I use ActiveSync to synchronize my Outlook 2003 and Windows Mobile 6
calendars. This works fine for my main calendar (labelled My Calendar in
Outlook 2003), but the other calendars in Outlook 2003 (such as Birthday
Calendar) do not get synchronized. Is there a way to tell Outlook 2003,
ActiveSync, and/or Windows Mobile 6 (whichever ones are necessary) which
calendars to synchronize? Thanks.
--
Nathan Sokalski
njsokalski********.com
http://www.nathansokalski.com/

No, activesync does not support secondary calendars, only the default
calendar can be synced.

--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com/

Outlook Tips by email:
mailto:dailytips-subscribe-request@lists.outlooktips.net

EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
mailto:EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQUEST@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Do you keep Outlook open 24/7? Vote in our poll:
http://forums.slipstick.com/showthread.php?t=22205

"Nathan Sokalski" <njsokalski********.com> wrote in message
news:etA34C4TKHA.3392@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> I use ActiveSync to synchronize my Outlook 2003 and Windows Mobile 6
> calendars. This works fine for my main calendar (labelled My Calendar in
> Outlook 2003), but the other calendars in Outlook 2003 (such as Birthday
> Calendar) do not get synchronized. Is there a way to tell Outlook 2003,
> ActiveSync, and/or Windows Mobile 6 (whichever ones are necessary) which
> calendars to synchronize? Thanks.
> --
> Nathan Sokalski
> njsokalski********.com
> http://www.nathansokalski.com/
>

"Nathan Sokalski" <njsokalski********.com> wrote:

>I use ActiveSync to synchronize my Outlook 2003 and Windows Mobile 6
>calendars. This works fine for my main calendar (labelled My Calendar in
>Outlook 2003), but the other calendars in Outlook 2003 (such as Birthday
>Calendar) do not get synchronized. Is there a way to tell Outlook 2003,
>ActiveSync, and/or Windows Mobile 6 (whichever ones are necessary) which
>calendars to synchronize? Thanks.

No. Your best bet is instead of using multiple calendars, assign
the items to a category. So, in the Birthday calendar, assign
them all Birthday, then move them to the main calendar.

You can switch views using category filters on Outlook or your
device and both will have everything.

Old article, but still relevant.
http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/news...lders-bad.html
--
__________________________________________________ ________________________________
Ed Hansberry (Please do *NOT* email me. Post here for the benefit of all)
What is on my Pocket PC? http://www.ehansberry.com/
Microsoft MVP - Mobile Devices www.pocketpc.com
What is an MVP? - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/

"Nathan Sokalski" <njsokalski********.com> wrote in news:etA34C4TKHA.3392
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:

> I use ActiveSync to synchronize my Outlook 2003 and Windows Mobile 6
> calendars. This works fine for my main calendar (labelled My Calendar in
> Outlook 2003), but the other calendars in Outlook 2003 (such as Birthday
> Calendar) do not get synchronized. Is there a way to tell Outlook 2003,
> ActiveSync, and/or Windows Mobile 6 (whichever ones are necessary) which
> calendars to synchronize? Thanks.

Both previous answers are only partly correct. ActiveSync can't cope with
more than one calendar but Chapura Pocket Mirror can sync any number of
calendars. It uses virtual Categories to do it and it works flawlessly.
The only downside is that on your mobile device all appointments appear in
one calendar with a category denoting which PC Outlook calendar it came
from. If you add a new entry on the mobile without a category it goes to
your default calendar on the PC, simply pick the appropriate category to
put it in a specific PC calendar.

HTH
Mark

On Oct 25, 5:52*pm, Mark <pho...@bogus.com> wrote:
> "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal...********.com> wrote in news:etA34C4TKHA.3392
> @TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:
>
> > I use ActiveSync to synchronize my Outlook 2003 and Windows Mobile 6
> > calendars. This works fine for my main calendar (labelled My Calendar in
> > Outlook 2003), but the other calendars in Outlook 2003 (such as Birthday
> > Calendar) do not get synchronized. Is there a way to tell Outlook 2003,
> > ActiveSync, and/or Windows Mobile 6 (whichever ones are necessary) which
> > calendars to synchronize? Thanks.
>
> Both previous answers are only partly correct. *ActiveSync can't cope with
> more than one calendar but Chapura Pocket Mirror can sync any number of
> calendars. *It uses virtual Categories to do it and it works flawlessly.. *
> The only downside is that on your mobile device all appointments appear in
> one calendar with a category denoting which PC Outlook calendar it came
> from. *If you add a new entry on the mobile without a category it goes to
> your default calendar on the PC, simply pick the appropriate category to
> put it in a specific PC calendar.
>
> HTH
> Mark

Mark,
I used this option before I upgraded to Windows 7 & Outlook 2007. Do
you know of an option for this setup?

Phil

"RandomEvents" <ross.phillip.m******.com> wrote in message
news:938257ab-1c63-4ea8-a696-bb016c84cadd@j35g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...

> I used this option before I upgraded to Windows 7 & Outlook 2007. Do
> you know of an option for this setup?

If yo used Chapura Pocket Mirror before the upgrade, why can't you use it
afterward? Did you check Chapura's web site to see if you need an update?
Have you installed Windows Mobile Device Center?
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobi...-download.mspx
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

I haven't looked at it for a while, but you might take a look at goosync
to see what their options are... paid service, but may be worth it if it
fits your needs... I do know that google calendar supports multiple
calendars, and goosync states that they handle them.

http://www.goosync.com/

Beverly Howard

On Nov 10, 8:18*am, "Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]"
<tillman1...******.com> wrote:
> "RandomEvents" <ross.philli...******.com> wrote in message
>
> news:938257ab-1c63-4ea8-a696-bb016c84cadd@j35g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I used this option before I upgraded to Windows 7 & Outlook 2007. *Do
> > you know of an option for this setup?
>
> If yo used Chapura Pocket Mirror before the upgrade, why can't you use it
> afterward? *Did you check Chapura's web site to see if you need an update?
> Have you installed Windows Mobile Device Center?http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobi...microsoft/devi...
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

Brian,
Only because I'm getting sick of the MVP non coders piping in with
holier than thou advice, without actually checking to see if their
advice is actually valid in the first place, I'm respectfully going to
tell you to shove it whichever pie hole is putting out the most brown
today. And why? Chapura has switched over to a Palm centric
platform for quite some time, as software development cycles go, and
Microsoft hasn't updated their anti multiple calendar philosophy since
the days of Activesync. Did you even read what I put down into
various bits and bytes? "I used this option before I upgraded to
Windows 7 & Outlook 2007", there is no other option at the moment
besides WMDC.

Huh, "WMD"c, i just got that.

cheers
-Phil

On Nov 10, 10:34*am, Beverly Howard <B...@NoSpamBevHoward.com> wrote:
> I haven't looked at it for a while, but you might take a look at goosync
> to see what their options are... paid service, but may be worth it if it
> fits your needs... I do know that google calendar supports multiple
> calendars, and goosync states that they handle them.
>
> http://www.goosync.com/
>
> Beverly Howard

Beverly,
Thanks for the heads up, but it doesn't quite fit for the setup i have
at home -: OfficeCalender in place of an exchange server for a small
home network, multiple calendars per user, each with a WinMobile 5 ->
6.1 (but really only looking for 6.0+).... that and well, i'm afraid
of the cloud after losing 2 gmail accounts.

-Phil

"RandomEvents" <ross.phillip.m******.com> wrote in message
news:770b451c-5d12-47fa-865a-089b4c59bc93@f20g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...

> Only because I'm getting sick of the MVP non coders piping in with
> holier than thou advice, without actually checking to see if their
> advice is actually valid in the first place

It's not my job to keep track of the obsolecence of whatever software you use.
It seems stupid to me to update your environment without first making sure
everytyhing will work after the upgrade. I also don't understand the "non
coders" reference. This newsgroup isn't for asking coding questions, so
there's no relevance to coding references.

On top of that, it seems to me your beef is with "Mark", since he's the one
who suggested PocketMirror. I was merely asking if you had checked with
Chapura, since you said you had used the product before. I certainly can't
know what you've investigated and what you've not, since I'm not clairvoyant.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

Brian,
The issue is that you gave advice without checking to make sure your
advice was actually valid in the first place. And all you've done
since then, is give excuses for why you didn't have to fact check your
own advice before giving it out. It's common sense, and actually more
than a little helpful for people that are asking for help. As for the
"non coders" qualifier, I only bring it up, since the MVP's that
aren't programmers tend to do this shotgun method of advice giving,
hoping that something sticks. Newsgroups, message boards, and forums
are filled with people like yourself, just taking up space, and not
helping the people that asked for help in the first place.

Mark, i had no issue with, he gave helpful advice, my query to him,
was only wondering if he had encountered the same situation.

Ha! Nothing is perfect after changing one's environment. You take
the good with the bad, and hope you can make things work.

Think about what you say, before you say it.

Cheers,
-Phil

On Nov 11, 10:48*am, "Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]"
<tillman1...******.com> wrote:
> "RandomEvents" <ross.philli...******.com> wrote in message
>
> news:770b451c-5d12-47fa-865a-089b4c59bc93@f20g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Only because I'm getting sick of the MVP non coders piping in with
> > holier than thou advice, without actually checking to see if their
> > advice is actually valid in the first place
>
> It's not my job to keep track of the obsolecence of whatever software youuse.
> It seems stupid to me to update your environment without first making sure
> everytyhing will work after the upgrade. *I also don't understand the "non
> coders" reference. *This newsgroup isn't for asking coding questions, so
> there's no relevance to coding references.
>
> On top of that, it seems to me your beef is with "Mark", since he's the one
> who suggested PocketMirror. *I was merely asking if you had checked with
> Chapura, since you said you had used the product before. *I certainly can't
> know what you've investigated and what you've not, since I'm not clairvoyant.
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

>> you gave advice without checking to make sure your advice was
actually valid in the first place <<

I submit that while your complaint would be valid if you were paying for
the advice, or the responder was being paid to give advice (mvp's are
not paid) but, imho, in this case, the appropriate response would have
been to simply ignore the response or to make a correction... it was not
posted in order to irritate you as was the obvious purpose of your response.

Respectfully, but sincerely,
Beverly Howard

"RandomEvents" <ross.phillip.m******.com> wrote in message
news:223e72d4-9262-4087-a6ab-db51babb9ba5@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...

> The issue is that you gave advice without checking to make sure your
> advice was actually valid in the first place.

Ah. i see your error now. I didn't give advice, I asked a question.
Actually, i asked three. Try reading.
--
Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

On Nov 11, 2:50*pm, "Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]"
<tillman1...******.com> wrote:
> "RandomEvents" <ross.philli...******.com> wrote in message
>
> news:223e72d4-9262-4087-a6ab-db51babb9ba5@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > The issue is that you gave advice without checking to make sure your
> > advice was actually valid in the first place.
>
> Ah. *i see your error now. *I didn't give advice, I asked a question.
> Actually, i asked three. *Try reading.
> --
> Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]

Brian,
Heh, you got me, punctuation does make all the difference doesn't it?
I was wrong in my response, as I read your questions as statements.

Cheers,
Phil

On Nov 11, 11:52*am, Beverly Howard <B...@NoSpamBevHoward.com> wrote:
> *>> you gave advice without checking to make sure your advice was
> actually valid in the first place <<
>
> I submit that while your complaint would be valid if you were paying for
> the advice, or the responder was being paid to give advice (mvp's are
> not paid) but, imho, in this case, the appropriate response would have
> been to simply ignore the response or to make a correction... it was not
> posted in order to irritate you as was the obvious purpose of your response.
>
> Respectfully, but sincerely,
> Beverly Howard

Beverly,
My compliant would have been valid if, I had read his questions for
what they were, questions. That just kinda of makes me look like an
idiot. As for wanting advice or technical help to be useful whether
one pays for it or not, I think that's a goal that everyone should
strive for. It's the ignoring of the MVP's with empty advice that
kills threads and litters the internet with those threads of half
answered questions (I was looking for a network printer driver work
around before tackling this issue, hence the frustration). All that
being said, it seems simplest to mimic what Chapura did for XP and
Activesync, and write a program the replaces the calendar export
\import in Windows Mobile Device Center (I just don't know how robust
the API is for that compared to Activesync).

Cheers,
-Phil