Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:04:09 -0600, Bruce Chambers
> <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote:
>
>
>>Dave T. wrote:
>>
>>>Bruce Chambers wrote:
>>>
>>> however, we have a different sort of troll, one who's baiting
>>>
>>>>the anti-Vista trolls.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Bruce, never seen it written better.
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>>>I am guilty on a few occasions of
>>>just that.
>>>
>>
>> Me too, on occasion. It's just so hard to resist the temptation,
>>sometimes. ;-}
>
>
> So you admit you're just some jackass that can't control his temper
> and acts on impulses. Well duh... thanks for sharing that.
>
> I NEVER saw a bigger bunch of prima donnas and crybaby types then
> those that hang out in this silly newsgroup.

FUKK!!!
That went so far over your pointy bald head you didn't even have to duck
in order for it to miss you didn't it?
Amazing just how stupid you really are!
Frank

Charlie wrote:
> I have been reading this newsgroup for several months now and it
> appears that Vista seems to work very well for some and not for
> others. What I haven't been able to determine is just how bad /good
> is Vista. Are the people that are having problems making the most
> noise? Are the people that are not having problems just not saying
> anything?
> I remembered that Newegg.com lets people post reviews about the
> products they purchase on their web site. For a non-bias opinion I
> went to Newegg's site and read some reviews people posted on the
> Vista operating systems. Here is one example posted for OEM 32 bit
> Vista Home Premium. I chose this product because it had the most
> reviews (477) posted. The other versions of Vista were very similar
> to Home Premium.
> Excellent/Good - 71%
> Average - 12%
> Poor/Very Poor - 17%
>
> There you have it. Draw your own conclusions. Too bad Newegg doesn't
> sell Ubuntu. :-)

Well, Micros~1 has sold about 55,000,000 copies of Vista. All 167 people
who've had an insoluble problem have posted here.

Bruce Chambers wrote:
>
> However, most of the "noise" in this newsgroup is just that: noise.
> There is a very vocal anti-Microsoft and anti-Vista cadre of trolls
> who spout a great deal of venom, but apparently have little or no real
> experience with either computers in general, or Vista in particular,
> based upon some of the nonsense they spout. These pathetic
> individuals seem to derive a considerable amount of pleasure from
> simply disrupting newsgroups for no other purpose than to sow
> discord. They have no interest in helping anyone and are doing their
> best to make it difficult for those who honestly seek help to filter
> the chaff from the wheat, so to speak.

We call them MSanthropes. They are a sub-set of folks who complain to give
their miserable lives meaning. By joining some anti-somthing (logging,
whalers, nuclear power, bras, bottle-feeding, meat-eating, Iraq war, Bush,
automobiles, religion, capitalism, Walmart, the "N-word", schoolyard tag,
death penalty, artificial coloring, Rumsfeld, etc.) they can take their mind
off their own meaningless affairs by minding other people's business.

Tragic, really, all that wasted effort. But, that's life.

The best thing to do is lie back and think of England.

Leythos wrote:
> In article <k880g3ta5ltnckr8l5j486hocuv0bthal8@4ax.com>, AA@ABC.net
> says...
> [snip]
>> God, you're delusional.
>
> You should have stated that YOU ARE delusional Adam, you never have
> anything constructive to say and are the most rude poster I've read in
> years.
>
>

<K-Man thinks or thought it was a God too. I haven't seen K-Man that
much anymore. K-Man doesn't care. It would attack anyone about anything
and would not discriminate. Albright is just discriminatory not only
with MS but with Human Beings too.>

<He is the most awful and terrible Human Being I have ever seen with no
justification on how he treats people. But he kisses the behind of
people who are acting in the same way he is acting on the bashing. He is
in many ways a hypocrite based on his so called claim of people
attacking posters in the NG when he is attaching people as well. He is
totally ridiculous.>

On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:33:58 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:

>In article <eZVSV#4AIHA.3848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, Charlie@nowhere.com
>says...
>> Are the
>> people that are having problems making the most noise? Are the people that
>> are not having problems just not saying anything?
>
>That's how Usenet has always worked - complainers post and few people
>without a problem post.
>
>If you have a fast computer, core 2 duo and a fast video card then Vista
>will perform well - just don't expect the same level of performance as
>you had under XP on the SAME hardware.

Duh... I have a fast computer that is dual core and a fast video card
with my overall Vista performance rating is 5.7 and since I just built
the computer from the ground up last February with all new so-called
"vista certified" hardware and have all the latest drivers and the
latest version of BIOS according to you I shouldn't have any problems.

