I don't expect a positive response but would there be any chance that ON
might support tex editing on a page? It could be awesome. Imagine yourself
typing a code or a latex document on a ON page. It would have made life much
easier for an academic.

OneNote 2010 has equation support, but no TeX. Check it out when you get a
chance.

--
Thanks,
John Guin
OneNote Test Team
http://blogs.msdn.com/johnguin


"minimus" wrote:

> I don't expect a positive response but would there be any chance that ON
> might support tex editing on a page? It could be awesome. Imagine yourself
> typing a code or a latex document on a ON page. It would have made life much
> easier for an academic.
>
> .
>

"minimus" <minimus@live.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hdn973$l41$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> I don't expect a positive response but would there be any chance that ON
> might support tex editing on a page? It could be awesome. Imagine yourself
> typing a code or a latex document on a ON page. It would have made life
> much easier for an academic.

https://connect.microsoft.com/onenot...dbackID=510664

Vote if you wish!!!!!!!!!!

minimus wrote:
> "minimus" <minimus@live.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:hdn973$l41$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> I don't expect a positive response but would there be any chance
>> that ON might support tex editing on a page? It could be awesome.
>> Imagine yourself typing a code or a latex document on a ON page. It
>> would have made life much easier for an academic.
>
>
https://connect.microsoft.com/onenot...dbackID=510664
>
> Vote if you wish!!!!!!!!!!

I did. But AFAICS Connect seems to have been dead for a long time
{siiiigh}

Rainald

"Rainald Taesler" <taesler@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:ez7ja6jZKHA.5608@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> minimus wrote:
>> "minimus" <minimus@live.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:hdn973$l41$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> I don't expect a positive response but would there be any chance
>>> that ON might support tex editing on a page? It could be awesome.
>>> Imagine yourself typing a code or a latex document on a ON page. It
>>> would have made life much easier for an academic.
>>
>>
> https://connect.microsoft.com/onenot...dbackID=510664
>>
>> Vote if you wish!!!!!!!!!!
>
> I did. But AFAICS Connect seems to have been dead for a long time
> {siiiigh}
>
> Rainald
>

Maybe MS guys are still considering regardless of any votes on the
feedbacks?

It could be nice, by the way, if they would inform us more about their
agenda. What are they working on? What features are they considering? PR is
a popular word right? But here I see some lack of relation.

minimus wrote:

>> I did. But AFAICS Connect seems to have been dead for a long time
>> {siiiigh}
>
> Maybe MS guys are still considering regardless of any votes on the
> feedbacks?

I can't say what is the basis of development decisions.
Daniel Escapa (head if the team) always claims that the decision were
based in users' feedback. I do not know, however, to whom they might be
listening.
From the TP for ON2010 I gained the impression that quite many things
often asked for in Connect were not implemented. Although there will be
many really fine new features, I an disappointed to a certain extent.

> It could be nice, by the way, if they would inform us more about their
> agenda. What are they working on? What features are they considering?
> PR is a popular word right? But here I see some lack of relation.

Maybe.
But you may see yourself what ON2010 will be. In a few days the "public
beta" will be available.

Rainald

"Rainald Taesler" <taesler@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:OIeqzpqZKHA.2164@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> minimus wrote:
>
>>> I did. But AFAICS Connect seems to have been dead for a long time
>>> {siiiigh}
>>
>> Maybe MS guys are still considering regardless of any votes on the
>> feedbacks?
>
> I can't say what is the basis of development decisions.
> Daniel Escapa (head if the team) always claims that the decision were
> based in users' feedback. I do not know, however, to whom they might be
> listening.
> From the TP for ON2010 I gained the impression that quite many things
> often asked for in Connect were not implemented. Although there will be
> many really fine new features, I an disappointed to a certain extent.
>
>> It could be nice, by the way, if they would inform us more about their
>> agenda. What are they working on? What features are they considering?
>> PR is a popular word right? But here I see some lack of relation.
>
> Maybe.
> But you may see yourself what ON2010 will be. In a few days the "public
> beta" will be available.
>
> Rainald
>

Thanks Rainald.

minimus wrote:
> "Rainald Taesler" wrote: in message
>> minimus wrote:

>> But you may see yourself what ON2010 will be. In a few days the
>> "public beta" will be available.
>
> Thanks Rainald.

It's *public* since today.
So hurry up!!

Don't miss the train as long as it has not left the station!

Rainald