My 6800GT on the test box gets about 5.2 so I'm sure you'll be happy with
the 7600GS.

"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:jq13p2de1ffp6b33m3a1igtlfkk30eai50@4ax.com...
> Thanks for responding, Colin,
> Where mine is the 7600 GS it is NOT as good as yours but if I do get in
> the fives that is more than I need cause my
> processor will be less than that.
> I have a duo core but the cheap one:
> (Pentium D 820 (S) DC 2.8 GHz Socket 775 Chipset Intel 945P)
> It's no way as good as the E6xxx series.I get confused on the different
> models.:(
>

I have a 7600 GS and get 4.7 and 4.8. The newer GS (i.e. 7600) is still not
as fast as the older GT but it is fast enough for most everything.

Dale

"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:vt43p2d7h7vha7t6kdv85po8jgupcgpptc@4ax.com...
> Hi Colin,
> I'm sure I will but your 6800GT is still a higher score than my 7600 GS.
> The second number x8xx tells the advancement the first number 6xxx tells
> the generation.
> I don't know the codes for GT,GS,LE etc but the GT is a faster memory than
> the GS also.
> Actually if I get even a 4.5 I will be happy.
>
> I really just wish MS would release the program to us XP users.
> It would be nice to know where you are BEFORE you have to buy it.
>
> Maybe someone can persuade MS of that?
>
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:11:48 -0700, "Colin Barnhorst"
> <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote:
>
>>My 6800GT on the test box gets about 5.2 so I'm sure you'll be happy with
>>the 7600GS.
>>
>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>news:jq13p2de1ffp6b33m3a1igtlfkk30eai50@4ax.com. ..
>>> Thanks for responding, Colin,
>>> Where mine is the 7600 GS it is NOT as good as yours but if I do get in
>>> the fives that is more than I need cause my
>>> processor will be less than that.
>>> I have a duo core but the cheap one:
>>> (Pentium D 820 (S) DC 2.8 GHz Socket 775 Chipset Intel 945P)
>>> It's no way as good as the E6xxx series.I get confused on the different
>>> models.:(
>>>
>
> Have a good day,
> RScotti
>
> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>

I have a 7600 GS and get 4.7 and 4.8. The newer GS (i.e. 7600) is still not
as fast as the older GT but it is fast enough for most everything.

Dale

"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:vt43p2d7h7vha7t6kdv85po8jgupcgpptc@4ax.com...
> Hi Colin,
> I'm sure I will but your 6800GT is still a higher score than my 7600 GS.
> The second number x8xx tells the advancement the first number 6xxx tells
> the generation.
> I don't know the codes for GT,GS,LE etc but the GT is a faster memory than
> the GS also.
> Actually if I get even a 4.5 I will be happy.
>
> I really just wish MS would release the program to us XP users.
> It would be nice to know where you are BEFORE you have to buy it.
>
> Maybe someone can persuade MS of that?
>
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:11:48 -0700, "Colin Barnhorst"
> <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote:
>
>>My 6800GT on the test box gets about 5.2 so I'm sure you'll be happy with
>>the 7600GS.
>>
>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>news:jq13p2de1ffp6b33m3a1igtlfkk30eai50@4ax.com. ..
>>> Thanks for responding, Colin,
>>> Where mine is the 7600 GS it is NOT as good as yours but if I do get in
>>> the fives that is more than I need cause my
>>> processor will be less than that.
>>> I have a duo core but the cheap one:
>>> (Pentium D 820 (S) DC 2.8 GHz Socket 775 Chipset Intel 945P)
>>> It's no way as good as the E6xxx series.I get confused on the different
>>> models.:(
>>>
>
> Have a good day,
> RScotti
>
> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>

Thanks Dale,
That's because the GS is DDR2 and the GT is DDR3 memory.
Did you understand with what I said about your ram earlier in this thread?
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:01:57 -0600, "Dale" <nospam@nospam.ever> wrote:

>I have a 7600 GS and get 4.7 and 4.8. The newer GS (i.e. 7600) is still not
>as fast as the older GT but it is fast enough for most everything.
>
>Dale
>
>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:vt43p2d7h7vha7t6kdv85po8jgupcgpptc@4ax.com.. .
>> Hi Colin,
>> I'm sure I will but your 6800GT is still a higher score than my 7600 GS.
>> The second number x8xx tells the advancement the first number 6xxx tells
>> the generation.
>> I don't know the codes for GT,GS,LE etc but the GT is a faster memory than
>> the GS also.
>> Actually if I get even a 4.5 I will be happy.
>>
>> I really just wish MS would release the program to us XP users.
>> It would be nice to know where you are BEFORE you have to buy it.
>>
>> Maybe someone can persuade MS of that?
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:11:48 -0700, "Colin Barnhorst"
>> <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote:
>>
>>>My 6800GT on the test box gets about 5.2 so I'm sure you'll be happy with
>>>the 7600GS.
>>>
>>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>news:jq13p2de1ffp6b33m3a1igtlfkk30eai50@4ax.com ...
>>>> Thanks for responding, Colin,
>>>> Where mine is the 7600 GS it is NOT as good as yours but if I do get in
>>>> the fives that is more than I need cause my
>>>> processor will be less than that.
>>>> I have a duo core but the cheap one:
>>>> (Pentium D 820 (S) DC 2.8 GHz Socket 775 Chipset Intel 945P)
>>>> It's no way as good as the E6xxx series.I get confused on the different
>>>> models.:(
>>>>
>>
>> Have a good day,
>> RScotti
>>
>> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>>

Have a good day,
RScotti

remove "nospam" in order to email me.

Thanks Dale,
That's because the GS is DDR2 and the GT is DDR3 memory.
Did you understand with what I said about your ram earlier in this thread?
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:01:57 -0600, "Dale" <nospam@nospam.ever> wrote:

>I have a 7600 GS and get 4.7 and 4.8. The newer GS (i.e. 7600) is still not
>as fast as the older GT but it is fast enough for most everything.
>
>Dale
>
>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:vt43p2d7h7vha7t6kdv85po8jgupcgpptc@4ax.com.. .
>> Hi Colin,
>> I'm sure I will but your 6800GT is still a higher score than my 7600 GS.
>> The second number x8xx tells the advancement the first number 6xxx tells
>> the generation.
>> I don't know the codes for GT,GS,LE etc but the GT is a faster memory than
>> the GS also.
>> Actually if I get even a 4.5 I will be happy.
>>
>> I really just wish MS would release the program to us XP users.
>> It would be nice to know where you are BEFORE you have to buy it.
>>
>> Maybe someone can persuade MS of that?
>>
>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:11:48 -0700, "Colin Barnhorst"
>> <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote:
>>
>>>My 6800GT on the test box gets about 5.2 so I'm sure you'll be happy with
>>>the 7600GS.
>>>
>>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>news:jq13p2de1ffp6b33m3a1igtlfkk30eai50@4ax.com ...
>>>> Thanks for responding, Colin,
>>>> Where mine is the 7600 GS it is NOT as good as yours but if I do get in
>>>> the fives that is more than I need cause my
>>>> processor will be less than that.
>>>> I have a duo core but the cheap one:
>>>> (Pentium D 820 (S) DC 2.8 GHz Socket 775 Chipset Intel 945P)
>>>> It's no way as good as the E6xxx series.I get confused on the different
>>>> models.:(
>>>>
>>
>> Have a good day,
>> RScotti
>>
>> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>>

Have a good day,
RScotti

remove "nospam" in order to email me.

Yes, I understood it. I have been building systems since 1986 and designed
8080/Z80 based CP/M microcomputers in the late 70's. While I don't claim to
have much more expertise in new hardware than most system builders today, I
at least understand all the concepts still. :)

Thanks,

Dale

"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:f604p29ihsau3g870ojp76anpv54r8qecr@4ax.com...
> Thanks Dale,
> That's because the GS is DDR2 and the GT is DDR3 memory.
> Did you understand with what I said about your ram earlier in this thread?
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:01:57 -0600, "Dale" <nospam@nospam.ever> wrote:
>
>>I have a 7600 GS and get 4.7 and 4.8. The newer GS (i.e. 7600) is still
>>not
>>as fast as the older GT but it is fast enough for most everything.
>>
>>Dale
>>
>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>news:vt43p2d7h7vha7t6kdv85po8jgupcgpptc@4ax.com. ..
>>> Hi Colin,
>>> I'm sure I will but your 6800GT is still a higher score than my 7600 GS.
>>> The second number x8xx tells the advancement the first number 6xxx tells
>>> the generation.
>>> I don't know the codes for GT,GS,LE etc but the GT is a faster memory
>>> than
>>> the GS also.
>>> Actually if I get even a 4.5 I will be happy.
>>>
>>> I really just wish MS would release the program to us XP users.
>>> It would be nice to know where you are BEFORE you have to buy it.
>>>
>>> Maybe someone can persuade MS of that?
>>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:11:48 -0700, "Colin Barnhorst"
>>> <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>My 6800GT on the test box gets about 5.2 so I'm sure you'll be happy
>>>>with
>>>>the 7600GS.
>>>>
>>>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:jq13p2de1ffp6b33m3a1igtlfkk30eai50@4ax.co m...
>>>>> Thanks for responding, Colin,
>>>>> Where mine is the 7600 GS it is NOT as good as yours but if I do get
>>>>> in
>>>>> the fives that is more than I need cause my
>>>>> processor will be less than that.
>>>>> I have a duo core but the cheap one:
>>>>> (Pentium D 820 (S) DC 2.8 GHz Socket 775 Chipset Intel 945P)
>>>>> It's no way as good as the E6xxx series.I get confused on the
>>>>> different
>>>>> models.:(
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Have a good day,
>>> RScotti
>>>
>>> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>>>
>
> Have a good day,
> RScotti
>
> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>

Yes, I understood it. I have been building systems since 1986 and designed
8080/Z80 based CP/M microcomputers in the late 70's. While I don't claim to
have much more expertise in new hardware than most system builders today, I
at least understand all the concepts still. :)

Thanks,

Dale

"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
news:f604p29ihsau3g870ojp76anpv54r8qecr@4ax.com...
> Thanks Dale,
> That's because the GS is DDR2 and the GT is DDR3 memory.
> Did you understand with what I said about your ram earlier in this thread?
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:01:57 -0600, "Dale" <nospam@nospam.ever> wrote:
>
>>I have a 7600 GS and get 4.7 and 4.8. The newer GS (i.e. 7600) is still
>>not
>>as fast as the older GT but it is fast enough for most everything.
>>
>>Dale
>>
>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>news:vt43p2d7h7vha7t6kdv85po8jgupcgpptc@4ax.com. ..
>>> Hi Colin,
>>> I'm sure I will but your 6800GT is still a higher score than my 7600 GS.
>>> The second number x8xx tells the advancement the first number 6xxx tells
>>> the generation.
>>> I don't know the codes for GT,GS,LE etc but the GT is a faster memory
>>> than
>>> the GS also.
>>> Actually if I get even a 4.5 I will be happy.
>>>
>>> I really just wish MS would release the program to us XP users.
>>> It would be nice to know where you are BEFORE you have to buy it.
>>>
>>> Maybe someone can persuade MS of that?
>>>
>>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:11:48 -0700, "Colin Barnhorst"
>>> <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>My 6800GT on the test box gets about 5.2 so I'm sure you'll be happy
>>>>with
>>>>the 7600GS.
>>>>
>>>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:jq13p2de1ffp6b33m3a1igtlfkk30eai50@4ax.co m...
>>>>> Thanks for responding, Colin,
>>>>> Where mine is the 7600 GS it is NOT as good as yours but if I do get
>>>>> in
>>>>> the fives that is more than I need cause my
>>>>> processor will be less than that.
>>>>> I have a duo core but the cheap one:
>>>>> (Pentium D 820 (S) DC 2.8 GHz Socket 775 Chipset Intel 945P)
>>>>> It's no way as good as the E6xxx series.I get confused on the
>>>>> different
>>>>> models.:(
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Have a good day,
>>> RScotti
>>>
>>> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>>>
>
> Have a good day,
> RScotti
>
> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>

Thanks Dale,
Well you have a lot more experience than I do. I was only a MS beta tester for Win 95 through ME.
I gave up my computer for seven years and trying to get back into it. XP has been a challenge and I am sure Vista will
be a lot more.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:23:44 -0600, "Dale" <noemailplease@noserver.com> wrote:

>Yes, I understood it. I have been building systems since 1986 and designed
>8080/Z80 based CP/M microcomputers in the late 70's. While I don't claim to
>have much more expertise in new hardware than most system builders today, I
>at least understand all the concepts still. :)
>
>Thanks,
>
>Dale
>
>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:f604p29ihsau3g870ojp76anpv54r8qecr@4ax.com.. .
>> Thanks Dale,
>> That's because the GS is DDR2 and the GT is DDR3 memory.
>> Did you understand with what I said about your ram earlier in this thread?
>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:01:57 -0600, "Dale" <nospam@nospam.ever> wrote:
>>
>>>I have a 7600 GS and get 4.7 and 4.8. The newer GS (i.e. 7600) is still
>>>not
>>>as fast as the older GT but it is fast enough for most everything.
>>>
>>>Dale
>>>
>>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>news:vt43p2d7h7vha7t6kdv85po8jgupcgpptc@4ax.com ...
>>>> Hi Colin,
>>>> I'm sure I will but your 6800GT is still a higher score than my 7600 GS.
>>>> The second number x8xx tells the advancement the first number 6xxx tells
>>>> the generation.
>>>> I don't know the codes for GT,GS,LE etc but the GT is a faster memory
>>>> than
>>>> the GS also.
>>>> Actually if I get even a 4.5 I will be happy.
>>>>
>>>> I really just wish MS would release the program to us XP users.
>>>> It would be nice to know where you are BEFORE you have to buy it.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe someone can persuade MS of that?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:11:48 -0700, "Colin Barnhorst"
>>>> <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>My 6800GT on the test box gets about 5.2 so I'm sure you'll be happy
>>>>>with
>>>>>the 7600GS.
>>>>>
>>>>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:jq13p2de1ffp6b33m3a1igtlfkk30eai50@4ax.c om...
>>>>>> Thanks for responding, Colin,
>>>>>> Where mine is the 7600 GS it is NOT as good as yours but if I do get
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the fives that is more than I need cause my
>>>>>> processor will be less than that.
>>>>>> I have a duo core but the cheap one:
>>>>>> (Pentium D 820 (S) DC 2.8 GHz Socket 775 Chipset Intel 945P)
>>>>>> It's no way as good as the E6xxx series.I get confused on the
>>>>>> different
>>>>>> models.:(
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have a good day,
>>>> RScotti
>>>>
>>>> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>>>>
>>
>> Have a good day,
>> RScotti
>>
>> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>>
>

Have a good day,
RScotti

remove "nospam" in order to email me.

Thanks Dale,
Well you have a lot more experience than I do. I was only a MS beta tester for Win 95 through ME.
I gave up my computer for seven years and trying to get back into it. XP has been a challenge and I am sure Vista will
be a lot more.
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:23:44 -0600, "Dale" <noemailplease@noserver.com> wrote:

>Yes, I understood it. I have been building systems since 1986 and designed
>8080/Z80 based CP/M microcomputers in the late 70's. While I don't claim to
>have much more expertise in new hardware than most system builders today, I
>at least understand all the concepts still. :)
>
>Thanks,
>
>Dale
>
>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:f604p29ihsau3g870ojp76anpv54r8qecr@4ax.com.. .
>> Thanks Dale,
>> That's because the GS is DDR2 and the GT is DDR3 memory.
>> Did you understand with what I said about your ram earlier in this thread?
>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:01:57 -0600, "Dale" <nospam@nospam.ever> wrote:
>>
>>>I have a 7600 GS and get 4.7 and 4.8. The newer GS (i.e. 7600) is still
>>>not
>>>as fast as the older GT but it is fast enough for most everything.
>>>
>>>Dale
>>>
>>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>news:vt43p2d7h7vha7t6kdv85po8jgupcgpptc@4ax.com ...
>>>> Hi Colin,
>>>> I'm sure I will but your 6800GT is still a higher score than my 7600 GS.
>>>> The second number x8xx tells the advancement the first number 6xxx tells
>>>> the generation.
>>>> I don't know the codes for GT,GS,LE etc but the GT is a faster memory
>>>> than
>>>> the GS also.
>>>> Actually if I get even a 4.5 I will be happy.
>>>>
>>>> I really just wish MS would release the program to us XP users.
>>>> It would be nice to know where you are BEFORE you have to buy it.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe someone can persuade MS of that?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:11:48 -0700, "Colin Barnhorst"
>>>> <colinbarharst@msn.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>My 6800GT on the test box gets about 5.2 so I'm sure you'll be happy
>>>>>with
>>>>>the 7600GS.
>>>>>
>>>>>"RScotti" <rscotti1@nospam.verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:jq13p2de1ffp6b33m3a1igtlfkk30eai50@4ax.c om...
>>>>>> Thanks for responding, Colin,
>>>>>> Where mine is the 7600 GS it is NOT as good as yours but if I do get
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> the fives that is more than I need cause my
>>>>>> processor will be less than that.
>>>>>> I have a duo core but the cheap one:
>>>>>> (Pentium D 820 (S) DC 2.8 GHz Socket 775 Chipset Intel 945P)
>>>>>> It's no way as good as the E6xxx series.I get confused on the
>>>>>> different
>>>>>> models.:(
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have a good day,
>>>> RScotti
>>>>
>>>> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>>>>
>>
>> Have a good day,
>> RScotti
>>
>> remove "nospam" in order to email me.
>>
>

Have a good day,
RScotti

remove "nospam" in order to email me.