dennis@home wrote:

> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a
> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some
> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what is
> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.

Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat
evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.

Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.

FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.

Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.

Anonymous wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:
>
>
>>There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a
>>simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some
>>troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what is
>>and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.
>
>
> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat
> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.
>
> Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.
>
> Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.
>
> FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.
>
> Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.
>
Hey you...butt-munch...get lost.
Read the sign...it says Vista...not open sores ...or loser linux...just
Vista.
Frank

Frank wrote:

> Anonymous wrote:
>
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>>>There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a
>>>simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some
>>>troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what
>>>is and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.
>>
>>
>> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat
>> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.
>>
>> Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.
>>
>> Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.
>>
>> FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.
>>
>> Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.
>>
> Hey you...butt-munch...get lost.
> Read the sign...it says Vista...not open sores ...or loser linux...just
> Vista.
> Frank

Idiot
--
Only two things are infinite,
the Universe and Stupidity.
And I'm not quite sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein

"7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
news:9EdLi.22294$c_1.8262@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:
>
>>
>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
>> news:dOVKi.21730$c_1.2486@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
>>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:4lUKi.21642$c_1.10147@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> See the advanced technology in action here
>>>>> http://www.livecdlist.com
>>>>> Just download and boot from CD.
>>>>
>>>> You must be joking.. nobody in their right mind would download a self
>>>> booting CD recommended by anyone they didn't know.
>>>> It could do absolutely anything to the machine you boot it on.
>>>> Its just the sort of thing a hacker would try to get you to do.
>>>> It would be a **** good way to root Linux boxes BTW.
>>>
>>> 100% wrong!!!
>>
>> You shouldn't be so certain, the Internet is full of nasty clever people
>> that will eat you for breakfast.
>>
>>> Linux distributions come with source code.
>>> If you don't trust a distro, you can make it yourself
>>> with the original source code.
>>>
>>> Begs the question which corporation is gonna trust a micoshaft CD that
>>> has no accompanying source code?
>>> Micoshaft recommend their install CDs which are self booting
>>> and you have no access to their source code to know
>>> whats in a Micoshaft CD!!!
>>>
>>> All Linux CDs come *WITH* source code so that you can be sure
>>> that no viruses or other crap spyware and adware has been put into it.
>>
>> Rubbish.
>> They don't all come with source, and you will find it hard to compile it
>> and make your own.
>
> Fine all you have to do now is prove it by naming one.

That is easy.
Ubuntu doesn't.
You have to go and find it if you want it.

> That will be the *first ever* GPL'd Linux distro without source code.

That would be true but that isn't what was said so we can draw a line here.

>
>
>> You have no way to actually know a live CD is safe unless you know where
>> it came from and you know they can be trusted.
>
> Well, ok. All you now have to do now is prove it!
> Simply download the source code, modify it and send it back to the
> Linux distro maintainers, explaining what your code does,
> and I'm sure they will jump to it and incorporate it in their next
> release.
>
> WAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AAAAA!!!!
>

You are an idiot as that is not the mechanism involved.
Its a hack aimed at people that are idiots like you.
Read what I post carefully and you will see that it is a variant on one of
the oldes hacks in existence and you still don't understand it.

> Don't give up your day job just yet fool!
> The Open Source world is whole lot smarter than you think

Its not if its full of people like you that haven't even worked out what
this is about yet!

Its not about the Linuses of the world that write code for the good of the
people its about the nasty little ba$%^&*d that want to control your
machine.
All they have to do is create a "Ubuntu" distro image and put it somewhere
others will download.
Then post a few "here it is its very good and you can get it fast here"
messages into usenet and idiots like you that don't understand what you are
talking about are going to download it and get infected and there is no way
they will ever know. Like wise it could infect a windows machine if you boot
it.. it doesn't make much difference what the target is if you boot it.

> once
> you get to know how it works.
> http://www.livecdlist.com
> http://www.distrowatch.com

Once you work out that that is irrelevant you might understand that you are
wrong.

>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux
>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.
>>
>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.
>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.
>

"Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message
news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...
> dennis@home wrote:
>
>> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a
>> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some
>> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what
>> is
>> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.
>
> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat
> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.

Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other* than
what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts about it in
a news group? There are no mechanisms to stop it in any distro and whats
more there can't be by definition. Anyone that can write the code can do it
and there is nothing you or anyone else can do to stop it without censoring
the internet and even that is not 100% certain.


>
> Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.
>
> Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.
>
> FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.

FREE CLUE: Its doesn't make any difference.. they never see the stuff so why
would it?
>
> Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.

You can take your time to answer the above.
I don't expect you too BTW.
>

dennis@home wrote:

>
> "Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message
> news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a
>>> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some
>>> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what
>>> is
>>> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.
>>
>> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat
>> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.
>
> Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other*
> than what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts
> about it in a news group?

So you are actually dumb enough to download a liveCD from a bogus site, not
the official one? You are too stupid to check the MD5 sum against the
published ones?

It figures. You are quite certainly a windows user

> There are no mechanisms to stop it in any distro
> and whats more there can't be by definition. Anyone that can write the
> code can do it and there is nothing you or anyone else can do to stop it
> without censoring the internet and even that is not 100% certain.

You are really an idiot. You know nothing at all about the subject at hand.

Anyone could write such code and pack it into a distro, right.

Free clue: That does nothing to propagate that one. How do you propose to
distrubute it?

Before you can somewhat intelligently answer *that* question, you can stop
rigth here with your scenario. It will not work

--
Support your local Search and Rescue unit -- get lost.

Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:

>
> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
> news:9EdLi.22294$c_1.8262@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:
>>
>>>
>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
>>> news:dOVKi.21730$c_1.2486@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
>>>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4lUKi.21642$c_1.10147@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> See the advanced technology in action here
>>>>>> http://www.livecdlist.com
>>>>>> Just download and boot from CD.
>>>>>
>>>>> You must be joking.. nobody in their right mind would download a self
>>>>> booting CD recommended by anyone they didn't know.
>>>>> It could do absolutely anything to the machine you boot it on.
>>>>> Its just the sort of thing a hacker would try to get you to do.
>>>>> It would be a **** good way to root Linux boxes BTW.
>>>>
>>>> 100% wrong!!!
>>>
>>> You shouldn't be so certain, the Internet is full of nasty clever people
>>> that will eat you for breakfast.
>>>
>>>> Linux distributions come with source code.
>>>> If you don't trust a distro, you can make it yourself
>>>> with the original source code.
>>>>
>>>> Begs the question which corporation is gonna trust a micoshaft CD that
>>>> has no accompanying source code?
>>>> Micoshaft recommend their install CDs which are self booting
>>>> and you have no access to their source code to know
>>>> whats in a Micoshaft CD!!!
>>>>
>>>> All Linux CDs come *WITH* source code so that you can be sure
>>>> that no viruses or other crap spyware and adware has been put into it.
>>>
>>> Rubbish.
>>> They don't all come with source, and you will find it hard to compile it
>>> and make your own.
>>
>> Fine all you have to do now is prove it by naming one.
>
> That is easy.
> Ubuntu doesn't.

YOU ARE 100% LIAR!!!!

> You have to go and find it if you want it.

Which means you are a LIAR!!!
You can download it all from their repository you *STUPID FSCK*!


>> That will be the *first ever* GPL'd Linux distro without source code.
>
> That would be true but that isn't what was said so we can draw a line
> here.

You are a STUPID FSCK!

>>
>>> You have no way to actually know a live CD is safe unless you know where
>>> it came from and you know they can be trusted.
>>
>> Well, ok. All you now have to do now is prove it!
>> Simply download the source code, modify it and send it back to the
>> Linux distro maintainers, explaining what your code does,
>> and I'm sure they will jump to it and incorporate it in their next
>> release.
>>
>> WAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AAAAA!!!!
>>
>
> You are an idiot as that is not the mechanism involved.
> Its a hack aimed at people that are idiots like you.
> Read what I post carefully and you will see that it is a variant on one of
> the oldes hacks in existence and you still don't understand it.

You are a STUPID UNEMPLOYABLE WINDUMMY FSCK!
All you have to do is prove you are not by simply downloading
source code from http://www.ubuntu.com,
writing your hack, and then subit your source code
to Ubuntu to get Ubuntu to distribute
your modifications for you. Go and do it now fool!!!
The world + dog is watching and waiting!!!!


>> Don't give up your day job just yet fool!
>> The Open Source world is whole lot smarter than you think
>
> Its not if its full of people like you that haven't even worked out what
> this is about yet!
>
> Its not about the Linuses of the world that write code for the good of the
> people its about the nasty little ba$%^&*d that want to control your
> machine.
> All they have to do is create a "Ubuntu" distro image and put it somewhere
> others will download.
> Then post a few "here it is its very good and you can get it fast here"
> messages into usenet and idiots like you that don't understand what you
> are talking about are going to download it and get infected and there is
> no way they will ever know. Like wise it could infect a windows machine if
> you boot it.. it doesn't make much difference what the target is if you
> boot it.
>
>> once
>> you get to know how it works.
>> http://www.livecdlist.com
>> http://www.distrowatch.com
>
> Once you work out that that is irrelevant you might understand that you
> are wrong.
>
>>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux
>>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.
>>>
>>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.
>>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.
>>

"7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
news:G3pLi.22525$c_1.16847@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...

Now I understand why others call you a cretin.
Bye.

dennis@home wrote:

>
> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
> news:G3pLi.22525$c_1.16847@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
>
> Now I understand why others call you a cretin.
> Bye.

He certainly uses the wrong language.

But that does not detract from the fact that he is basically right.
You are one of the dumbest widiots who has posted in cola for quite some
time. Your "knowledge" about linux is so incredibly missing that you can't
get even simple things right.
That does not hinder you in posting your FUD, though. And this for sure
makes *you* the cretin.
But then, you are a typical windows user. And those tend to be stupid beyond
imagination
--
Warning: You have moved the mouse.
Windows will reboot now to make the change permanent

Frank wrote:
> Anonymous wrote:
>
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>>> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from
>>> such a simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not
>>> listening to some troll posting download web sites in a news group.
>>> Do get a clue on what is and isn't safe with the computer you are
>>> supposed to be in charge of.
>>
>>
>> Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat
>> evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.
>>
>> Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.
>>
>> Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.
>>
>> FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.
>>
>> Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.
>>
> Hey you...butt-munch...get lost.
> Read the sign...it says Vista...not open sores ...or loser linux...just
> Vista.
> Frank

Um, you are crossposting to COLA and you are too dense to even realize
it. I have to remove COLA because AIOE won't post to it but look at your
headers and see what doors you sent your post to and then apologize. Are
you man enough to admit a mistake?

Then, try to refute the post without using personal attacks (you can't).

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

dennis@home wrote:

>
> "Anonymous" <cripto@ecn.org> wrote in message
> news:a74ba05b9abd63f5f9afc787b8be985c@ecn.org...
> > dennis@home wrote:
> >
> >> There is *nothing* in Linux (or most OSes) to protect a user from such a
> >> simple attack and yet you think I am paranoid for not listening to some
> >> troll posting download web sites in a news group. Do get a clue on what
> >> is
> >> and isn't safe with the computer you are supposed to be in charge of.
> >
> > Your state of clue-free is astounding. There's scores of ways to defeat
> > evil package distributors from dolling out bogus packages.
>
> Name one way to defeat a rogue live CD put out on the Internet *other* than
> what I said about not downloading it just because someone shouts about it in

I can name a dozen ways in a few different categories ya' ninny.
Hashes, digital signatures, and transport layer certificates signed by
trusted CA's are collectively the methods you're apparently oblivious
to. That's part what those tools are designed to do ferChristsakes.

> a news group? There are no mechanisms to stop it in any distro and whats
> more there can't be by definition. Anyone that can write the code can do it
> and there is nothing you or anyone else can do to stop it without censoring
> the internet and even that is not 100% certain.
>
> > Micro$oft only uses the most fragile of them, if it uses any at all.
> >
> > Linux uses the strongest whenever and wherever possible.
> >
> > FREE CLUE: the GnuPG keyring maintained by package managers.
>
> FREE CLUE: Its doesn't make any difference.. they never see the stuff so why
> would it?

What in the ****** are you prattling on about? Who never sees what?

> > Take as long as you want to think it over. No time limit.
>
> You can take your time to answer the above.
> I don't expect you too BTW.

