|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 is now available. For those who are not already using the OS, it is a great system for either server or desktop applications. Beta 2 has been so solid that I am almost hesitant to upgrade to Beta 3. It has been trouble free during 2+ months of use. |
| |||
| Re: Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 BARF - Just FYI. You think Windows Server 2008 is good for the desktop? Just FYI? Are you brain dead or related to our resident RETARD, Kevin? Just FYI. Do you know how much Windows Server 2008 costs for the desktop? Just FYI Do you know what needs to be done to get Windows Server tweaked to work as a desktop? Just FYI Your next steps are: Install Ubuntu and marvel at it. Just FYI Become an USPS employee. Just FYI Just FYI "Robbie" <robbiex@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:uVwyGuR4HHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 is now available. For those who are not already > using the OS, it is a great system for either server or desktop > applications. > Beta 2 has been so solid that I am almost hesitant to upgrade to Beta 3. > It has been trouble free during 2+ months of use.[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Server 2008 Beta 3 is an old build that came out in April. "Robbie" <robbiex@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:uVwyGuR4HHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 is now available. For those who are not already > using the OS, it is a great system for either server or desktop > applications. > Beta 2 has been so solid that I am almost hesitant to upgrade to Beta 3. > It has been trouble free during 2+ months of use.[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Old news, and not topical to this newsgroup. -- Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] [email]rgharper******.com[/email] * NEW! Catch my blog ... [url]http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/[/url] * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * The Website - [url]http://rgharper.mvps.org/[/url] * HELP us help YOU ... [url]http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm[/url] "Robbie" <robbiex@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:uVwyGuR4HHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 is now available. For those who are not already > using the OS, it is a great system for either server or desktop > applications. > Beta 2 has been so solid that I am almost hesitant to upgrade to Beta 3. > It has been trouble free during 2+ months of use.[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Richard G. Harper wrote:[color=blue] > Old news, and not topical to this newsgroup. >[/color] Not old news as far as I know. There has been, however, considerable confusion about the naming of the various betas. Build 6001 (available in April 2007), for example, is labeled beta 3, but is actually beta 2. Microsoft states that the latest beta, which has just become publicly available, is proposed to be that final beta before what I assume may be one or more release candidates; i.e., RC1, RC2, etc. More details are at: [url]https://www.microsoft.com/servers/faces/default.aspx[/url] Regarding server versus desktop, there are many users who utilize "server" versions for either desktop or combined desktop and server applications. One of the multiple reasons for doing this with Windows Server 2008 is that the software is further in the future in the production cycle, there is a different team of Microsoft engineers working on at least some of the aspects of Server and some of Vista's many problems have been corrected. Server 2008 is available for test and evaluation at minimal cost until April 2009. It isn't an unreasonable choice to try it until then and possibly switch to Vista for desktop only applications at that time if Microsoft has improved that operating system. I don't know of a single report from a user who has tried Server build 6001, has not liked it and has not found it to be vastly superior to Vista. This is in contrast to the seemingly endless complaints and problems with Vista. We have, however, now had some problems with beta 3 and had to go back to beta 2 which, since April 2007, hasn't had a single operating system crash and has run all of our standard application programs without any problems. NaturallySpeaking 9.5, which works flawlessly on build 6001, crashes immediately on execution with a "privileged instruction" error. A second problem is that beta 3 doesn't include the Radeon 7000 series video adapter driver that is in beta 2. This is a big problem for us because there is no known alternate source for this driver. (As opposed to software considerations, video adapters on server hardware platforms can be a real problem). I should say that the installation was an upgrade rather than a clean install. The is a legitimate option, but I am well aware that it is always best to do a clean install. It does, however, take about eight hours to install the operating system and all the application programs. The only good news is that the test computer is always backed up using an Ez Bus DTS SATA drive hardware and a complete restore took only about 18 minutes. I might try NaturallySpeaking 9.5 on a clean installation of Server Beta 3, but perhaps someone else has already done this and knows if the program will work on this version of the beta. |
| |||
| Re: Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Yes, old news. And definitely not topical to a Vista newsgroup. -- Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] [email]rgharper******.com[/email] * NEW! Catch my blog ... [url]http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/[/url] * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * The Website - [url]http://rgharper.mvps.org/[/url] * HELP us help YOU ... [url]http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm[/url] "Robbie" <robbiex@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:ub7Epua4HHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... <crap clipped> |
| |||
| Re: Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Server 2008 Beta 3 6001.16510.070417-1740 Server 2008 Latest Build 6001.16606.070619-1930 August CTP is due any day now. "Robbie" <robbiex@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:uVwyGuR4HHA.1204@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 is now available. For those who are not already > using the OS, it is a great system for either server or desktop > applications. > Beta 2 has been so solid that I am almost hesitant to upgrade to Beta 3. > It has been trouble free during 2+ months of use.[/color] |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sick of Vista? Try Out Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Public Beta, Just FYI. | Kevin John Panzke | Windows Vista | 24 | 08-13-2007 05:30 PM |
| I Want my Windows 2008 Server Beta Public Beta - Just FYI | Mrs. Right Wing | Windows Vista | 0 | 07-19-2007 04:30 PM |
| If You Hate Vista, You'll Love Windows Server 2008 Beta 3, Just FYI. | Kevin John Panzke | Windows Vista | 46 | 06-26-2007 06:20 AM |
| Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Still Running Nice And Strong On My Two Computer's. | Kevin John Panzke | Windows Vista | 23 | 06-21-2007 12:10 PM |
| Bug: Windows Modules Service Is Broken In Windows Server 2008 Beta 3 Web Server Addition. | Windows Vista | 26 | 05-24-2007 03:00 PM | |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |