|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| RE: Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown "Tiberius" wrote: [color=blue] > another benchmark that shows that vista is slower than XP > > I see no one remarked on the other benchmark I posted... > > when I provide proof, the vistaboys are silent! lol > > Note: this article has 11 pages, press the next arrow on the bottom to see > the other pages > > [url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/[/url] > > > PLEASE SEE THIS PAGE!!!! YOU HAVE TO!! > > [url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page6.html[/url] > [url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page7.html[/url] > > THE TRUTH SHINES>>> XP is faster than Vista[/color] AHHH SO WHAT!!! I didn't buy Vista because it would run faster . NO new OS I ever bought did and Vista is no different. I'm glad this all make you so very happy and I suppose it also makes you feel somehow very superior to us Vista users and that has to be good for your mental health treatment . Hope you get well soon. bp [color=blue] > > >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown I too downloaded Ubuntu installed on my backup drive,Ubuntu asked if i wanted to use the free space on my backup hd,so i clicked yes installed ok, i thought? would not even boot my windows xp system, if that was not bad for me i lost all my backup files on my backup hd,when it said use free space i thought it would leave my backup programs alone:( So people thinking of trying Ubuntu DONT I will stick with my vista & xp Thank you The only thing Ubuntu is good for is the old 386 & 486 box's LOL Thanks IQON "Dana Cline - MVP" wrote: [color=blue] > That's Mister MVP to you... > > My reality is...I have Vista on a new laptop, fresh install, tweaked and > optimized, and it's blazingly fast. No, I didn't measure it against XP on > the same hardware, because I had no desire to run XP on that hardware. I > have XP running on other hardware at home, and it'll remain XP forever > because the hardware isn't fast enough to run Vista. > > Just for grins, I downloaded Ubuntu 7.04 the other day and tried to install > it on a PC I'm resurrecting. It died with a cryptic message and left me at a > Linux prompt pretty soon after the install started. Really useful there. > I'll be putting XP back on that box... > > Since you seem to have a thing for performance, why are you even bothering > with Vista at all? You should be running command line Unix on a Cray or > something... > > Dana Cline - MCE MVP > > "Tiberius" <James@tiberius.kirk> wrote in message > news:O8$3AnUnHHA.4428@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=green] > > don't be so hasty to say that miss mvp..... > > > > these are only benchmarks.. in reality, in real life situations, > > vista is slow as a snail in the Sahara pulling a trailer (compared to xp > > of course) > >[/color] > > >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown I will drive my catalack slow thanks .. "Frank" <fb@nospamm.cmm> wrote in message news:%232bZCtVnHHA.2596@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Tiberius wrote: >[color=green] >> another benchmark that shows that vista is slower than XP >> >> I see no one remarked on the other benchmark I posted... >> >> when I provide proof, the vistaboys are silent! lol >> >> Note: this article has 11 pages, press the next arrow on the bottom to >> see the other pages >> >> [url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/[/url] >> >> >> PLEASE SEE THIS PAGE!!!! YOU HAVE TO!! >> >> [url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page6.html[/url] >> [url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page7.html[/url] >> >> THE TRUTH SHINES>>> XP is faster than Vista[/color] > You need to actually read the entire article, capin' crucnh as it does not > entirely support you hyperbole position on Vista vs. XP. > I also find it kind of ironic that a person like you, who lives in the > futuristic world of Kirk, clings to, for all intents and purposes, dead > technology like XP. > Vista is the future, like it or not. > Frank[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown > I didn't buy Vista because it would run faster . NO new OS I ever bought[color=blue] > did > and Vista is no different.[/color] So why do the vistaboys say lies that vista is faster? [color=blue] >us Vista users[/color] I have vista too.. but I just don't have delusions that its faster than XP But vista is also badly designed with a gui made from monkeys for monkeys. Wanna banana? "bp" <bp@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:FE6F1CC2-30AC-43E5-996C-BD83CE4C7FE1@microsoft.com...[color=blue] > > > "Tiberius" wrote: >[color=green] >> another benchmark that shows that vista is slower than XP >> >> I see no one remarked on the other benchmark I posted... >> >> when I provide proof, the vistaboys are silent! lol >> >> Note: this article has 11 pages, press the next arrow on the bottom to >> see >> the other pages >> >> [url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/[/url] >> >> >> PLEASE SEE THIS PAGE!!!! YOU HAVE TO!! >> >> [url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page6.html[/url] >> [url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page7.html[/url] >> >> THE TRUTH SHINES>>> XP is faster than Vista[/color] > > AHHH SO WHAT!!! > > I didn't buy Vista because it would run faster . NO new OS I ever bought > did > and Vista is no different. > > I'm glad this all make you so very happy and I suppose it also makes you > feel somehow very superior to us Vista users and that has to be good for > your > mental health treatment . > > Hope you get well soon. > > bp >[color=green] >> >> >>[/color][/color] |
| |||
| Re: Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown "say lies that vista is faster?" There you go AGAIN, calling people liars with NO FACTS to back up your claim. Many have reported Vista to be faster on their computer and you are in NO position to call them a liar if someone says so. But as usual, facts are elusive to you and you seem to need to make up your own and call people liars when their experiences disagree with yours. Of course you can always present your proof that someone has lied. I have already proved to you that you have already called a liar FALSELY. I suppose that makes you guilty of slander, but then that may be another FACT you choose to ignore. -- Jupiter Jones [MVP] [url]http://www3.telus.net/dandemar[/url] [url]http://www.dts-l.org[/url] "Tiberius" <James@tiberius.kirk> wrote in message news:OAhyN7bnHHA.1000@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > So why do the vistaboys say lies that vista is faster? >[color=green] >>us Vista users[/color] > > I have vista too.. but I just don't have delusions that its faster > than XP > > But vista is also badly designed with a gui made from monkeys for > monkeys. > > Wanna banana?[/color] |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Windows "Workstation" 2008 Clobbers Vista in Benchmark Testing | nobody@is.home | Windows Vista | 3 | 03-06-2008 05:50 PM |
| Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown | Vic | Windows Vista | 3 | 10-19-2007 02:00 PM |
| Benchmark: Vista vs. XP | bb | Windows Vista | 1 | 10-18-2007 05:20 PM |
| Re: Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown | John Braham | Windows Vista | 1 | 05-23-2007 01:40 PM |
| Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown | jim | Windows Vista | 0 | 01-30-2007 02:15 AM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |