Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Frank wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of
>>>> Windows, you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to
>>>> sluff if off.
>>>
>>>
>>> You never get tired of lying do you?
>>> Frank[/color]
>>
>>
>> You never get tired of posting foolish posts that reveal how reading
>> comprehension and logic impaired you are, do you?
>>[/color]
>
> Stop lying, ok?
> We all know you're a known liar!
> Stop it!
> Frank[/color]

Projecting again. What would Jesus think?

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

Leythos wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <fcbq0c$ch9$1@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...[color=green]
>> Leythos wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff if off.
>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>[/color]
>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then. Not to mention logic impaired
>> like Frank. The ONLY proof I should need that I have a legit copy of
>> Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it and there is NO
>> reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of "prove you aren't
>> running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over and over again. In fact,
>> MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA later on this year to ask you, once
>> again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T STOLEN WINDOWS![/color]
>
> So, since the majority of the world doesn't agree with your Opinion why
> are you still using something that you think is calling you a theif?[/color]

You're wrong and it's spelled T-H-I-E-F. Also, you don't speak for
*anyone* in the world but yourself.
[color=blue]
> Stop using it if it bothers you so much.[/color]

Oh, so now you're trying to say it's my fault that MS makes paying
customers prove, over and over and over again that they paid for their
copy of Windows and didn't S-T-E-A-L it. Lame, lame, lame, Leythos.

What do you think that MS is trying to protect its intellectual property
from? Being stolen and used without permission or payment per chance?


--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

Seven wrote:[color=blue]
> At police check points, you have to produce a valid drivers license.[/color]

I don't have a drivers license, valid or invalid and, even if I did, the
cop can't come into my private home and take a look see without properly
identifying himself and providing a search warrant. A better example
would be me walking out of a store with a new lap top and the security
cop asking to see the receipt. If I show him the receipt and he then
told me I had to take three "genuine" tests, I would, well, get testy
and so would you.
[color=blue]
> Do you scream at the cop.."How dare you accuse me of being a criminal!" ?[/color]

Only if he or she accused me of being a criminal.
[color=blue]
> Do you scream at the waitress.."How dare you accuse me of under aged
> drinking!" ?[/color]

I *wish* a waitress would accuse me of that.
[color=blue]
> Linux has no need for license agreements...Its free.
> Linux must be horrible software...its users feel inclined to sway
> opinion by bashing Microsoft.[/color]

I seek to make the Net safer without Windows boxes spreading crap all
over it.

Course, you are comparing breaching and EULA, a civil offense, with
breaking the law, a criminal offense but I understand how desperate you
are because you're not the only fanboy flailing around trying to defend
Redmond and their unconscionable practices but I guess misery loves company.
[color=blue]
> Does Linux do anything useful ? ... or is it just "not Windows" ?[/color]

Check out [url]www.ubuntu.com[/url] and find out for yourself. I've tried Windows
and I've tried Ubuntu. You've only tried Windows if you have to ask such
a stupid question.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes
[color=blue]
>
> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fcbq0c$ch9$1@aioe.org...[color=green]
>> Leythos wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff if
>>>> off.
>>>
>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>[/color]
>>
>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then. Not to mention logic
>> impaired like Frank. The ONLY proof I should need that I have a legit
>> copy of Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it and there
>> is NO reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of "prove you
>> aren't running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over and over again.
>> In fact, MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA later on this year to
>> ask you, once again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T STOLEN WINDOWS!
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>> To email me, remove shoes[/color]
>[/color]

Seven wrote:[color=blue]
> At police check points, you have to produce a valid drivers license.[/color]

I don't have a drivers license, valid or invalid and, even if I did, the
cop can't come into my private home and take a look see without properly
identifying himself and providing a search warrant. A better example
would be me walking out of a store with a new lap top and the security
cop asking to see the receipt. If I show him the receipt and he then
told me I had to take three "genuine" tests, I would, well, get testy
and so would you.
[color=blue]
> Do you scream at the cop.."How dare you accuse me of being a criminal!" ?[/color]

Only if he or she accused me of being a criminal.
[color=blue]
> Do you scream at the waitress.."How dare you accuse me of under aged
> drinking!" ?[/color]

I *wish* a waitress would accuse me of that.
[color=blue]
> Linux has no need for license agreements...Its free.
> Linux must be horrible software...its users feel inclined to sway
> opinion by bashing Microsoft.[/color]

I seek to make the Net safer without Windows boxes spreading crap all
over it.

