> Don't expect a reply from the OP.

Here is a reply

some people using vista with a limited amount of applications on all new
hardware do not have problems.
To those people even I say get vista with a new computer..

but introducing vista into a computer environment with old peripherals
hardware, and programs that someone needs to use for work yet they have
problems with vista is a nightmare....

even if everything is new, hardware and software, if you use the computer
enough, you will run into twice as many problems than you did with XP..

not to mention the degrade in speed and performance




"David" <dgprozzoLEAVE@bellsouthOUT.net> wrote in message
news:urq0UV2XIHA.3556@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> You and I like Vista because it works well for us. That's a fact.
>
> Don't expect a reply from the OP.
>
> "Brian W" <brian.wescombeSODOFF@ntlSPAMworld.com> wrote in message
> news:ibfmj.67035$h35.41999@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>>
>> "Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message
>> news:47994113@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>
>> [unsubstantiated crap snipped]
>>
>> Has it not occurred to you that many people are using Vistas with no
>> problems at all? Or are simply jumping on the Vista-hating bandwagon
>> with no actual proof of what you've written here?
>> XP was good, but I'll never go back to it now after using Vista for a
>> year.
>>

Joe cann wrote:

>>Don't expect a reply from the OP.
>
>
> Here is a reply
>
> some people using vista with a limited amount of applications on all new
> hardware do not have problems.
> To those people even I say get vista with a new computer..
>
> but introducing vista into a computer environment with old peripherals
> hardware, and programs that someone needs to use for work yet they have
> problems with vista is a nightmare....

Bullsh*t!
>
> even if everything is new, hardware and software, if you use the computer
> enough, you will run into twice as many problems than you did with XP..

More bullsh*t fukkin lies!
>
> not to mention the degrade in speed and performance

What did MS ever do to your little stupid ass for you to constantly spew
your lying bullsh*t in this ng?
Are you that sick?
Frank

Hi, Bob, if you want folks to take what you say more serioulsy, you should
speak in a more shcolarly way and show evidence for what you are saying. If
you don't like Vista, give some examples of where the OS has failed, rather
than throw forward an essay that shows bitterness and bias. It's clear you
don't like Microsoft more than it is clear that Vista is a bad OS.
--
Cheers,
D-man

the list would fill the biggest library on the world...

Typing that much would need several years :-)



"D-man" <Dman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:F8036037-2B43-496A-874E-5AEEA4348453@microsoft.com...
> Hi, Bob, if you want folks to take what you say more serioulsy, you should
> speak in a more shcolarly way and show evidence for what you are saying.
> If
> you don't like Vista, give some examples of where the OS has failed,
> rather
> than throw forward an essay that shows bitterness and bias. It's clear you
> don't like Microsoft more than it is clear that Vista is a bad OS.
> --
> Cheers,
> D-man

@ Windows7 M1 wrote:


...more pretending capin' crunch...hahaha...LOL!
Try getting that cardboard space ship to fly...LOL!
Frank

Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in news:u#2ChI3XIHA.6044@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:

>> but introducing vista into a computer environment with old
>> peripherals hardware, and programs that someone needs to use for work
>> yet they have problems with vista is a nightmare....
>
> Bullsh*t!

That depends on your definition of 'old' peripherals and hardware....

How old is old ?

DanS wrote:

> Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in news:u#2ChI3XIHA.6044@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
>
>
>>>but introducing vista into a computer environment with old
>>>peripherals hardware, and programs that someone needs to use for work
>>>yet they have problems with vista is a nightmare....
>>
>>Bullsh*t!
>
>
> That depends on your definition of 'old' peripherals and hardware....
>
> How old is old ?

I loaded the very first 4k series longhorn on a 1gig celery 512RAM and
32meg video. Obviously is wasn't very fast, but nothing was really
"fast" on that box.
It sure was not a nightmare though.
Frank

>>>>but introducing vista into a computer environment with old
>>>>peripherals hardware, and programs that someone needs to use for work
>>>>yet they have problems with vista is a nightmare....
>>>
>>>Bullsh*t!
>>
>>
>> That depends on your definition of 'old' peripherals and hardware....
>>
>> How old is old ?
>
> I loaded the very first 4k series longhorn on a 1gig celery 512RAM and
> 32meg video. Obviously is wasn't very fast, but nothing was really
> "fast" on that box.
> It sure was not a nightmare though.
> Frank

Well I thinking more along the lines of the officially released Vista.

But of course, that doesn't answer the question.

DanS wrote:
>>>>> but introducing vista into a computer environment with old
>>>>> peripherals hardware, and programs that someone needs to use for work
>>>>> yet they have problems with vista is a nightmare....
>>>> Bullsh*t!
>>>
>>> That depends on your definition of 'old' peripherals and hardware....
>>>
>>> How old is old ?
>> I loaded the very first 4k series longhorn on a 1gig celery 512RAM and
>> 32meg video. Obviously is wasn't very fast, but nothing was really
>> "fast" on that box.
>> It sure was not a nightmare though.
>> Frank
>
> Well I thinking more along the lines of the officially released Vista.
>
> But of course, that doesn't answer the question.

Frank doesn't answer questions. If he isn't insulting people, using
profanity or lying, he's back pedaling full bluster ahead.

Alias

"Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message
news:479a090c$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>> Don't expect a reply from the OP.
>
> Here is a reply
>
> some people using vista with a limited amount of applications on all new
> hardware do not have problems.
> To those people even I say get vista with a new computer..

Wrong. I have a POS Acer eBay special. Definitely NOT top of the line. I run
everything on Vista that I did on XP. Poser, Bryce, PSP, and even software
circa 2001 run fine.

> but introducing vista into a computer environment with old peripherals
> hardware, and programs that someone needs to use for work yet they have
> problems with vista is a nightmare....

Wrong again. Run my home business on it with ZERO problems. Popped in an old
HP F340, HP CD16b CD-RW, my old Memorex mouse. Even popped some IDE to SATA
adapters on my older Barracudas. Have yet to have a problem with anything I
have thrown at it. Running Office 2007 Enterprise, QuickBooks, and a
plethora of other apps. Again NO problems.

> even if everything is new, hardware and software, if you use the computer
> enough, you will run into twice as many problems than you did with XP..

Again wrong. Have yet to have one BSOD under Vista. Apps like Bryce and
Poser choked XP. Vista barely blinks at them. You REALLY need to get your
facts straight before posting this stuff.

> not to mention the degrade in speed and performance

**** you're not doing to well are you? My machine is as fast or faster in
some areas than XP, so that dog don't hunt. Again, get the facts straight
before posting blatantly untrue information.

--
Sanity calms, but madness is more interesting.
http://www.lockergnome.com/darksentinel
Undo the munge to reply by email

> "David" <dgprozzoLEAVE@bellsouthOUT.net> wrote in message
> news:urq0UV2XIHA.3556@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> You and I like Vista because it works well for us. That's a fact.
>>
>> Don't expect a reply from the OP.
>>
>> "Brian W" <brian.wescombeSODOFF@ntlSPAMworld.com> wrote in message
>> news:ibfmj.67035$h35.41999@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>>>
>>> "Joe cann" <joe@beerget.com> wrote in message
>>> news:47994113@newsgate.x-privat.org...
>>>
>>> [unsubstantiated crap snipped]
>>>
>>> Has it not occurred to you that many people are using Vistas with no
>>> problems at all? Or are simply jumping on the Vista-hating bandwagon
>>> with no actual proof of what you've written here?
>>> XP was good, but I'll never go back to it now after using Vista for a
>>> year.
>>>
>
>