|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| Re: Page File Generally, spending time on the swap file is a waste of time. But it's interesting to play around with it for a while - the only real advantage is if you have a faster drive than the system drive - or, myth has it if you frequently execute memory intensive app's from another drive. When you're done experimenting, you will forget about it. Personally, I find that forcing the page file to a fixed size (wherever it sits) is the most efficient little helper to the system. You do this by setting the min-size the same as the max-size. Page file re-sizing is probably among the slowest operations the OS is ever performing. Even if you do move it, you still need some swap space on the system drive. The system recommended size should work fine. Tony. . . "Kue2" <h.j.kennedy@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:uLwj8KA7HHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Is there any advantage to moving the page file to a different drive than[/color] the[color=blue] > OS (Vista 64) or (Xp 64)? > Drawbacks? >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Page File "Kue2" <h.j.kennedy@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:uLwj8KA7HHA.1184@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Is there any advantage to moving the page file to a different drive than > the OS (Vista 64) or (Xp 64)? > Drawbacks?[/color] I used to do this. You can get slight improvements in speed if you put the pagefile on another drive, as the system drive is likely to be busy while the pagefile is being accessed, especially the %TEMP% folder. There is only any point in doing this with more than one physical drive. Doing this with partitions on the same drive is totally pointless, and probably would slow things down. I don't bother anymore, as the system drive(s) are RAID-0, and by far the fastest in the system. You must remember to keep a small pagefile on the system drive, for crash memory dumps. I do not know what the size you need for Vista, but IIRC, I had 64KB on XP, for a small memory dump. ss. |
| |||
| Re: Page File On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:11:08 -0400, Kue2 wrote: [color=blue] >Is there any advantage to moving the page file to a different drive than the >OS (Vista 64) or (Xp 64)?[/color] Yes, if that different drive is used much less. [color=blue] >Drawbacks?[/color] None. But in most cases it doesn't help much either. Have a look at [url]http://winhlp.com/?q=node/42[/url] for some additional information. Hans-Georg -- No mail, please. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Page file | Annie R J Brion | Windows Vista | 9 | 07-19-2007 11:00 PM |
| Can I do without page file if I have 4 GB of RAM? | Jim | Windows Vista | 4 | 04-18-2007 12:30 PM |
| Page File | cyba | Windows Vista | 5 | 04-10-2007 02:00 PM |
| page file size | Robbo | Windows XP | 2 | 01-04-2007 03:01 AM |
| Re: page file use | Aries | Windows XP | 1 | 01-04-2007 01:52 AM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |