I found windows swither have some problem ,I check the icon and select a
programme that I want to view ,but windows doesn't show ,instead ,it show me
another programme ,I found windows switcher point a file "shell32.dll" which
is in the folder "system32" ,I want to copy the file form other machine ,Can
I do it ?or you have a better solvet ?

I am sorry I cannot help you but maybe you could help me. My window switcher
showed my windows stacked one behind the other but now it is showing them on
a blue panel side by side. How do I change it back to stacked??

Tosh

"wwy12321" wrote:
[color=blue]
> I found windows swither have some problem ,I check the icon and select a
> programme that I want to view ,but windows doesn't show ,instead ,it show me
> another programme ,I found windows switcher point a file "shell32.dll" which
> is in the folder "system32" ,I want to copy the file form other machine ,Can
> I do it ?or you have a better solvet ?[/color]

My problem now was solved ,I think you was push alt + tab button to switch
window ,
you can push windows + tab button (in keyboard) to switch window .and it
will show windows stacked one behind the other .
"Tosh" wrote:
[color=blue]
> I am sorry I cannot help you but maybe you could help me. My window switcher
> showed my windows stacked one behind the other but now it is showing them on
> a blue panel side by side. How do I change it back to stacked??
>
> Tosh
>
> "wwy12321" wrote:
>[color=green]
> > I found windows swither have some problem ,I check the icon and select a
> > programme that I want to view ,but windows doesn't show ,instead ,it show me
> > another programme ,I found windows switcher point a file "shell32.dll" which
> > is in the folder "system32" ,I want to copy the file form other machine ,Can
> > I do it ?or you have a better solvet ?[/color][/color]

That is due to the Appearance settings. Under your Personalize panel, go
to Appearance, change the Color Scheme to Windows Aero (the default upon
installation should be Windows Vista Basic). There is nothing wrong with
Vista or any missing files. That's all


--
Antzgiler
Posted via [url]http://www.vistaheads.com[/url]

Antzgiler;1262837 Wrote:[color=blue]
> That is due to the Appearance settings. Under your Personalize panel, go
> to Appearance, change the Color Scheme to Windows Aero (the default upon
> installation should be Windows Vista Basic). There is nothing wrong with
> Vista or any missing files. That's all[/color]
But is there anyway to have vista basic, and still have the aero
switcher?
I've been frustrated with this. .______.
Is it somewhere in the aero shellstyle.dll? I looked but I dont speak
c++ and all that duixml/duihtml stuff.


--
StephenKitty
Posted via [url]http://www.vistaheads.com[/url]

"StephenKitty" <StephenKitty.3w7i0h@no-mx.forums.vistaheads.com> wrote in
message news:StephenKitty.3w7i0h@no-mx.forums.vistaheads.com...[color=blue]
>
> Antzgiler;1262837 Wrote:[color=green]
>> That is due to the Appearance settings. Under your Personalize panel, go
>> to Appearance, change the Color Scheme to Windows Aero (the default upon
>> installation should be Windows Vista Basic). There is nothing wrong with
>> Vista or any missing files. That's all[/color]
> But is there anyway to have vista basic, and still have the aero
> switcher?
> I've been frustrated with this. .______.
> Is it somewhere in the aero shellstyle.dll? I looked but I dont speak
> c++ and all that duixml/duihtml stuff.
>
>
> --
> StephenKitty
> Posted via [url]http://www.vistaheads.com[/url]
>[/color]
In a word, no.

PvdG42;1525990 Wrote:[color=blue]
> "StephenKitty" <StephenKitty.3w7i0h@no-mx.forums.vistaheads.com> wrote
> in
> message news:StephenKitty.3w7i0h@no-mx.forums.vistaheads.com...[color=green]
> >
> > Antzgiler;1262837 Wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> That is due to the Appearance settings. Under your Personalize[/color][/color]
> panel, go[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> to Appearance, change the Color Scheme to Windows Aero (the default[/color][/color]
> upon[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> installation should be Windows Vista Basic). There is nothing wrong[/color][/color]
> with[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> Vista or any missing files. That's all[/color]
> > But is there anyway to have vista basic, and still have the aero
> > switcher?
> > I've been frustrated with this. .______.
> > Is it somewhere in the aero shellstyle.dll? I looked but I dont[/color]
> speak[color=green]
> > c++ and all that duixml/duihtml stuff.
> >
> >
> > --
> > StephenKitty
> > Posted via [url]http://www.vistaheads.com[/url]
> >[/color]
> In a word, no.[/color]
well then how about in a sentence?
Im sure though there is some kind of application designed by
wannabe-vistas that looks the same and stuff or something.
.___. *sigh*


--
StephenKitty
Posted via [url]http://www.vistaheads.com[/url]

"StephenKitty" <StephenKitty.3w7nke@no-mx.forums.vistaheads.com> wrote in
message news:StephenKitty.3w7nke@no-mx.forums.vistaheads.com...[color=blue]
>
> well then how about in a sentence?
> Im sure though there is some kind of application designed by
> wannabe-vistas that looks the same and stuff or something.
> ___. *sigh*
>
>
> --
> StephenKitty
> Posted via [url]http://www.vistaheads.com[/url]
>[/color]
*sigh* Google is your friend. Search Google Groups for "aero for Vista
basic" and see what you find.
A quick look revealed many articles.

PvdG42 wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
>>SNIP
>>[/color]
> *sigh* Google is your friend. Search Google Groups for "aero for Vista
> basic" and see what you find.
> A quick look revealed many articles.[/color]

What then are the purpose of forums and newsgroups if you think people
should just google?

A moronic response.

Many people don't google cause they will end up with links to unanswered
post such as you have just created.
Google is often an endless loop of non-answers.

If you don't know, then don't respond.

"Mr.Pancks" <pancks@bleedingheart.yard> wrote:
[color=blue]
>PvdG42 wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>SNIP
>>>[/color]
>> *sigh* Google is your friend. Search Google Groups for "aero for Vista
>> basic" and see what you find.
>> A quick look revealed many articles.[/color]
>
>What then are the purpose of forums and newsgroups if you think people
>should just google?
>
>A moronic response.[/color]

No, YOUR response is the moronic one. The Googling suggestion
provides numerous good hits.

When you ask a question that can easily be answered by Googling,
expect to be told that is the way to go. It is not at all
unreasonable to expect folks to try to find their own answers before
coming here and have others do that work for them.

[color=blue]
>
>Many people don't google cause they will end up with links to unanswered
>post such as you have just created.
>Google is often an endless loop of non-answers.
>
>If you don't know, then don't respond.[/color]

Bill Daggett wrote:

[color=blue]
>
> When you ask a question that can easily be answered by Googling,
> expect to be told that is the way to go. It is not at all
> unreasonable to expect folks to try to find their own answers before
> coming here and have others do that work for them.
>
>[/color]

Please define/list all the easily answered questions, douche bag.