Course, you are comparing breaching and EULA, a civil offense, with
breaking the law, a criminal offense but I understand how desperate you
are because you're not the only fanboy flailing around trying to defend
Redmond and their unconscionable practices but I guess misery loves company.
[color=blue]
> Does Linux do anything useful ? ... or is it just "not Windows" ?[/color]

Check out [url]www.ubuntu.com[/url] and find out for yourself. I've tried Windows
and I've tried Ubuntu. You've only tried Windows if you have to ask such
a stupid question.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes
[color=blue]
>
> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fcbq0c$ch9$1@aioe.org...[color=green]
>> Leythos wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff if
>>>> off.
>>>
>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>[/color]
>>
>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then. Not to mention logic
>> impaired like Frank. The ONLY proof I should need that I have a legit
>> copy of Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it and there
>> is NO reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of "prove you
>> aren't running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over and over again.
>> In fact, MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA later on this year to
>> ask you, once again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T STOLEN WINDOWS!
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>> To email me, remove shoes[/color]
>[/color]

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Leythos wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>
>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff if
>>>> off.
>>>
>>>
>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>[/color]
>>
>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then.[/color]
>
> Can't provide written proof , huh?
> How fukkin dumb and stupid are you?
>
> Not to mention logic impaired[color=green]
>> like Frank.[/color]
>
> Logically speaking, you've just proved that YOU'RE AN IDIOT!
>
> The ONLY proof I should need that I have a legit copy of[color=green]
>> Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it and there is NO
>> reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of "prove you aren't
>> running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over and over again.[/color]
>
> Uhhh...you sure like to make up bs to cover up you're ignorant stupidity
> don't you?
>
> In fact,[color=green]
>> MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA later on this year to ask you,
>> once again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T STOLEN WINDOWS![/color]
>
> hehehe...well as*hole...post the legal language where MS states that
> from the git-go they think everyone is running a pirated copy. ok?
> Or else we'll all just conclude that you are in fact mentally
> challenged, re: stupid!
> Frank
>
>[/color]

Sorry, I can't help you, Frank. It's impossible to be logical with you
as you are completely incapable of thinking rationally and logically.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Leythos wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>
>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff if
>>>> off.
>>>
>>>
>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>[/color]
>>
>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then.[/color]
>
> Can't provide written proof , huh?
> How fukkin dumb and stupid are you?
>
> Not to mention logic impaired[color=green]
>> like Frank.[/color]
>
> Logically speaking, you've just proved that YOU'RE AN IDIOT!
>
> The ONLY proof I should need that I have a legit copy of[color=green]
>> Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it and there is NO
>> reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of "prove you aren't
>> running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over and over again.[/color]
>
> Uhhh...you sure like to make up bs to cover up you're ignorant stupidity
> don't you?
>
> In fact,[color=green]
>> MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA later on this year to ask you,
>> once again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T STOLEN WINDOWS![/color]
>
> hehehe...well as*hole...post the legal language where MS states that
> from the git-go they think everyone is running a pirated copy. ok?
> Or else we'll all just conclude that you are in fact mentally
> challenged, re: stupid!
> Frank
>
>[/color]

Sorry, I can't help you, Frank. It's impossible to be logical with you
as you are completely incapable of thinking rationally and logically.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

Leythos wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <r53je31acbf9j79bo86dc11qeuk3im93fn@4ax.com>, [email]AA@ABC.net[/email]
> says...[color=green]
>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:02:41 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> In article <31uie3hv6alfudqq5j37lqv84f922gg5od@4ax.com>, [email]AA@ABC.net[/email]
>>> says...
>>>> I'm a idiot
>>> I agree, you said it right - you're an idiot.[/color]
>>
>> Typical of fanboys, need to do some heavy snipping and never address
>> what was said.[/color]
>
> Snipping the BS you posted was warranted, the only part of your post,
> from what you said, that was worth reading was the part I left of your
> post - you claimed you are an idiot and I agree.
>[/color]

Oh, how cute, Leythos trying to pull a Frank.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

Leythos wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <r53je31acbf9j79bo86dc11qeuk3im93fn@4ax.com>, [email]AA@ABC.net[/email]
> says...[color=green]
>> On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:02:41 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> In article <31uie3hv6alfudqq5j37lqv84f922gg5od@4ax.com>, [email]AA@ABC.net[/email]
>>> says...
>>>> I'm a idiot
>>> I agree, you said it right - you're an idiot.[/color]
>>
>> Typical of fanboys, need to do some heavy snipping and never address
>> what was said.[/color]
>
> Snipping the BS you posted was warranted, the only part of your post,
> from what you said, that was worth reading was the part I left of your
> post - you claimed you are an idiot and I agree.
>[/color]

Oh, how cute, Leythos trying to pull a Frank.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

LOL
you don't drive..hehe
That's why you prefer Linux...its free
The example was that at the check point, they check drivers
licenses...thereby accusing innocent drivers of criminal activity.
If you drove, you would have got it.

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
news:fcchdb$p0f$1@aioe.org...[color=blue]
> Seven wrote:[color=green]
>> At police check points, you have to produce a valid drivers license.[/color]
>
> I don't have a drivers license, valid or invalid and, even if I did, the
> cop can't come into my private home and take a look see without properly
> identifying himself and providing a search warrant. A better example would
> be me walking out of a store with a new lap top and the security cop
> asking to see the receipt. If I show him the receipt and he then told me I
> had to take three "genuine" tests, I would, well, get testy and so would
> you.
>[color=green]
>> Do you scream at the cop.."How dare you accuse me of being a criminal!" ?[/color]
>
> Only if he or she accused me of being a criminal.
>[color=green]
>> Do you scream at the waitress.."How dare you accuse me of under aged
>> drinking!" ?[/color]
>
> I *wish* a waitress would accuse me of that.
>[color=green]
>> Linux has no need for license agreements...Its free.
>> Linux must be horrible software...its users feel inclined to sway opinion
>> by bashing Microsoft.[/color]
>
> I seek to make the Net safer without Windows boxes spreading crap all over
> it.
>
> Course, you are comparing breaching and EULA, a civil offense, with
> breaking the law, a criminal offense but I understand how desperate you
> are because you're not the only fanboy flailing around trying to defend
> Redmond and their unconscionable practices but I guess misery loves
> company.
>[color=green]
>> Does Linux do anything useful ? ... or is it just "not Windows" ?[/color]
>
> Check out [url]www.ubuntu.com[/url] and find out for yourself. I've tried Windows and
> I've tried Ubuntu. You've only tried Windows if you have to ask such a
> stupid question.
>
> --
> Alias
> To email me, remove shoes
>[color=green]
>>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fcbq0c$ch9$1@aioe.org...[color=darkred]
>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff if
>>>>> off.
>>>>
>>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then. Not to mention logic impaired
>>> like Frank. The ONLY proof I should need that I have a legit copy of
>>> Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it and there is NO
>>> reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of "prove you aren't
>>> running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over and over again. In fact,
>>> MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA later on this year to ask you, once
>>> again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T STOLEN WINDOWS!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>> To email me, remove shoes[/color]
>>[/color]
>[/color]

LOL
you don't drive..hehe
That's why you prefer Linux...its free
The example was that at the check point, they check drivers
licenses...thereby accusing innocent drivers of criminal activity.
If you drove, you would have got it.

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
news:fcchdb$p0f$1@aioe.org...[color=blue]
> Seven wrote:[color=green]
>> At police check points, you have to produce a valid drivers license.[/color]
>
> I don't have a drivers license, valid or invalid and, even if I did, the
> cop can't come into my private home and take a look see without properly
> identifying himself and providing a search warrant. A better example would
> be me walking out of a store with a new lap top and the security cop
> asking to see the receipt. If I show him the receipt and he then told me I
> had to take three "genuine" tests, I would, well, get testy and so would
> you.
>[color=green]
>> Do you scream at the cop.."How dare you accuse me of being a criminal!" ?[/color]
>
> Only if he or she accused me of being a criminal.
>[color=green]
>> Do you scream at the waitress.."How dare you accuse me of under aged
>> drinking!" ?[/color]
>
> I *wish* a waitress would accuse me of that.
>[color=green]
>> Linux has no need for license agreements...Its free.
>> Linux must be horrible software...its users feel inclined to sway opinion
>> by bashing Microsoft.[/color]
>
> I seek to make the Net safer without Windows boxes spreading crap all over
> it.
>
> Course, you are comparing breaching and EULA, a civil offense, with
> breaking the law, a criminal offense but I understand how desperate you
> are because you're not the only fanboy flailing around trying to defend
> Redmond and their unconscionable practices but I guess misery loves
> company.
>[color=green]
>> Does Linux do anything useful ? ... or is it just "not Windows" ?[/color]
>
> Check out [url]www.ubuntu.com[/url] and find out for yourself. I've tried Windows and
> I've tried Ubuntu. You've only tried Windows if you have to ask such a
> stupid question.
>
> --
> Alias
> To email me, remove shoes
>[color=green]
>>
>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fcbq0c$ch9$1@aioe.org...[color=darkred]
>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff if
>>>>> off.
>>>>
>>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then. Not to mention logic impaired
>>> like Frank. The ONLY proof I should need that I have a legit copy of
>>> Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it and there is NO
>>> reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of "prove you aren't
>>> running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over and over again. In fact,
>>> MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA later on this year to ask you, once
>>> again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T STOLEN WINDOWS!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>> To email me, remove shoes[/color]
>>[/color]
>[/color]

