|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? Why does x86 mean 32 bits while x64 means 64 bits? "Elliot" <elliot_barclay********.co.uk> wrote in message news:1F4AB56F-9BB1-4ED6-887B-A96D0A923407@microsoft.com...[color=blue] > as title[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? "Elliot" <elliot_barclay********.co.uk> wrote in message news:1F4AB56F-9BB1-4ED6-887B-A96D0A923407@microsoft.com...[color=blue] > as title[/color] Actually, you have it backwards. x86 means 32 bit and refers to a general class of processors (remember the 8086/8088, 80286, 80386, etc.?). x64 refers to 64 bit architecture. |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? "8086/8088, 80286, 80386" What's that? "pvdg42" <pvdg42@newsgroups.nospam> wrote in message news:#e0UWzHmHHA.4564@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > > "Elliot" <elliot_barclay********.co.uk> wrote in message > news:1F4AB56F-9BB1-4ED6-887B-A96D0A923407@microsoft.com...[color=green] >> as title[/color] > > Actually, you have it backwards. > x86 means 32 bit and refers to a general class of processors (remember the > 8086/8088, 80286, 80386, etc.?). > x64 refers to 64 bit architecture. > >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? "Elliot" <elliot_barclay********.co.uk> a ecrit dans le message de news:F1F67216-EB8D-40E9-A6E4-08E37D3B7F9B@microsoft.com...[color=blue] > "8086/8088, 80286, 80386" > What's that?[/color] I suggest you read a little history: [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_microprocessors[/url] ThePro |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? "Elliot" <elliot_barclay********.co.uk> wrote in message news:51E5DBF7-6422-44D9-A635-7B6E477DBB4A@microsoft.com...[color=blue] > Why does x86 mean 32 bits while x64 means 64 bits? >[/color] Stop prating around mate. Bumping your question will piss people off. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86[/url] |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? > "8086/8088, 80286, 80386"[color=blue] > What's that?[/color] They are Intel microprocessor models from years ago. So "x86" refers to the series of Intel processors based on that architecture. Originally they were 16-bit, but they became 32-bit. (We could argue about exactly what is meant by '16 bit' and '32 bit', but it's too anal for now). I haven't heard the term "x64", but it obviously refers to Intel's current 64-bit range. Steve |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? "Elliot" <elliot_barclay********.co.uk> wrote in message news:F1F67216-EB8D-40E9-A6E4-08E37D3B7F9B@microsoft.com...[color=blue] > "8086/8088, 80286, 80386" > What's that? >[/color] Get onto google or Wikipedia for Christ's sake. |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? "Steve Thackery" <thack@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:ugNvMhImHHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... [color=blue] > I haven't heard the term "x64"[/color] It's pretty much everywhere these days: [url]http://search.microsoft.com/results.aspx?mkt=en-US&form=MSHOME&setlang=en-US&q=x64[/url] -- [url]http://www.markrae.net[/url] |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? What does Christ have to do with it? Since there is no GOD, Christ is just a fabrication "Julian" <Julianlzb87******.com> wrote in message news:10AAF920-92CB-480D-BA03-E095DEC35380@microsoft.com...[color=blue] > "Elliot" <elliot_barclay********.co.uk> wrote in message > news:F1F67216-EB8D-40E9-A6E4-08E37D3B7F9B@microsoft.com...[color=green] >> "8086/8088, 80286, 80386" >> What's that? >>[/color] > > Get onto google or Wikipedia for Christ's sake. >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? Give credit where credit is due. Since AMD came out with 64 bit eXtensions to the x86 type processors, x64 is an AMD invention, not an Intel invention. Saucy "Steve Thackery" <thack@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:ugNvMhImHHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue][color=green] >> "8086/8088, 80286, 80386" >> What's that?[/color] > > They are Intel microprocessor models from years ago. > > So "x86" refers to the series of Intel processors based on that > architecture. Originally they were 16-bit, but they became 32-bit. (We > could argue about exactly what is meant by '16 bit' and '32 bit', but it's > too anal for now). > > I haven't heard the term "x64", but it obviously refers to Intel's current > 64-bit range. > > Steve > > >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? "Bill Yanaire" <bill@yanaire.com> wrote in message news:emi5DjKmHHA.1244@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > What does Christ have to do with it? Since there is no GOD, Christ is > just a fabrication >[/color] Failed logic 101 huh? |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? Are you saying AMD is responsible for x64 being used to distinguish 64-bit, or that they created the 64-bit processor? If you mean the latter, you're wrong. -Michael * Saucy:[color=blue] > Give credit where credit is due. Since AMD came out with 64 bit eXtensions > to the x86 type processors, x64 is an AMD invention, not an Intel invention. > > Saucy > > > "Steve Thackery" <thack@nowhere.net> wrote in message > news:ugNvMhImHHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=green][color=darkred] >>> "8086/8088, 80286, 80386" >>> What's that?[/color] >> They are Intel microprocessor models from years ago. >> >> So "x86" refers to the series of Intel processors based on that >> architecture. Originally they were 16-bit, but they became 32-bit. (We >> could argue about exactly what is meant by '16 bit' and '32 bit', but it's >> too anal for now). >> >> I haven't heard the term "x64", but it obviously refers to Intel's current >> 64-bit range. >> >> Steve >> >> >>[/color] >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: Why does x86 mean 64 bits while x32 means 32 bits? AMD is responsible for the 64-bit EXTENSIONS to the x86 architecture. Which Intel then licensed from AMD. "MICHAEL" <u158627_emr2@dslr.net> wrote in message news:u5XkukLmHHA.1624@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...[color=blue] > Are you saying AMD is responsible for x64 being used > to distinguish 64-bit, or that they created the 64-bit > processor? If you mean the latter, you're wrong. > > > -Michael > > * Saucy:[color=green] >> Give credit where credit is due. Since AMD came out with 64 bit eXtensions >> to the x86 type processors, x64 is an AMD invention, not an Intel invention. >> >> Saucy >> >> >> "Steve Thackery" <thack@nowhere.net> wrote in message >> news:ugNvMhImHHA.3264@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[color=darkred] >>>> "8086/8088, 80286, 80386" >>>> What's that? >>> They are Intel microprocessor models from years ago. >>> >>> So "x86" refers to the series of Intel processors based on that >>> architecture. Originally they were 16-bit, but they became 32-bit. (We >>> could argue about exactly what is meant by '16 bit' and '32 bit', but it's >>> too anal for now). >>> >>> I haven't heard the term "x64", but it obviously refers to Intel's current >>> 64-bit range. >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >>>[/color] >>[/color][/color] |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| xp 64 bits | Tester | Windows XP | 4 | 01-04-2008 04:10 AM |
| Internet Explorer 7 (32-bits) keeps on freezing wile the 64-bits works OK in Vista 64 | Trond Ruud | Windows Vista | 1 | 06-16-2007 08:40 AM |
| Ubuntu 32 bits op 64 bits amd systeem | Friso | Linux | 1 | 05-06-2007 12:46 AM |
| Window XP 32 bits and Xp 64 bits | apple | Windows XP | 6 | 04-21-2007 01:30 PM |
| Is it 32 or 64 bits? | Rey | Windows XP | 4 | 01-04-2007 06:12 AM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |