|
| | |||||||
| Windows Vista Discuss the different versions of Windows Vista, Fuji, or Vienna |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| |||
| I spent 45 minutes I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my computer. I can't do **anything** with it. As Ubuntu loads by default: I can't load/run Office 2007 I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version I can't load/run Visio 2007 I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows XP or Vista. What good is Linsux? And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want the above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default. No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All it is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-: -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Richard Urban wrote:[color=blue] > I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my > computer. I can't do **anything** with it. > > As Ubuntu loads by default: > > I can't load/run Office 2007[/color] A plus, although there are ways to run that bloatware in Linux. Do your research or ask on an appropriate newsgroup or IRC group. [color=blue] > > I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version[/color] Maybe you need to do more research. [color=blue] > > I can't load/run Visio 2007[/color] Maybe you need to do more research. [color=blue] > > I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows XP > or Vista. > > What good is Linsux? > > And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want the > above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default.[/color] Try asking on a Linux newsgroup or IRC group. [color=blue] > > No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All it > is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-:[/color] False but you know that, don't you? Or do you? Alias |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes No! I am not going to munge the operating system. Just as you have said in the past - it should just work! If Ubuntu 7.04, and other flavors of Linux can't run what I need "out of the box" (so to say), WTF good is it. I had hoped that Manical had come along further than they did. If these other things that you have talked of in the past are available, and allow one to load Window programs, why isn't it included, turned on and configured to do so **BY DEFAULT**. Then they may have something. As it stands now it is a somewhat relaxing diversion. -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.bg> wrote in message news:f0g4m6$9u4$3@aioe.org...[color=blue] > Richard Urban wrote:[color=green] >> I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my computer. >> I can't do **anything** with it. >> >> As Ubuntu loads by default: >> >> I can't load/run Office 2007[/color] > > A plus, although there are ways to run that bloatware in Linux. Do your > research or ask on an appropriate newsgroup or IRC group. >[color=green] >> >> I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version[/color] > > Maybe you need to do more research. >[color=green] >> >> I can't load/run Visio 2007[/color] > > Maybe you need to do more research. >[color=green] >> >> I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows XP >> or Vista. >> >> What good is Linsux? >> >> And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want the >> above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default.[/color] > > Try asking on a Linux newsgroup or IRC group. >[color=green] >> >> No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All it >> is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-:[/color] > > False but you know that, don't you? Or do you? > > Alias[/color] |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Richard Urban wrote:[color=blue] > No! I am not going to munge the operating system. Just as you have said > in the past - it should just work! If Ubuntu 7.04, and other flavors of > Linux can't run what I need "out of the box" (so to say), WTF good is it. > > I had hoped that Manical had come along further than they did. > > If these other things that you have talked of in the past are available, > and allow one to load Window programs, why isn't it included, turned on > and configured to do so **BY DEFAULT**. > > Then they may have something. > > As it stands now it is a somewhat relaxing diversion.[/color] Try asking on alt.os.linux.ubuntu or don't you have the balls? Alias |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Alias Had you done research, your transition period would have long been over.. lol.. "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.bg> wrote in message news:f0g4m6$9u4$3@aioe.org...[color=blue] > Richard Urban wrote:[color=green] >> I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my computer. >> I can't do **anything** with it. >> >> As Ubuntu loads by default: >> >> I can't load/run Office 2007[/color] > > A plus, although there are ways to run that bloatware in Linux. Do your > research or ask on an appropriate newsgroup or IRC group. >[color=green] >> >> I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version[/color] > > Maybe you need to do more research. >[color=green] >> >> I can't load/run Visio 2007[/color] > > Maybe you need to do more research. >[color=green] >> >> I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows XP >> or Vista. >> >> What good is Linsux? >> >> And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want the >> above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default.[/color] > > Try asking on a Linux newsgroup or IRC group. >[color=green] >> >> No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All it >> is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-:[/color] > > False but you know that, don't you? Or do you? > > Alias[/color] -- Mike Hall MS MVP Windows Shell/User [url]http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/[/url] |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes I don't really believe that you loaded it. You and Vista deserve each other. Stay with it. On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:56:28 -0400, Richard Urban wrote: [color=blue] > I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my > computer. I can't do **anything** with it. > > As Ubuntu loads by default: > > I can't load/run Office 2007 > > I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version > > I can't load/run Visio 2007 > > I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows XP > or Vista. > > What good is Linsux? > > And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want the > above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default. > > No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All it > is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-: > >[/color] ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- [url]http://www.newsfeeds.com[/url] The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Mike Hall - MS MVP wrote:[color=blue] > Alias > > Had you done research, your transition period would have long been > over.. lol..[/color] And the reason you think I am in a hurry is? Alias[color=blue] > > > "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.bg> wrote in message > news:f0g4m6$9u4$3@aioe.org...[color=green] >> Richard Urban wrote:[color=darkred] >>> I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my >>> computer. I can't do **anything** with it. >>> >>> As Ubuntu loads by default: >>> >>> I can't load/run Office 2007[/color] >> >> A plus, although there are ways to run that bloatware in Linux. Do >> your research or ask on an appropriate newsgroup or IRC group. >>[color=darkred] >>> >>> I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version[/color] >> >> Maybe you need to do more research. >>[color=darkred] >>> >>> I can't load/run Visio 2007[/color] >> >> Maybe you need to do more research. >>[color=darkred] >>> >>> I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows >>> XP or Vista. >>> >>> What good is Linsux? >>> >>> And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want >>> the above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default.[/color] >> >> Try asking on a Linux newsgroup or IRC group. >>[color=darkred] >>> >>> No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All >>> it is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-:[/color] >> >> False but you know that, don't you? Or do you? >> >> Alias[/color] >[/color] |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Why should I? They can't place in the Ubuntu install that which isn't there. My experiment is over. Ubuntu is crap. -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.bg> wrote in message news:f0g5kj$dii$1@aioe.org...[color=blue] > Richard Urban wrote:[color=green] >> No! I am not going to munge the operating system. Just as you have said >> in the past - it should just work! If Ubuntu 7.04, and other flavors of >> Linux can't run what I need "out of the box" (so to say), WTF good is it. >> >> I had hoped that Manical had come along further than they did. >> >> If these other things that you have talked of in the past are available, >> and allow one to load Window programs, why isn't it included, turned on >> and configured to do so **BY DEFAULT**. >> >> Then they may have something. >> >> As it stands now it is a somewhat relaxing diversion.[/color] > > Try asking on alt.os.linux.ubuntu or don't you have the balls? > > Alias[/color] |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Two months ago you were telling us how you were using Ubuntu. It takes you that long to learn a new operating system. It's free man. That means NO MONEY. There is no reason in the friggin world that you should not have it on your other two computers and be done with it. It is so easy, as you have said. JUST DO IT, AND QUIT TALKING ABOUT IT. Oh! The wife and kiddies can't use Linux. Well, it's so easy - teach them tonight. After all, you have 2 months experience under your belt and should be an expert. Wait! You're not an expert under Windows - why should you be an expert under Ubuntu? -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.bg> wrote in message news:f0g4m6$9u4$3@aioe.org...[color=blue] > Richard Urban wrote:[color=green] >> I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my computer. >> I can't do **anything** with it. >> >> As Ubuntu loads by default: >> >> I can't load/run Office 2007[/color] > > A plus, although there are ways to run that bloatware in Linux. Do your > research or ask on an appropriate newsgroup or IRC group. >[color=green] >> >> I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version[/color] > > Maybe you need to do more research. >[color=green] >> >> I can't load/run Visio 2007[/color] > > Maybe you need to do more research. >[color=green] >> >> I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows XP >> or Vista. >> >> What good is Linsux? >> >> And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want the >> above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default.[/color] > > Try asking on a Linux newsgroup or IRC group. >[color=green] >> >> No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All it >> is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-:[/color] > > False but you know that, don't you? Or do you? > > Alias[/color] |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Why go there and not the official Ubuntu forum? "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.bg> wrote in message news:f0g5kj$dii$1@aioe.org...[color=blue] > Richard Urban wrote:[color=green] >> No! I am not going to munge the operating system. Just as you have said >> in the past - it should just work! If Ubuntu 7.04, and other flavors of >> Linux can't run what I need "out of the box" (so to say), WTF good is it. >> >> I had hoped that Manical had come along further than they did. >> >> If these other things that you have talked of in the past are available, >> and allow one to load Window programs, why isn't it included, turned on >> and configured to do so **BY DEFAULT**. >> >> Then they may have something. >> >> As it stands now it is a somewhat relaxing diversion.[/color] > > Try asking on alt.os.linux.ubuntu or don't you have the balls? > > Alias[/color] -- Mike Hall MS MVP Windows Shell/User [url]http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/[/url] |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Too funny.. "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.bg> wrote in message news:f0g6c5$fuf$1@aioe.org...[color=blue] > Mike Hall - MS MVP wrote:[color=green] >> Alias >> >> Had you done research, your transition period would have long been over.. >> lol..[/color] > > And the reason you think I am in a hurry is? > > Alias[color=green] >> >> >> "Alias" <aka@masked&anonymous.bg> wrote in message >> news:f0g4m6$9u4$3@aioe.org...[color=darkred] >>> Richard Urban wrote: >>>> I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my >>>> computer. I can't do **anything** with it. >>>> >>>> As Ubuntu loads by default: >>>> >>>> I can't load/run Office 2007 >>> >>> A plus, although there are ways to run that bloatware in Linux. Do your >>> research or ask on an appropriate newsgroup or IRC group. >>> >>>> >>>> I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version >>> >>> Maybe you need to do more research. >>> >>>> >>>> I can't load/run Visio 2007 >>> >>> Maybe you need to do more research. >>> >>>> >>>> I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows XP >>>> or Vista. >>>> >>>> What good is Linsux? >>>> >>>> And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want the >>>> above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default. >>> >>> Try asking on a Linux newsgroup or IRC group. >>> >>>> >>>> No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All >>>> it is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-: >>> >>> False but you know that, don't you? Or do you? >>> >>> Alias[/color] >>[/color][/color] -- Mike Hall MS MVP Windows Shell/User [url]http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/[/url] |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Richard Urban wrote: [color=blue] > I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my computer. > I can't do **anything** with it. > > As Ubuntu loads by default: > > I can't load/run Office 2007 > > I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version > > I can't load/run Visio 2007 > > I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows XP or > Vista. > > What good is Linsux?[/color] With all due respect Richard, you are expecting Windows apps to run on a non-windows operating system. I honestly do not get why people expect Linux to run Windows apps. Windows cant run Linux apps either. Linux apps that have their source code ported to Windows don't count here, I mean native linux apps. It's like buying a diesel and expecting it to run on friggin gasoline! They are different operating systems. They do things differently. They use different apps. It should be this way. If they were identical, what would be the point? If you try linux expecting all your windows apps to run then you are bound for failure as this is impossible. Same would be possible vice-versa as not everthing from the linux world is ported to windows. While WINE does exist for running windows apps under linux, it is far from being able to run everything and I honestly doubt it will ever get there. The whole "windows apps under linux" is completely the wrong approach. What is needed are the approriate replacement apps under linux so that the windows equivalents are no longer needed. In some cases these exist. In some cases they don't. In some cases they are better than the windows equivalent. In some cases they are not. Everything has its pros / cons somewhere. No single OS is ever going to please everyone. People who do not wish to use a different app because it has a different name but otherwise the same functionality just need to stick to windows. Nothing will help there. [color=blue] > > And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want the > above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default.[/color] In that case your only choice is windows. No non-windows os in the world is ever going to fully, if at all, support windows applications. [color=blue] > > No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All it > is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-:[/color] So basically it is perfectly fine and capable for...the majority of the population of this planet who pretty much don't do much else beyond that? I find that the only thing that I have to boot into windows for is the occasional gaming. Everything else I can do right here from Ubuntu and my needs go far beyond surfing the web and getting e-mail. Matter of fact, I am about to go watch a DVD on my attached Plasma TV which I currently CANNOT under windows since nVidia dropped full screen video overlay on my current drivers!! yay!!! Go windows! Now before you go blaming the vendor, interestingly enough...the same vendors linux drivers have far more features and options than the windows drivers have ever had... -- Stephan 2003 Yamaha R6 君のこと思い出す日なんてないのは 君のこと忘れたときがないから |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes What is the date/time in the Ubuntu 7.04 window? What is that over there on the left? Is that Ubuntu 6.06.1 I see? And OMFG! That's Ubuntu 6.10 too? WOW! Ubuntu, and all Linux, is still crap! -- Regards, Richard Urban Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User (For email, remove the obvious from my address) Quote from George Ankner: If you knew as much as you think you know, You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew! |
| |||
| Re: I spent 45 minutes Stephan I do hope that Alias is taking notes from what you say.. he is still in a transitory state, ya know.. :-) "Stephan Rose" <kermos@nospam.somrek.net> wrote in message news:C7Gdnau6bN71MLbbnZ2dnUVZ8qKvnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=blue] > Richard Urban wrote: >[color=green] >> I spent about 45 minutes this morning loading Ubunto 7.04 on my computer. >> I can't do **anything** with it. >> >> As Ubuntu loads by default: >> >> I can't load/run Office 2007 >> >> I can't load/run AutoCAD, any version >> >> I can't load/run Visio 2007 >> >> I can't do *****ANYTHING***** that I can do in Windows 2000, Windows XP >> or >> Vista. >> >> What good is Linsux?[/color] > > With all due respect Richard, you are expecting Windows apps to run on a > non-windows operating system. > > I honestly do not get why people expect Linux to run Windows apps. Windows > cant run Linux apps either. Linux apps that have their source code ported > to Windows don't count here, I mean native linux apps. > > It's like buying a diesel and expecting it to run on friggin gasoline! > > They are different operating systems. They do things differently. They use > different apps. It should be this way. If they were identical, what would > be the point? > > If you try linux expecting all your windows apps to run then you are bound > for failure as this is impossible. Same would be possible vice-versa as > not > everthing from the linux world is ported to windows. > > While WINE does exist for running windows apps under linux, it is far from > being able to run everything and I honestly doubt it will ever get there. > > The whole "windows apps under linux" is completely the wrong approach. > What > is needed are the approriate replacement apps under linux so that the > windows equivalents are no longer needed. In some cases these exist. In > some cases they don't. In some cases they are better than the windows > equivalent. In some cases they are not. > > Everything has its pros / cons somewhere. No single OS is ever going to > please everyone. > > People who do not wish to use a different app because it has a different > name but otherwise the same functionality just need to stick to windows. > Nothing will help there. > > >[color=green] >> >> And don't tell me there are substitutes that run in Linsux. I want the >> above three programs to run on Linsux as Linsux installs by default.[/color] > > In that case your only choice is windows. No non-windows os in the world > is > ever going to fully, if at all, support windows applications. >[color=green] >> >> No wonder Linsux is years away from being a desktop replacement. All it >> is good for is surfing the web and getting email. (-:[/color] > > So basically it is perfectly fine and capable for...the majority of the > population of this planet who pretty much don't do much else beyond that? > > I find that the only thing that I have to boot into windows for is the > occasional gaming. Everything else I can do right here from Ubuntu and my > needs go far beyond surfing the web and getting e-mail. Matter of fact, I > am about to go watch a DVD on my attached Plasma TV which I currently > CANNOT under windows since nVidia dropped full screen video overlay on my > current drivers!! yay!!! Go windows! Now before you go blaming the vendor, > interestingly enough...the same vendors linux drivers have far more > features and options than the windows drivers have ever had... > > -- > Stephan > 2003 Yamaha R6 > > 君のこと思い出す日なんてないのは > 君のこと忘れたときがないから[/color] -- Mike Hall MS MVP Windows Shell/User [url]http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/[/url] |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| application to log time spent on internet | makhan10 | Internet Explorer | 5 | 02-27-2008 11:30 AM |
| Vista Offline Files Consuming 100% CPU for 2 minutes every few minutes | Eriq Cook | Windows Vista | 0 | 12-28-2007 09:00 AM |
| First day and a half with new laptop spent updating | Punkzip | Windows Vista | 5 | 09-07-2007 10:50 AM |
| MY RANT! sadly after 2 days with my new investment, I think the money could have been better spent elsewhere... | Paul | Windows Vista | 10 | 08-14-2007 06:10 PM |
| 6 billion spent in development of Vista. | Mario Rosario \(info\) | Windows Vista | 15 | 01-23-2007 08:00 PM |
| New To Technology Questions? | Do You Need Help with Your Computer or Device? | Do You Need Help with this site? |