|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| SP1 and defragging FYI: SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago. |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging Addendum: My original post should have stated: ...though I had used XP SP2's defragger on it 2 days ago My original post: FYI: SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago. |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging You can download 2 free defrag utils here to use along with the vista one, these have visual feedback (I like the first one better) [url]http://www.auslogics.com/disk-defrag[/url] [url]http://www.defraggler.com/[/url] "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > FYI: > > SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. > There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging > It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with > SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago.[/color] |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging Listen, there is no need to download any "free" defrag utilities which may well be malware. Vista does defrag in the background if you leave computer overnight. it will even do it when the machine is in sleep mode with a power saving option. Don't worry about defrag. MS has taken care of it. "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > FYI: > > SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. > There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging > It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with > SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago.[/color] |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging I bet you're like your hero McCain who sees a terrorist in every corner.. but with you every site or program that doesn't have a big fat Microsoft logo on it is malware... made by hackers to destroy your computer.. lol Yes paranoia goes hand and hand with racism.. and you got both. "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message news:ONGWEZyfIHA.4260@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Listen, there is no need to download any "free" defrag utilities which may > well be malware. Vista does defrag in the background if you leave computer > overnight. it will even do it when the machine is in sleep mode with a > power saving option. > > Don't worry about defrag. MS has taken care of it. > > > "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message > news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=green] >> FYI: >> >> SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. >> There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging >> It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with >> SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago.[/color] >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging I am not saying that everything you offer to people is malware. What I am saying that (1) Most of the stuff you offer is AVAILABLE in Vista. Then why will the user pay cash for something that simply duplicates existing services. I bet most of them use elementary DOS commands or VBScript files generated on a temporary basis form an "exec." (2) If you give me an iron clad assurance that what I download as "free" software is malware free for every offer out there and back it up with a good bet, I will take it. If enough cash is provided I will do hard nosed research trying to prove my point. I think you have a good chance to lose your shirt. It is a know fact that most of them are Trojan horses. The reason I am so concerned about it that I realize that security of my computing depends on security of the whole community. If malware progenitors have no foothold my computers will be problem free. The malware is contagious. Also I am concerned that people are being ripped off for the lack of knowledge about simple available options like DOS commands. "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message news:47cf4607$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=blue] >I bet you're like your hero McCain who sees a terrorist in every corner.. > but with you every site or program that doesn't have a big fat Microsoft > logo on it > is malware... made by hackers to destroy your computer.. lol > > Yes paranoia goes hand and hand with racism.. and you got both. > > > "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:ONGWEZyfIHA.4260@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=green] >> Listen, there is no need to download any "free" defrag utilities which >> may well be malware. Vista does defrag in the background if you leave >> computer overnight. it will even do it when the machine is in sleep mode >> with a power saving option. >> >> Don't worry about defrag. MS has taken care of it. >> >> >> "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message >> news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=darkred] >>> FYI: >>> >>> SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. >>> There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging >>> It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with >>> SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago.[/color] >>[/color] > >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging AlexB wrote: [color=blue] > I am not saying that everything you offer to people is malware. > > What I am saying that > > (1) Most of the stuff you offer is AVAILABLE in Vista. Then why will the > user pay cash for something that simply duplicates existing services. I > bet most of them use elementary DOS commands or VBScript files generated > on a temporary basis form an "exec." > > (2) If you give me an iron clad assurance that what I download as "free" > software is malware free for every offer out there and back it up with a > good bet, I will take it. If enough cash is provided I will do hard nosed > research trying to prove my point. I think you have a good chance to lose > your shirt. > > It is a know fact that most of them are Trojan horses. > > The reason I am so concerned about it that I realize that security of my > computing depends on security of the whole community. If malware > progenitors have no foothold my computers will be problem free. The > malware is contagious. > > Also I am concerned that people are being ripped off for the lack of > knowledge about simple available options like DOS commands. > >[/color] If you're going to be that paranoid about malware, it's time you switched to Linux. Cheers. [color=blue] > > "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message > news:47cf4607$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=green] >>I bet you're like your hero McCain who sees a terrorist in every corner.. >> but with you every site or program that doesn't have a big fat Microsoft >> logo on it >> is malware... made by hackers to destroy your computer.. lol >> >> Yes paranoia goes hand and hand with racism.. and you got both. >> >> >> "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message >> news:ONGWEZyfIHA.4260@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=darkred] >>> Listen, there is no need to download any "free" defrag utilities which >>> may well be malware. Vista does defrag in the background if you leave >>> computer overnight. it will even do it when the machine is in sleep mode >>> with a power saving option. >>> >>> Don't worry about defrag. MS has taken care of it. >>> >>> >>> "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message >>> news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>> FYI: >>>> >>>> SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. >>>> There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging >>>> It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with >>>> SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago. >>>[/color] >> >>[/color][/color] -- What does Bill Gates use? [url]http://tinyurl.com/2zxhdl[/url] Proprietary Software: a 20th Century software business model. AlexB's abacus: [url]http://www.poppystoys.co.uk/shop/baby-toys/caterpillar.jpg[/url] The closest to "computing" that man should go. Frank, hard at work on his Vista computer all day: [url]http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/compost.htm[/url] |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging I actually considered it for a very very special operation but for that no Internet access will be needed, only LAN and it will be highly computational. It is way in the future. I may be actually looking into Unix. For all things considered Linux is a dead horse as far as any flexibility and stability goes. It is a firm fact. "NoStop" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:fqnjg3115qv@news4.newsguy.com...[color=blue] > AlexB wrote: >[color=green] >> I am not saying that everything you offer to people is malware. >> >> What I am saying that >> >> (1) Most of the stuff you offer is AVAILABLE in Vista. Then why will the >> user pay cash for something that simply duplicates existing services. I >> bet most of them use elementary DOS commands or VBScript files generated >> on a temporary basis form an "exec." >> >> (2) If you give me an iron clad assurance that what I download as "free" >> software is malware free for every offer out there and back it up with a >> good bet, I will take it. If enough cash is provided I will do hard nosed >> research trying to prove my point. I think you have a good chance to lose >> your shirt. >> >> It is a know fact that most of them are Trojan horses. >> >> The reason I am so concerned about it that I realize that security of my >> computing depends on security of the whole community. If malware >> progenitors have no foothold my computers will be problem free. The >> malware is contagious. >> >> Also I am concerned that people are being ripped off for the lack of >> knowledge about simple available options like DOS commands. >> >>[/color] > If you're going to be that paranoid about malware, it's time you switched > to > Linux. > > Cheers. > >[color=green] >> >> "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message >> news:47cf4607$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=darkred] >>>I bet you're like your hero McCain who sees a terrorist in every corner.. >>> but with you every site or program that doesn't have a big fat Microsoft >>> logo on it >>> is malware... made by hackers to destroy your computer.. lol >>> >>> Yes paranoia goes hand and hand with racism.. and you got both. >>> >>> >>> "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message >>> news:ONGWEZyfIHA.4260@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>> Listen, there is no need to download any "free" defrag utilities which >>>> may well be malware. Vista does defrag in the background if you leave >>>> computer overnight. it will even do it when the machine is in sleep >>>> mode >>>> with a power saving option. >>>> >>>> Don't worry about defrag. MS has taken care of it. >>>> >>>> >>>> "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message >>>> news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>>> FYI: >>>>> >>>>> SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. >>>>> There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging >>>>> It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with >>>>> SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago. >>>> >>> >>>[/color][/color] > > -- > What does Bill Gates use? > [url]http://tinyurl.com/2zxhdl[/url] > > Proprietary Software: a 20th Century software business model. > > AlexB's abacus: [url]http://www.poppystoys.co.uk/shop/baby-toys/caterpillar.jpg[/url] > The closest to "computing" that man should go. > > Frank, hard at work on his Vista computer all day: > [url]http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/compost.htm[/url] >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging I give people top quality professional advice, most of the times its stuff I have tested myself, but in the rare occasion that its something that I have not tested myself I tell them. I deeply care about users... and I always give 110% ... I would never tell them to download something that may have malware. There is not one chance in a quadrillion that those programs I suggested have any malware. If you KNEW more about general products and not only what Microsoft gives you then you would know that these programs are being suggested by many techs, not only me. The built in stuff that Microsoft has are very basic, for more serious stuff or more features you install other programs dah.... its like saying you should install Photoshop because it may be malware.. and you have Microsoft paint built in to vista. Visual feedback is considered a feature... if you don't believe visual feedback is important PLEASE UNPLUG YOUR MONITOR AND SIT THERE STARRING AT YOUR EMPTY SCREEN! Cut the nonsense... some people in here know what they are talking about. Clean up your act, have more acceptance for people around the world, stop being such a racist, and I will promise you that we can get along very well. "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message news:eSSKp0yfIHA.4396@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue] >I am not saying that everything you offer to people is malware. > > What I am saying that > > (1) Most of the stuff you offer is AVAILABLE in Vista. Then why will the > user pay cash for something that simply duplicates existing services. I > bet most of them use elementary DOS commands or VBScript files generated > on a temporary basis form an "exec." > > (2) If you give me an iron clad assurance that what I download as "free" > software is malware free for every offer out there and back it up with a > good bet, I will take it. If enough cash is provided I will do hard nosed > research trying to prove my point. I think you have a good chance to lose > your shirt. > > It is a know fact that most of them are Trojan horses. > > The reason I am so concerned about it that I realize that security of my > computing depends on security of the whole community. If malware > progenitors have no foothold my computers will be problem free. The > malware is contagious. > > Also I am concerned that people are being ripped off for the lack of > knowledge about simple available options like DOS commands. > > > > "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message > news:47cf4607$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=green] >>I bet you're like your hero McCain who sees a terrorist in every corner.. >> but with you every site or program that doesn't have a big fat Microsoft >> logo on it >> is malware... made by hackers to destroy your computer.. lol >> >> Yes paranoia goes hand and hand with racism.. and you got both. >> >> >> "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message >> news:ONGWEZyfIHA.4260@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=darkred] >>> Listen, there is no need to download any "free" defrag utilities which >>> may well be malware. Vista does defrag in the background if you leave >>> computer overnight. it will even do it when the machine is in sleep mode >>> with a power saving option. >>> >>> Don't worry about defrag. MS has taken care of it. >>> >>> >>> "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message >>> news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>> FYI: >>>> >>>> SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. >>>> There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging >>>> It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with >>>> SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago. >>>[/color] >> >>[/color] >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging MS provides almost all needed services and there is not need for more for most people. Most of the add-ons people download from your websites are used only on a limited basis. Don't tell me that sh*it. You are "professional." Professionals do not behave this way. I will do my best to show people around here that MS has most of the stuff you hide, never mention because you make money on selling those crap*py pieces. It is up to them to compare and make a decision. My decision is final. As long as I am in this group you will have no way. No Pasaran! "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message news:47cf5700$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=blue] >I give people top quality professional advice, most of the times its stuff >I have tested myself, > but in the rare occasion that its something that I have not tested myself > I tell them. > > I deeply care about users... and I always give 110% ... I would never tell > them to download something that may have malware. > > There is not one chance in a quadrillion that those programs I suggested > have any malware. > > If you KNEW more about general products and not only what Microsoft gives > you then you would know that these programs are being suggested by many > techs, not only me. > > The built in stuff that Microsoft has are very basic, for more serious > stuff or more features you install other programs dah.... its like saying > you should install Photoshop because it may be malware.. and you have > Microsoft paint built in to vista. Visual feedback is considered a > feature... > > if you don't believe visual feedback is important PLEASE UNPLUG YOUR > MONITOR AND SIT > THERE STARRING AT YOUR EMPTY SCREEN! > > Cut the nonsense... some people in here know what they are talking about. > Clean up your act, have more acceptance for people around the world, stop > being such a racist, > and I will promise you that we can get along very well. > > > > "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:eSSKp0yfIHA.4396@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=green] >>I am not saying that everything you offer to people is malware. >> >> What I am saying that >> >> (1) Most of the stuff you offer is AVAILABLE in Vista. Then why will the >> user pay cash for something that simply duplicates existing services. I >> bet most of them use elementary DOS commands or VBScript files generated >> on a temporary basis form an "exec." >> >> (2) If you give me an iron clad assurance that what I download as "free" >> software is malware free for every offer out there and back it up with a >> good bet, I will take it. If enough cash is provided I will do hard nosed >> research trying to prove my point. I think you have a good chance to lose >> your shirt. >> >> It is a know fact that most of them are Trojan horses. >> >> The reason I am so concerned about it that I realize that security of my >> computing depends on security of the whole community. If malware >> progenitors have no foothold my computers will be problem free. The >> malware is contagious. >> >> Also I am concerned that people are being ripped off for the lack of >> knowledge about simple available options like DOS commands. >> >> >> >> "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message >> news:47cf4607$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=darkred] >>>I bet you're like your hero McCain who sees a terrorist in every corner.. >>> but with you every site or program that doesn't have a big fat Microsoft >>> logo on it >>> is malware... made by hackers to destroy your computer.. lol >>> >>> Yes paranoia goes hand and hand with racism.. and you got both. >>> >>> >>> "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message >>> news:ONGWEZyfIHA.4260@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>> Listen, there is no need to download any "free" defrag utilities which >>>> may well be malware. Vista does defrag in the background if you leave >>>> computer overnight. it will even do it when the machine is in sleep >>>> mode with a power saving option. >>>> >>>> Don't worry about defrag. MS has taken care of it. >>>> >>>> >>>> "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message >>>> news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>>> FYI: >>>>> >>>>> SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. >>>>> There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging >>>>> It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with >>>>> SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago. >>>> >>> >>>[/color] >>[/color] > >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging you are one messed up kid, there is no malware involved and you know it, there are no hackers involved and you know it... either you know it or you are crazy! I dont know why you are doing and saying all this misinformation all the time. gesh... Your desision is final that you will keep on being the crappy person you where before... Ok you are just making a fool of yourself, giving people the absolutly worst impression about you. You further try to justify yourself saying that whoever dislikes you is ... fill in the dots with racism and hate. You have issues boy... you will never be happy. Im sorry I even took the time and bothered replying to you. It seems unfortunatly you are not worth the effort. "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message news:Oz7r%236zfIHA.4684@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > MS provides almost all needed services and there is not need for more for > most people. > > Most of the add-ons people download from your websites are used only on a > limited basis. > > Don't tell me that sh*it. You are "professional." Professionals do not > behave this way. > > I will do my best to show people around here that MS has most of the stuff > you hide, never mention because you make money on selling those crap*py > pieces. It is up to them to compare and make a decision. > > My decision is final. As long as I am in this group you will have no way. > No Pasaran! > > "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message > news:47cf5700$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=green] >>I give people top quality professional advice, most of the times its stuff >>I have tested myself, >> but in the rare occasion that its something that I have not tested myself >> I tell them. >> >> I deeply care about users... and I always give 110% ... I would never >> tell them to download something that may have malware. >> >> There is not one chance in a quadrillion that those programs I suggested >> have any malware. >> >> If you KNEW more about general products and not only what Microsoft gives >> you then you would know that these programs are being suggested by many >> techs, not only me. >> >> The built in stuff that Microsoft has are very basic, for more serious >> stuff or more features you install other programs dah.... its like saying >> you should install Photoshop because it may be malware.. and you have >> Microsoft paint built in to vista. Visual feedback is considered a >> feature... >> >> if you don't believe visual feedback is important PLEASE UNPLUG YOUR >> MONITOR AND SIT >> THERE STARRING AT YOUR EMPTY SCREEN! >> >> Cut the nonsense... some people in here know what they are talking about. >> Clean up your act, have more acceptance for people around the world, stop >> being such a racist, >> and I will promise you that we can get along very well. >> >> >> >> "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message >> news:eSSKp0yfIHA.4396@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=darkred] >>>I am not saying that everything you offer to people is malware. >>> >>> What I am saying that >>> >>> (1) Most of the stuff you offer is AVAILABLE in Vista. Then why will the >>> user pay cash for something that simply duplicates existing services. I >>> bet most of them use elementary DOS commands or VBScript files generated >>> on a temporary basis form an "exec." >>> >>> (2) If you give me an iron clad assurance that what I download as "free" >>> software is malware free for every offer out there and back it up with a >>> good bet, I will take it. If enough cash is provided I will do hard >>> nosed research trying to prove my point. I think you have a good chance >>> to lose your shirt. >>> >>> It is a know fact that most of them are Trojan horses. >>> >>> The reason I am so concerned about it that I realize that security of my >>> computing depends on security of the whole community. If malware >>> progenitors have no foothold my computers will be problem free. The >>> malware is contagious. >>> >>> Also I am concerned that people are being ripped off for the lack of >>> knowledge about simple available options like DOS commands. >>> >>> >>> >>> "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message >>> news:47cf4607$1@newsgate.x-privat.org... >>>>I bet you're like your hero McCain who sees a terrorist in every >>>>corner.. >>>> but with you every site or program that doesn't have a big fat >>>> Microsoft logo on it >>>> is malware... made by hackers to destroy your computer.. lol >>>> >>>> Yes paranoia goes hand and hand with racism.. and you got both. >>>> >>>> >>>> "AlexB" <alexb@comcast.net> wrote in message >>>> news:ONGWEZyfIHA.4260@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>> Listen, there is no need to download any "free" defrag utilities which >>>>> may well be malware. Vista does defrag in the background if you leave >>>>> computer overnight. it will even do it when the machine is in sleep >>>>> mode with a power saving option. >>>>> >>>>> Don't worry about defrag. MS has taken care of it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... >>>>>> FYI: >>>>>> >>>>>> SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. >>>>>> There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging >>>>>> It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista >>>>>> with SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>[/color] >> >>[/color] >[/color] |
| |||
| Your Professional advice "On the Bridge!" <On@the,Bridge> wrote in message news:47cf5700$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...[color=blue] >I give people top quality professional advice, most of the times its stuff >I have tested myself,[/color] So you give professional advice? Here is the question: Do I overseed my lawn and try to thicken things up with good quality grass, or do I put down the Turf Builder with Halts Crabgrass preventer to ensure I don't get that nasty stuff poping up in my yard this year. Crabgrass was pretty bad last year, but I'm working with builder-grad (read: crappy) sod and trying really hard to improve it with better quality grass seed. But in doing the latter each of the past couple of years, I think i've helped the crabgrass really take route in my yard. The problem is the pre-emergent that prevents crabgrass from growing also prevents new grass from growing.... so it really is one or the other. I think after two years taking the overseeding route, I have to do the crabgrass prevention and wait til the fall to try to overseed. Any thoughts/comments/suggestions? |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging On the Bridge! wrote:[color=blue] > I bet you're like your hero McCain who sees a terrorist in every > corner.. but with you every site or program that doesn't have a big > fat Microsoft logo on it > is malware... made by hackers to destroy your computer.. lol > > Yes paranoia goes hand and hand with racism.. and you got both. >[/color] There IS a terrorist on every corner! They call themselves "Democrats." Why just the other day a Marine found a terrorists disguised as a puppy. |
| |||
| Re: SP1 and defragging AlexB wrote:[color=blue] > Listen, there is no need to download any "free" defrag utilities which > may well be malware. Vista does defrag in the background if you leave > computer overnight. it will even do it when the machine is in sleep mode > with a power saving option. > > Don't worry about defrag. MS has taken care of it. > > > "CZ" <CZ@no99spam.com> wrote in message > news:%23Nq0a2wfIHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=green] >> FYI: >> >> SP1 allows you to select individual vols to defrag via the GUI. >> There is still no display of fragmentation or progress of defragging >> It just took 12 minutes on my relatively new/clean setup of Vista with >> SP1, though I had used XP SP2's on it 2 days ago.[/color] >[/color] Some reasons to use a third party defrag are The packaged defrag application in Vista does not defragment System Files in use Paging File MFT and cannot defragment an individual folder. While some of the third party applications can do this. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Defragging and Vista | occam | Windows Vista | 5 | 11-05-2007 08:20 AM |
| defragging the disk | KRK | Windows Vista | 8 | 10-15-2007 08:50 AM |
| defragging an image | Mani | Windows XP | 3 | 05-11-2007 01:50 PM |
| Defragging | I agree that you have to be careful abou | Windows XP | 4 | 04-28-2007 12:30 PM |
| Defragging difficulty | Brad | Windows XP | 13 | 02-06-2007 10:46 AM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |