By PowerUser:
"Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I
stand on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam
are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may
be, Adam acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
ungrateful politics.

I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that
Adam and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create
profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue
eventually, and the second is that the justification he gave for seeking
to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of
their character was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever
heard. It was so addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here.
Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite
clearly: Adam keeps telling everyone within earshot that honesty and
responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. I'm
guessing that Adam read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More
reliable sources generally indicate that he isn't as smart as he thinks
he is. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to
Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll
find that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit
that he has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I
recommend you check out some of his commentaries and draw your own
conclusions on the matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism.
Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist
re-education camp. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
repeat it. Of course, if Adam had learned anything from history, he'd
know that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that
proposes that we ought to worship feckless mountebanks as folk heroes.
It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.


We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make
people suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any
thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is
ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the
grotesque can deny that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he
means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the
existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand
that I become truly impatient with people who refuse to recognize the
key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization, but
from the fog and mist of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of
nihilism. An equal but opposite observation is that I and Adam part
company when it comes to the issue of quislingism. He feels that
those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness,
should be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop
living in a fool's paradise. But there's the rub; his idea of mutinous
autism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of
hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of
an irascible blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan
religion that incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then
prompts them to precipitate riots.


Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing
for the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement
of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something
to the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest
education and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all
the gory details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least
discerning among us can see right through it.


It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption
when he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow
center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like
shaking things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order
to convince us that he has the authority to issue licenses for
practicing heathenism, Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of
comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that
you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete
surprise that there can be no argument that when I first realized that
Mr. Adam Albright is a proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses
catachrestically in place of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my
back. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the
words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would violate
the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of
course, to the likes of Adam Albright."

Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
lying pig?
For your reading pleasure!

[url]http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYFiZuwWGCKzw8oMmJKS7[/url]

Enjoy!
I know I did!...LOL!
Frank

And your profane rants are better because...?

--
A Professional Amateur...If anyone knew it all, none of would be here!
[email]CarGodZeroOne********.com[/email]
Change Alpha to Numeric to reply

"Frank" <fb@sto.cln> wrote in message
news:48263e9b$0$7695$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...[color=blue]
> By PowerUser:
> "Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
> making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
> main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
> recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
> enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
> that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I stand
> on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam are not
> born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, Adam
> acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
> astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
> defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
> counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
> aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
> ungrateful politics.
>
> I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that Adam
> and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create profound
> emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue eventually, and
> the second is that the justification he gave for seeking to judge people
> by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of their character
> was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever heard. It was so
> addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing
> the details you can still see my point quite clearly: Adam keeps telling
> everyone within earshot that honesty and responsibility have no cash value
> and are therefore worthless. I'm guessing that Adam read that on some Web
> site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that he
> isn't as smart as he thinks he is. As an interesting experiment, try to
> point this out to
> Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find
> that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit that he
> has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I recommend you
> check out some of his commentaries and draw your own conclusions on the
> matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism. Students who have been
> through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp. Those who
> fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Adam had
> learned anything from history, he'd know that I challenge him to point out
> any text in this letter that proposes that we ought to worship feckless
> mountebanks as folk heroes. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a
> suggestion of such a thing.
>
>
> We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
> principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
> most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
> irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make people
> suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any thought to
> what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is ridiculous -- as
> ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the grotesque can deny
> that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he means by this, of
> course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the existence of human
> life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand that I become truly
> impatient with people who refuse to recognize the key role that he is
> playing in the destruction of our civilization, but from the fog and mist
> of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of nihilism. An equal but
> opposite observation is that I and Adam part company when it comes to the
> issue of quislingism. He feels that
> those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should
> be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop living in
> a fool's paradise. But there's the rub; his idea of mutinous autism is no
> political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and
> intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of an irascible
> blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan religion that
> incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then prompts them to
> precipitate riots.
>
>
> Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
> consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
> were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for
> the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
> thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
> things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of
> his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to
> the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education
> and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all the gory
> details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning
> among us can see right through it.
>
>
> It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
> Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption when
> he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center
> of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking
> things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order to convince
> us that he has the authority to issue licenses for practicing heathenism,
> Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results
> brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that you've read the bulk
> of this letter, it should not come as a complete surprise that there can
> be no argument that when I first realized that Mr. Adam Albright is a
> proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses catachrestically in place
> of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my back. However, this fact
> bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the
> hardened exteriors of those who would violate the basic tenets of
> journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of course, to the likes of
> Adam Albright."
>
> Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth lying
> pig?
> For your reading pleasure!
>
> [url]http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYFiZuwWGCKzw8oMmJKS7[/url]
>
> Enjoy!
> I know I did!...LOL!
> Frank[/color]

Not Me wrote:
[color=blue]
> And your profane rants are better because...?
>[/color]
You got a dog in this fight?
Frank

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Not Me wrote:
>[color=green]
>> And your profane rants are better because...?
>>[/color]
> You got a dog in this fight?
> Frank[/color]

Not Him, he is toothless. What's wrong with him?

????What wrote:
[color=blue]
> Frank wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Not Me wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> And your profane rants are better because...?
>>>[/color]
>> You got a dog in this fight?
>> Frank[/color]
>
>
> Not Him, he is toothless. What's wrong with him?[/color]

hahaha...now that is funny...and proly true! :-)
Frank

If I ever lose my teeth, I can just grab yours out of that glass on your
nightstand...


"Frank" <fb@sto.cln> wrote in message
news:4826625c$0$7716$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...[color=blue]
> ????What wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Frank wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Not Me wrote:
>>>
>>>> And your profane rants are better because...?
>>>>
>>> You got a dog in this fight?
>>> Frank[/color]
>>
>>
>> Not Him, he is toothless. What's wrong with him?[/color]
>
> hahaha...now that is funny...and proly true! :-)
> Frank[/color]

"????What" <What?@Wha???t.com> wrote in message
news:OQM%23vuwsIHA.420@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Frank wrote:[color=green]
>> Not Me wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> And your profane rants are better because...?
>>>[/color]
>> You got a dog in this fight?
>> Frank[/color]
>
> Not Him, he is toothless. What's wrong with him?
>[/color]

Clearly Frank just found this posted somewhere else and just changed the
names within.
He doesn't possess the intelligence to have composed this himself.

aberrancy? addlepated?

he has no clue what he just posted.
what a loser.

Frank, lay off the Mad Dog 20/20

"Frank" <fb@sto.cln> wrote in message
news:48263e9b$0$7695$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...[color=blue]
> By PowerUser:
> "Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
> making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
> main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
> recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
> enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
> that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I stand
> on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam are not
> born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, Adam
> acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
> astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
> defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
> counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
> aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
> ungrateful politics.
>
> I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that Adam
> and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create profound
> emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue eventually, and
> the second is that the justification he gave for seeking to judge people
> by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of their character
> was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever heard. It was so
> addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing
> the details you can still see my point quite clearly: Adam keeps telling
> everyone within earshot that honesty and responsibility have no cash value
> and are therefore worthless. I'm guessing that Adam read that on some Web
> site of dubious validity. More reliable sources generally indicate that he
> isn't as smart as he thinks he is. As an interesting experiment, try to
> point this out to
> Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll find
> that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit that he
> has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I recommend you
> check out some of his commentaries and draw your own conclusions on the
> matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism. Students who have been
> through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp. Those who
> fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Adam had
> learned anything from history, he'd know that I challenge him to point out
> any text in this letter that proposes that we ought to worship feckless
> mountebanks as folk heroes. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a
> suggestion of such a thing.
>
>
> We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
> principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
> most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
> irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make people
> suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any thought to
> what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is ridiculous -- as
> ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the grotesque can deny
> that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he means by this, of
> course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the existence of human
> life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand that I become truly
> impatient with people who refuse to recognize the key role that he is
> playing in the destruction of our civilization, but from the fog and mist
> of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of nihilism. An equal but
> opposite observation is that I and Adam part company when it comes to the
> issue of quislingism. He feels that
> those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness, should
> be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop living in
> a fool's paradise. But there's the rub; his idea of mutinous autism is no
> political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and
> intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of an irascible
> blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan religion that
> incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then prompts them to
> precipitate riots.
>
>
> Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
> consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
> were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing for
> the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
> thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
> things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of
> his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to
> the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest education
> and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all the gory
> details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning
> among us can see right through it.
>
>
> It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
> Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption when
> he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center
> of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking
> things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order to convince
> us that he has the authority to issue licenses for practicing heathenism,
> Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of comparing results
> brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that you've read the bulk
> of this letter, it should not come as a complete surprise that there can
> be no argument that when I first realized that Mr. Adam Albright is a
> proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses catachrestically in place
> of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my back. However, this fact
> bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the
> hardened exteriors of those who would violate the basic tenets of
> journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of course, to the likes of
> Adam Albright."
>
> Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth lying
> pig?
> For your reading pleasure!
>
> [url]http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?hl=en&enc_user=tYag3woAAABrYFiZuwWGCKzw8oMmJKS7[/url]
>
> Enjoy!
> I know I did!...LOL!
> Frank[/color]

Not Me wrote:
[color=blue]
> If I ever lose my teeth, I can just grab yours out of that glass on your
> nightstand...[/color]

----------------------------------------

So you're a thief huh?
How wonderful!
Frank

john wrote:
[color=blue]
> "????What" <What?@Wha???t.com> wrote in message
> news:OQM%23vuwsIHA.420@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>[color=green]
>>Frank wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Not Me wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>And your profane rants are better because...?
>>>>
>>>
>>>You got a dog in this fight?
>>>Frank[/color]
>>
>>Not Him, he is toothless. What's wrong with him?
>>[/color]
>
>
> Clearly Frank just found this posted somewhere else and just changed the
> names within.
> He doesn't possess the intelligence to have composed this himself.
>
> aberrancy? addlepated?
>
> he has no clue what he just posted.
> what a loser.[/color]

Obviously you're too stupid to comprehend what you've read...if indeed
you actually read it.
You're not that bright are you john-boy!
Frank