Zandor wrote:[color=blue]
> Linux fanboys love trolling and trying to make people think what they have is
> better he's just a loser i wish he would just go back to his Linux forums and
> stop trying to so how stupid he is here.
>
>
>
> "Alias" wrote:
>
>[color=green]
>>Frank wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Advantages of Linux over Windows:
>>>>
>>>>It's free and Vista is way overpriced, especially in Europe. Retail
>>>>Ultimate, for example, goes for over 800 US Dollars and Office 2007
>>>>Retail Ultimate goes for over 1200 US Dollars.
>>>>
>>>>No viruses
>>>>
>>>>No malware
>>>>
>>>>No need for an anti virus program
>>>>
>>>>No need for a software firewall
>>>>
>>>>No need for anti malware programs
>>>>
>>>>No activation
>>>>
>>>>No WGA, in all of its flavors
>>>>
>>>>No DRM.
>>>>
>>>>No need to buy new, expensive hardware.
>>>>
>>>>I am having a nice day.
>>>>
>>>>Alias
>>>
>>>All lies![/color]
>>
>>A lie.
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>>You're a known liar.[/color]
>>
>>Another lie.
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>>No more lies![/color]
>>
>>Yeah, when will you stop?
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Linux loser.[/color]
>>
>>I haven't lost *anything*.
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Get a life.
>>>Frank[/color]
>>
>>I have one, thank you very much and I love living it.
>>
>>Alias
>>[/color][/color]

Yeah I'm thru laser frying up his linux suckin'ass.
There ain't nothing left of him.
He's a nobody.
Frank

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:40:48 -0400, norm wrote:
[color=blue]
> Frank wrote:[color=green]
>> GO wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> GO wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Advantages of Linux over Windows:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's free and Vista is way overpriced, especially in Europe. Retail
>>>>>>> Ultimate, for example, goes for over 800 US Dollars and Office 2007
>>>>>>> Retail Ultimate goes for over 1200 US Dollars.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No viruses
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No malware
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need for an anti virus program
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need for a software firewall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need for anti malware programs
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No activation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No WGA, in all of its flavors
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No DRM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need to buy new, expensive hardware.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am having a nice day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All lies!
>>>>>> You're a known liar.
>>>>>> No more lies!
>>>>>> Linux loser.
>>>>>> Get a life.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Care to demonstrate how they are all lies? I'm a Linux newbie but
>>>>> I know enough to say all of Alias' statements are well documented
>>>>> facts.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then you'll probably be in for a big surprise someday.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>> Good job! Way to prove how any of the statements are false.
>>>
>>>[/color]
>> Well I'll just take one example for instance. When the clown said..."No
>> need for a software firewall".
>> Fine with me. But you just got to ask yourself one question punk...do
>> you feel safe...well do you punk?
>> Then ask yourself if in fact, as you believe, there is no need for a
>> firewall as he said, and you concurred...then why does it come with a
>> software firewall?
>> Hummm...good question huh?
>> Well..best to know what you're talking about before you commit to die
>> for it.
>> You'a think?
>> Frank[/color]
> Why does vista come with an outbound firewall that by default needs to
> first be configured before it is of any use. The iptables firewall is
> included, if I read correctly, in all iterations of linux, and it too
> has to be configured before it is of any use. If one wants to use
> either, one must be prepared to configure first. So in reality, both
> vista and linux include a firewall, but neither are internet ready in
> all (in the case of vista) or any (in the case of ubuntu) in their
> installed state.[/color]

Incorrect. The firewall (in the case of ubuntu) is configured to not let
anything in by default. All ports are closed.

So in reality, it comes in a very usable state by default.

If someone wants more advanced protection, then they need to configure
those options themselves. Not unreasonable in my mind.

--
Stephan
2003 Yamaha R6

君のこと思い出す日なんてないのは
君のこと忘れたときがないから

Zandor wrote:[color=blue]
> Linux fanboys love trolling and trying to make people think what they have is
> better he's just a loser i wish he would just go back to his Linux forums and
> stop trying to so how stupid he is here.[/color]

Brainwashed MS boys can only jealously hurl insults and never, ever,
address content.

You say I am a loser but what I use is free and what you use costs a
kidney and a liver.

Alias[color=blue]
>
>
>
> "Alias" wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Frank wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Advantages of Linux over Windows:
>>>>
>>>> It's free and Vista is way overpriced, especially in Europe. Retail
>>>> Ultimate, for example, goes for over 800 US Dollars and Office 2007
>>>> Retail Ultimate goes for over 1200 US Dollars.
>>>>
>>>> No viruses
>>>>
>>>> No malware
>>>>
>>>> No need for an anti virus program
>>>>
>>>> No need for a software firewall
>>>>
>>>> No need for anti malware programs
>>>>
>>>> No activation
>>>>
>>>> No WGA, in all of its flavors
>>>>
>>>> No DRM.
>>>>
>>>> No need to buy new, expensive hardware.
>>>>
>>>> I am having a nice day.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>> All lies![/color]
>> A lie.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> You're a known liar.[/color]
>> Another lie.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> No more lies![/color]
>> Yeah, when will you stop?
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Linux loser.[/color]
>> I haven't lost *anything*.
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Get a life.
>>> Frank[/color]
>> I have one, thank you very much and I love living it.
>>
>> Alias
>>[/color][/color]

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> Zandor wrote:[color=green]
>> Linux fanboys love trolling and trying to make people think what they
>> have is better he's just a loser i wish he would just go back to his
>> Linux forums and stop trying to so how stupid he is here.
>>
>>
>> "Alias" wrote:
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Advantages of Linux over Windows:
>>>>>
>>>>> It's free and Vista is way overpriced, especially in Europe. Retail
>>>>> Ultimate, for example, goes for over 800 US Dollars and Office 2007
>>>>> Retail Ultimate goes for over 1200 US Dollars.
>>>>>
>>>>> No viruses
>>>>>
>>>>> No malware
>>>>>
>>>>> No need for an anti virus program
>>>>>
>>>>> No need for a software firewall
>>>>>
>>>>> No need for anti malware programs
>>>>>
>>>>> No activation
>>>>>
>>>>> No WGA, in all of its flavors
>>>>>
>>>>> No DRM.
>>>>>
>>>>> No need to buy new, expensive hardware.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am having a nice day.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>> All lies!
>>>
>>> A lie.
>>>
>>>
>>>> You're a known liar.
>>>
>>> Another lie.
>>>
>>>
>>>> No more lies!
>>>
>>> Yeah, when will you stop?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Linux loser.
>>>
>>> I haven't lost *anything*.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Get a life.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>> I have one, thank you very much and I love living it.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>>[/color][/color]
>
> Yeah I'm thru laser frying up his linux suckin'ass.
> There ain't nothing left of him.
> He's a nobody.
> Frank[/color]

Another typical MS fanboy tactic: declare himself the "winner" of the
debate and, of course, hurl another unfounded insult.

Alias

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:07:01 -0700, Zandor wrote:
[color=blue]
> the guy was saying and i agree you should not have to jump thu hoops to get
> your OS to run it should just run out of the box.
>
> and as i all so fart around with Ubuntu don't try and give me the crap that
> you just point and click to install video drivers you have xserver running
> which means you have to boot into a thermal.[/color]

Actually that is *exactly* how you install video drivers these days.

Point on the restricted driver manager.
Cick it.
Point on the "enable" button next to your listed video card.
Click it.
Click OK.
Reboot.
Done.

Tell you what I Didn't need to install though:

- Drivers for any and all of my other hardware, including any and all
attached peripherals.
[color=blue]
>
> sure you could use the drivers that they give you in there version of add
> remove programs but they suck just as bad as the ones Ubuntu installs
> with the OS.[/color]

The nVidia proprietary drivers suck? Might want to let nVidia know about
that.
[color=blue]
>
> and you just don't down load java and point and click the file and it
> installs you have to all so jump thu hoops to install it flash is a little
> easyer.[/color]

Actually, you do install both with a point and click.

But you see, unlike Microsoft, Canonical does not need 5 years to release
an update to their OS. They stick to a 6 month schedule with more new
features and changes every 6 months than MS can come up with in 5 years.

So Ubuntu has a habit of improving drastically every 6 months. =)

--
Stephan
2003 Yamaha R6

君のこと思い出す日なんてないのは
君のこと忘れたときがないから

Zandor wrote:[color=blue]
> the guy was saying and i agree you should not have to jump thu hoops to get
> your OS to run it should just run out of the box.[/color]

Which is exactly what happened when I installed Ubuntu.
[color=blue]
>
> and as i all so fart around with Ubuntu don't try and give me the crap that
> you just point and click to install video drivers you have xserver running
> which means you have to boot into a thermal.[/color]

My video works fine and I did not configuring at all. With Windows, I
had to first install the drivers that came with the CD and then update
them from ATI's web site.
[color=blue]
>
> sure you could use the drivers that they give you in there version of add
> remove programs but they suck just as bad as the ones Ubuntu installs with
> the OS.[/color]

False. The drivers for my video card work just fine in Ubuntu and I did
*nothing*.
[color=blue]
>
> and you just don't down load java and point and click the file and it
> installs you have to all so jump thu hoops to install it flash is a little
> easyer.[/color]

If you consider one click to install Java, another to install Flash
"hoops", you obviously haven't a clue.
[color=blue]
>
> so your a Ubuntu fanboy fine but if someone says Ubuntu should work out of
> the box and it does not which it does not you should know it's true and not
> lie about it and call people lame[/color]

It works out of the box and comes with everything you need. I can see
you haven't installed Ubuntu or, if you did, you didn't seek help
anywhere. If you open Fire Fox after installing Ubuntu, you will find
links to all kinds of support.

Alias[color=blue]
>
> "Alias" wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Frank wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Homer Schwartz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just want to educate the users here in the Vista forum. You know the
>>>> guy who always wants to give an alternative to Vista, the Mr. Ubuntu
>>>> guy, (I won't say his name but his initials are 'Alias') says he is
>>>> just educating Vista users for alternatives.
>>>>
>>>> Read this
>>>>
>>>> [url]http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2124099,00.asp[/url]
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Like the reviewer said..."Feisty Fawn" indeed. I think "Crappy Cow" is
>>> more like it."
>>> Ouch!
>>> Frank[/color]
>> It figures you would like that quote. The guy doesn't know what he's
>> doing. I, a non expert, solved all the problems he had without having to
>> move anything Windows over to Linux. All I needed is my data to be up an
>> running.
>>
>> I am watching a DVD right now. I have flash, java etc. The guy is about
>> as lame as you, Frankie boy.
>>
>> Alias
>>[/color][/color]

Zandor wrote:[color=blue]
> he is right you are stupid you are spreading FUD he is telling the truth you
> are a troll. he is on his own website why not troll there and not here in
> case you have not read this is a windows forum not a we want to be a Linux
> fanboy site.
>
> and from reading your post you don't seem to know much your self i would bet
> you can't even install Ubuntu our you would know that the guy on that site
> was giving you the facts.[/color]

I am writing this post using Ubuntu. Oops.
[color=blue]
>
> and if you are saying hes not i say you are full of FUD. and just trying to
> get people to think you know something you don't.[/color]

I stand by everything I said here. Care to respond to content or can you
only be a net nanny and hurl unfounded insults?

Alias[color=blue]
>
> "Alias" wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Homer Schwartz wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Just want to educate the users here in the Vista forum. You know the
>>> guy who always wants to give an alternative to Vista, the Mr. Ubuntu
>>> guy, (I won't say his name but his initials are 'Alias') says he is just
>>> educating Vista users for alternatives.
>>>
>>> Read this
>>>
>>> [url]http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,2124099,00.asp[/url]
>>>
>>>[/color]
>> All this review does is prove how lazy the writer is and how little he
>> knows about Ubuntu and has no credible right to be writing a review.
>>
>> Alias
>>[/color][/color]

Stephan Rose wrote:[color=blue]
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:40:48 -0400, norm wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Frank wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> GO wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> GO wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Advantages of Linux over Windows:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's free and Vista is way overpriced, especially in Europe. Retail
>>>>>>>> Ultimate, for example, goes for over 800 US Dollars and Office 2007
>>>>>>>> Retail Ultimate goes for over 1200 US Dollars.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No viruses
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No malware
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No need for an anti virus program
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No need for a software firewall
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No need for anti malware programs
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No activation
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No WGA, in all of its flavors
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No DRM.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No need to buy new, expensive hardware.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am having a nice day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>> All lies!
>>>>>>> You're a known liar.
>>>>>>> No more lies!
>>>>>>> Linux loser.
>>>>>>> Get a life.
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Care to demonstrate how they are all lies? I'm a Linux newbie but
>>>>>> I know enough to say all of Alias' statements are well documented
>>>>>> facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Then you'll probably be in for a big surprise someday.
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>> Good job! Way to prove how any of the statements are false.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Well I'll just take one example for instance. When the clown said..."No
>>> need for a software firewall".
>>> Fine with me. But you just got to ask yourself one question punk...do
>>> you feel safe...well do you punk?
>>> Then ask yourself if in fact, as you believe, there is no need for a
>>> firewall as he said, and you concurred...then why does it come with a
>>> software firewall?
>>> Hummm...good question huh?
>>> Well..best to know what you're talking about before you commit to die
>>> for it.
>>> You'a think?
>>> Frank[/color]
>> Why does vista come with an outbound firewall that by default needs to
>> first be configured before it is of any use. The iptables firewall is
>> included, if I read correctly, in all iterations of linux, and it too
>> has to be configured before it is of any use. If one wants to use
>> either, one must be prepared to configure first. So in reality, both
>> vista and linux include a firewall, but neither are internet ready in
>> all (in the case of vista) or any (in the case of ubuntu) in their
>> installed state.[/color]
>
> Incorrect. The firewall (in the case of ubuntu) is configured to not let
> anything in by default. All ports are closed.
>
> So in reality, it comes in a very usable state by default.
>
> If someone wants more advanced protection, then they need to configure
> those options themselves. Not unreasonable in my mind.
>[/color]
Gotcha. I made the mistake of interpreting "needing configuration" for
both the outgoing vista firewall and iptables as meaning the same in
terms of not providing any use at all until configured.
--
norm

On 6/20/2007 8:50 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard
[color=blue]
> Frank wrote:[color=green]
>> GO wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> GO wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Advantages of Linux over Windows:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's free and Vista is way overpriced, especially in Europe.
>>>>>>> Retail Ultimate, for example, goes for over 800 US Dollars and
>>>>>>> Office 2007 Retail Ultimate goes for over 1200 US Dollars.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No viruses
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No malware
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need for an anti virus program
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need for a software firewall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need for anti malware programs
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No activation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No WGA, in all of its flavors
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No DRM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need to buy new, expensive hardware.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am having a nice day.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>> All lies!
>>>>>> You're a known liar.
>>>>>> No more lies!
>>>>>> Linux loser.
>>>>>> Get a life.
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>> Care to demonstrate how they are all lies? I'm a Linux newbie but
>>>>> I know enough to say all of Alias' statements are well documented
>>>>> facts.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Then you'll probably be in for a big surprise someday.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>> Good job! Way to prove how any of the statements are false.
>>>
>>>[/color]
>> Well I'll just take one example for instance. When the clown
>> said..."No need for a software firewall".
>> Fine with me. But you just got to ask yourself one question punk...do
>> you feel safe...well do you punk?
>> Then ask yourself if in fact, as you believe, there is no need for a
>> firewall as he said, and you concurred...then why does it come with a
>> software firewall?
>> Hummm...good question huh?
>> Well..best to know what you're talking about before you commit to die
>> for it.
>> You'a think?
>> Frank[/color]
>
> Nothing is absolute and there are always exceptions but talking about a
> desktop environment which is what was being discussed: Do I feel safe?
> Yes. Linux by default puts you into a limited user account, that in itself
> protects the OS. As well, by default, Linux doesn't leave a number of open
> doors/ports. Why is it included? For those that may want Linux to act as a
> server or gateway.
>
> One down...quite a few more to go...
>
>
>[/color]

Don't hold your breath...

--
Terry R.

***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

Frank wrote:[color=blue]
> GO wrote:
>
>[color=green]
>>
>>
>> Good question. I'm not really sure anymore. This group seems to be
>> full of completely unhelpful people. I first came to this group to
>> get assistance but my question was treated with such disdain it does
>> make me wonder why I'm still here.
>> Why are you here? Certainly not to aid anyone, or provide any
>> valuable insight.
>>
>>
>>
>>[/color]
> I guess you've failed to correctly peruse the ng if that all you know
> of my postings.
> Who cares?
> I certainly don't give a rats ass what you think.
> Frank[/color]

No, as I already mentioned I'm new to this group so there is no way I could
have seen all of your posts. But I have read a great deal of threads so far
and I have seen a *lot* of posts from you, *none* of which were helpful. So
statistically speaking, this leads me to believe that the rest of your posts
are equally as useful. Perhaps you do help the odd person but the odds are
stacked as you being as useful as a poopy flavored lollypop.

[color=blue]
> So Ubuntu has a habit of improving drastically every 6 months. =)[/color]

Yup. Ubuntu's made some great strides in the last few releases. I actually
love the "enchanced effects" they have. They're a ton more useful than
anything MS added to the Aero interface. Aero's pretty and all but it
certainly doesn't add anything useful.

