Now when you troll for Senators, you can hold your Republican head up high.
Just FYI. Senator Craig's conviction stands. Just FYI.

If he was using Windows 2008 Server, he probably wouldn't have been in that
bathroom. Just FYI.

Just FYI

A dumb lawyer could have defended Craig easily with the lack of evidence
they had. He does show how stupid Republicans are to have foregone a lawyer
and to have copped the plea of an easily winnable case. And now he's spent a
couple hundred thousand on Stan Brand and Billy Martin.

One thing for sure--it's going to be a gaduate rich Christmas for the
combined families from the Billy Martin divorce--two older daughters and
twins with Michel.

If Vitter's state had a Republican Governor they would have tried to run him
out of the Senate but they don't dare loose the seat until 2008. Craig is
staying until 2009 and that's not helpful to Rudy 911. Keep the Iraq
killing of Americans going and it matters little who the Republicans
run--their dead in the water already.

CH

"Spanky deMonkey" <Spanky@deMonkey.com> wrote in message
news:OlyVdFsBIHA.5328@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Now when you troll for Senators, you can hold your Republican head up
> high. Just FYI. Senator Craig's conviction stands. Just FYI.
>
> If he was using Windows 2008 Server, he probably wouldn't have been in
> that bathroom. Just FYI.
>
> Just FYI
>
>

Addict Limbaugh's Divorce Proceedings Kept Secret--another fat privleged
Republican scumbag:

Terms of Limbaugh's Divorce Settlement to Stay Private
Billy Shields
Daily Business Review
10-04-2007

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh may keep his divorce settlement
private, a three-judge panel of the 3rd District Court of Appeal ruled
Wednesday.

In a 2-1 decision, Judges Richard J. Suarez and Angel A. Cortiñas denied a
petition by The Palm Beach Post, which wanted a Monroe (Fla.) Circuit judge
to unseal Limbaugh's settlement. Judge Gerald B. Cope Jr. wrote in a
dissenting opinion that "I believe the motion for rehearing is well taken
and we should grant it."

The decision instantly ignited the ire of public information advocates.

"We're concerned here with people getting special treatment in terms of
keeping information private, or having different access to the courts that
other people might have," said Adria Harper, director of the First Amendment
Foundation in Tallahassee. She noted that Florida generally has strong
open-records law, "nonetheless, we have a case like this, where certain
prominent individuals have their records treated differently.

"Whenever we see these kinds of cases it's alarming and it's difficult for
the rest of us to understand."

Cope remarked there were two legal questions at work in this case. The first
dealt with whether a marital settlement is public when a trial judge reviews
it, and Cope argued it was. The second question dealt with discerning the
proper procedures for gaining access to such a settlement. Cope said the
Post followed those procedures when it sued to see the divorce settlement.

"On the merits, the marital settlement agreement is a judicial record and
must be disclosed unless there is an applicable exemption. We should remand
...." he wrote.

Limbaugh's Miami-based divorce lawyer Dirk Lorenzen did not return calls
seeking comment. Jupiter, Fla.-based attorney L. Martin Reeder Jr., who
represents the Post, declined comment until after he had thoroughly read the
ruling.

Limbaugh filed a petition for divorce in Monroe Circuit Court on Dec. 21,
2004, and reached a settlement with ex-wife Marta Miranda two days later.
The court allowed the couple to keep the settlement out of the court file,
but initialed it to make it official.

News of the divorce was published in January 2005, and the Post filed a
motion to unseal the settlement in March 2005.

When the newspaper discovered Limbaugh's court file did not include the
settlement terms, the Post sued, alleging the agreement was part of the
court file and a public record.

Without writing anything other than the word "denied," Suarez and Cortiñas
agreed Wednesday with Monroe Circuit Judge Sandra Taylor, who originally
ruled the settlement was not public. They cited a 2005 Ohio case, Davis v.
Cincinnati Enquirer, as precedent.

But Cope wrote that the Ohio case isn't applicable in Florida, and added
that Taylor's order returning the secret settlement to Limbaugh and Miranda
is void "because a judgment entered without notice is void."

Since the settlement was received in connection with public business, it is
therefore a public record, he wrote.

"The trial judge received it, reviewed it, initialed it, and made findings
about it in the hearing on the petition for dissolution of marriage. The
agreement was received by the judge in connection with the official business
of the court, and is therefore a judicial record."



"Spanky deMonkey" <Spanky@deMonkey.com> wrote in message
news:OlyVdFsBIHA.5328@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Now when you troll for Senators, you can hold your Republican head up
> high. Just FYI. Senator Craig's conviction stands. Just FYI.
>
> If he was using Windows 2008 Server, he probably wouldn't have been in
> that bathroom. Just FYI.
>
> Just FYI
>
>

LOL --so now there are going to be Republicans on the Ethics Committees
having televized purported sex scandle hearings? Too frigging funny.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

"The genius of Craig’s move today is in calling the Republicans’ bluff on
Ethics Committee hearings: Does the Republican leadership really want
televised hearings on gay sex in public, involving one of their own, as the
AP is reporting is “virtually certain”? Didn’t think so. Who’s taking odds
that those hearings are cancelled somehow, some way?"

I'll take odds they go way far away. But I grin when ole Escort Service
Banger Vitter gets up to pontificate now. Maybe he can bring his hookers
with him.

CH


"Spanky deMonkey" <Spanky@deMonkey.com> wrote in message
news:OlyVdFsBIHA.5328@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Now when you troll for Senators, you can hold your Republican head up
> high. Just FYI. Senator Craig's conviction stands. Just FYI.
>
> If he was using Windows 2008 Server, he probably wouldn't have been in
> that bathroom. Just FYI.
>
> Just FYI
>
>

Just one thing. Stay away from the public restrooms at the airport! If
they tap your foot with theirs, RUN.

Oh yea, don't bend over and pick up the soap!

Just FYI.


"Chad Harris" <vistaneedsmuchowork.net> wrote in message
news:O0pkYDuBIHA.324@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> LOL --so now there are going to be Republicans on the Ethics Committees
> having televized purported sex scandle hearings? Too frigging funny.
>
> http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/
>
> "The genius of Craig’s move today is in calling the Republicans’ bluff on
> Ethics Committee hearings: Does the Republican leadership really want
> televised hearings on gay sex in public, involving one of their own, as
> the AP is reporting is “virtually certain”? Didn’t think so. Who’s taking
> odds that those hearings are cancelled somehow, some way?"
>
> I'll take odds they go way far away. But I grin when ole Escort Service
> Banger Vitter gets up to pontificate now. Maybe he can bring his hookers
> with him.
>
> CH
>
>
> "Spanky deMonkey" <Spanky@deMonkey.com> wrote in message
> news:OlyVdFsBIHA.5328@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Now when you troll for Senators, you can hold your Republican head up
>> high. Just FYI. Senator Craig's conviction stands. Just FYI.
>>
>> If he was using Windows 2008 Server, he probably wouldn't have been in
>> that bathroom. Just FYI.
>>
>> Just FYI
>>
>>
>