Sorry to disappoint you kid. :)

7 wrote:
> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:
>
>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
>> news:9EdLi.22294$c_1.8262@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
>>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:
>>>
>>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:dOVKi.21730$c_1.2486@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
>>>>> Asstroturfer dennis@home wrote on behalf of Micoshaft Corporation:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "7" <website_has_email@www.enemygadgets.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:4lUKi.21642$c_1.10147@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See the advanced technology in action here
>>>>>>> http://www.livecdlist.com
>>>>>>> Just download and boot from CD.
>>>>>> You must be joking.. nobody in their right mind would download a self
>>>>>> booting CD recommended by anyone they didn't know.
>>>>>> It could do absolutely anything to the machine you boot it on.
>>>>>> Its just the sort of thing a hacker would try to get you to do.
>>>>>> It would be a **** good way to root Linux boxes BTW.
>>>>> 100% wrong!!!
>>>> You shouldn't be so certain, the Internet is full of nasty clever people
>>>> that will eat you for breakfast.
>>>>
>>>>> Linux distributions come with source code.
>>>>> If you don't trust a distro, you can make it yourself
>>>>> with the original source code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Begs the question which corporation is gonna trust a micoshaft CD that
>>>>> has no accompanying source code?
>>>>> Micoshaft recommend their install CDs which are self booting
>>>>> and you have no access to their source code to know
>>>>> whats in a Micoshaft CD!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> All Linux CDs come *WITH* source code so that you can be sure
>>>>> that no viruses or other crap spyware and adware has been put into it.
>>>> Rubbish.
>>>> They don't all come with source, and you will find it hard to compile it
>>>> and make your own.
>>> Fine all you have to do now is prove it by naming one.
>> That is easy.
>> Ubuntu doesn't.
>
> YOU ARE 100% LIAR!!!!
>
>> You have to go and find it if you want it.
>
> Which means you are a LIAR!!!
> You can download it all from their repository you *STUPID FSCK*!
>
>
>>> That will be the *first ever* GPL'd Linux distro without source code.
>> That would be true but that isn't what was said so we can draw a line
>> here.
>
> You are a STUPID FSCK!
>
>>>> You have no way to actually know a live CD is safe unless you know where
>>>> it came from and you know they can be trusted.
>>> Well, ok. All you now have to do now is prove it!
>>> Simply download the source code, modify it and send it back to the
>>> Linux distro maintainers, explaining what your code does,
>>> and I'm sure they will jump to it and incorporate it in their next
>>> release.
>>>
>>> WAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AAAAA!!!!
>>>
>> You are an idiot as that is not the mechanism involved.
>> Its a hack aimed at people that are idiots like you.
>> Read what I post carefully and you will see that it is a variant on one of
>> the oldes hacks in existence and you still don't understand it.
>
> You are a STUPID UNEMPLOYABLE WINDUMMY FSCK!
> All you have to do is prove you are not by simply downloading
> source code from http://www.ubuntu.com,
> writing your hack, and then subit your source code
> to Ubuntu to get Ubuntu to distribute
> your modifications for you. Go and do it now fool!!!
> The world + dog is watching and waiting!!!!
>
>
>>> Don't give up your day job just yet fool!
>>> The Open Source world is whole lot smarter than you think
>> Its not if its full of people like you that haven't even worked out what
>> this is about yet!
>>
>> Its not about the Linuses of the world that write code for the good of the
>> people its about the nasty little ba$%^&*d that want to control your
>> machine.
>> All they have to do is create a "Ubuntu" distro image and put it somewhere
>> others will download.
>> Then post a few "here it is its very good and you can get it fast here"
>> messages into usenet and idiots like you that don't understand what you
>> are talking about are going to download it and get infected and there is
>> no way they will ever know. Like wise it could infect a windows machine if
>> you boot it.. it doesn't make much difference what the target is if you
>> boot it.
>>
>>> once
>>> you get to know how it works.
>>> http://www.livecdlist.com
>>> http://www.distrowatch.com
>> Once you work out that that is irrelevant you might understand that you
>> are wrong.
>>
>>>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux
>>>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.
>>>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.
>>>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.
>

<You have already encountered the loon Albright. He can't shut his pie
hole up. The hag 7 is his wife and a serious nut case too that cannot
stop the dribble with its pie hole either. 7 is by far worst than
Albright, if you let this nut get started. Shut the Linux ho down by not
responding to it.>

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:04:39 -0400, Adam GARBAGE AT THE CURB Albright
<YesHeIsGarbage@TheDumpTurckIsComing.net> wrote:


>>>>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux
>>>>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.
>>>>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.
>>>>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.
>>
>
><You have already encountered the loon Albright. He can't shut his pie
>hole up. The hag 7 is his wife and a serious nut case too that cannot
>stop the dribble with its pie hole either. 7 is by far worst than
>Albright, if you let this nut get started. Shut the Linux ho down by not
>responding to it.>

The obvious hate spewing of some Vista loons is obvious in this
newsgroup. They have lost their grip on reality and many need
intensive psychotherapy, like this nut case; Adam GARBAGE AT THE CURB
Albright, who changes the name he posts under more often that normal
people change their underwear.

Frank wrote:
> 7 wrote:
>> pus.boy99******.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 27, 12:28 pm, "Ms. Polly Ester" <pes...******.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20070927...ylt=AiieE0MGKY...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fearing the restrictions it places on their work, the majority of open
>>>> source software developers do not plan to publish code in the next year
>>>> under a controversial new license authored by the main governing
>>>> body for
>>>> open source and free software, according to a survey released
>>>> Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>> In addition, more than 40% of those surveyed said they won't ever
>>>> publish
>>>> their work under Version 3 of the General Public License, which was
>>>> released earlier this year by the Free Software Foundation. "GPLv3 is
>>>> controversial because it imposes restrictions on what you can do with
>>>> programs," said John Andrews, CEO of survey taker Evans Data, in a
>>>> statement.
>>>
>>>
>>> More fragmentation to put some more nails in the Linux coffin.
>>> At some point the Linux loons will figure out that all of these spin
>>> offs are not a good thing for Linux.
>>>
>>> With 700+ different versions of Linux and now new GPL3 it's just more
>>> confusion for the suits that make the decisions.
>>> Microsoft makes it easy for those types.
>>> Linux makes it a clusterfsck.
>>
>>
>>
>> There are more Linux clusters that windopws clusters.
>> There are more open source developers than Micoshaft developers.
>> 75% of all new projects are open source.
>> Its time to switch to Linux and be done with.
>> See the advanced technology in action here
>> http://www.livecdlist.com
>> Just download and boot from CD.
>> All your drivers automagically configured.
>> No amount of Pistification of your Pista PC will
>> compare with a Linux PC.
>> http://www.distrowatch.com for more in depth reviews.
>>
>
>
> So that what...just makes linux a bigger pile of crap?
> Frank

More reading comprehension problems, eh, Frankie Boy. Vista is just
Windows Me II. Live with it. Oh, I forgot, you DO! LOL!

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

Adam Albright wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:04:39 -0400, Adam GARBAGE AT THE CURB Albright
> <YesHeIsGarbage@TheDumpTurckIsComing.net> wrote:
>
>
>>>>>>> That is a fundmantal distinction between open source Linux
>>>>>>> and closed source untrustworthy Micoshaft sponsored products.
>>>>>> You are letting irrational hate get in the way of logic.
>>>>>> You would make an ideal target for a hacker.
>> <You have already encountered the loon Albright. He can't shut his pie
>> hole up. The hag 7 is his wife and a serious nut case too that cannot
>> stop the dribble with its pie hole either. 7 is by far worst than
>> Albright, if you let this nut get started. Shut the Linux ho down by not
>> responding to it.>
>
> The obvious hate spewing of some Vista loons is obvious in this
> newsgroup. They have lost their grip on reality and many need
> intensive psychotherapy, like this nut case; Adam GARBAGE AT THE CURB
> Albright, who changes the name he posts under more often that normal
> people change their underwear.
>

<I am just checking Albright just checking your status. The devil made
me do it. I might as well get two loons with one stone. You don't get
out of the house at all nor out of the Vista NG period, Albright. I knew
you would respond, and that's why I did it, just to see you jump out of
the water because I knew you were there. You know that 20 out 24 hours
seven days a week thing you have going.

<Don't let him fool you, Albright has MS firmly planted up his behind,
and the fool is using Vista. He keeps talking about Linux, but he has no
guts to move to it. BTW, changing the name is in honer of you Albright
just to mess with you. Your name has been there constant in some form.
There is no other reason for it. ;-) But you're too stupid to realize it.>