Is there a Vista forum with more traffic than this one?

On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:16:12 -0400, "Lang Murphy"
<lang_murphy********.com> wrote:

>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
>news:4smqd3982git2m0jndkmmv9vttpm9r9cpf@4ax.com.. .
>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 00:34:04 -0400, "Lang Murphy"
>> <lang_murphy********.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Dave" <dave@beepbeep.com> wrote in message
>>>news:%23SaWRqo7HHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl.. .
>>>> No, this is the busiest newsgroup.... unless you take away the trolls,
>>>> and
>>>> responders to trolls.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "David" <david@invalid.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:U6qdnZvYVcSSP0HbnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>>>>> I've posted several issues here that have drawn no responses over the
>>>>> past couple months. With millions of Vista users, there MUST be
>>>>> somewhere online where vast numbers of users come together to get their
>>>>> questions answered. Do I need a secret handshake to join such a group?
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>OK... guilty to the latter charge. Hard to stop responding when one feels
>>>the trolls are a detriment to the ng. But I guess I can just hold my
>>>tongue,
>>>so to speak.
>>
>> You could grow a brain, but that would be expecting too much. There
>> isn't a single post you've made where you've done anything but defend
>> the moronic fanboy view and do a good deal of screaming and yelling
>> yourself. Your technical skills are on a par with Frank's. Zero.
>>
>
>
>Once again, you post nothing of substance. And you're flat out wrong about
>my posts, which just proves you only read what you want to read, which is,
>apparently, any post not bashing MS or Vista or MVP's, so you can jump in
>and call people names. You have no clue what my technical skills are while I
>know, all too well, what your trolling skills are like.
>
>The only reason you're here is to call people names, cast aspersions on
>their capabilities, and claim you "kicked ass." What a bitter individual you
>are.
>
I guess the above was one of your technical posts right? Sure sounded
like another of your typical rants to me.

On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:53:00 -0400, "Lang Murphy"
<lang_murphy********.com> wrote:

>That's too funny. So that would make Vista haters, like yourself, only
>capable of truth, compliments, and reticence?
>
>I - think - not.
>
>I also think that there really are no "Vista lovers," although I do think
>there are "Vista haters."

More proof you're just a fool. When a group of people claiming to be
Christians were asked if they believed in the existence of a place
called Hell and an entity called the Devil, a sizeable number said no,
yet claimed they believe in God and Heaven. So in effect what they
were saying is while claiming to be Christians, they elected to cherry
pick what their main document (the bible) claims, thus agreeing with
only parts of it they happened to agree with, rejecting huge sections
they did not agree with.

Clowns like you and that's the mildest word that comes to mind to
describe you undying devotion to Microsoft, only see the "good" things
in Vista and squeeze your eyes shut tightly so you can pretend there
is nothing wrong with Vista. That's dumb.

Often who you call Vista haters are simply pointing out what they have
experienced first hand in Vista that prevents it from working properly
on their systems. So in effect you are like that group of Christians
that fake being true believers, since they feel they have a right to
cherry pick what they believe and just ignore what they don't like.

The reality is Vista has many flaws. Fanboys just can't bring
themselves to admitting it does and thus find comfort in labeling
those that have had issues with Vista as Vista haters when in fact
these people are simply showing their frustration and actually wish
they too could get Vista to work as advertised.

"Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
news:fblt3o$i31$3@aioe.org...
> Lang Murphy wrote:
>> "Alias" <iamalias@shoesgmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fbj68j$2lg$8@aioe.org...
>>> David wrote:
>>>> DP wrote:
>>>>> Now that you've got our attention, how about asking your questions
>>>>> again?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> LOL! I mentioned a number of issues with indexing which have never
>>>> been resolved. I ended up turning off indexing. I'm still open to
>>>> answers on that subject. :)
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>
>>> Don't hold your breath as there isn't anyone here that knows much about
>>> Vista. The Vista lovers are only capable of lies, insults and bluster.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alias
>>> To email me, remove shoes
>>
>>
>> That's too funny. So that would make Vista haters, like yourself, only
>> capable of truth, compliments, and reticence?
>>
>> I - think - not.
>>
>> I also think that there really are no "Vista lovers," although I do think
>> there are "Vista haters." Even the most pro Vista posters in this ng
>> would, at the very least, admit Vista is far from perfect. Since you only
>> post hit-and-run anti-Vista, anti-MS screeds in here, without having to
>> defend the deficiencies of your beloved Ubuntu, I have no respect for
>> your posting methodology in this ng.
>
> Insult.

Truth.

>
>>
>> That said, I'm going to take a break from responding to your trolling
>> posts. As someone else pointed out, that makes me as guilty as you for
>> disrupting the ng.
>
> Lie.
>

Nonsense. Too funny.

>>
>> And so... I apologise to all "regular folks" if I have disrupted your
>> experience in this ng by taking part in these senseless threads.
>>
>> My bad.
>>
>> Lang
>
> Bluster.
>

I don't think you know the definition of bluster. No surprise that.

Lang

> --
> Alias
> To email me, remove shoes

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:6retd31dspc80r4uk5s79j4hqk7gl174fk@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:53:00 -0400, "Lang Murphy"
> <lang_murphy********.com> wrote:
>
>>That's too funny. So that would make Vista haters, like yourself, only
>>capable of truth, compliments, and reticence?
>>
>>I - think - not.
>>
>>I also think that there really are no "Vista lovers," although I do think
>>there are "Vista haters."
>
> More proof you're just a fool. When a group of people claiming to be
> Christians were asked if they believed in the existence of a place
> called Hell and an entity called the Devil, a sizeable number said no,
> yet claimed they believe in God and Heaven. So in effect what they
> were saying is while claiming to be Christians, they elected to cherry
> pick what their main document (the bible) claims, thus agreeing with
> only parts of it they happened to agree with, rejecting huge sections
> they did not agree with.
>
> Clowns like you and that's the mildest word that comes to mind to
> describe you undying devotion to Microsoft, only see the "good" things
> in Vista and squeeze your eyes shut tightly so you can pretend there
> is nothing wrong with Vista. That's dumb.
>
> Often who you call Vista haters are simply pointing out what they have
> experienced first hand in Vista that prevents it from working properly
> on their systems. So in effect you are like that group of Christians
> that fake being true believers, since they feel they have a right to
> cherry pick what they believe and just ignore what they don't like.
>
> The reality is Vista has many flaws. Fanboys just can't bring
> themselves to admitting it does and thus find comfort in labeling
> those that have had issues with Vista as Vista haters when in fact
> these people are simply showing their frustration and actually wish
> they too could get Vista to work as advertised.
>


Man... you just continue to spew your own lopsided spin on what people post
in here. Obviously, you did not actually -read- my post. I "can't bare" it.

Lang

"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
news:3petd3h28s0vf6ocpimt0tadaglnpqg3p4@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:16:12 -0400, "Lang Murphy"
> <lang_murphy********.com> wrote:
>
>>"Adam Albright" <AA@ABC.net> wrote in message
>>news:4smqd3982git2m0jndkmmv9vttpm9r9cpf@4ax.com. ..
>>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 00:34:04 -0400, "Lang Murphy"
>>> <lang_murphy********.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Dave" <dave@beepbeep.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:%23SaWRqo7HHA.536@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl. ..
>>>>> No, this is the busiest newsgroup.... unless you take away the trolls,
>>>>> and
>>>>> responders to trolls.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "David" <david@invalid.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:U6qdnZvYVcSSP0HbnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>>>>>> I've posted several issues here that have drawn no responses over the
>>>>>> past couple months. With millions of Vista users, there MUST be
>>>>>> somewhere online where vast numbers of users come together to get
>>>>>> their
>>>>>> questions answered. Do I need a secret handshake to join such a
>>>>>> group?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>OK... guilty to the latter charge. Hard to stop responding when one
>>>>feels
>>>>the trolls are a detriment to the ng. But I guess I can just hold my
>>>>tongue,
>>>>so to speak.
>>>
>>> You could grow a brain, but that would be expecting too much. There
>>> isn't a single post you've made where you've done anything but defend
>>> the moronic fanboy view and do a good deal of screaming and yelling
>>> yourself. Your technical skills are on a par with Frank's. Zero.
>>>
>>
>>
>>Once again, you post nothing of substance. And you're flat out wrong about
>>my posts, which just proves you only read what you want to read, which is,
>>apparently, any post not bashing MS or Vista or MVP's, so you can jump in
>>and call people names. You have no clue what my technical skills are while
>>I
>>know, all too well, what your trolling skills are like.
>>
>>The only reason you're here is to call people names, cast aspersions on
>>their capabilities, and claim you "kicked ass." What a bitter individual
>>you
>>are.
>>
> I guess the above was one of your technical posts right? Sure sounded
> like another of your typical rants to me.
>
>


Too funny coming from the King of ranters.

Lang