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fcbsp6$jgi$3@aioe.org...
>>>
>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:fcbq0c$ch9$1@aioe.org...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of
>>>>>>>> Windows, you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just
>>>>>>>> trying to sluff if off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where
>>>>>>> they've called anyone a thief.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then. Not to mention logic
>>>>>> impaired like Frank. The ONLY proof I should need that I have a
>>>>>> legit copy of Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it
>>>>>> and there is NO reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of
>>>>>> "prove you aren't running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over
>>>>>> and over again. In fact, MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA
>>>>>> later on this year to ask you, once again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T
>>>>>> STOLEN WINDOWS!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>> To email me, remove shoes
>>>>>
>>>>> So you better stop using Windows because you don't want to be
>>>>> labeled a "thief". Wipe your system clean and just stick with Ubuntu.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Glad to see you agree with my points. There's hope for you yet.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not a Microsoft fanboy as they say. I use their products because
>>> that is how I make my living. Do I believe in some of their
>>> deceptive practices? Hell No. So you are right, sometime in the
>>> future, I just might become an Ubuntu "junkie"![/color]
>>
>>
>> I used to only use Windows as an operating system since DOS until they
>> pushed the envelop too far and I found out that Linux isn't just for
>> geeks.
>>
>> I just cleaned up an XP computer where I found the following:
>>
>> 50 viruses.
>> Over 500 errant registry entries
>> 7% free space on the hard drive.
>> C was the only partition.
>> 26 GB folder on the desktop
>> Panda had been nuked by the viruses
>> Spybot, spywareblaster were also nuked.
>> Couldn't get on line.
>> When I ran the defrag analysis, the entire thing was red with two
>> green bars, not a blue one in sight.
>> 54 Windows updates.
>>
>> To top it off, the client didn't have a copy of XP.
>>
>> Took me about ten hours to clean the ****ed thing up.
>>
>> Owners: mother who doesn't have a clue about computers and a 12 year
>> old son who knows enough to be dangerous but not enough to stay out of
>> trouble, an eMule freak.
>>[/color]
> More lies?
> Give it up ok? We all know by now what a pathological liar (you believe
> your own lies) you are!
> We all know...!
> Frank[/color]

How convincing, Frank.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Alias wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fcbsp6$jgi$3@aioe.org...
>>>
>>>> Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:fcbq0c$ch9$1@aioe.org...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of
>>>>>>>> Windows, you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just
>>>>>>>> trying to sluff if off.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where
>>>>>>> they've called anyone a thief.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then. Not to mention logic
>>>>>> impaired like Frank. The ONLY proof I should need that I have a
>>>>>> legit copy of Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it
>>>>>> and there is NO reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of
>>>>>> "prove you aren't running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over
>>>>>> and over again. In fact, MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA
>>>>>> later on this year to ask you, once again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T
>>>>>> STOLEN WINDOWS!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>> To email me, remove shoes
>>>>>
>>>>> So you better stop using Windows because you don't want to be
>>>>> labeled a "thief". Wipe your system clean and just stick with Ubuntu.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Glad to see you agree with my points. There's hope for you yet.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not a Microsoft fanboy as they say. I use their products because
>>> that is how I make my living. Do I believe in some of their
>>> deceptive practices? Hell No. So you are right, sometime in the
>>> future, I just might become an Ubuntu "junkie"![/color]
>>
>>
>> I used to only use Windows as an operating system since DOS until they
>> pushed the envelop too far and I found out that Linux isn't just for
>> geeks.
>>
>> I just cleaned up an XP computer where I found the following:
>>
>> 50 viruses.
>> Over 500 errant registry entries
>> 7% free space on the hard drive.
>> C was the only partition.
>> 26 GB folder on the desktop
>> Panda had been nuked by the viruses
>> Spybot, spywareblaster were also nuked.
>> Couldn't get on line.
>> When I ran the defrag analysis, the entire thing was red with two
>> green bars, not a blue one in sight.
>> 54 Windows updates.
>>
>> To top it off, the client didn't have a copy of XP.
>>
>> Took me about ten hours to clean the ****ed thing up.
>>
>> Owners: mother who doesn't have a clue about computers and a 12 year
>> old son who knows enough to be dangerous but not enough to stay out of
>> trouble, an eMule freak.
>>[/color]
> More lies?
> Give it up ok? We all know by now what a pathological liar (you believe
> your own lies) you are!
> We all know...!
> Frank[/color]

How convincing, Frank.

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes

Seven wrote:[color=blue]
> LOL
> you don't drive..hehe
> That's why you prefer Linux...its free[/color]

No, sitting in a car is the most dangerous place you can be, even more
dangerous than Iraq. I've driven more miles than you can even imagine
but now that I live in a country where cars aren't really necessary, I
don't own one and lose the benefit of paying for repairs, insurance,
gas, oil, etc. No need to tear my hair out because I can't find a
parking place, etc.
[color=blue]
> The example was that at the check point, they check drivers
> licenses...thereby accusing innocent drivers of criminal activity.
> If you drove, you would have got it.[/color]

And if you show your valid license and he demands that you prove it's
*genuine* over and over again by coming into your home without
permission, what would you think?

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes[color=blue]
>
> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fcchdb$p0f$1@aioe.org...[color=green]
>> Seven wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> At police check points, you have to produce a valid drivers license.[/color]
>>
>> I don't have a drivers license, valid or invalid and, even if I did,
>> the cop can't come into my private home and take a look see without
>> properly identifying himself and providing a search warrant. A better
>> example would be me walking out of a store with a new lap top and the
>> security cop asking to see the receipt. If I show him the receipt and
>> he then told me I had to take three "genuine" tests, I would, well,
>> get testy and so would you.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Do you scream at the cop.."How dare you accuse me of being a
>>> criminal!" ?[/color]
>>
>> Only if he or she accused me of being a criminal.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Do you scream at the waitress.."How dare you accuse me of under aged
>>> drinking!" ?[/color]
>>
>> I *wish* a waitress would accuse me of that.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Linux has no need for license agreements...Its free.
>>> Linux must be horrible software...its users feel inclined to sway
>>> opinion by bashing Microsoft.[/color]
>>
>> I seek to make the Net safer without Windows boxes spreading crap all
>> over it.
>>
>> Course, you are comparing breaching and EULA, a civil offense, with
>> breaking the law, a criminal offense but I understand how desperate
>> you are because you're not the only fanboy flailing around trying to
>> defend Redmond and their unconscionable practices but I guess misery
>> loves company.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Does Linux do anything useful ? ... or is it just "not Windows" ?[/color]
>>
>> Check out [url]www.ubuntu.com[/url] and find out for yourself. I've tried Windows
>> and I've tried Ubuntu. You've only tried Windows if you have to ask
>> such a stupid question.
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>> To email me, remove shoes
>>[color=darkred]
>>>
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fcbq0c$ch9$1@aioe.org...
>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff
>>>>>> if off.
>>>>>
>>>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then. Not to mention logic
>>>> impaired like Frank. The ONLY proof I should need that I have a
>>>> legit copy of Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it
>>>> and there is NO reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of
>>>> "prove you aren't running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over and
>>>> over again. In fact, MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA later on
>>>> this year to ask you, once again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T STOLEN WINDOWS!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alias
>>>> To email me, remove shoes
>>>[/color]
>>[/color]
>[/color]

Seven wrote:[color=blue]
> LOL
> you don't drive..hehe
> That's why you prefer Linux...its free[/color]

No, sitting in a car is the most dangerous place you can be, even more
dangerous than Iraq. I've driven more miles than you can even imagine
but now that I live in a country where cars aren't really necessary, I
don't own one and lose the benefit of paying for repairs, insurance,
gas, oil, etc. No need to tear my hair out because I can't find a
parking place, etc.
[color=blue]
> The example was that at the check point, they check drivers
> licenses...thereby accusing innocent drivers of criminal activity.
> If you drove, you would have got it.[/color]

And if you show your valid license and he demands that you prove it's
*genuine* over and over again by coming into your home without
permission, what would you think?

--
Alias
To email me, remove shoes[color=blue]
>
> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fcchdb$p0f$1@aioe.org...[color=green]
>> Seven wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> At police check points, you have to produce a valid drivers license.[/color]
>>
>> I don't have a drivers license, valid or invalid and, even if I did,
>> the cop can't come into my private home and take a look see without
>> properly identifying himself and providing a search warrant. A better
>> example would be me walking out of a store with a new lap top and the
>> security cop asking to see the receipt. If I show him the receipt and
>> he then told me I had to take three "genuine" tests, I would, well,
>> get testy and so would you.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Do you scream at the cop.."How dare you accuse me of being a
>>> criminal!" ?[/color]
>>
>> Only if he or she accused me of being a criminal.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Do you scream at the waitress.."How dare you accuse me of under aged
>>> drinking!" ?[/color]
>>
>> I *wish* a waitress would accuse me of that.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Linux has no need for license agreements...Its free.
>>> Linux must be horrible software...its users feel inclined to sway
>>> opinion by bashing Microsoft.[/color]
>>
>> I seek to make the Net safer without Windows boxes spreading crap all
>> over it.
>>
>> Course, you are comparing breaching and EULA, a civil offense, with
>> breaking the law, a criminal offense but I understand how desperate
>> you are because you're not the only fanboy flailing around trying to
>> defend Redmond and their unconscionable practices but I guess misery
>> loves company.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Does Linux do anything useful ? ... or is it just "not Windows" ?[/color]
>>
>> Check out [url]www.ubuntu.com[/url] and find out for yourself. I've tried Windows
>> and I've tried Ubuntu. You've only tried Windows if you have to ask
>> such a stupid question.
>>
>> --
>> Alias
>> To email me, remove shoes
>>[color=darkred]
>>>
>>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fcbq0c$ch9$1@aioe.org...
>>>> Leythos wrote:
>>>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff
>>>>>> if off.
>>>>>
>>>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess you're blind, deaf and dumb then. Not to mention logic
>>>> impaired like Frank. The ONLY proof I should need that I have a
>>>> legit copy of Windows it the receipt they gave me when I bought it
>>>> and there is NO reason for me to have to jump through a bunch of
>>>> "prove you aren't running a pirated copy" DRM crap over and over and
>>>> over again. In fact, MS is planning a new, "improved" WGA later on
>>>> this year to ask you, once again, to PROVE YOU HAVEN'T STOLEN WINDOWS!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alias
>>>> To email me, remove shoes
>>>[/color]
>>[/color]
>[/color]

Alias wrote:
[color=blue]
> The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy'
> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Leythos wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> In article <fcbn5p$337$2@aioe.org>, [email]iamalias@shoesgmail.com[/email] says...
>>>
>>>> MS says if you don't prove you have a non pirated copy of Windows,
>>>> you're a thief. Course you knew that and are just trying to sluff if
>>>> off.
>>>
>>>
>>> Strange, I've never seen that from MS - please quote where they've
>>> called anyone a thief.
>>>[/color]
>>
>> It's my opinion that Alias used the wrong term. It shouldn't be
>> thief, but pirate. Please don't be stupid enough to open your mouth
>> and say you have never seen MS call anyone a pirate.
>>[/color]
>
> Pirate is not the appropriate term as the people who *steal* software
> have no parrots, no eye patch, no sword, no boat and Jolly Roger waving
> in the wind. They are accusing you of THEFT until you prove otherwise.
> They try to cover up this fact with words like "pirate" not "genuine",
> etc. but let's call a spade a spade.
>[/color]

Lets call a liar a liar, ok? In this case it's you who are lying,
fabricating the lie and then trying to proliferate the lie. No where and
at no time have I been called a "thief or a pirate or been accused of
stealing MS software simply by using it and complying with the EULA (the
terms of usage)". Nor is the term "thief, pirate, or stealing" explicit
in the EULA or anywhere else for that matter. Nor are those terms even
implied anywhere concerning any MS software usage.
That you imply that those terms are used in any manner by MS seems to
point to the fact that you possibly have something to hide or you
yourself are hiding from something or someone and have a guilt complex
about such things.
We know by your postings, that you're a "fringe" type of person
espousing fringe beliefs (or non-beliefs) and this "thief, pirate,
stealing" attitude goes right well with the rest of your fringe type of
life.
Your mistake, is trying to push your fringe beliefs onto others who
don't feel or think that way and then you have the audacity to insult
them with your nefarious labels when they don't feel or believe the same
as you!
You're wrong and need to accept that fact. If you feel like a thief, or
a pirate or that you're being accused of stealing, then don't use the
**** software, but stop trying to pass off your fringe beliefs on the
rest of us.
Cause we don't believe them or you!
Frank