I recently switched my Vista Home Premium computer to using black for the
wallpaper. Bad idea.

The next time I booted up, nothing would run. Outlook would not run,
Taskmanager opened but only slowly. My browser would not tun.

As soon as I switched back to my last wallpaper, everything ran just fine.

Is there something inherently wrong with using black?
[color=blue][color=green]
>>RSM[/color][/color]

On Thu, 8 May 2008 19:49:01 -0700, Richard Mitnick
<RichardMitnick@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>I recently switched my Vista Home Premium computer to using black for the
>wallpaper. Bad idea.
>
>The next time I booted up, nothing would run. Outlook would not run,
>Taskmanager opened but only slowly. My browser would not tun.
>
>As soon as I switched back to my last wallpaper, everything ran just fine.
>
>Is there something inherently wrong with using black?[/color]


Black wallpaper works just fine on my Vista Home Premium SP1
--
----------------
Stubbo of Oz
----------------

Same here (Vista Ultimate 64-Bit SP1)
Just to make sure, Are you talking about the built-in solid color wallpaper?
Or you're using some third-party software to change wallpaper?

"Stubbo of Oz" <stubbo@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:evf724llrupchdi249u43m3vgsh07ikotb@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 19:49:01 -0700, Richard Mitnick
> <RichardMitnick@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>I recently switched my Vista Home Premium computer to using black for the
>>wallpaper. Bad idea.
>>
>>The next time I booted up, nothing would run. Outlook would not run,
>>Taskmanager opened but only slowly. My browser would not tun.
>>
>>As soon as I switched back to my last wallpaper, everything ran just fine.
>>
>>Is there something inherently wrong with using black?[/color]
>
>
> Black wallpaper works just fine on my Vista Home Premium SP1
> --
> ----------------
> Stubbo of Oz
> ----------------[/color]