So much for your theory pal. Want to tackle the big bang theory next
Mr. Computer Genius?

HeyBub wrote:

> Charlie wrote:
>> I have been reading this newsgroup for several months now and it
>> appears that Vista seems to work very well for some and not for
>> others. What I haven't been able to determine is just how bad /good
>> is Vista. Are the people that are having problems making the most
>> noise? Are the people that are not having problems just not saying
>> anything?
>> I remembered that Newegg.com lets people post reviews about the
>> products they purchase on their web site. For a non-bias opinion I
>> went to Newegg's site and read some reviews people posted on the
>> Vista operating systems. Here is one example posted for OEM 32 bit
>> Vista Home Premium. I chose this product because it had the most
>> reviews (477) posted. The other versions of Vista were very similar
>> to Home Premium.
>> Excellent/Good - 71%
>> Average - 12%
>> Poor/Very Poor - 17%
>>
>> There you have it. Draw your own conclusions. Too bad Newegg doesn't
>> sell Ubuntu. :-)
>
> Well, Micros~1 has sold about 55,000,000 copies of Vista. All 167 people
> who've had an insoluble problem have posted here.

No, Micros~1 hasn't sold that many copies. They've sold licenses (so they
say) for that many copies. But, that could mean that manufacturers are
still sitting on many of them and in fact, will continue to do so, as
end-users request XP instead. Many others have gotten computers with Vista
installed and that counts as a "sale". But they've either overwritten that
pathetic bloated p.o.s. with XP or gone on to a real operating system like
Ubuntu.

Cheers.

--
Remove Vista Activation Completely ...
http://tinyurl.com/2w8qqo

Do you use Linux? Everytime you "google", you're using Linux.

Coming Soon! Ubuntu 7.10 ... New Features:
http://lunapark6.com/ubuntu-gutsy-gi...-features.html

On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:51:12 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:

>In article <k880g3ta5ltnckr8l5j486hocuv0bthal8@4ax.com>, AA@ABC.net
>says...
>[snip]
>>
>> God, you're delusional.
>
>You should have stated that YOU ARE delusional Adam, you never have
>anything constructive to say and are the most rude poster I've read in
>years.

You don't get out much do you.

Adam Albright wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:51:12 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
>
>> In article <k880g3ta5ltnckr8l5j486hocuv0bthal8@4ax.com>, AA@ABC.net
>> says...
>> [snip]
>>> God, you're delusional.
>> You should have stated that YOU ARE delusional Adam, you never have
>> anything constructive to say and are the most rude poster I've read in
>> years.
>
> You don't get out much do you.
>


Only if they forget to lock the cell door...

In article <p7q0g350ei4m9j77aigu3ropmdrkr6t4lt@4ax.com>, AA@ABC.net
says...
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:51:12 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
>
> >In article <k880g3ta5ltnckr8l5j486hocuv0bthal8@4ax.com>, AA@ABC.net
> >says...
> >[snip]
> >>
> >> God, you're delusional.
> >
> >You should have stated that YOU ARE delusional Adam, you never have
> >anything constructive to say and are the most rude poster I've read in
> >years.
>
> You don't get out much do you.

Based on your lack of ability to respond in a polite manner to most
people, your lack of technical skills, your being filled with scorn and
hate for anyone that exposes your ignorance, it would appear that you
are the one that doesn't get out much, not at all from what I've seen.

--

Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Adam Albright wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:33:58 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
>
>
>>In article <eZVSV#4AIHA.3848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, Charlie@nowhere.com
>>says...
>>
>>>Are the
>>>people that are having problems making the most noise? Are the people that
>>>are not having problems just not saying anything?
>>
>>That's how Usenet has always worked - complainers post and few people
>>without a problem post.
>>
>>If you have a fast computer, core 2 duo and a fast video card then Vista
>>will perform well - just don't expect the same level of performance as
>>you had under XP on the SAME hardware.
>
>
> Duh... I have a fast computer that is dual core and a fast video card
> with my overall Vista performance rating is 5.7 and since I just built
> the computer from the ground up last February with all new so-called
> "vista certified" hardware and have all the latest drivers and the
> latest version of BIOS according to you I shouldn't have any problems.
>
> So much for your theory pal. Want to tackle the big bang theory next
> Mr. Computer Genius?
>


You took the time and went to the expense of building such a powerful
computer yet you did an in place upgrade install of Vista
business?..hahaha...you're an idiot and you keep proving it.
Frank

NoStop wrote:

>
>
> No, Micros~1 hasn't sold that many copies. They've sold licenses (so they
> say) for that many copies. But, that could mean that manufacturers are
> still sitting on many of them and in fact, will continue to do so, as
> end-users request XP instead. Many others have gotten computers with Vista
> installed and that counts as a "sale". But they've either overwritten that
> pathetic bloated p.o.s. with XP or gone on to a real operating system like
> Ubuntu.
>
> Cheers.
>

Hey doris...I head them calling for you over at the open sores ng. RS is
about to give his daily blessing and it's your turn to kiss his holy arse.
Hurry, you won't want to miss your turn!
Frank

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:sfsvf35scaocs0t0o7ir66eg8bht0ndmps@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:27:44 -0400, "Charlie" <Charlie@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
>
>>I have been reading this newsgroup for several months now and it appears
>>that Vista seems to work very well for some and not for others.
>
> That's a fair, unbiased observation.

OK who is pretending to be Adam?

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:kjn0g3523u39qp41qi89t5dimd1r4ouvfe@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:33:58 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
>
>>In article <eZVSV#4AIHA.3848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, Charlie@nowhere.com
>>says...
>>> Are the
>>> people that are having problems making the most noise? Are the people
>>> that
>>> are not having problems just not saying anything?
>>
>>That's how Usenet has always worked - complainers post and few people
>>without a problem post.
>>
>>If you have a fast computer, core 2 duo and a fast video card then Vista
>>will perform well - just don't expect the same level of performance as
>>you had under XP on the SAME hardware.
>
> Duh... I have a fast computer that is dual core and a fast video card
> with my overall Vista performance rating is 5.7 and since I just built
> the computer from the ground up last February with all new so-called
> "vista certified" hardware and have all the latest drivers and the
> latest version of BIOS according to you I shouldn't have any problems.
>
> So much for your theory pal. Want to tackle the big bang theory next
> Mr. Computer Genius?
>

Hi Adam.. still haven't worked out that its you that's the problem?
You aren't going to solve your problem by shouting about everyone else being
wrong and dumber than you.
We all know you are crazy.

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 08:19:37 +0100, "dennis@home"
<dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:

>
>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
>news:sfsvf35scaocs0t0o7ir66eg8bht0ndmps@4ax.com.. .
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:27:44 -0400, "Charlie" <Charlie@nowhere.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I have been reading this newsgroup for several months now and it appears
>>>that Vista seems to work very well for some and not for others.
>>
>> That's a fair, unbiased observation.
>
>OK who is pretending to be Adam?

You know, since I have so many moronic little puppy dogs following me
around trying to sniff my butt or whatever other sick idea pops into
their pea sized brains, I decided to give you idiots numbers. You're
number six Dennis. Do try to remember when I say heel, that's your
cue, but please no jumping up and down trying to lick me and
absolutely no attempts to hump my leg.

On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:32:29 -0700, Frank <fb@osspan.clm> wrote:

>Adam Albright wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 15:33:58 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <eZVSV#4AIHA.3848@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, Charlie@nowhere.com
>>>says...
>>>
>>>>Are the
>>>>people that are having problems making the most noise? Are the people that
>>>>are not having problems just not saying anything?
>>>
>>>That's how Usenet has always worked - complainers post and few people
>>>without a problem post.
>>>
>>>If you have a fast computer, core 2 duo and a fast video card then Vista
>>>will perform well - just don't expect the same level of performance as
>>>you had under XP on the SAME hardware.
>>
>>
>> Duh... I have a fast computer that is dual core and a fast video card
>> with my overall Vista performance rating is 5.7 and since I just built
>> the computer from the ground up last February with all new so-called
>> "vista certified" hardware and have all the latest drivers and the
>> latest version of BIOS according to you I shouldn't have any problems.
>>
>> So much for your theory pal. Want to tackle the big bang theory next
>> Mr. Computer Genius?

>You took the time and went to the expense of building such a powerful
>computer yet you did an in place upgrade install of Vista
>business?..hahaha...you're an idiot and you keep proving it.
>Frank

Wow Frank, that's the 179th time you repeated the same lie. If you do
it just 21 more times you win a set of steak knives. Of course since
we all know you to be raving lunatic they're be just plastic blades,
so it reduced the chances of your hurting yourself or somebody else.