I just got a very irrate responder who wrote me off as spam between all of
his self righteous explicatives. The information in this survey will go no
further than my presentation in class next month and that will only be
generalized. I'm sorry if you're too used to dealing with shady characters
here, but you're going to have to take my word that I'm not one of them.
>
> Here's the link: http://www.summitcadd.com/ms_word_survey.htm
> Thanks,
>
> John

not interested...
but thanks for the offer...

oh wait, you had nothing
to offer in return for taking
a survey... silly me.

"John" <jprovetto@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Oetmki1CHHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I just got a very irrate responder who wrote me off as spam between all of
>his self righteous explicatives. The information in this survey will go no
>further than my presentation in class next month and that will only be
>generalized. I'm sorry if you're too used to dealing with shady characters
>here, but you're going to have to take my word that I'm not one of them.
>>
>> Here's the link: http://www.summitcadd.com/ms_word_survey.htm
>> Thanks,
>>
>> John
>
>

So what is your point? Are you the spammer?

"John" <jprovetto@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Oetmki1CHHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I just got a very irrate responder who wrote me off as spam between all of
>his self righteous explicatives. The information in this survey will go no
>further than my presentation in class next month and that will only be

No, I'm a college grad student trying figure out if software developers are
loading their product with lots of unnessecary features that the end users
have no need for.

I'm also an AutoDesk Certified Prof in my day job

"Tom Willett" <tompepper@mvps.invalid> wrote in message
news:Otl4od3CHHA.4740@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> So what is your point? Are you the spammer?
>
> "John" <jprovetto@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:Oetmki1CHHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>I just got a very irrate responder who wrote me off as spam between all of
>>his self righteous explicatives. The information in this survey will go
>>no further than my presentation in class next month and that will only be
>
>

And you need to conduct a survey to figure that out?

Word 2003 has 1074 commands (and I doubt that number includes all the
options and settings). Who do you know uses more than some 10% subset of
that?

Oh, that's actually somewhat less than the 1175 commands in Word 2000. But
they make up for it, Word 2007 (B2TR) has 1758 commands!!!

Val

"John" <jprovetto@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:OjqGKA4CHHA.3524@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> No, I'm a college grad student trying figure out if software developers
> are loading their product with lots of unnessecary features that the end
> users have no need for.
>

It's actually 20%. If you want data on this stuff, read
http://pschmid.net/blog/2006/10/14/66 and make sure to read the 4 posts
of the "Office UI Bible" linked there.

Patrick Schmid [OneNote MVP]
--------------
http://pschmid.net
***
Office 2007 RTM Issues: http://pschmid.net/blog/2006/11/13/80
Office 2007 Beta 2 Technical Refresh (B2TR):
http://pschmid.net/blog/2006/09/18/43
***
Customize Office 2007: http://pschmid.net/office2007/customize
OneNote 2007: http://pschmid.net/office2007/onenote
***
Subscribe to my Office 2007 blog: http://pschmid.net/blog/feed

"Val" <vmanes@NOSPAMrap.midco.net> wrote in message
news:pJCdnYsKNIc1WsLYnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@midco.net:

> And you need to conduct a survey to figure that out?
>
> Word 2003 has 1074 commands (and I doubt that number includes all the
> options and settings). Who do you know uses more than some 10% subset of
> that?
>
> Oh, that's actually somewhat less than the 1175 commands in Word 2000. But
> they make up for it, Word 2007 (B2TR) has 1758 commands!!!
>
> Val
>
> "John" <jprovetto@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:OjqGKA4CHHA.3524@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> > No, I'm a college grad student trying figure out if software developers
> > are loading their product with lots of unnessecary features that the end
> > users have no need for.
> >

The answer to that question is "it all depends on the user." No doubt
there are at least a few users who love absolutely every feature of
Office, but I'm sure that most users do not use many of the features or
even know that they are there.

Be aware that an online survey that depends on volunteer respondents may
produce interesting results, but those results have no statistical
significance and cannot be applied to any larger group.


John <jprovetto@earthlink.net> wrote:
> No, I'm a college grad student trying figure out if software developers are
> loading their product with lots of unnessecary features that the end users
> have no need for.

> I'm also an AutoDesk Certified Prof in my day job

> "Tom Willett" <tompepper@mvps.invalid> wrote in message
> news:Otl4od3CHHA.4740@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> > So what is your point? Are you the spammer?
> >
> > "John" <jprovetto@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:Oetmki1CHHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> >>I just got a very irrate responder who wrote me off as spam between all of
> >>his self righteous explicatives. The information in this survey will go
> >>no further than my presentation in class next month and that will only be

--
Gary L. Smith
Columbus, Ohio