading things into memory so they run almost instantly when you click the
icon - try running "top" on Linux or Mac OS X - the inactive part, is memory
that's full, but can be emptied should be needed. Vista does this too, only
pre-emptively.

Vista may run slower for some apps, because it needs to emulate the old GDI
way of drawing to the screen. Programs that use the new APIs shouldn't have
this problem. Mac OSX users didn't moan because their classic apps ran slow
in "Classic Mode" - they accepted the need to evolve.

So stop moaning. Just as people said they loved Windows 2000 when XP came
out, and how everyone suddenly loved Windows 95's lack of Active Desktop
(and er.. USB Support) when Windows 98 was released... History repeats
itself.

Notice how I skipped Windows ME :D
Now for another beer....

Marc

Bill Yanaire wrote:
[color=blue]
> ****. You really are stupid. You just can't wait to find any negative
> print about Vista and get this big "hard on" to rush to the group and
> spew your garbage. Who really gives a RATS ASS? Why not go to the
> local YMCA and hand out towels to the senior citizens?[/color]

Dude, you cared enough to reply, and attacked the messenger instead of
disputing the message.

Why don't you volunteer at the local nursing home changing bedpans, since
you are so comfortable playing in sh*t all the time?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Former Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"