Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

> * Scotter:

>> iTunes
>
> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
> holes...

iTunes 7 runs fine on my Vista x64 install.

There are known compatibility problems with Vista versus iTunes7 (which I
haven't encountered), but it affects both 32bit and 64bit Vista, not just
64bit.

Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

> * Scotter:

>> iTunes
>
> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
> holes...

iTunes 7 runs fine on my Vista x64 install.

There are known compatibility problems with Vista versus iTunes7 (which I
haven't encountered), but it affects both 32bit and 64bit Vista, not just
64bit.

Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

> * Scotter:

>> iTunes
>
> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
> holes...

iTunes 7 runs fine on my Vista x64 install.

There are known compatibility problems with Vista versus iTunes7 (which I
haven't encountered), but it affects both 32bit and 64bit Vista, not just
64bit.

Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

> * Scotter:

>> iTunes
>
> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
> holes...

iTunes 7 runs fine on my Vista x64 install.

There are known compatibility problems with Vista versus iTunes7 (which I
haven't encountered), but it affects both 32bit and 64bit Vista, not just
64bit.

Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

> * Scotter:

>> iTunes
>
> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
> holes...

iTunes 7 runs fine on my Vista x64 install.

There are known compatibility problems with Vista versus iTunes7 (which I
haven't encountered), but it affects both 32bit and 64bit Vista, not just
64bit.

Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

> * Scotter:

>> iTunes
>
> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
> holes...

iTunes 7 runs fine on my Vista x64 install.

There are known compatibility problems with Vista versus iTunes7 (which I
haven't encountered), but it affects both 32bit and 64bit Vista, not just
64bit.

Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

> * Scotter:

>> iTunes
>
> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
> holes...

iTunes 7 runs fine on my Vista x64 install.

There are known compatibility problems with Vista versus iTunes7 (which I
haven't encountered), but it affects both 32bit and 64bit Vista, not just
64bit.

Benjamin Gawert <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

> * Scotter:

>> iTunes
>
> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
> holes...

iTunes 7 runs fine on my Vista x64 install.

There are known compatibility problems with Vista versus iTunes7 (which I
haven't encountered), but it affects both 32bit and 64bit Vista, not just
64bit.

I am running 64 bit Vista Ultimate, had not problems with Office 2003
Acrobat. I have not tried any other programs yet.


"Scotter" <spam@spam.net> wrote in message
news:urFQmUpWHHA.2256@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Building a new computer.
> Bought Vista Ultimate 64-bit.
>
> Does that OS have a compatibility mode for 32-bit software? Or do I need
> to
> run 64-bit versions of everything? Will using the 64-bit version of Vista
> severely limit what software I can use? Here are some of the programs I
> can
> think of now:
>
> MS Office 2003
> MS Visual Studio 2005
> FTP Voyager
> Boxer Text Editor
> Nero
> Photoshop CS2
> Illustrator CS2
> Acrobat
> Flash 8
> Poser 7
> Game: Supreme Commander
> Game: Planetside
> iTunes
> Fraps
>
> Oh and I suppose I'll switch from Outlook to the mail program built into
> Vista... ? Anything you all want to share about that? For one, does that
> mail program have a built-in spam-checker? If so, how effective have you
> all
> found it to be? If it doesn't, is there a 3rd-party spam-checker that
> works
> with the 64-bit Vista mail program?
>
> Thanks for any info/advice you can give! (I'm going to do a lot of
> Googling
> now to see what I can learn while I hope for response to this post)
> --
> Scotter
>
>
>
> --
> Scotter
>
>

* Scotter:

> Building a new computer.
> Bought Vista Ultimate 64-bit.
>
> Does that OS have a compatibility mode for 32-bit software?

Yes.

> Or do I need to
> run 64-bit versions of everything?

No.

> Will using the 64-bit version of Vista
> severely limit what software I can use?

Yes. No 16bit programs (and this includes 32bit programs that come with
16bit installers), no programs that only come with 32bit drivers...

> Here are some of the programs I can
> think of now:

[snip]

> iTunes

No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
holes...

> Oh and I suppose I'll switch from Outlook to the mail program built into
> Vista... ?

What for? Windows Mail is just a pimped Outlook Express. Why give up
Outlook for that?

> Anything you all want to share about that?

Do you have any native x64 programs or more than 4GB RAM? If not then
you will be much better suited with 32bit Vista...

Benjamin

I can't promote using Vista64 myself, since I'm still questioning whether we
have a need yet for a 64bit OS. But since you listed some things that might
actually need greater than 4GB of ram, I'll skip my thoughts on that.
Currently I triple boot between XP, Vista32 and Vista64

I mostly game, and I have Supreme Commander, it's a Games for Windows games,
which means it should work under Vista64 as well. Check the Tech Support
forums and you'll see there is problems with SupCom in general so hard to
know where the problem is, but under Vista 64, Ive gotten 2 BSODs and 2 CTDs
.. Under XP and Vista32 no BSODS and only 1 CTD.

Office 2003 works fine, though Outlook is all I really use.

I used FRAPS 2.8.2 and it would give me BSODs when playing Battlefield 2142
for more than 45 mins. Stopped using FRAPs and the BSODs went away


"Scotter" <spam@spam.net> wrote in message
news:urFQmUpWHHA.2256@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Building a new computer.
> Bought Vista Ultimate 64-bit.
>
> Does that OS have a compatibility mode for 32-bit software? Or do I need
> to
> run 64-bit versions of everything? Will using the 64-bit version of Vista
> severely limit what software I can use? Here are some of the programs I
> can
> think of now:
>
> MS Office 2003
> MS Visual Studio 2005
> FTP Voyager
> Boxer Text Editor
> Nero
> Photoshop CS2
> Illustrator CS2
> Acrobat
> Flash 8
> Poser 7
> Game: Supreme Commander
> Game: Planetside
> iTunes
> Fraps
>
> Oh and I suppose I'll switch from Outlook to the mail program built into
> Vista... ? Anything you all want to share about that? For one, does that
> mail program have a built-in spam-checker? If so, how effective have you
> all
> found it to be? If it doesn't, is there a 3rd-party spam-checker that
> works
> with the 64-bit Vista mail program?
>
> Thanks for any info/advice you can give! (I'm going to do a lot of
> Googling
> now to see what I can learn while I hope for response to this post)
> --
> Scotter
>
>
>
> --
> Scotter
>
>

Hi,

I feel at this stage that you could end up very frustrated with Vista64
with at the current instabilities.
regards

Steve.

Dale M. White;37497 Wrote:
> I can't promote using Vista64 myself, since I'm still questioning
> whether we
> have a need yet for a 64bit OS. But since you listed some things that
> might
> actually need greater than 4GB of ram, I'll skip my thoughts on that.
> Currently I triple boot between XP, Vista32 and Vista64
>
> I mostly game, and I have Supreme Commander, it's a Games for Windows
> games,
> which means it should work under Vista64 as well. Check the Tech
> Support
> forums and you'll see there is problems with SupCom in general so hard
> to
> know where the problem is, but under Vista 64, Ive gotten 2 BSODs and 2
> CTDs
> .. Under XP and Vista32 no BSODS and only 1 CTD.
>
> Office 2003 works fine, though Outlook is all I really use.
>
> I used FRAPS 2.8.2 and it would give me BSODs when playing Battlefield
> 2142
> for more than 45 mins. Stopped using FRAPs and the BSODs went away
>
>
> "Scotter" <spam@spam.net> wrote in message
> news:urFQmUpWHHA.2256@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> > Building a new computer.
> > Bought Vista Ultimate 64-bit.
> >
> > Does that OS have a compatibility mode for 32-bit software? Or do I
> need
> > to
> > run 64-bit versions of everything? Will using the 64-bit version of
> Vista
> > severely limit what software I can use? Here are some of the programs
> I
> > can
> > think of now:
> >
> > MS Office 2003
> > MS Visual Studio 2005
> > FTP Voyager
> > Boxer Text Editor
> > Nero
> > Photoshop CS2
> > Illustrator CS2
> > Acrobat
> > Flash 8
> > Poser 7
> > Game: Supreme Commander
> > Game: Planetside
> > iTunes
> > Fraps
> >
> > Oh and I suppose I'll switch from Outlook to the mail program built
> into
> > Vista... ? Anything you all want to share about that? For one, does
> that
> > mail program have a built-in spam-checker? If so, how effective have
> you
> > all
> > found it to be? If it doesn't, is there a 3rd-party spam-checker
> that
> > works
> > with the 64-bit Vista mail program?
> >
> > Thanks for any info/advice you can give! (I'm going to do a lot of
> > Googling
> > now to see what I can learn while I hope for response to this post)
> > --
> > Scotter
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Scotter
> >
> >


--
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve's Profile: http://www.vistaheads.com/forums/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://www.vistaheads.com/forums/for...ay.php?f=38389

Thanks for all the great info!
Yeah, I purchased 8 gig of RAM for this new machine and I want/need to use
all of it.
That is my number one reason for moving into a 64-bit OS.
Glad you illluminated that mail program.
So it does not have a calendar?
I actually preferred many things about Outlook Express and only reason I
moved to Outlook was for the calendar. Outlook's way of handling contacts
frustrates me. But if the new Windows Mail in Vista doesn't have a calendar
then I'll stick with Outlook. I suppose that will make moving all my rules,
etc. easier?

--
Scotter
-
"Benjamin Gawert" <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>* Scotter:
>
>> Building a new computer.
>> Bought Vista Ultimate 64-bit.
>>
>> Does that OS have a compatibility mode for 32-bit software?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Or do I need to
>> run 64-bit versions of everything?
>
> No.
>
>> Will using the 64-bit version of Vista
>> severely limit what software I can use?
>
> Yes. No 16bit programs (and this includes 32bit programs that come with
> 16bit installers), no programs that only come with 32bit drivers...
>
>> Here are some of the programs I can
>> think of now:
>
> [snip]
>
>> iTunes
>
> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
> holes...
>
>> Oh and I suppose I'll switch from Outlook to the mail program built into
>> Vista... ?
>
> What for? Windows Mail is just a pimped Outlook Express. Why give up
> Outlook for that?
>
>> Anything you all want to share about that?
>
> Do you have any native x64 programs or more than 4GB RAM? If not then you
> will be much better suited with 32bit Vista...
>
> Benjamin

Windows Mail does have a calendar


"Scotter" <spam@spam.net> wrote in message
news:uzPSm6AXHHA.4964@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Thanks for all the great info!
> Yeah, I purchased 8 gig of RAM for this new machine and I want/need to use
> all of it.
> That is my number one reason for moving into a 64-bit OS.
> Glad you illluminated that mail program.
> So it does not have a calendar?
> I actually preferred many things about Outlook Express and only reason I
> moved to Outlook was for the calendar. Outlook's way of handling contacts
> frustrates me. But if the new Windows Mail in Vista doesn't have a
> calendar then I'll stick with Outlook. I suppose that will make moving all
> my rules, etc. easier?
>
> --
> Scotter
> -
> "Benjamin Gawert" <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in message
> news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>* Scotter:
>>
>>> Building a new computer.
>>> Bought Vista Ultimate 64-bit.
>>>
>>> Does that OS have a compatibility mode for 32-bit software?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> Or do I need to
>>> run 64-bit versions of everything?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> Will using the 64-bit version of Vista
>>> severely limit what software I can use?
>>
>> Yes. No 16bit programs (and this includes 32bit programs that come with
>> 16bit installers), no programs that only come with 32bit drivers...
>>
>>> Here are some of the programs I can
>>> think of now:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> iTunes
>>
>> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
>> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
>> holes...
>>
>>> Oh and I suppose I'll switch from Outlook to the mail program built into
>>> Vista... ?
>>
>> What for? Windows Mail is just a pimped Outlook Express. Why give up
>> Outlook for that?
>>
>>> Anything you all want to share about that?
>>
>> Do you have any native x64 programs or more than 4GB RAM? If not then you
>> will be much better suited with 32bit Vista...
>>
>> Benjamin
>
>

Ah! Has anyone here played with Vista Mail?
Impressions?
I'm going to go Google "reviews of Vista Mail" now to see what I can find.

--
Scotter
-
"John Barnes" <jbarnes@email.net> wrote in message
news:udSi3yBXHHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Windows Mail does have a calendar
>
>
> "Scotter" <spam@spam.net> wrote in message
> news:uzPSm6AXHHA.4964@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks for all the great info!
>> Yeah, I purchased 8 gig of RAM for this new machine and I want/need to
>> use all of it.
>> That is my number one reason for moving into a 64-bit OS.
>> Glad you illluminated that mail program.
>> So it does not have a calendar?
>> I actually preferred many things about Outlook Express and only reason I
>> moved to Outlook was for the calendar. Outlook's way of handling contacts
>> frustrates me. But if the new Windows Mail in Vista doesn't have a
>> calendar then I'll stick with Outlook. I suppose that will make moving
>> all my rules, etc. easier?
>>
>> --
>> Scotter
>> -
>> "Benjamin Gawert" <bgawert@gmx.de> wrote in message
>> news:OOTJWN5WHHA.4132@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>>* Scotter:
>>>
>>>> Building a new computer.
>>>> Bought Vista Ultimate 64-bit.
>>>>
>>>> Does that OS have a compatibility mode for 32-bit software?
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>>> Or do I need to
>>>> run 64-bit versions of everything?
>>>
>>> No.
>>>
>>>> Will using the 64-bit version of Vista
>>>> severely limit what software I can use?
>>>
>>> Yes. No 16bit programs (and this includes 32bit programs that come with
>>> 16bit installers), no programs that only come with 32bit drivers...
>>>
>>>> Here are some of the programs I can
>>>> think of now:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>> iTunes
>>>
>>> No iTunes for 64bit Windows. The last iTunes version that runs on 64bit
>>> Windows is 6.0.4 which is outdated and suffers from several security
>>> holes...
>>>
>>>> Oh and I suppose I'll switch from Outlook to the mail program built
>>>> into
>>>> Vista... ?
>>>
>>> What for? Windows Mail is just a pimped Outlook Express. Why give up
>>> Outlook for that?
>>>
>>>> Anything you all want to share about that?
>>>
>>> Do you have any native x64 programs or more than 4GB RAM? If not then
>>> you will be much better suited with 32bit Vista...
>>>
>>> Benjamin
>>
>>
>