"Rich" <r.green@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:uMi4mAZgIHA.4712@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue][color=green]
>> Here is a link from the Times concerning Microsoft and Vista. It is very
>> interesting reading.[/color]
>
> The New York Times?
>
> good lord .. your better off with MAD Magazine[/color]

That should be "you're", stop reading magazines :)


[color=blue]
> Rich[/color]

I'm still chuckling. What a firestorm! Over one article? Ha!!!

Thank you to all the serious posters.

Ernie


"Scrivener" <dntsaycant@cox.net> wrote in message
news:858E538D-EB01-4900-BFF6-7FA7E3CB563E@microsoft.com...[color=blue]
> Here is a link from the Times concerning Microsoft and Vista. It is very
> interesting reading.
>
> [url]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?_r=1&oref=slogin[/url]
>
> If the link doesn't work, go to [url]www.nytimes.com[/url], click on Technology, then
> Digital Domain, They Criticized Vista. And They Should Know.
>
> Ernie
>
>
>
>
>
>[/color]

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Bob Campbell wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:OJUL$CZgIHA.2540@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>> Bob Campbell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:uZ7AcvYgIHA.944@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Then don't pretend to comment on something you haven't read.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When did I do that?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When you assumed that the "experts" referred to was the New York Times.
>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't assume anything. All I stated was that (1) the NYT is not
>>> an expert in anything (true) and (2) I don't read the NYT (also true).
>>>[/color]
>>
>> Had you started a thread entitled "The NYT is not an expert on
>> anything", you would have a point. As it stands, you jumped into a
>> thread and assumed the experts Frank mistakenly was referring to was
>> the NYT. Had you and Frank read the article, you would know that the
>> NYT was not claiming to be experts on this and your comment would make
>> no sense in the context of the thread. Am I going too fast for you?
>>
>> Alias[/color]
>
> FUKK!!!...I don't think you can backpedal fast enough on this one.
> Best to just take your sheep and go home...LOL!
> Frank[/color]

What a moron.

Alias

Alias wrote:
[color=blue]
> Frank wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Alias wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Bob Campbell wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:OJUL$CZgIHA.2540@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>
>>>>> Bob Campbell wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:uZ7AcvYgIHA.944@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then don't pretend to comment on something you haven't read.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When did I do that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When you assumed that the "experts" referred to was the New York
>>>>> Times.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I didn't assume anything. All I stated was that (1) the NYT is not
>>>> an expert in anything (true) and (2) I don't read the NYT (also true).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Had you started a thread entitled "The NYT is not an expert on
>>> anything", you would have a point. As it stands, you jumped into a
>>> thread and assumed the experts Frank mistakenly was referring to was
>>> the NYT. Had you and Frank read the article, you would know that the
>>> NYT was not claiming to be experts on this and your comment would
>>> make no sense in the context of the thread. Am I going too fast for you?
>>>
>>> Alias[/color]
>>
>>
>> FUKK!!!...I don't think you can backpedal fast enough on this one.
>> Best to just take your sheep and go home...LOL!
>> Frank[/color]
>
>
> What a moron.
>
> Alias[/color]

Hey, you never told us what you call your sheep?
Well...?
Frank

On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:13:39 +0000, bdog wrote:
[color=blue]
> ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote in news:63gvb3F273c9fU1@mid.individual.net:
>[color=green]
>> On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:09:27 -0800, Frank wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Scrivener wrote:
>>>> Here is a link from the Times concerning Microsoft and Vista. It is
>>>> very interesting reading.
>>>>
>>>> [url]http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?[/url][/color][/color][/color]
_r=1&oref=slogin[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>>>
>>>> If the link doesn't work, go to [url]www.nytimes.com[/url], click on Technology,
>>>> then Digital Domain, They Criticized Vista. And They Should Know.
>>>>
>>>> Ernie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Tell us why the NY Times should be considered experts on Vista? Frank[/color]
>>
>> They don't pretend to be - they quote MS executives!
>>
>>[/color]
> The only thing the NYT is proficient at is lying.
>
> bdog[/color]

Then why are they not defending themselves in many lawsuits?

"Frank" <fb@osspan.clm> wrote in message
news:OKJNuqfgIHA.4376@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Frank wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bob Campbell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:OJUL$CZgIHA.2540@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bob Campbell wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:uZ7AcvYgIHA.944@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then don't pretend to comment on something you haven't read.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When did I do that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When you assumed that the "experts" referred to was the New York
>>>>>> Times.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't assume anything. All I stated was that (1) the NYT is not
>>>>> an expert in anything (true) and (2) I don't read the NYT (also true).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Had you started a thread entitled "The NYT is not an expert on
>>>> anything", you would have a point. As it stands, you jumped into a
>>>> thread and assumed the experts Frank mistakenly was referring to was
>>>> the NYT. Had you and Frank read the article, you would know that the
>>>> NYT was not claiming to be experts on this and your comment would make
>>>> no sense in the context of the thread. Am I going too fast for you?
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> FUKK!!!...I don't think you can backpedal fast enough on this one.
>>> Best to just take your sheep and go home...LOL!
>>> Frank[/color]
>>
>>
>> What a moron.
>>
>> Alias[/color]
>
> Hey, you never told us what you call your sheep?
> Well...?
> Frank[/color]

He calls his Sheep Ba-ba-ba-rry!!

ray <ray@zianet.com> wrote in news:63igroF2769ltU4@mid.individual.net:
[color=blue]
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:13:39 +0000, bdog wrote:
>[color=green]
>> The only thing the NYT is proficient at is lying.
>>
>> bdog[/color]
>
> Then why are they not defending themselves in many lawsuits?
>[/color]

Check their subscriber numers over the past two years.

"Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
news:eOTGRLZgIHA.6092@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=blue]
> Bob Campbell wrote:[color=green]
>> "Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:OJUL$CZgIHA.2540@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=darkred]
>>> Bob Campbell wrote:
>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@removethisgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:uZ7AcvYgIHA.944@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Then don't pretend to comment on something you haven't read.
>>>>
>>>> When did I do that?
>>>>
>>>
>>> When you assumed that the "experts" referred to was the New York Times.[/color]
>>
>> I didn't assume anything. All I stated was that (1) the NYT is not an
>> expert in anything (true) and (2) I don't read the NYT (also true).
>>[/color]
>
> Had you started a thread entitled "The NYT is not an expert on anything",
> you would have a point. As it stands, you jumped into a thread and assumed
> the experts Frank mistakenly was referring to was the NYT. Had you and
> Frank read the article, you would know that the NYT was not claiming to be
> experts on this and your comment would make no sense in the context of the
> thread. Am I going too fast for you?
>
> Alias[/color]

You jump into most threads insulting people with "Switch to Ubuntu" because
they have an issue with Vista. What an idiot you are. Am I going too fast
for you? Just FYI.