On 6/21/2007 5:50 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard
[color=blue]
> Frank wrote:[color=green]
>> GO wrote:
>>
>>[color=darkred]
>>>
>>> Good question. I'm not really sure anymore. This group seems to be
>>> full of completely unhelpful people. I first came to this group to
>>> get assistance but my question was treated with such disdain it does
>>> make me wonder why I'm still here.
>>> Why are you here? Certainly not to aid anyone, or provide any
>>> valuable insight.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>[/color]
>> I guess you've failed to correctly peruse the ng if that all you know
>> of my postings.
>> Who cares?
>> I certainly don't give a rats ass what you think.
>> Frank[/color]
>
> No, as I already mentioned I'm new to this group so there is no way I could
> have seen all of your posts. But I have read a great deal of threads so far
> and I have seen a *lot* of posts from you, *none* of which were helpful. So
> statistically speaking, this leads me to believe that the rest of your posts
> are equally as useful. Perhaps you do help the odd person but the odds are
> stacked as you being as useful as a poopy flavored lollypop.
>
>
>[/color]

You could sort by sender if you wanted to see all of them (within the
time period you've set), but your statistics are close enough. Don't
bother. You'll see mainly what he gave you. Nothing but rude
unprofessional blabbering. And he wants everyone to believe he's a
businessman:

Search for <OCRG#tEtHHA.4916@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl> in Google Groups.

--
Terry R.

***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.

Terry R. wrote:[color=blue]
> On 6/21/2007 5:50 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard
>[color=green]
>> Frank wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> GO wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good question. I'm not really sure anymore. This group seems to
>>>> be full of completely unhelpful people. I first came to this
>>>> group to get assistance but my question was treated with such
>>>> disdain it does make me wonder why I'm still here.
>>>> Why are you here? Certainly not to aid anyone, or provide any
>>>> valuable insight.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I guess you've failed to correctly peruse the ng if that all you
>>> know of my postings.
>>> Who cares?
>>> I certainly don't give a rats ass what you think.
>>> Frank[/color]
>>
>> No, as I already mentioned I'm new to this group so there is no way
>> I could have seen all of your posts. But I have read a great deal
>> of threads so far and I have seen a *lot* of posts from you, *none*
>> of which were helpful. So statistically speaking, this leads me to
>> believe that the rest of your posts are equally as useful. Perhaps
>> you do help the odd person but the odds are stacked as you being as
>> useful as a poopy flavored lollypop.
>>
>>
>>[/color]
>
> You could sort by sender if you wanted to see all of them (within the
> time period you've set), but your statistics are close enough. Don't
> bother. You'll see mainly what he gave you. Nothing but rude
> unprofessional blabbering. And he wants everyone to believe he's a
> businessman:
>[/color]

Yup. I was tempted to do as you say or even perform a search, but I have
better things to do with my time. But I think I've seen enough already to
make a valid opinion. Why I even bothered replying to him is beyond me. I
guess I just have too much (unplaced) faith in humanity.

On 6/21/2007 8:21 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard
[color=blue]
> Terry R. wrote:[color=green]
>> On 6/21/2007 5:50 PM On a whim, GO pounded out on the keyboard
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>> GO wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Good question. I'm not really sure anymore. This group seems to
>>>>> be full of completely unhelpful people. I first came to this
>>>>> group to get assistance but my question was treated with such
>>>>> disdain it does make me wonder why I'm still here.
>>>>> Why are you here? Certainly not to aid anyone, or provide any
>>>>> valuable insight.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I guess you've failed to correctly peruse the ng if that all you
>>>> know of my postings.
>>>> Who cares?
>>>> I certainly don't give a rats ass what you think.
>>>> Frank
>>> No, as I already mentioned I'm new to this group so there is no way
>>> I could have seen all of your posts. But I have read a great deal
>>> of threads so far and I have seen a *lot* of posts from you, *none*
>>> of which were helpful. So statistically speaking, this leads me to
>>> believe that the rest of your posts are equally as useful. Perhaps
>>> you do help the odd person but the odds are stacked as you being as
>>> useful as a poopy flavored lollypop.
>>>
>>>
>>>[/color]
>> You could sort by sender if you wanted to see all of them (within the
>> time period you've set), but your statistics are close enough. Don't
>> bother. You'll see mainly what he gave you. Nothing but rude
>> unprofessional blabbering. And he wants everyone to believe he's a
>> businessman:
>>[/color]
>
> Yup. I was tempted to do as you say or even perform a search, but I have
> better things to do with my time. But I think I've seen enough already to
> make a valid opinion. Why I even bothered replying to him is beyond me. I
> guess I just have too much (unplaced) faith in humanity.
>
>
>[/color]

I feel the same. Don't let it stifle your faith.

--
Terry R.

***Reply Note***
Anti-spam measures are included in my email address.
Delete NOSPAM from the email address after clicking Reply.